Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.



Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 90
» Latest member: WalksInSilence
» Forum threads: 4,009
» Forum posts: 29,122

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 68 online users.
» 2 Member(s) | 66 Guest(s)
Armonica_Templar, Mystic Wanderer

Latest Threads
Does anyone use essential...
Forum: Daily Chit Chat
Last Post: Mystic Wanderer
11 minutes ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 17
Operation Rebirth: Little...
Forum: Short Stories
Last Post: guohua
11 minutes ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 125
Rogue Cartoonist Ben Garr...
Forum: Off Topic
Last Post: guohua
18 minutes ago
» Replies: 4
» Views: 122
Greece And Macedonia, Wha...
Forum: European Union
Last Post: BIAD
6 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 31
The European Union & It's...
Forum: European Union
Last Post: BIAD
6 hours ago
» Replies: 92
» Views: 6,830
Banners Like There's No T...
Forum: The Rogue-Nation Graphics Lab
Last Post: BIAD
9 hours ago
» Replies: 1,696
» Views: 609,922
Propaganda watch
Forum: Political News and more
Last Post: BIAD
9 hours ago
» Replies: 156
» Views: 57,232
Ginsburg Voted From Hospi...
Forum: Political News and more
Last Post: Mystic Wanderer
11 hours ago
» Replies: 3
» Views: 298
Pro and con for Bob Lazar
Forum: UFOs, Aliens and Universal Questions
Last Post: 727Sky
Yesterday, 12:30 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 38
Child Sex Trafficking/Piz...
Forum: General News and Events
Last Post: Mystic Wanderer
Yesterday, 12:36 AM
» Replies: 165
» Views: 31,263

  UN bans skeptical journalists from climate summit
Posted by: guohua - 10-22-2016, 04:15 AM - Forum: Man Made Disasters - Replies (5)

That's right, here is the entire title.

Quote:CAUGHT ON TAPE: UN bans skeptical journalists from climate summit for holding views not ‘particularly helpful’

Tell me again how this isn't Rigged like Our Next Election. It all about the Money!
Quote:UN official Nick Nuttall on why conservative media outlet is being banned: 'I don't see what they are actually reporting as being particularly helpful." 

Even establishment & warmist CBC was having none of the UN's excuses. 
CBC to UN: 'Do people have to prove that they're helpful in order to be accredited journalists?' - 'So it does seem that what Mr. Levant is saying is true — that you didn't like his point of view.'
Quote:CBC’s As it Happens host Carol Off spoke with the UN’s Nick Nuttall. Nuttall was involved in the decision to deny Rebel Media accreditation for next month’s meeting. Here’s an excerpt of their conversation:
CAROL OFF: Mr. Nuttall, Ezra Levant says that you have rejected his application because you don’t like Rebel Media’s point of view. How do you respond?
NICK NUTTALL: We looked at Rebel Media and we just really weren’t sure what it was. I mean, we weren’t sure if it was a platform for this chap Ezra — I can’t remember his last name now …
CO: Levant. Ezra Levant.
NN: Ok fine, yeah. I don’t live in Canada, so I don’t know. We get a lot of people who purport to be journalists and sometimes they’re NGOs or civil societies or others with all kinds of different axes to grind and all kind of issues. We try and just make sure that we accredit what we consider to be journalists.
Quote:“I looked at Rebel Media’s website and it seemed to me that this was a kind of website that was very much pushing a very particular point of view and therefore made me wonder how it was funded, who backs it, and what kind of purpose they were there to serve.”– UN’s Nick Nuttall
CO: On what grounds did you reject Mr. Levant and Rebel Media’s application?
NN: I looked at Rebel Media’s website and it seemed to me that this was a kind of website that was very much pushing a very particular point of view and therefore made me wonder how it was funded, who backs it, and what kind of purpose they were there to serve. Looking at some of the headlines on their website … there didn’t seem to be much balance in the reporting. It seemed to be more kind of anti-refugee, anti-climate, anti-this, anti-that. And I just didn’t feel that it was maybe appropriate in terms of better understanding climate change issues and giving balanced reporting to a general public

Ezra Levant, shown March 2, tried to get accreditation for three journalists from his The Rebel online site for a UN climate conference in Morocco this November. He was turned down and now says the UN is ‘banning the one journalistic group they find offensive.’ (Canadian Press)

CO: So it does seem that what Mr. Levant is saying is true — that you didn’t like his point of view.
NN: No, not really. The point is he seems to be advocating a particular point of view which is so personal that it didn’t seem to be a genuine media outlet to me… I don’t see what he is actually reporting you know as being particularly helpful.

Do people have to prove that they’re helpful in order to be accredited journalists?
NN: Well, what do you think journalism is about?

NN: Reporting. Factually, accurately, honestly, trying to get the truth out of what actually is going on in this very complex world. And, from the little I saw, which were inflammatory headlines on issues that weren’t even related to climate change … It was a croc of something, or other.
CO: He called it “climate change croc”.
NN: Yeah, well what does that add to public understanding? What is journalism?

Is it not possible, though, by rejecting his application that you have given his position even more publicity?
NN: That is one reason why I was slightly reluctant to do this interview with you … Many people have written to me that he’s very adept at using this kind of thing to generate more money through crowd-funding to keep his website going. I hope that people who maybe listen to this interview will think twice.

 Can he do anything to convince you otherwise to give him the accreditation?
NN: Well I have to say that two Canadian journalism associations have in fact written to me saying that we should rethink the situation. Now, when serious Canadian journalist associations actually write to me on that basis and are willing to stand by this individual and his website and what he covers, then now, I’m chewing that over. [These associations] have credibility, it would seem, and so I’m really thinking about it.
A Serious Journalist, You won't Know One If He / She Was Standing In Front Of YOU!


Now Tell Me, How truthful is The UN and Climate Change or Global Warming?
It's All Bull Shit, they are pushing their own agenda to control your every day lives.

Print this item

  Your Average Hillary Voter
Posted by: guohua - 10-22-2016, 03:58 AM - Forum: Election 2016 ! - Replies (4)

[Image: j37.jpg]

Quote:Woman mistakes meeting for Trump gathering, smears peanut butter on cars
I suppose she's worried her Welfare would be Cut-Off!
Quote:An Amherst woman is expected to be charged with disorderly conduct after she smeared peanut butter on 30 vehicles she believed were parked outside a Trump gathering.
Investigators said the gathering was actually a conservation group and had nothing to do with politics.
The incident was reported Monday evening when the group's meeting was interrupted by a woman that appeared intoxicated. According to the incident report, the woman identified by deputies as Christina Ferguson, 32, entered the meeting and began yelling she hated Donald Trump. The woman was asked to leave, and did.
However, when one of the group's members went outside he saw the woman smearing peanut butter on the vehicles.
According to the incident report the woman used peanut butter to make phallic symbols and wrote profanity across the windshield of another vehicle.
Ferguson had a preliminary breath alcohol concentration of .218.
Ferguson is free on bond.
[Image: S16-09732+(2).JPG] [Image: S16-09732+(8).JPG] [Image: S16-09732+(23).JPG] [Image: S16-09732+(24).JPG]

Print this item

  Emory looking to establish regular POC-only social events
Posted by: guohua - 10-22-2016, 03:51 AM - Forum: Social Unrest and Justice - Replies (6)

P O C stand for People Of Color and this Event Well Not Allow White People To Participate.
I thought we had Laws Against Segregation and Blatant Racism. 

Quote:Emory University’s Campus Life Department will soon host an event that it hopes will develop into a regular social hour, but invitations will only be extended to students and staff “of color.”

DeLa Sweeney, Emory's interim director for Multicultural Programs, defended the concept of a POC-only gathering, saying it will offer participants the chance to explore their "shared interests and common goals."

Quote:“This event is intended to serve as an opportunity for people of color at Emory to connect with one another and strengthen relationships within and across various communities, identities, and positions in the university,” the email explains, noting that the event is the first of “what will hopefully manifest into a series of annual gatherings that create and add to the tradition of acknowledging, honoring, and celebrating the experiences, contributions, and lives of people of color at Emory.”

Later in the email, a copy of which was obtained by Campus Reform, Sweeney reiterates that the social event will be open exclusively to people of color, saying “ECL staff of color are invited to attend this event,” but neglecting to extend the same invitation to others in the department.

Sweeney defended that nature of the event in an exchange with Campus Reform, arguing that the participants will benefit from the opportunity to explore their “shared interests” in the absence of white peers.

“Hosting programs for specific communities and affinity groups—in this case community members of color—is a practice that has been shown to be beneficial for employees and institutions in many fields including higher education,” he explained, adding that the upcoming event reserved for people of color will help in “creating mechanisms for individuals with shared interests and common goals.”
I want to start a People Of Caucasian and Yellow and Green Event!
Well, All cultures except WHITE PEOPLES culture. That is Multi-Culti Libidiotism in a nutshell. Uncle Karl and Daddy Moa Would give these dimwitted Useful Idiots a big thumbs up.

Liberal hypocrisy on full display. Segregation is bad unless liberals do it. 
If it was advertised ALL WHITE it would be called a HATE GROUP!

Print this item

  Hillary cares About Women and Their Pay
Posted by: guohua - 10-22-2016, 01:46 AM - Forum: Political News and more - Replies (2)

Pure and Simple Bull Shit, She Doesn't Give A Shit About Women and Never Has and Never Well!

Quote:WikiLeaks: Clinton Foundation Paid Women Less Than Men

Leaked email exposes Hillary's gender gap hypocrisy, pay disparity at family charity
That's Right, men still make more than women, even in Hillary's Controllable World.
Quote:The Clinton Foundation in 2011 employed more women than men but paid them less, on average, according to a salary schedule included in an email released Friday by WikiLeaks.

A foundation employee emailed the payroll schedule to board Chairman Bruce Lindsey and John Podesta, who currently chairs Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. It included then-Chief Operating Office and Chief of Staff Laura Graham’s salary recommendations for 2012 for rank-and-file employees.

Overall, the average salary for women and men was close. But men out-earned women. Men earned $68,164 compared to $64,118 for women, on average. The median salary also was higher for men, $55,200 compared with $50,000.

The spreadsheet included 62 employees, 37 women and 25 men. It did not include people who received money from the foundation as contractors. The top-paid employee on the list was senior adviser Justin Cooper, who was pulling in $127,000. The lowest-paid employee was a female assistant making $18,000.

Hey, liberal,,,,, Still Think She Gives A Shit About YOU?

Print this item

  Trump Roasts Hillary With Truth....All She Can do is Laugh.
Posted by: Jude - 10-21-2016, 10:01 PM - Forum: Election 2016 ! - Replies (8)

The Vid says it all folks. Trump outs her in an arena where she can only laugh or be unveiled as the evil we all know.

But why laugh? Is it because she's a good sport? I think that train was derailed a long time ago. I believe her laughing is genuine tho...Remember that old adage..."It's only funny because it's true".



Print this item

  Dragon Caught on Tape in China?
Posted by: Mystic Wanderer - 10-21-2016, 05:14 PM - Forum: Cryptozoology - Replies (8)

This video has acquired over 611,587 views on YouTube in just a few days.  Is this evidence that dragons or pterodactyls are still living on Earth?

Could this be a parallel universe from an earlier time bleeding through into our present day caused by CERN?

What do you think?

Quote:Published on Oct 16, 2016

A man in China took footage of this giant mysterious flying creature that was spotted near the border of Laos. Many theories have emerged with some claiming the creature is a real dragon that was caught on tape and others saying it provides evidence that pterodactyls still exist. Is this a dragon or a pterodactyl caught on tape? What do you think?


You can learn about dragons and other mythical beasts on a show on Coast to Coast a.m. that aired on February 24, 2004 with guests, Jonathan Downes and Richard Freeman of The Centre for Fortean Zoology

Quote:Richard Freeman believes that the mythology of the dragon is, in fact, based on a real creature. He noted that every culture has a legend about such a creature, going as far back as 25,000 years ago. He theorized that dragons may have been able to fly or float in the air, because of the large amount of gas they contained.

Coast to Coast a.m. Show

Print this item

  Bad Hombres , Nasty Women
Posted by: Daitengu - 10-21-2016, 02:55 PM - Forum: Election 2016 ! - Replies (1)

Bit more entertainment on the sham of an election an the debates from wierd al .....
Bad Hombres , Nasty Women

Print this item

  A letter to a dirt bag
Posted by: 727Sky - 10-21-2016, 04:33 AM - Forum: Off Topic - Replies (3)

 September 2, 2016
Mr. James Comey
Director Federal Bureau of Investigation,
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W
Washington, D.C.  20535-0001
I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in  Federal Court. However, you personally  re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as "extremely careless” in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job.
As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions, which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be silent.
Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her. Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have set a precedent that can never be rectified….and certainly not justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world…. for entirely political reasons.
Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved.  It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation….NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU
(unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S.  but, instead, personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury.  You were wrong  to take this upon yourself. Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence , or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?
Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased manner regardless of the subject’s position or standing in the community. All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir, decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion)  which threatened the security  of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization.  This is a RICO case if there ever was one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business.  It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted.  You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.
I will conclude with this:  Following my retirement from the FBI, I volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations.  For most of that year I operated “outside the wire” patrolling with the troops, interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the bad guys.  The results of my work would then be reported through secure channels to the Commanding Officer. All reports and communications were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices.  Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the battle space.   It would have been convenient if I could have just called the Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal laptop.  But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State communications, low level classifications of Secret.  Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so.  That is how serious this violation is considered.
Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO activities and is running for President of the United States, the most powerful position in the world.  You have trampled on the Rule of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in unbiased enforcement of the law.  How do you sleep at night? It is time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.
Hugh W. Galyean
(FBI Agent, Retired)

Print this item

  Trump Revises His Statement on Honoring the Election Outcome in November
Posted by: Jude - 10-20-2016, 10:00 PM - Forum: Election 2016 ! - Replies (4)

Remember the last question in the debate?

"Will you accept and respect the election results if you lose?" And of course Trump was seen struggling with the answer he truly wanted to give, which would be a resounding NO due to the corrupt and rigged race by Hillary.

It seems he's changed his stance. Woke up to this today...

He's meeting the question half way at least. tinylaughing


Print this item

  ALERT! Wikileaks Exposes Clinton Plot Against Trump. Globalist SATANIC Plans For US
Posted by: Mystic Wanderer - 10-20-2016, 05:40 PM - Forum: Election 2016 ! - Replies (1)

Quote:Published on Oct 17, 2016

THIS Channel will NEVER be Politically Correct. We will tell the REAL TRUTH Regardless if you like it or not.


I watched this video last night.  It really goes into deep detail about how the Clintons and Obama have invaded our country with Shiara Law, and how Hillary's wish is to continue with this plan, if elected President of the U.S. 

I know she talks a good talk people, but what she is REALLY doing is hidden behind the scenes. 

WE CAN'T ALLOW HER TO WIN! minusculeredtantrum


Here is another great video by an ex CIA agent who seems to know what he's talking about!

Kevin Shipp - the Subversion of America

Print this item