According to WikiLeaks, "George Soros, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton orchestrated a coup in the Vatican to overthrow the conservative Pope Benedict and replace him with radical leftist Pope Francis, according to a group of Catholic leaders citing evidence from various sources including WikiLeaks emails."



Pope Benedict XVI reigned as Pope of the Catholic Church from 2005 to 2013. He resigned, he said, due to health reasons, becoming the first Pope to step down since Pope Gregory XII in 1415. This shocked the Catholic Church community and left many with conspiracy theories about a cover-up in play.
Those suspicions could be answered now as WikiLeaks reveals e-mail conversations that he "was pushed out of the Vatican by a coup that the group of researchers are calling the “Catholic Spring.”

Quote:Soros, Obama and Clinton used the United States’ diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce, bribe and blackmail “regime change” in the Roman Catholic Church in order to replace the conservative Benedict with the current Pope Francis – who has since become an unlikely mouthpiece for the international left, stunning Catholics around the world.


The Catholic leaders cite eight specific questions they seek to have answered concerning suspect events that led to the resignation of Pope Benedict, the first papal abdication in 700 years.

“Specifically, we have reason to believe that a Vatican ‘regime change’ was engineered by the Obama administration,” say the petitioners, in their January 20 letter to President Trump.

“We were alarmed to discover,” their letter notes, “that, during the third year of the first term of the Obama administration your previous opponent, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and other government officials with whom she associated proposed a Catholic ‘revolution’ in which the final demise of what was left of the Catholic Church in America would be realized.”

Quote:“Podesta, a longtime Clinton adviser/confidante and hand-picked top activist for left-wing funder George Soros, revealed in a 2011 e-mail that he and other activists were working to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Catholic Church, an obvious reference to the disastrous “Arab Spring” coups organized that same year by the Obama-Clinton-Soros team that destabilized the Middle East and brought radical Islamist regimes and terrorist groups to power in the region. 

The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church, which he described as a “middle ages [sic] dictatorship.”

In their letter to President Trump, the group of Catholics leaders write: “Approximately a year after this e-mail discussion, which was never intended to be made public, we find that Pope Benedict XVI abdicated under highly unusual circumstances and was replaced by a pope whose apparent mission is to provide a spiritual component to the radical ideological agenda of the international left.  The Pontificate of Pope Francis has subsequently called into question its own legitimacy on a multitude of occasions.”

“We remain puzzled by the behavior of this ideologically charged Pope, whose mission seems to be one of advancing secular agendas of the left rather than guiding the Catholic Church in Her sacred mission,” they say, expressing the thoughts of millions of Catholics around the world stunned by Pope Francis’s left-wing ideology. “It is simply not the proper role of a Pope to be involved in politics to the point that he is considered to be the leader of the international left.”

Source

This is a new video where Don Phillips discusses his time and work at Lockheed Martin, Area 51, witnessing ET craft, working on UFOs, documented evidence of advanced ET races visiting us,  and more.

Disclosure is happening!  Be a part of the awakening!

LOCKHEED MARTIN - USAF/CIA - RET. - DON PHILLIPS - DISCLOSES WORKING ON UFO'S



https://youtu.be/lQBwILatz_0

Dr. Judy Wood 9/11 IRREFUTABLE Full Length HD ~ PROFOUND

Dr. Judy Wood shows irrefutable evidence that a type of energy unknown to the public was used to "dustify" the towers on 9/11.  She goes over evidence frame by frame, and discusses Tesla's past experiments to harness "free energy", and more.
Her videos have been released for several years, but I'm just now discovering them.  Have you watched them?

President Trump is re-opening the 9/11 investigation, so I really hope he will look at what Dr. Judy Wood has to show. 
She also has a book out titled, Where Did the Towers Go?

This video is broken up into episodes, and gets more interesting with each one.  I watched it last night, and it really is worth your time.


https://youtu.be/cow8GtYkeA4

I also watched this one.  It's over 2 hours long, but well worth your time to see more in-depth details brought out.


https://youtu.be/bITl3lmbWb8


The Elite tried to discredit Dr. Wood's claims, using their usual tactics of calling her a nut job, etc., which only reinforces my belief that there is something there they don't want getting out to the public.
In my opinion, she shows undeniable proof we have Free Energy, and it was used to bring the towers down on 9/11.
Watch it, and then make up your own mind.

What do you think?

I suggest you all watch this NOW before the powers that be see it and take it down.

This video shows how to build your own free energy device.

BIAD, you never told us your brother moved to California!    

What other secrets are you hiding?    





online picture uploader

Quote:Trump fires top government lawyer for defiance on immigration order
By Julia Edwards Ainsley and Dan Levine
REUTERS
 

FILE PHOTO - U.S. Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates testifies during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on "Going Dark: Encryption, Technology, and the Balance Between Public Safety and Privacy" in Washington July 8, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
 
WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump fired the federal government's top lawyer Sally Yates on Monday after she took the extraordinarily rare step of defying the White House and saying the Justice Department would not defend his new travel restrictions targeting seven Muslim-majority nations.
 
The White House said on Twitter that Dana Boente, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, would replace Yates, an appointee of former Democratic President Barack Obama, as acting U.S. attorney general.
 
Yates on Monday told Justice Department lawyers in a letter that they would not defend in court Trump's directive that put a 120-day hold on allowing refugees into the country, an indefinite ban on refugees from Syria and a 90-day bar on citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
 
Yates said she did not believe defending the order would be "consistent with this institution's solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right."
 
Trump has argued tougher vetting of immigrants is needed to protect America from terror attacks but critics complain that his order unfairly singles out Muslims and defiles America's historic reputation as a welcoming place for immigrants.
 
Yates was days away from being replaced by Trump's pick for the top spot at the Justice Department, Republican Senator Jeff Sessions, who is awaiting Senate confirmation.
 
The White House dismissed her comments as rhetoric and said Trump acted within his presidential powers.
 
"I think that's a further demonstration of how politicized our legal system has become," said Stephen Miller, a policy adviser to Trump, in an interview on MSNBC.
 
There have been only a handful of instances in U.S. history of top Justice Department officials publicly breaking with the White House. The most famous example was in 1973, when then-Attorney General Elliot Richardson resigned rather than obey President Richard Nixon’s order to fire a special prosecutor investigating the Watergate scandal.
 
(Additional reporting by Dan Levine in San Francisco, Doina Chiacu, Arshad Mohammed, Susan Heavey, Mark Hosenball and Patricia Zengerle in Washington, Jonathan Allen in New York, Brian Snyder in Boston, and Sharon Bernstein in Sacramento; Writing by Roberta Rampton and Alistair Bell; Editing by Bernadette Baum and Bill Rigby)
 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-01-31

Brussels bomb suspect Mohamed Abrini to be questioned over Paris attacks.

'Belgian officials believe the terror cell that struck in Brussels last year also
orchestrated the 2015 atrocities in France. A suspect in the Brussels airport
attack dubbed the "man in the hat" has been handed over to France to be
questioned about the Paris atrocities...'



But wait, I thought this was the work of a few radicalised males fleeing the
war-torn Middle-East? The way this article is written implies organisation,
duration-accepting intent and a deep commitment for their goals.

'...Mohamed Abrini was detained in Brussels in April last year over his suspected
involvement in the 22 March attacks and the Paris killings, which the Islamic
State group has claimed responsibility for...'

Wow! Isis really landed on their feet when they just happened to not only
recruit a guy willing to cause mayhem in the land he'd been living in for a
long time, they didn't need to convince someone who was fleeing the conflict
of his country.
Imagine the odds of that happening!

Still, it must've been a coincidence or the mainstream media would have
told us otherwise.

'...Belgium's prosecutor's office said in a statement: "In the framework of the
investigation related to the attacks in Paris on 13 November 2015, Mohamed
Abrini was surrendered to the French judicial authorities for a period of one day."

Eric Van Der Sypt, a spokesman, said the decision was based on "mutual
agreements" between the two countries.

He said: "It's not uncommon that suspects in different cases are surrendered for
one day or a few days."...'

'Uncommon' you say...? What does that mean? Do you mean it's a regular act when
said within the Paris attacks framework? I thought this was just fallout from some
people who had sympathetic views of strict religious dogma and where fleeing an
area of war.

If moving terrorist suspects from one country to another for further investigations is
a regular procceedure, would this not hint of a organised campaign...? a long-term
plan that involved many people being put into positions awaiting their orders?

Hmmm... maybe the articles I read immediately after the attacks in Europe failed
to project this idea of a planned invasion of an extreme view of this ideology?

'...Belgian investigators have said the airport and metro bombers, who killed 32 people,
were part of the same Brussels-based cell that plotted the November 2015 Paris attacks.
Some 130 people were killed in the Paris attacks.

CCTV footage of Brussels airport taken shortly before the March 2016 terror attack
Abrini, who was dubbed the "man in the hat" in CCTV images, fled from the airport
without apparently detonating a suitcase bomb after accomplices Najim Laachraoui
and Ibrahim El Bakraoui set off theirs, killing 16 people and themselves.

Sources close to the Belgian-led investigation have said the three bombers targeted
passengers travelling to the United States, as well as Jewish people and perhaps
Russians at the airport.

US sources said they are confident the airline check-in counters for flights to the United
States, Israel and Russia were targeted...'

Good-Gosh! I know what I'd do if I had the authority, I'd 'beef-up' my migration and travel
policies with the idea of stopping this terrible violence arriving at my shores.
But that's just me.

'...Abrini had a record as a petty criminal who grew up in the deprived Molenbeek area
of Brussels with Salah Abdeslam, the only survivor of the group that carried out the Paris
attacks.

He was nicknamed "Brioche" after his days working in a bakery and is thought to have
given up training as a welder at the age of 18 before he became radicalised...'

I'm not 'au fait' with the areas of Iran, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Somalia or Libya, so
I guess this chap-in-the-hat's home of Molebeek made him the killer he's accused of
being and not the countries that are on the recently announced 'banned list'
Maybe Belgium should be put on there too?

'...The Belgian, of Moroccan origin, was seen at a petrol station north of Paris two days
before the 13 November attacks with prime suspect Abdeslam, who drove one of the
vehicles used in the attacks...'

Er... this is problematic. It seems that any physical attacks bear no relation to what
colour skin the person has or where they're from, it's something to do with what's in
their heads.
Dammit, I wish we could locate the sources of this radicalisation... maybe we could
stifle their travel plans.

'...Belgian authorities have charged Abrini with "participation in the activities of a
terrorist group and terrorist murders" following the atrocity in Paris.

Investigators said he briefly visited Syria last year and his younger brother Suleiman,
20, died there...'

I can only assume this is something other Belgian holiday-makers and visitors have had
happen to them. You visit a combative country with your brother and heh presto, he's
killed whilst perusing for postcards.

'...He came on to the radar of security services while he was allegedly part of the same
cell as Abdelhamid Abaaoud, one of the organisers of the Paris attacks who opened
fire on bars, restaurants and a concert hall before he died in a police shootout shortly
afterwards...'
SOURCE:

Oh well, at least they knew him on sight and were aware he was part of a cell that had
already caused mischief. I've been looking at this all wrong... being a member of a
terrorist cell that's already killed people doesn't necessarily mean you're a bad person
if the country's agenda is welcoming war-fleeing refugees of a certain religion.

Even if you already lived in that country before the war.

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

https://youtu.be/gneBUA39mnI

Should I try it?



I mean, when I have off of work I can be a bit of a Sofa King. Seems like a good idea...




AHHH, now I get it 

But still, I'm going to try it...