Skewed Demographics in Prime Time Broadcast TV Commercials

[BIAD]

So then why try "to instill anger", push "emotive" buttons and blatantly state their viewers are "burdened with prejudice"
when it's all about the money?

Because that is what it's all about. The themes they use... whether it's race, gender or sexual acts are just topics
to entice you to watch boob-tube for a couple of minutes more. Pissing a viewer off isn't a worry, many of the
TV pundits and commentators don't even  believe their narratives and understand these debating talking-points
are merely there to entertain.

Listen to any of the 'news-presenters' interview a favoured guest, the questions are so barbed and yet they
say them anyway. It's not because they are dumb, they have vocal tones that have been deemed appropriate
and physical features okayed by media agencies, it's because the network knows the obvious answer will not
be said and this will activate viewers who think something important has been missed.

The subject matter isn't important, it just has to spicy enough to hold your attention.
"This horrid white man took out a spatula and with an innocent woman-of-colour looking on,
rammed the utensil..."  -The rest after these important messages.
"Man swallows crocodile, film at eleven"


Th-that's show-biz!!

[BIAD]

I will review the dots I'm connecting here. It's a fairly clear picture emerging and it's becoming clear to me at least what is the best conclusion to draw from all this.

These commercials are not being produced and aired on the higher priced prime time adverting spots to primarily sell a product or service, but being commercial advertising, it must be selling something.

Because these ads are not effectively selling (in effect the opposite) a product or service from a private corporate entity, then I must assume that these businesses are working on behalf of another organization. If so, there must be another agenda at play outside of the capitalist goal of higher profit margins.

Because the federal government is restricted and have their hands tied in certain areas, they will persuade private businesses and use NGOs to push though certain agendas that they can't pursue any other way without being directly implicated. Those in the government that are doing this will use backdoor deals and bribes and if these private corporations don't play ball, they will get threatened and intimidated with blackmail or getting cancelled for being Nazi racists. Naturally it would be better for a corporation to take a hit on their profits when the alternative is to go out of business, never to do business again.

The agenda here seems to be social engineering meant to elevate black people while cancelling out the dominant white culture. Why they would want blacks folk to become yuppies while shaming everything that is white culture is beyond me though. There is the idea that this agenda calls for an emotional reaction to cause more strife and division and so it may have nothing to do with raising black living standards while lowering the white's ones. This is part of the communist goals to destroy the U.S. from within, so there is that aspect.

I have one last idea, it is fairly lame but very believable. Due to the cost of production and the rates to air on prime time, these businesses create what they believe are universally excepted formats so that they could air anywhere in any slot. It's just basically saving advertising money by making one size fits all commercials, although they are over the top if that is the case. They are also trying to jump on the virtue signalling bandwagon to use that angle in these universal format commercials.

You could well be correct with a second agenda -possibly agreed to by the businesses advertising
with the TV services or possibly not. Social-engineering comes in many guises, but the main goal
for commodity-producers is to have the public give them more money for an item than they spent
on creating the item.

However, the infux of black people in commercials could just be a false reality designed to 'train'
-as you suggest, certain minorities to step-up and believe their lifestyles require products that
this false TV paradigm shows via their commercials.