I'll tell you folks, I think something bad is on the horizon for our entire planet.
Just look at this election; we have the worst of both candidates running for POTUS in both parties.
I think these candidates were "put in place" by the "Powers That Be", i.e., the Cabal, the Shadow Government, the Illuminati, or whatever name you wish to call them, in hopes that whichever party wins, the other party supporters will begin a riot like none we as a country have never witnessed.
If this should happen, it would give Obummer his opportunity to declare Martial Law and remain in power, as he, and other prophesies, claimed he would do.
I know my message alone will not reach enough people to prevent this from happening, BUT, if we all connect and spread the word together, we can reach a large amount of people and stop this state of communism from completely over-taking our country.
WE MUST REMAIN CALM and not cause large riots that would open the door for Obama to declare Martial Law after the results come in!
The MSM will be feeding the masses all the propaganda the puppet holders tell them to, and using every means of "mind control" at their disposal.
PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND AFTER THE ELECTION, AND DON'T PLAY INTO THEIR GAME WITH OUT FUTURE!
THE TIME TO REMAIN CALM AND IN CONTROL IS NEEDED NOW MORE THAN EVER, or else, we will lose ALL our freedoms!!
LET'S DO THIS!
TOGETHER!
THE TIME TO WAKE UP AND SEE THEIR HIDDEN SECRET AGENDA IS NOW!
An LRAD is a powerful portable speaker device using acoustic sound waves to clear areas of people away during riots, or when crowd control is needed. This method is becoming progressively popular among police departments. It is sometimes called a sound cannon, offering a user “the ability to issue clear, authoritative verbal commands, followed with powerful deterrent tones.”
What does it sound like?
Quote:Unlike a conventional speaker, which vibrates a diaphragm to amplify sound, the LRAD uses piezoelectric transducers to concentrate and direct acoustic energy. Inner and outer transducers bend and vibrate to create sound waves that are not completely in phase with each other. This creates sound waves that cancel out those in the outermost edges of the beam. It also creates a sound that is "flatter" than usual, with minimal dispersion as it propagates. The LRAD's sound waves also interact with the air in ways that create additional frequencies within the wave, thus amplifying the sound and pitch. This allows for voice commands—pre-recorded and played off its built-in MP3 player, or spoken by an officer into a microphone—at a volume meant to be intelligible 600 meters away.
The machine's "alert mode" is its deterrent feature. Imagine pressing your head against the hood of a car while its alarm is going off. Permanent hearing loss begins with a sustained sound that's louder than 90 dB SPL—for example, a subway train 200 feet away—but you won't start to feel immediate pain until 120 decibels, about the loudness of a shotgun blast. At 160 dB—a little less loud than a rocket launch—your eardrum will burst.
The tones of the LRAD can reach as high as 152 decibels—20 to 30 dB louder than a bullhorn—which can easily cause permanent hearing damage. It's a siren that makes the adjective "earsplitting" much less of a metaphor.
One person's account of how it "feels":
Quote:"In person, at first I thought it was just a high pitched really loud car alarm," Anika Edrei, a photojournalist who was documenting the Eric Garner protests, told me. In the early morning hours on December 5th, Edrei said she was just ten meters away from an LRAD device when the NYPD switched on its alarm function. "It was really loud—I could hear it through my fingers."
Edrei said that protesters were already dispersing down the block, on 58th Street, when something smashed against the ground. "The police took that as a violent threat," she said. That's when the siren went off.
Afterwards, "for the first week, I had a migraine, and just a lot of facial pressure," she said. "Since the LRAD incident, I've been pretty freaked out about going back," she added. "I'm worried about what damage it caused and it could cause if I went out there again."
"It feels like your eardrums are beating out of your head," photojournalist Shay Horse, who was also nearby, told VICE News. "It makes the side of your body that you've been hit on feel numb and that your sinuses are inflamed. I felt like I had blood coming out of my orifices. I heard the ringing for about a week."
This is a great way to control riots, but used at very high levels, or too close, it could cause physical damage or permanent hearing loss.
Quote:In a letter to the NYPD last week, lawyers from the National Lawyers Guild contended that the NYPD had used their LRADs last week "at unsafe distances and unreasonably high volumes."
Elena Cohen, a co-author of the letter to the NYPD and the president of the New York chapter of the National Lawyers Guild, expressed concerned about the distance issue, in an email. "We're still determining at what distance the police were from the protesters when the LRAD was used. As you can see from the videos below, it seems as though they are relatively close." In addition to the video above, she attached these videos:
Quote:The LRAD first appeared in the streets of New York during the protests surrounding the Republican National Convention, after the NYPD purchased two of them for $35,000 each. (I was reporting on the convention, and saw it—a black circular thing the size and shape of a giant birthday cake—mounted on a police truck.) LRAD devices would also make appearances during the Occupy Wall Street protests. But until last week, there was no known use of the LRAD's deterrent siren in New York.
The first high-profile use of an LRAD in the U.S. took place in the streets of Pittsburgh in 2009, during the G20 Summit. Karen Piper, an English professor at the University of Missouri, who was researching protests around the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, was 100 feet away when police used the LRAD siren, "without warning, causing a continuous piercing sound to be emitted for a number of minutes." She sued the city of Pittsburgh, claiming the LRAD gave her nausea and headaches, and made fluid leak out of her ear.
"Contrary to some reports," says the LRAD Corporation's website," LRAD does not generate the ultra low frequency tones that are needed to cause nausea and disorientation." But it also notes that “LRAD broadcasts have been optimized to the 1 – 5 kHz range where human hearing is most sensitive.” Pittsburgh ultimately settled the suit for $72,000 and agreed to develop a policy for the safe use of an LRAD .
It is still not clear what constitutes "safe use" of an LRAD.
It is urgent to learn about how these machines affect the body because the use of LRAD appears to be spreading.
Quote:A number of private security contractors own them, and one has appeared at London's O2 arena, presumably for crowd control. Now LRAD's are designed to operate remotely—the new one is "IP addressable"—and they're now being put on drone boats. In 2014, the LRAD Corporation received a number of million-dollar orders from un-named Asian and Middle Eastern customers.
In 2010, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association wrote in a letter to government officials in advance of potential LRAD use around the G8 and G20 summits:
Quote:"The introduction of any new weapon into police arsenals requires a process of objective scientific research into the short-term and long-term physical effects of the weapon’s use, consultation with the public who are the potential targets of such weapons, and policy debates. Reliance on research by the manufacturer is insufficient. . . . Simply put, new weapons such as the LRAD should not be employed without prior independent assessment and study."
There are also less substantial concerns. This device could be helpful in preventing violence and prevent the use of more dangerous weapons like batons or guns. But, as critics point out, "it can easily fudge the line between keeping the peace and deterring public assembly".
This easily casts the idea of citizens gathering in public for political reasons as some kind of threat to security, and a prevention of our constitutional rights.
Quote:"When the police use it, it’s not as if they’re just targeting one person," Gideon Oliver, a New York lawyer, told Gothamist. "It’s indiscriminate like teargas.” Oliver was one of the lawyers who authored the recent letter of complaint to the NYPD's commissioner asking for more details about the program. An earlier Freedom of Information Law request he filed in 2012 contained no rules on the use of LRADs. Another known FOIA request sent to the Boston Police Dept. in 2012 by Muckrock's Michael Morisy received no effective response.
If people would just march PEACEFULLY and voice their concerns, this device would never have to be used in the first place, but with demonstrations becoming ever more destructible and violent, such means are necessary, in my opinion. It is, however, also the responsibility of the police and military to not cause any lasting physical damage to the people demonstrating their concerns.
So, what do you think? Should this device be allowed, or will it be turned into something used as a weapon against the populace when other lesser means for control are available?
I think we might just find out after the upcoming 2016 Presidential election in November.
If you don't want to risk losing your hearing, don't let things get out of control when you take to the streets!
The ONLY reason I am posting this is for ALL of you to look at the comments section underneath the article, where Mr & Mrs Ordinary Folks are stating their observations, their opinions.
It appears that more and more Americans are AWARE of the Clinton/Medias shenanigans....
It also appears that more and more Americans are seeing THROUGH the bullshit thrown at them...
'EXCLUSIVE: Bill Clinton's long-time lover reveals how he called ruthless Hillary 'The Warden', bemoaned his sex life with his wife who had greasy hair and BO but wanted a baby to dispel the rampant 'lesbian rumors'
**********************
Arkansas native Dolly Kyle says she had an affair with Bill Clinton that began in the 1970s and lasted across decades.
Their relationship ended in 1990s when Bill Clinton threatened to 'destroy' Kyle if she spoke to the media, she tells DailyMail.com in interview.
When Kyle first met Hillary in Hot Springs, Hillary's eyes glared at her from behind 'coke-bottle-thick lenses with an air of real hostility'
'She looked so bad and she smelled so bad I just didn't believe this was Hillary - I hoped that I wouldn't gag when she got in my car,' said Kyle.
Hillary is 'a mean, angry person, she’s a volcano waiting to erupt and god help you if you’re anywhere near the lava flow'
The last time Kyle spoke to Bill Clinton was at their 35th high school reunion in 1994.
Bill Clinton is a sex-addicted 'monster' who mocked Hillary Clinton by calling her 'The Warden' in front of friends and privately boasted about his high notch count, according to his long-time mistress and childhood friend Dolly Kyle.
Kyle, now 68, says she had a decades-long affair with the former president before and during his marriage and had a front-row seat to Bill's salacious double-life in the 1970s and '80s.
Their on-again, off-again relationship ended abruptly in the 1990s, after Bill Clinton allegedly threatened to 'destroy' Kyle if she spoke to the media about their relationship.
Kyle's decades of observations, shared in an interview with the DailyMail.com as well as in her 2016 book The Other Woman, provide a unique perspective on the Clintons' marriage and the couple's treatment of the women who have accused the former president of infidelity or sexual assault over the years.
Kyle, an Arkansas native who has since befriended several of Bill Clinton's sexual assault accusers, said she was determined to come forward with her story after hearing Hillary Clinton say on the campaign trail that women who have been sexually assaulted have the 'right to be believed'.
'When [Hillary Clinton] said women who claim they are raped or sexually assaulted should be believed, we should support them, I thought "You lying dog hypocrite",' said Kyle...' SOURCE:
So this is Trump's latest brain fart. Democracy is alive and well then.
"Lighthearted" this guy says random shit and then says I was just being "sarcastic" and then changes that back the next day. "Oh, I was just joking *smarmy grin*, do you people have no sense of humour?" This is a dangerous way for a potential world leader to act.
"Just thinking to myself right now"
WTAF - Is this how he is going to give speeches on the world stage, in front of the world's media? Just saying whatever pops into his befuddled brain. Do people not see how dangerous this is?
What planet is this guy living on??
Quote:Donald Trump, trailing his opponent in key battleground states polls less than two weeks from Election Day, said Thursday he'd like to "cancel the election" and be declared the winner.
"Just thinking to myself right now, we should just cancel the election and just give it to Trump," the Republican presidential nominee said during a rally here on Thursday.
"Her policies are so bad. Boy, do we have a big difference," he added of his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
The apparently lighthearted comment falls against the backdrop of Trump's repeated and serious questioning of the legitimacy of the presidential election in recent weeks as he has tumbled in the polls.
The MSM Urinalists, Sorry, I meant to say, Journalist are Crying and Whining and The mean Comments Trump Supporter are Saying to them, The Snow Flakes are Afraid there will be Violence.
They Support, Open Borders Globalist Media whores, from Megyn Kelly to Jake Tapper, are frauds, anti-American frauds, paid to tote their masters open borders agenda
Their agenda is to make America identical to South America, a third world cesspool readily submissive and easily ruled.
Why would any American allow frauds to end America?
They get What They deserve!
Quote:Triggered: Journalist Snowflakes Scared Trump Supporters Are ‘Turning on the Media’
Poor Babies, Run To Obama and Hillary and ask for your Diaper To be Changed!
Quote:Triggered journalists from across the nation are bemoaning the treatment members of the press are receiving at Trump campaign rallies from the Trump supporters the media routinely misrepresents as ignorant racists, fascist Nazis, or disenchanted working whites.
With increasing regularity, these journalist snowflakes are “reporting” their victimization at the hands Trump supporters who chant mean things like, “CNN sucks” and call them names like “presstitutes.”
For members of the media elite, the occasional taunts and jeers signal a dangerous threat to the free press. During an interview with Kellyanne Conway on Tuesday, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer breathlessly asked Trump’s campaign manager to ask Trump to stop calling out the press at his rallies because he is scared “there could be an ugly incident” between Trump supporters and the “hardworking young journalists” who cover his rallies.
A quick review of media stories over the last two weeks reveals more than a dozen articles in major publications with the same “journalists victimized by Trump supporters at rallies” narrative. Trump supporters endure long waits, messy parking, and often obstructed view seating to rally for their candidate. The press, on the other hand, is given their own entrance, sectioned off seating, and protection from event security and the Secret Service.
After an exhaustive search, this Breitbart reporter could find exactly zero incidences of members of the media being physically attacked or assaulted at Trump rallies. None of this has stopped the misleading characterization of Trump supporters creating a “menacing” and “dangerous” environment for these special snowflakes.
The narrative sprung up briefly in August when NBC‘s Katy Tur wrote a long piece in Marie Claire in which she gives her account of her confrontational relationship with Trump and the backlash his “insults” on her reporting created with his supporters. Here is a small piece from her “no-holds-barred” account:
Quote:I was six months into covering the Trump campaign for MSNBC and NBC News, and there I was, in the belly of a World War II battleship, in a press pen made out of bicycle racks, surrounded by thousands of whipped-up Trump supporters.
…
Trump decided to go further in Mount Pleasant, pointing his finger squarely at me and launching a personal attack as millions of Americans watched at home.
“What a lie it was,” Trump said, referring to the claim that he had left the stage abruptly. “What a lie. Katy Tur. What a lie it was. Third. Rate. Reporter. Remember that.” The crowd’s boos ricocheted off the iron hull of the USS Yorktown.
Just a few days after the Tur piece was published, two other NBC press employees — Frank Thorp and Ali Vitali — tweeted out pictures and videos of Trump supporters showing insufficient deference to the press. It was so very traumatic that it inspired several stories, including this one in Real Clear Politics.
The Snow-Flake pissed Himself!
See the pictures and read the article here: Source
At a Clinton "gathering" the Cameras always show the people. They even do pan-in shots of individual people doing cheers. As EVIDENCE of Media Bias the Cameras never show the people at a Trumpion Rally.
Most have likely seen this by the late, great George Carlin but I'm posting it here for those who might not have. And what's the harm in watching it again for those of us who have seen it?
Remember that it wouldn't be funny if it wasn't true...right?
I remember hearing a story about a guy called Jack.
He lived around here I think?
The story starts with Jack and his family gathered around a camp-fire.... not unlike ours...
“It was back in... let me see... When was it...’91 maybe?
Anyways, back in those days things were a lot... simpler around here.”
Jack briefly glanced up from the mug of coffee he’d been aimlessly stirring and looked around the faces of the people gathered around the fire; Uncle Jim, Bradley, the Twins, Mum and Dad, old Ted and his pal Harry.
”You see, time can... do things to a man, it can make him stronger, it can make him weaker. It can fill his heart with fond memories or it can just as easily snatch them away.
I don’t... uhm... drink anymore by the way.
Well, you all know well that I grew up around here, and spent my time in these very woods or down by the river there with a fishing line in my hand.
And... well, that was where I met my Kate.
No more than a boy really, I didn’t have a clue what to say or do... but when you see them... when you meet your own true... well, your heart skips a beat and then starts poundin’ and you just know that they’re the one for you and somehow you find a way to, you know... you just.. just fumble through and then suddenly they’re right there with you.
They’re right beside you, in your life and in your heart.
Their stuff starts appearing in your house and before you know it... it’s their house too and you start to realise that it just wouldn’t be the same without them.”
Jack glanced up again and could see that everyone was staring intently at him.
It made him feel slightly ill-at-ease but, well it had been his idea to have this cook-out and camp-fire thing in the first place and he had sorta started the story-telling part too, so...
”She was so pretty! With her little blue dress and the ribbons in her hair, knees all muddy from runnin’ down the trail there. I can still see her sparklin’ green eyes and her smile to this day.”
A small tear caught the flickering orange fire-light as it formed at the corner of Jack’s eye, and he feigned flicking away a bug so he could wipe it clear without anyone seeing.
He sucked in one long heavy breath, took a single gulp of his coffee, and then carried on;
”We, uhm... we got married when she was still in her teens, and we settled right here in Mum & Dad’s old place.”
Jack gave a thankful and thoughtful nod to his Dad who started glassing over before steeling himself and nodding right back.
”Sure, it needed a lot of work, but I was young and strong then, and Kate was so good with all the house work and stuff. It wasn’t too long before we had it kind of homely and warm.
I remember that Christmas when Uncle Jim brought Bradley and the twins over for the very first time!
They were chasin’ the dog down through the trees and the chickens were goin’ crazy and you were shoutin’ and hollerin’ at them, with Harry & Ted lookin’ over the fence to see what the hell was goin’ on.
It was like a crazy house! I remember we got the big old oil-drum barbecue and set it up on the porch because the clouds were building up and we thought it might rain? Mum wanted to cook in the kitchen, but I was pretty determined back then and I insisted that I was havin’ myself a BBQ!
So, I cracked open the beer and Bradley there started singin’ and strummin’ on his guitar, I think Harry had his harmonica? That’s how I remember it anyways... I suppose that all means “Jack” now.
Jack held back another tear and shuffled uneasily from foot to foot as he glanced up once again.
Looking in turn at Mum & Dad, Uncle Jim, Bradley & the Twins, Old Harry and finally Ted.
”I, uh... I guess that’s why I asked you all to come here tonight. You see... it was all... my fault.
I got drunk that night and Kate got angry with me and stomped off into the woods. I lashed out at the porch-rail, but I missed and lost my balance... I fell against the Oil-Drum and I guess I kind of blacked out.
The fire musta gotten hold of the place then... it was all tinder dry at the end of the summer, and well... I never saw my Kate again.
That was 25 years ago...
25 years ago... tonight as it happens, and I just wanted the chance to put things right and to apologise to you all.
Jacks tears were flowing now and he couldn’t properly see through them, so he took out a handkerchief, blew his nose and wiped his eyes clear before looking up again... The fire was gone, as were all of the ghosts of his lost family and friends from that fateful night.
As he stood there cold and alone, he started sobbing openly, as he had done at this time every year...
When suddenly, for the first time in 25 years, he felt a hand on his shoulder and turned to see, just standing there...
A beautiful girl, in a blue dress, with green eyes and ribbons in her hair, and she was smiling.
They hugged like never before, and she led him across the lawns to Mum & Dad’s old place, which was all homely and warm... again.
Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the
30k emails Hillary deleted from her private e-mail server very likely
had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a
conflict of interest.
The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as
a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually
prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. History.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and
repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.
Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clintons
set it up in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian
charity. In this case, over 1,000 did - contributing mega millions.
I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and
expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one
morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian
charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and
makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim
Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for
legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this
is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the
Clintons, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund
lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually tax free, which means you and I
are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best
accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax
filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process
of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result - foreign money goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free
and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook
definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity"
includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy
who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company
that somehow acquired massive U.S. Uranium interests and then sold
them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction
required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary
of State when the approval was granted.
As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels.
That poor chap was in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in
gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin
company. Not legal, but not exactly putting U.S. Security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly
structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons, ask
yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a
Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?
Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations
and countries in need?
This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Now
you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she
was willing to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled,
dishonest and criminal and they are Slick!
![[Image: 1418620295610616.jpg]](http://motherboard-images.vice.com/content-images/contentimage/17628/1418620295610616.jpg)
