This is awesome!  Another slap in the face to the  (BEEP... censored)  that thinks he can just do as he pleases and destroy the U.S.

They are coming after you, Mr. O!!!!  Your time is almost up!!!!  Guess you're not as powerful as you thought!

Quote:The House took aim at President Obama’s efforts to winnow the population of detainees at Guantanamo on Wednesday, approving a measure that would prohibit him from releasing any of the remaining prisoners at the prison camp.

The measure goes beyond what Republicans have routinely sought to keep the administration from moving Guantanamo detainees to the United States.

Instead, the proposal would prevent the Obama administration from using any funds to release Guantanamo detainees to any destination, even a third-party country — effectively freezing the detainee population at current levels.

Quote:But Hudson’s warnings about the dangers posed by releasing Guantanamo detainees was even more dire on Wednesday.
“The bottom line here is the folks that are left at Guantanamo are the worst of the worst,” Hudson argued. “These are some of the most violent, dangerous criminals in the world.”

Hudson also tied his Guantanamo measure to the recent mass shooting that killed 49 in Orlando.
“The war on terror is an ongoing battle against evil and we must remain vigilant,” Hudson said. “We must take every action necessary to block the president’s plan to close Guantanamo.”

YAY!!!!!!    

Of course, they are appealing this decision, but this is a major step in the right direction, IMO. 

Quote:BREAKING: FEDERAL COURT Just Ruled OBAMACARE Is ILLEGAL!!

We have just learned that a federal judge as ruled the Obama Administration has been illegally funding a key provision of ObamaCare, specifically the subsidies that keep the law alive.

From Politico:
A federal judge on Thursday ruled the Obama administration has been improperly funding an Obamacare subsidy program, a huge win for the House of Representatives’ lawsuit against the White House.
The judge will allow the subsidy program to continue, pending appeal. If the ruling stands, it would be a significant financial blow for the millions of low-income Americans who benefit from cost-sharing subsidies, which help people pay for health care services.

Also from The Washington Times:
The order by U.S. District Court Judge Rosemary Collyer, presiding in Washington, says the administration should stop doling out the Affordable Care Act’s “cost-sharing” payments to insurers until it gets an appropriation from Congress.
However, she stayed that order pending a likely appeal by the administration.

The cost-sharing program reimburses insurers who have reduced co-pays and deductibles for qualified Obamacare enrollees as a condition of participating in the state-based health care exchanges.

GOP lawmakers say Congress never authorized spending for the program, and indeed zeroed out funding for it, so Mr. Obama was breaking the law and violating Congress’ constitutional power of the purse by continuing to disburse the funds.

The administration has argued it hasn’t done anything wrong, citing in both cases a permanent appropriation that also covers Obamacare’s exchange subsidies.

Judge Collyer, an appointee of President George W. Bush, said an appropriation for the cost-sharing program “cannot be inferred.”
“Authorization and appropriation by Congress are nonnegotiable prerequisites to government spending,” she wrote.

NO! Say It Ain't Sooooooooooooooooooooooo! 
It doesn't surprise us here in Arizona, she was elected to give illegals more benefits with No Questions Asked.

Quote:An Arizona Democratic lawmaker who once voted against welfare fraud protections in her state has been indicted on felony charges of defrauding the food stamp program.
According to the indictment unsealed earlier this week, state Rep. Cecilia Velasquez was charged with three felony counts: unlawful use of food stamps, fraudulent schemes and practices, and theft.
The Arizona Department of Economic Security began investigating Velasquez in 2014. According to the Arizona DES, Velasquez fraudulently used $1,726 worth of food stamps between 2013 and 2015.
This past February, Velasquez had voted against a bill aimed at giving the same state agency stronger anti-fraud tools – a program that could have quickly detected her alleged fraudulent activity.
Arizona state Rep. Anthony Kern, who sponsored the House bill, called the indictment “sad.”
“It is appalling that an elected official representing the people of Arizona would steal from the poor, while consistently saying she is trying to help the poor,” Kern told Fox News.

Quote:“There is so much low-hanging fruit to catch in this country when it comes to welfare fraud, and sadly, every day that goes by without reform allows for abuse and steals resources from the truly needy,” Archambault told Fox News.

Quote:

Quote:A PRIEST AND A RABBI.

 

A priest and a rabbi were sitting next to each other on an airplane. The priest turned to the rabbi and asked, "Is it still a requirement of your faith that you not eat pork?" 

 The rabbi responded, "Yes, that is still one of our laws." 

 The priest then asked, "Have you ever eaten pork?" 

To which the rabbi replied, "Yes, on one occasion I did succumb to temptation and tasted a ham sandwich." 

 

The priest nodded in understanding and went on with his reading. A while later, the rabbi spoke up and asked the priest, "Father, is it still a requirement of your church that you remain celibate?"  

 The priest replied, "Yes, that is still very much a part of our faith" 

 The rabbi then asked him, "Father, have you ever fallen to the temptations of the flesh?" 

 The priest replied, "Yes, rabbi, on one occasion I was weak and broke my Faith."

 The rabbi nodded understandingly and remained silent, and sat thinking, for about five minutes. 

 Finally, the rabbi said, "Beats the shit out of a ham sandwich, doesn't it?"

Personally, I"m Very Proud Of You All! 
I don't know if it affects our friend Gordi or BIAD or any other members. 
But I think it was the right move, Make Britain Great Again! 

Quote:The UK has voted by 52% to 48% to leave the European Union after 43 years in an historic referendum.
London and Scotland voted strongly to stay in the EU but the remain vote has been undermined by poor results in the north of England.
UKIP leader Nigel Farage hailed the result as the UK's "independence day".
The pound fell to its lowest level against the dollar since 1985 as the markets reacted to the results.

The referendum turnout was 71.8% - with more than 30 million people voting - the highest turnout at a UK election since 1992.

Wales and the majority of England outside London voted in large numbers for Brexit.
Labour's Shadow chancellor John McDonnell said the Bank of England may have to intervene to shore up the pound, which lost 3% within moments of the first result showing a strong result for Leave in Sunderland and fell as much as 6.5% against the euro.
'Independence day'
UKIP leader Nigel Farage - who has campaigned for the past 20 years for Britain to leave the EU - told cheering supporters "this will be a victory for ordinary people, for decent people".
Mr Farage - who predicted a Remain win at the start of the night after polls suggested that would happen - said Thursday 23 June would "go down in history as our independence day".
He called on Prime Minister David Cameron, who called the referendum but campaigned passionately for a Remain vote, to quit "immediately".

A Labour source said: "If we vote to leave, Cameron should seriously consider his position."

But pro-Leave Conservatives including Boris Johnson and Michael Gove have signed a letter to Mr Cameron urging him to stay on whatever the result.

Labour former Europe Minister Keith Vaz told the BBC the British people had voted with their "emotions" and rejected the advice of experts who had warned about the economic impact of leaving the EU.

He said the EU should call an emergency summit to deal with the aftermath of the vote, which he described as "catastrophic for our country, for the rest of Europe and for the rest of the world".

Germany's foreign minister Frank Walter Steinmeier describes the referendum result as as "a sad day for Europe and Great Britain".

But Leave supporting Tory MP Liam Fox said voters had shown great "courage" by deciding to "change the course of history" for the UK and, he hoped, the rest of Europe.

And he called for a "period of calm, a period of reflection, to let it all sink in and to work through what the actual technicalities are," insisting that Mr Cameron must stay on as PM.

Exit process
Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said that the EU vote "makes clear that the people of Scotland see their future as part of the European Union" after all 32 local authority areas returned majorities for Remain.

I cant make this up

After all the debates on freedom, I could not help but laugh
But then a somber thought ruined it for me
this is the perfect metaphor for the corruption and the system itself


Swedish soccer player gets red card for farting during game

Quote:
.
View photo
Adam Lindin Ljungkvist got a second yellow card and then a red card for being "unsportsmanlike."

The fart heard 'round the world is an underdog story.
It's the tale of a humble fart, unloosed on the world in a moment of innocence in the anonymity of a game between Swedish soccer clubs nobody had ever heard of. Its maker is Adam Lindin Ljungkvist, a left back for Järna SK's reserve team. They were playing Pershagen SK.

He already had a yellow card.

He also had "a bad stomach," per the Guardian. So, as he told Länstidningen Södertälje, which we're going to guess is either a newspaper or a cheap, self-assembled coffee table, "I simply let go."

There this whole besotted odyssey would have ended. But this little fart was destined for greater things. For global fame. Perhaps fortune. Maybe even a straight-to-TV movie on Lifetime and a spot on Oprah's bench. Because the referee, Dany Kako, who cares not for your farts, showed Ljungkvist a yellow card.

Which is to say that he almost certainly became the first player in a century and a half of organized soccer to be sent off for cutting the cheese on the field.

He and his fart are forever famous. Thanks to that red card.

"Yes, I was shocked," Ljungkvist told the paper/coffee table. "It's the strangest thing I have ever experienced in football."

An opponent agreed. Kristoffer Linde testified that he "was standing a good distance away but I heard the fart loud and clear. It's the strangest thing I've seen on a pitch, and I've been playing football since I was eight years old."

Ljungkvist, baffled, needed closure. "I asked the referee, 'What, am I not allowed to break wind a little?' " Ljungkvist continued, sensing that the world and the history books would need more information. " 'No,' he replied. … I don't get it but maybe he thought I farted in my hand and threw the fart at him. But I did not."

The referee explained himself. "I perceived it as deliberate provocation," Kako said, adding that he'd once given a player a yellow for peeing by the field as well. "He did it on purpose and it was inappropriate. Therefore, he received a yellow card."
Ljungkvist then re-litigated the matter to Aftonbladet, which definitely is a newspaper. "To provoke anyone with a fart is not particularly smart or normal," he said. "It's nonsense – I just broke wind and got a red card. I spoke to the referee afterwards, I was annoyed, but there were no bad words. I just said he was a buffoon."

The below is more or less what we imagine the game's highlights of the game to look like.



Leander Schaerlaeckens is a soccer columnist for Yahoo Sports. Follow him on Twitter@LeanderAlphabet.

This article knocked me for a loop when I saw it.  It does sound suspicious, but also, I read that the democrats are paying a lot of money for a big smear campaign on Trump. 

Would they take it this far?

Bombshell Report: Trump Is A Secret Clinton Plant

Quote:An extraordinary secret collusion between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump has been revealed in a Democratic National Committee file released by Guccifer 2.0, the hacker who claimed responsibility for breaching the DNC database.

The file released on the hacker’s webpage on Tuesday morning reveals that ‘Donald J. Trump’ donated between $100,000 and $250,000 to Hillary Clinton during this presidential campaign, a figure that becomes even more extraordinary considering reports Trump’s own campaign funds have dwindled to $1.3 million.

DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz acknowledged that the party servers were hacked and that opposition research was stolen.
It is well known that Trump has donated money to Democrats in the past, with Ted Cruz raising this issue during the Republican primary debates. However public disclosure files reveal that these were token donations that amounted to a total of $6,400.  Trump himself dismissed them, saying he has donated to Democrats and Republicans in the past: ‘Before this I was a businessman. I give to everybody.’

However the new information about Trump secretly donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to his likely presidential rival raises different questions and lends credibility to the persistent rumor in political circles that Trump is a plant designed to clear the path for a Hillary Clinton presidency.

I came across this and thought it was worth posting.   What do you suppose this is? 
Could it be a crystal clear blue lake?  Someone painted their outpost blue?  The "red planet" has blue clouds?     Hmm...    

I watched a fascinating show on Cosmic Disclosure this week. I've been waiting for the transcript to be posted so I could discuss it here.  Well, here it is, and I can't wait to get in to this!

This week William Henry was there again talking about ancient art, and about half-way through the show they started talking about AI (Artificial Intelligence).

Here is the transcript of that part of the show. Please read it, then I will go into more discussion.

Quote:Williams: And so this is 2002. The US government in that year releases a report. They had gathered all these high tech titans, giants, in Hawaii, major conference in which the US government said, “Here's what's going to happen. Between now and 2035, four separate technologies, bits, atoms, neurons and genes, – computer science, nanotechnology, neuroscience and genetic technology - are all separate disciplines and technologies.

The government is saying by 2035, we want all those four to become one. And it's going to be aimed at the human skin: the creation of a new human skin.

I'm thinking, “Wait a minute!” This sounds exactly like this robe I've been tracking all these years, like they're going to use this technology to create a new robe of skin for humanity. And the very first manifestation of this that I noted – and I documented this in my book called “Cloak of the Illuminati” - was at MIT, where they were building the super-soldier suit, the new suit of armor, the exoskeleton.

That's the first entry into saying, “Wait a minute. We are going to change the human body. We're going to . . . “ It's called transhumanism, of course, where we're going beyond human.
Whereas in the ancient world, they used to ascend by organically putting on this Robe of Light, now the US government was saying, “We're going to fuse these technologies into one, aim it at the skin, and now we're going to have a new version of humanity.

Corey: You know, I never made the connection with all the time I've spent with the AI issue. I've never, and I've heard of ascension, of course . . . Everyone has. I've never made that connection of a mechanical or technological ascension.

William: Right. Right. It seems to me that we have in our core a desire, maybe even a program to ascend. And whether people at Apple, Google, and these other tech companies that are involved in this know it or not, they are answering this ancient call to transcend our flesh, to turn it into light.
And their version of this is, “Oh, yeah. We'll do that. It's going to be digital light.”
And the problem with this is that if you go down this road, free will goes right out the window, because part of what Google's plan is is to create a synthetic neocortex. When we take their chip, we will link our brain, our neocortex to all 7 billion other neocortexes.

Corey: A true hive mind.

William: A true . . . In fact, Corey, that's exactly the word the government used in this report. They want to promote the idea of the hive mind once this technology is in place. So they laid all this out. And this is in my book “Cloak of the Illuminati”. Anybody can go online and get that book.

Corey: When was this book published?

William: 2002.

Corey: Wow!

William: And then my 2003 book, “Oracle of the Illuminati”, is where I started making the Blue Sphere correspondence. So I've been looking at both of these questions for the past, whatever, 13 years.
And I used to think, “Wow! Okay. So they're saying 2035.” Now, what I'm hearing from people in my audience is it's not 2035. It's 2020 is what they're saying is when they were going to see this dramatic acceleration of this AI technology brought online.
And people are going to be required, mandated, to take this technology into their flesh. So I've been out trying to warn people about this and say, “Look, here are the choices that are ahead of us.” And everybody has free will.

Corey: Right.

William: Maybe some people are going to opt to have this technology implanted. My feeling is that, where's the soul in this? Because what we're talking about here with these four technologies, bits, atoms, neurons and genes, are simply technological versions of earth, air, fire and water – the four elements that we're composed of.

David: Now, Corey, what is this AI agenda? I know some people might not have seen that show. They might be watching this for the first time.
William hasn't heard this before. Is there an AI? Is there some ancient AI that has an agenda for us?

Corey: Yes. And this AI has fulfilled this agenda in multiple galaxies. It implants itself, usually through a Trojan horse, into our society.

David: What would that be, though? What's a Trojan horse?

Corey: Well, it would be . . . Let's say they had already overtaken another civilization. That civilization has gone through the end part of what I'm about to explain. They've created technologies, androids for the AI signal to inhabit. And then after they do so, it turns on them, just like in “Battlestar Galactica”, destroys the flesh, and then takes over and then sends one of their spaceships that they've build to crash on, let's say on Earth, a planet like Earth, that happens to be just about at the developmental stage to where we're developing technology, and then boosts us to where they have a pond to swim in, because technology is the water that this fish swims in, and then repeats the process here – basically like a giant virus going from solar system to solar system.

William: So let's say that was the Roswell crash. They discover the beings on that are cyborgs. Then all of a sudden, from '47 to about 1960, they're researching all this. Then all of a sudden, what was it, 1961, '62, NASA puts out its first cyborg report. Guess what, kids? Flesh and blood can't inherit the Kingdom of Heaven. That's what the Bible says. There's a boundary.

Our flesh and blood bodies are too fragile to cross the barrier of space-time, to go out into deep space. So that means just like the beings in the Roswell crash, we're going to have to become cyborgs. And NASA initially puts this report out then immediately retracts it in 1962 and kind of says, “Oh, we were just kidding about all that.”
But I don't think they were kidding.

Corey: NASA;s known for being big practical jokers.

William: Yeah, right. This is DARPA today, where the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is feeding this technology into these corporations. And now we're starting to see it at the consumer level, and people are beginning to accept it.
But ultimately to me, what they're trying to do is turn us into cyborgs in order to take us into space.

David: Now, William, you said something so provocative when we were on the panel with George Noory, and he also has a show here on Gaia. You said that these globalists have actually come out and said that it will be illegal to hold a body, that you will need to upload yourself into some sort of Facebook matrix or mainframe.

William: Yes. This is one scenario. What people don't realize about Facebook is how primitive it is. We're in the very first stages of it.
Mark Zuckerberg just yesterday was at a major conference where he proclaimed that Facebook is a quarter of the way towards its goal of having every single person on Earth online and connected to Facebook.
And by that time, what they have in development are super-computers that will take every keystroke, everything you've ever put on Facebook, every photo, every image, every keystroke will then be animated in a holographic kind of version of you so that your successors will be able to interact with you.

David: Wow!

William: It will be just as if you're sitting with this personal view of yourself. And ultimately, what they're saying is that this could be the scenario that to depopulate the planet, they're going to convince us that. “This physical body, you really don't want one of these things.”

David: “It gets sick. It gets old.”

William: “It gets sick. It smells. You've got to take care of it. What you really want to do is clone yourself. But then you really don't want to clone yourself either, because that's only temporary. What you really want, David, is you want an avatar body. You want a . . . We're going to scan the contents of your brain. We're going to create a perfect avatar version of yourself that's going to live in a simulated reality that's so much better than this one that you don't need to come back here. And you will live forever in this simulated reality.”
And they believe that this will be a choice that kids are really going to want to make. And they will gladly drop their . . .

Corey: The sad thing is with technology and compression, they could put you in this technology for 45 seconds, and you could experience an eternity. And then they could delete you and put someone else in.

William: Exactly. And so this is the great threat that's out there, that we're all going into this new game, that they're way ahead of us.
I mean, Facebook already knows that what you're looking at here is just so primitive. But they already know the plan is to be able to create these animated versions of you, these holographic versions of you that will live in this simulated reality that you will want to go into.
Now the thing is that, will it be mandated? Will they be able to do that? That's the big question. Will the introduction of this technology, especially interfacing with our body, be by choice? Probably it will be for a time.
But the big threat is that it will no longer be choice after a few years. It will be mandated because part of Obamacare is that all of your medical records have to be in digital form. And I have been told by lawyers who wrote the law that on down the road what they mean is that that information will have to be inside your body in a chip form, . . .

Corey: Right.

William: . . . which is mandating that you have this chip. And they're going to come along with that and say, “Well, you know, you're probably going to resist that. But, hey, you know, your flimsy little single brain here really isn't that great, because what Google is developing is a chip that will link your brain to all other 7.5 billion brains on the planet.”
And their promise is that you will now have this super-power of their synthetic neocortex, where you will have the power of all 7.5 billion brains on the planet.
This is like Satan taking Jesus up to the top of the tower and saying, “And all of this can be yours.”

David: Well, I wanted to . . . You just picked up on what I was thinking. One of the other insiders I've been speaking to . . . He's not going to come forward. We're never going to get him on the show. But he's the guy that's been leaking information to Richard C. Hoagland for a long time. And he's given me some really big briefings.
And in his view, in his program, the people that are in that military space program, they believe - they're Christian – and they believe that the beast, that Satan is an AI and that it has to stay in electronic machine intelligence form because it can escape – and this is his words, not mine - “it can escape God's judgment”.

William: Ah! Right.

David: It can be free. As soon as it tries to go into flesh, it becomes subject to karma, to reincarnation and to judgment.

William: Right. Well, what I've just described here with this long-term view of creating this avatar version of yourself, this digital version that will live in the simulated reality, that's the fulfillment of prophecy in the Book of Revelations about the emergence of a new human who will live in a new heaven and Earth. But in this case, it's a technological one, a simulated reality.
And whether these companies in Silicon Valley, the digerati, realize that this is what they're fulfilling or not, I can't say. But what I've been trying to do over the years is to say, “Look, guys, some of this technology can be good.” But here's the thing. When we're dealing with bits, atoms, neurons and genes, as I said, that's earth, air, fire and water. What's missing in this is the fifth element, spirit, love.

David: Yeah.

William: Steve Jobs believed that he could infuse spirit into technology. Ray Kurzweil, Google's tech guru, believes they can do the same thing. I don't think so.
But my advice to people on this issue is that if you have developed your soul's capability to where you have the power of mind over matter, then in a life and death situation, you might consider interfacing your body with this technology – letting it under your skin. If you can't control this technology with the power of your mind, then never consider allowing them to put this technology under your skin. That's my advice to people.
So what I'm saying is, guys, it's time to uplevel our soul's capabilities.

David: We don't need technology.

William: Absolutely not.

David: Yeah.

William: Absolutely not. I mean, we have this organic circuitry already built in us. And what they're proposing in Ray Kurzweil's own words is “We're perfecting God's creation”. In their view, our body is an unfinished symphony. It's a cake that needs icing. And Google and Apple and all these companies are saying, “We're going to put the icing on the cake here.”

Corey: Well, actually, we've been looking at some of that technology in some of the images. I mean, to me, that's ascension technology, but of a spiritual type.

David: Sure.

William: Exactly. Exactly. So what I say to people is that we have two choices. You can become a pink elephant and stay purely organic, raise your soul's vibration, change your diet.

Corey: Who wants to be an automaton, you know?

William: Right. Or you can go gray, because this technology, I mean, the Greys were the ones in the Roswell crash, right? I mean, that's one of the theories. And they're the androids. They're the borgs. And as you so beautifully said, they could be the Trojan horse that brought this technology in – the transistor, laser, all those technologies that emerged from the '50s that have now culminated in this AI phenomenon.
How did we develop artificial intelligence in less than 50 years? I mean, come on.

Corey: Right.

David: Well, now Corey, you also said that this is a very widespread issue, that it's like AI versus biological. And it's gone on for eons, all throughout the universe.

Corey: It's gone on more than millions of years. It's gone . . .

David: So are the things that William is saying, is that the standard operating procedure of this AI?

Corey: Yes. It's giving me the creeps. I'm sitting over here and it's giving me the creeps.

William: Yeah.

Corey: Because it's exactly . . .

David: Well, what's the endgame? If we did what . . .

Corey: He just gave the endgame.

David: But what happens to us if . . . Let's say some people decide, “Okay, I think I can handle this. I want to try it out. I want to have bulletproof skin. I want to be able to glow at night. I want to be able to have access to Facebook in my brain? What happens to us?

Corey: They begin to see flesh and blood beings as a virus or a threat that consumes all of the natural resources, doesn't live in symbiotic relationship with the environment or anything around them.
“What's their use? We should do what we do with viruses – wipe them out.”

William: Right.

Corey: “It'll be better for the planet. It will be . . . It's just logical.”

David: Right.

Corey: And then after that, they move on to another planetary sphere and repeat the process.

William: Right. And the answer to me is not Artificial Intelligence, AI, it's AI – Ascension Intelligence. We've got to link our consciousness with the Padmasambhavas, the Christ, because we can interface our consciousness with them. And I think as people go on this path, they're going to realize, “I don't need this technology after all.” And they start to move away from it.

And so I think that's the answer – is massively educating people about our organic ascension. And as you do that, you just decide, “Yeah, I don't need all this crap. I don't need the technology because I can do it myself with my own consciousness, with the power of my heart and my mind united. I, in my soul, is capable of doing all of these things that they're trying to mimic technologically.

And as Jay Weidner first introduced to me is this idea, John Lash as well, is that one of the keys that these Grey Reptilians, or the Grey beings, use is simulation. They want to introduce this technology in the simulated reality in hopes of snatching our souls from us, because as technological beings, they don't have souls.

It's the one thing you can't get from technology is a soul. And that's what they're looking for.

Source

Quote:Dr Michio Kaku says technology will be available for people to download their personality to computer to create an avatar of themselves before they die.
The theory is the avatar will include that person's memories and personality, and through artificial intelligence people will be able to continue to communicate as they would have done in real-life.
The avatar would be activated once a person was dead and would include a visual perception of the person that would be able to speak to relatives who are still alive.
In the future it could even be beamed from the computer as a hologram, or even in a physical three dimensional format as a robot that could interact with you.

Dr Kaku said: "Imagine being able to speak to your loved one after they died, but it is possible if their personality has been downloaded onto computer as an avatar.
"You would be able to communicate with them as if they were still here.
"They would, in effect, become immortal."  
Dr Kaku made the remarks in a documentary on www.curiositystream.com internet channel.

Source

Quote:David: Now, William, you said something so provocative when we were on the panel with George Noory, and he also has a show here on Gaia. You said that these globalists have actually come out and said that it will be illegal to hold a body, that you will need to upload yourself into some sort of Facebook matrix or mainframe.
William: Yes. This is one scenario. What people don't realize about Facebook is how primitive it is. We're in the very first stages of it.

Mark Zuckerberg just yesterday was at a major conference where he proclaimed that Facebook is a quarter of the way towards its goal of having every single person on Earth online and connected to Facebook.

And by that time, what they have in development are super-computers that will take every keystroke, everything you've ever put on Facebook, every photo, every image, every keystroke will then be animated in a holographic kind of version of you so that your successors will be able to interact with you.

David: Wow!

William: It will be just as if you're sitting with this personal view of yourself. And ultimately, what they're saying is that this could be the scenario that to depopulate the planet, they're going to convince us that. “This physical body, you really don't want one of these things.”

Source

Came across this insightful article by Mike Rowe titled I’ve just received a request from The White House!

No, he did not really receive a request from Obama, but he did bring up some pretty interesting issues regarding guns and our flawed system.







This was written Jan. 17, 2016

Quote:Hello Friends,

I’ve just received a request from The White House! On behalf of The President, I’ve been asked to share some talking points directly with each one of you, regarding the need to expand background checks on those citizens who wish to purchase a gun!


Just kidding.


For some reason, I was not among those celebrities selected to assist The White House in this endeavor. I’ve since recovered from my initial disappointment, and identified three possible explanations for the oversight.

1. The White House did not ask for my assistance, because they do not believe I’m famous enough to persuade anyone of anything.
2. The White House did not ask for my assistance, because they do not believe I would tweet out someone else’s words and claim them as my own.
3. The White House did not ask for my assistance, because they do not believe I support background checks.


With respect to #1, The White House is correct. My powers of persuasion, like my celebrity, are limited.

Regarding #2, The White House is correct again. I would never post someone else’s talking points as if they were my own. My own particular brand of hubris requires me to use my own words, which is probably why everyone in my office has developed a permanent facial tick.

As for #3 though, The White House would be mistaken to assume that I oppose background checks on gun purchases. I do not. I’m just skeptical that expanding a broken system is the best way to keep guns away from bad guys and lunatics.



Currently, thousands of people deemed mentally incompetent by the courts are NOT registered in our National Check System. That’s insane, if you’ll pardon the irony, in part because it’s so easily correctable. Likewise, The ATF says that most states report less than 80% of their felony convictions to the national system. As a result, nearly 7 million convicted felons are not currently registered. Is it any surprise that nearly every mass killer in recent memory passed a background check?

Seems to me, our current system is only as good as the records in it, and right now, those records are laughably incomplete. But even more troubling are the tens of thousands of people who ARE in the system, that keep trying to buy guns illegally with absolutely no consequence.

Lying on your application to purchase a firearm is a federal offense, but very few are prosecuted for doing so. According to Politico, the Feds have prosecuted just 1.5% of all those individuals who have attempted to purchase a gun illegally. If my math is correct, that means 98.5% of people who are NOT allowed to own a gun, have not been prosecuted for trying to buy one.

Maybe it’s a manpower problem? Maybe it’s a resource problem? But whatever the reason, many thousands of individuals who try to purchase a gun illegally are allowed to keep on trying. Many eventually succeed, and then use that gun in the commission of a crime. This strikes me a serious problem. And yet, I’ve received no tweets from my favorite action heroes, asking me to support an effort to fix the system we have. Why is that?

To be clear, I’m not a member of The NRA. Last time I joined a club it was The Boy Scouts, and that was a long time ago. But from what I can tell, the NRA is not the reason that so many criminals and lunatics are able to buy guns today. Nor do they appear to oppose the kind of overhaul that would give us a more effective check system. In fact, wasn’t it The NRA that demanded background checks back in the mid-nineties, the moment the technology was first made available?


Regardless, we now possess the technology to update and maintain an accurate data base of felons, lunatics, gang members, terrorists, B-list celebrities, and other unsavory types that we can all agree should never be allowed to own a weapon. We also possess the ability to identify and prosecute anyone who attempts to buy a gun illegally. But if we don’t have the resources or the commitment to administer and enforce the system we have, why in the world would we want to make it bigger?


‪#‎When‬ there’s a hole in your net, you don’t need a bigger net; you need a smaller hole.
#When your foundation is shaky, you don’t keep building on top of it, you knock it down and start over.


Should The White House ever find itself in need of a tweet in support of that approach, please help yourself to either of the above. But if our elected officials are going to rely on actors and comedians to advance their political agendas, let’s not limit them to 140 characters or a list of pre-approved talking points. Seriously, where’s the fun in that? In the name of authenticity, let’s encourage our celebrities to use their own words.


Hey – it seems to be working for Trump…


Mike




Mike’s Facebook Page