State University Now Offers 'Stop White People' Training

[guohua]

Just makes you want to Pull Your Hair Out And SCREAM! WTF People! 
If anything is keeping us Racially Divided It's Our Education System!

The State University of New York (SUNY) at Binghamton is now offering a course called “#StopWhitePeople2K16” as part of routine training for residential assistants.
The university’s residential assistant training schedule lists “#StopWhitePeople2016” on its roster, with the mission of giving RA’s an “overview of disabilities in Higher Education.”
The presenters of the course, Ciaran Slattery, Nicholas Pulakos, and Urenna Nwogwugwu, are all RAs at the state-funded college, which describes itself as New York’s highest-ranking public college. They state their purpose is to “help others take the next step in understanding diversity, privilege, and the society we function within,” presumably the “white” society they plan to "stop" at the event.

The three RAs claim they will give “#StopWhitePeople2K16” course attendees the “tools” to respond to “uneducated people” with “‘good’ arguments.” You know, the people who preach mutual respect, equality under God, and constitutional freedoms. Those people.
They also state they will help other RAs at the state-funded college “hopefully expand upon what they may already know”: that white people are cancer, of course.


College RAs hold important roles in college residential and dormitory life, serving as mentors, counselors, and peers to the student residents they oversee. “These people should be sensitive to the issues of their residents, and to be prejudiced against someone on the basis of his or her skin color would seem, just like the hashtag itself, petty,” student Howard Hecht noted.

Binghamton Review, the university’s conservative student paper, publicized the course schedule, noting the university “seems to endorse it as a proper part of a RA training.” It was added:
At a public, state funded university, to potentially see racism endorsed is a frightening prospect for the future of higher education.

Source
So, let's stop racism by being racist. According to our Education System, Hollywood and Democrats, Only White People Can be Racist,,,, Well they need to take to the Chinese or at least this Little Old Chinese Lady!

[Mystic Wanderer]

Sigh... it's really getting to the point now that the whole thing just makes me laugh at how stupid people are!  I see something like this, and I'm like... seriously?!  

I find it so ridiculous, it makes me wonder if this isn't just more of the Cabal's propaganda to get us stirred up.  

[senona]

College RAs hold important roles in college residential and dormitory life, serving as mentors, counselors, and peers to the student residents they oversee.


“These people should be sensitive to the issues of their residents, and to be prejudiced against someone on the basis of his or her skin color would seem, just like the hashtag itself, petty,” student Howard Hecht noted.

 Um, yo dudes.....your own message of #stopwhitepeople is the total opposite of what the message above claims.

To be sensitive to people and their issues......you see that up there ^^^^^


So what, white people have no issues????
Or are you just not sensitive to them, because of their skin color.


You guys are a bunch of ignorant morons!!!!  
I would never ever allow you to be a mentor/counselor to my kid.




I am so sick of this white guilt shit or what ever the hell you want to call it.
Trying to "shame" white folks for being ......white.

Now they are allowing these azzholes to spread their poison in colleges. YIKES.
Oh yeah, what a role model alright.....pfffft  

[guohua]

College RAs hold important roles in college residential and dormitory life, serving as mentors, counselors, and peers to the student residents they oversee.


“These people should be sensitive to the issues of their residents, and to be prejudiced against someone on the basis of his or her skin color would seem, just like the hashtag itself, petty,” student Howard Hecht noted.

 Um, yo dudes.....your own message of #stopwhitepeople is the total opposite of what the message above claims.

To be sensitive to people and their issues......you see that up there ^^^^^


So what, white people have no issues????
Or are you just not sensitive to them, because of their skin color.


You guys are a bunch of ignorant morons!!!!  
I would never ever allow you to be a mentor/counselor to my kid.




I am so sick of this white guilt shit or what ever the hell you want to call it.
Trying to "shame" white folks for being ......white.

Now they are allowing these azzholes to spread their poison in colleges. YIKES.
Oh yeah, what a role model alright.....pfffft  

They should actually read their own history about Black People Own Selling and Fighting To Keep Their Slaves, Right Here In America!

In a fascinating essay reviewing this controversy, R. Halliburton shows that free black people have owned slaves “in each of the thirteen original states and later in every state that countenanced slavery,” at least since Anthony Johnson and his wife Mary went to court in Virginia in 1654 to obtain the services of their indentured servant, a black man, John Castor, for life.

And for a time, free black people could even “own” the services of white indentured servants in Virginia as well.

Free blacks owned slaves in Boston by 1724 and in Connecticut by 1783; by 1790, 48 black people in Maryland owned 143 slaves.

One particularly notorious black Maryland farmer named Nat Butler “regularly purchased and sold Negroes for the Southern trade,” Halliburton wrote.

Perhaps the most insidious or desperate attempt to defend the right of black people to own slaves was the statement made on the eve of the Civil War by a group of free people of color in New Orleans, offering their services to the Confederacy, in part because they were fearful for their own enslavement: “The free colored population [native] of Louisiana … own slaves, and they are dearly attached to their native land … and they are ready to shed their blood for her defense.
They have no sympathy for abolitionism; no love for the North, but they have plenty for Louisiana … They will fight for her in 1861 as they fought [to defend New Orleans from the British] in 1814-1815.”  
These guys were, to put it bluntly, opportunists par excellence: As Noah Andre Trudeau and James G. Hollandsworth Jr. explain, once the war broke out, some of these same black men formed 14 companies of a militia composed of 440 men and were organized by the governor in May 1861 into “the Native Guards, Louisiana,” swearing to fight to defend the Confederacy. Although given no combat role, the Guards — reaching a peak of 1,000 volunteers — became the first Civil War unit to appoint black officers. 

So,,,, Where's your Safe Place Now,,,, Assholes!

How Many Slaves Did Blacks Own?

So what do the actual numbers of black slave owners and their slaves tell us?
In 1830, the year most carefully studied by Carter G. Woodson, about 13.7 percent (319,599) of the black population was free.

Of these, 3,776 free Negroes owned 12,907 slaves, out of a total of 2,009,043 slaves owned in the entire United States, so the numbers of slaves owned by black people over all was quite small by comparison with the number owned by white people.

In his essay, ” ‘The Known World’ of Free Black Slaveholders,” Thomas J. Pressly, using Woodson’s statistics, calculated that 54 (or about 1 percent) of these black slave owners in 1830 owned between 20 and 84 slaves; 172 (about 4 percent) owned between 10 to 19 slaves; and 3,550 (about 94 percent) each owned between 1 and 9 slaves. Crucially, 42 percent owned just one slave.
Pressly also shows that the percentage of free black slave owners as the total number of free black heads of families was quite high in several states, namely 43 percent in South Carolina, 40 percent in Louisiana, 26 percent in Mississippi, 25 percent in Alabama and 20 percent in Georgia. So why did these free black people own these slaves?

These poor frightened Black Students need to check the last names of anyother Black Student in the same room and if it matches the following names of Blacks Owning Blacks, They need to Run and Find Their Safe Place!

Who Were These Black Slave Owners?

If we were compiling a “Rogues Gallery of Black History,” the following free black slaveholders would be in it:
John Carruthers Stanly — born a slave in Craven County, N.C., the son of an Igbo mother and her master, John Wright Stanly — became an extraordinarily successful barber and speculator in real estate in New Bern. As Loren Schweninger points out in Black Property Owners in the South, 1790-1915, by the early 1820s, Stanly owned three plantations and 163 slaves, and even hired three whiteoverseers to manage his property! He fathered six children with a slave woman named Kitty, and he eventually freed them. Stanly lost his estate when a loan for $14,962 he had co-signed with his white half brother, John, came due. After his brother’s stroke, the loan was Stanly’s sole responsibility, and he was unable to pay it.
William Ellison’s fascinating story is told by Michael Johnson and James L. Roark in their book, Black Masters: A Free Family of Color in the Old South. At his death on the eve of the Civil War, Ellison was wealthier than nine out of 10 white people in South Carolina. He was born in 1790 as a slave on a plantation in the Fairfield District of the state, far up country from Charleston. In 1816, at the age of 26, he bought his own freedom, and soon bought his wife and their child. In 1822, he opened his own cotton gin, and soon became quite wealthy. By his death in 1860, he owned 900 acres of land and 63 slaves. Not one of his slaves was allowed to purchase his or her own freedom.

Louisiana, as we have seen, was its own bizarre world of color, class, caste and slavery. By 1830, in Louisiana, several black people there owned a large number of slaves, including the following: In Pointe Coupee Parish alone, Sophie Delhonde owned 38 slaves; Lefroix Decuire owned 59 slaves; Antoine Decuire owned 70 slaves; Leandre Severin owned 60 slaves; and Victor Duperon owned 10. In St. John the Baptist Parish, Victoire Deslondes owned 52 slaves; in Plaquemine Brule, Martin Donatto owned 75 slaves; in Bayou Teche, Jean B. Muillion owned 52 slaves; Martin Lenormand in St. Martin Parish owned 44 slaves; Verret Polen in West Baton Rouge Parish owned 69 slaves; Francis Jerod in Washita Parish owned 33 slaves; and Cecee McCarty in the Upper Suburbs of New Orleans owned 32 slaves. Incredibly, the 13 members of the Metoyer family in Natchitoches Parish — including Nicolas Augustin Metoyer, pictured — collectively owned 215 slaves.

Antoine Dubuclet and his wife Claire Pollard owned more than 70 slaves in Iberville Parish when they married. According to Thomas Clarkin, by 1864, in the midst of the Civil War, they owned 100 slaves, worth $94,700. During Reconstruction, he became the state’s first black treasurer, serving between 1868 and 1878.


Andrew Durnford was a sugar planter and a physician who owned the St. Rosalie plantation, 33 miles south of New Orleans. In the late 1820s, David O. Whitten tells us, he paid $7,000 for seven male slaves, five females and two children. He traveled all the way to Virginia in the 1830s and purchased 24 more. Eventually, he would own 77 slaves. When a fellow Creole slave owner liberated 85 of his slaves and shipped them off to Liberia, Durnford commented that he couldn’t do that, because “self interest is too strongly rooted in the bosom of all that breathes the American atmosphere.”
It would be a mistake to think that large black slaveholders were only men. In 1830, in Louisiana, the aforementioned Madame Antoine Dublucet owned 44 slaves, and Madame Ciprien Ricard owned 35 slaves, Louise Divivier owned 17 slaves, Genevieve Rigobert owned 16 slaves and Rose Lanoix and Caroline Miller both owned 13 slaves, while over in Georgia, Betsey Perry owned 25 slaves. According to Johnson and Roark, the wealthiest black person in Charleston, S.C., in 1860 was Maria Weston, who owned 14 slaves and property valued at more than $40,000, at a time when the average white man earned about $100 a year. (The city’s largest black slaveholders, though, were Justus Angel and Mistress L. Horry, both of whom owned 84 slaves.) 

In Savannah, Ga., between 1823 and 1828, according to Betty Wood‘s Gender, Race, and Rank in a Revolutionary Age, Hannah Leion owned nine slaves, while the largest slaveholder in 1860 was Ciprien Ricard, who had a sugarcane plantation in Louisiana and owned 152 slaves with her son, Pierre — many more that the 35 she owned in 1830. According to economic historian Stanley Engerman, “In Charleston, South Carolina about 42 percent of free blacks owned slaves in 1850, and about 64 percent of these slaveholders were women.” Greed, in other words, was gender-blind.

 Source

It's very wrong for them to even begin to teach, White Only Had Slaves and Were Abusive.
Many Black Owners were just as abusive and anyone that was, even though from what I read in this and other articles, Most Slave Owners Slept and Ate with their Slaves and Most White owners allowed Slaves to Buy Their Freedom when many Black Owners won't!

They're not teaching the Truth, All They Want To be Is The Victim!

[senona]

@"guohua" , that's the thing tho.

I clicked on 2 of the names in the article, and they are white dudes.
 And the 3rd name with the weird spelling, I'm pretty sure is a black chick .
(she closed her FB/Google+/ and other social media down to the  public)

[BIAD]

I think that the older members may recall this strategic tactic...
'Divide & Conquer'

These silly buggers are walking a treacherous road of segregating in the name of
a fantasy where people of all races will lose the value of their national identity.
Which is what enemies always want.

This is a time for unity, not a time when dubious quarrels about the colour of a
person's skin should come into debate. I can only assume it's another petty swing
at keeping yourself in a job by promoting a controversial belief.
Which usually has a short life-span. (But there's usually a book in it for 'em!)

The USA is already on the list for radicalising, this kind of asinine behavior will
only assist your foe. It's time we all grew up and see what's around the corner.
They behead you for your beliefs, not your skin colour.

[guohua]

@"guohua" , that's the thing tho.

I clicked on 2 of the names in the article, and they are white dudes.
 And the 3rd name with the weird spelling, I'm pretty sure is a black chick .
(she closed her FB/Google+/ and other social media down to the  public)

What those two Little Girlie Men Need is a Small Old Chinese Chic to come in and Bitch Slap them back Into their Whiteness! 
But I'm sure they would just Scream and Run To Their Safe Place and Phone For Their Black Boyfriend to came and Save Them!
 Try Me!

[Daitengu]

gaijin are idiots ..... time to close asia off to all westerners in order to keep the western stupidity out .....

[senona]

@guohua, someone was kind enough to post to the RN link on Facebook, the page for the University and there you can read mixed comments about the #StopWhitePeople (thank you Steve Smith)


Binghamton University Facebook page



I have to agree with one of the comments -- they could have came up with  a better title instead of one that ignites tension rather than helping with diversity. 


Here's a couple of the comments....











TV news 7 ABC reported it as a "misunderstanding" ........LMAO, you think????



The damn hashtag of #StopWhitePeople2K16 clearly showed there was no misunderstanding









Way to go guys, way to go....so much for helping with so-called diversity. All you did was make the situation worse with the racist sounding ignorant hashtag course, against white folks. smh.



- - - - - -


oh, now this is good.
Actually she hits the nail on the head in all ways possible.

[guohua]

Thank You Senona, those replies were very enlightening.

[guohua]

Folks, our Progressive Universities are now going to Monitor and Approve the student Halloween Costumes to assure they are not Racist! YES, NO I Not Kidding You!

The University of Wisconsin – LaCrosse appears to be on a roll these days.

The hyper-sensitive campus is set to host a review of student’s Halloween costumes to ensure they do not come across as racist.
UWL made headlines recently for a student’s outrage at a Harry Potter-character themed mural that, the student claimed, depicted “Man power. Cis power. Able power. Class power.”
In a comical attempt to avoid offending anyone else on campus, the Ethnic and Racial Studies Department of UW LaCrosse (which offers students classes in white privilege and “Food and Race in the United States”) is holding a Halloween costume review on October 5th.
“Is Your Costume Racist?” a poster for the event queries passersby.
Politically correct sensitivity at UWL already led to the resident Hate Response Team investigating sidewalk chalk that simply read “Trump,” “Build the wall,” and “All Lives Matter” because the words and phrases were deemed discriminatory and “hostile.”

No, You can't make this Stupid Shit-Up! 

Last December, a school official asked local law enforcement to investigate a truck driver who displayed a rebel flag on the grille of his tractor-trailer. The driver worked for a private company that was participating in a building project on campus. The official, Paula Knudson who was a vice chancellor, then apologized to students for the “fear and angst” caused by the truck. Several UWL students harassed workers at the job site when they saw the flag.

Source

Boys and Girl, go change Your Diapers, I didn't mean to raise My Voice To You.

[BIAD]

Isn't this blasphemous to religious people...?

Aren't Witches seen as 'bad people' and connected to the 'dark arts'?

Doesn't the work of Dark Arts imply a negative and ergo, dark/black is a slur
towards folk with non-white skin?

Anyone can act childishly and arrange words to play on someone's feelings and this
is what it's all about. What's bothering me isn't the stupid, uneducated mutterings
of the young people in these Colleges, it's the teachers of this crap... why are they
doing it and being allowed to do it?

Here... take this as an idea.
Stop People.

[BIAD]

I was browsing Binghamton University's website and came across this...

'Here's the deal on Binghamton's '#StopWhitePeople2K16'

'...“The program title ‘#StopWhitePeople2K16′ was drawn from a familiar hashtag
in use on Twitter, and was not invented by the program facilitators,”

Brian Rose said. “It is my understanding that the hashtag is used ironically.”

Rose noted that although the majority of attendees said the program resulted in
“respectful and productive conversation,” there were also several students who
had a “mixed reaction.”

Rose also said that the administration verified that the course content was
“not anti-white” and that it explored a variety of topics, including reverse racism,
segregation and community relations...'
SOURCE:

Is it me, or would it be that most people would assume an educated tutor would have
persuaded the 'three school’s current residential advisers' NOT to have used that title?

The essence of a University is to add extra education and training for the young men and
women setting out in society. The generations that pass through these academies should
be equipped to the gills to aid them in their roles in society, not burdened them with:

'instruct them how to respond to “uneducated” people about these topics,
according to a description in the school’s residential assistant training schedule.'

That's their parents' task.
I am refusing to look at the idea that this sort of misuse of 'irony' brings any polemical
fame to the University on the off-chance that it's a case of 'any advertising is good advertising'
and agree with Miss Yarussi's Face-Book comments, these guys are idiots.

[guohua]

I agree, that is a Hateful and Racist title.
How can promoting Anti White People Be Productive?

[BIAD]

I agree, that is a Hateful and Racist title.
How can promoting Anti White People Be Productive?

Yeah... it makes you wonder just who is the “uneducated” people'  they're
on about. Maybe this is all a case of echo-chambers and guilt-mirrors.

It's certainly not a case of adults instructing the next set of adults.