Coronavirus - Take two - Action!

[Kenzo]

Just like hemp. melatonin is also good in many ways , and rated safe also.


Melatonin Significantly Reduces COVID-19 Mortality: Study


EMF radiation reduces melatonin

[guohua]

The Truth is out there, the MSM will never allow the Truth to be reported.

Real Covid hospitalization data from San Francisco General Hospital
72% of Covid patients are vaccinated (including 26% who are BOOSTED)

72% is a lot, isn't it? 

One in three is an incidental admission (has Covid but not admitted for Covid). Several of those are likely pregnant women (L&D is labor and delivery).

And NOT ONE is a child.

Source

[BIAD]

The Truth is out there, the MSM will never allow the Truth to be reported.

Real Covid hospitalization data from San Francisco General Hospital
72% of Covid patients are vaccinated (including 26% who are BOOSTED)

72% is a lot, isn't it? 

And on the back of this, it is now reported by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the UK's Covid deaths were 17,500.
A number where half a million of the UK public normally die in the same period of the Covid project.

[guohua]

The Truth is out there, the MSM will never allow the Truth to be reported.

Real Covid hospitalization data from San Francisco General Hospital
72% of Covid patients are vaccinated (including 26% who are BOOSTED)

72% is a lot, isn't it? 

And on the back of this, it is now reported by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the UK's Covid deaths were 17,500.
A number where half a million of the UK public normally die in the same period of the Covid project.

I like this guy 
He is telling the Truth and the biggest problem with The Truth is,,,,, The MSM will Ignore him so your average Citizen (Sheeple) will never hear The Truth! 
This is a Great video.

[guohua]

This is going to be a L-O-N-G post.
I am going to copy and past this and you can grab a drink of whatever makes you happen and look it over as you have time.
You may even offer rebuttals/debates to any of the following question/statements you fine to be wrong or misleading about COVID and the Treatments offered and the deaths from the treatments.
Okay here goes, seat down and grab your Whiskey, Beer,,, I mean Coffee or Tea 

Here’s a list of questions that you can ask your doctor, local, state, and federal lawmakers and health authorities. I haven’t had any luck getting any of these questions answered on camera so I can share the answers with you. Perhaps you will have better luck.

General questions

1. [/url][url=https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/incriminating-evidence]Incriminating Evidence is a collection of counter-narrative evidence. Can we go through that one piece at a time and can you explain how these are all wrong? Or conversely, perhaps you can find just one document that you can show is wrong in that article?
   

Censorship

1. President Biden has a Disinformation Dozen list. Why not debate these people instead of censoring them? Is it right for the leader of the free world to proudly proclaim a censorship list?
   
   
2. Facebook has removed vaccine victim support groups with over 200,000 users. Why was this done? Why didn’t the medical community say a word in protest? How is removing a support group for vaccine injured a benefit to society?
   
   
3. Will you sponsor a law allowing people who have had live saving content removed from large social media platforms to sue for statutory damages?
   
   
4. Why hasn’t the mainstream medical community come out to denounce censorship attempts by a rogue set of 270 “doctors”?
   

1. Accountability
   
   1. Why won’t any member of the FDA/CDC outside committees debate me for $1M just to show up at the debate table?
      
      
   2. Why are people trying to censor the doctors instead of debating them? Why weren’t any of the 270 signers of the letter asking Spotify to censor Joe Rogan willing to debate Malone on the issues they objected to?
      
      
   3. Why won’t any local, state, or federal lawmaker or official agree to answer any of these questions in a live recorded video interview?
      
      
   4. How can the CDC not find a single safety signal with these vaccines other than minor symptoms? It was the DoD who found the myocarditis signal.
      
      
   5. Will the CDC ever admit there are thousands of adverse events and deaths?
      
      
   6. Why did Steven A. Anderson of the FDA (who is the top person for safety monitoring for these vaccines) duck all my phone calls and emails when I asked if he wanted to see the troubling safety signals in VAERS?
      
      
   7. Why did Janet Woodcock not follow through on her agreement to investigate the Maddie de Garay case?
      
      
   8. Everyone knows there was fraud in the Phase 3 trial for 12-15 year olds. How come nobody is saying anything?
      
      
   9. Jessica Rose’s paper on myocarditis was unethically pulled by Elsevier for no stated reason. Why is the academic community not saying anything?
      
      
   10. Social media companies have removed the accounts of people who tried to expose the truth. This cost hundreds of thousands of lives. Will the social media companies be held accountable?
       
       
   11. Is there a single member of congress who will object to Biden’s censorship list?
       
       
   12. If the State Board removes the license of a physician for “misinformation” and said “misinformation” later turns out to be true, shouldn’t the affected physician be allowed to sue the State Board for treble damages and attorney fees?
       
       1. 1. Pandemic response
       2. Why didn’t we just mandate everyone get the Fareed-Tyson protocol if they got COVID? This would have resulted in very few deaths. Why did the NIH refuse to investigate this?
          
          
       3. Everyone knows about the Fareed-Tyson protocol today. Why not simply mandate its use now and drop the other restrictions?
          
          
       4. When we found out the vaccines did nothing to prevent infection, the societal benefit ended at that point. Why didn’t we drop the mandates then?
          Vaccine efficacy
          
          1. There are over 9 studies that show the vaccines make it MORE likely (not less likely) you’ll be infected from COVID. Did they make a mistake in all 9 studies?
             
          2. The latest UK and Scotland data show negative vaccine efficacy. Was there a mistake?
             
       5. Vaccine safety
          
          1. Why do 13 different methods show that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the vaccines? Are they all wrong? Where is the correct analysis we should rely on?
             
          2. How come there were no primate studies showing the amount, distribution, and duration of the spike protein after vaccination?
             
          3. How long do d-dimer and troponin stay elevated for? In what percentage of patients?
             
          4. How long until the spike protein is undetectable in people’s blood after vaccination?
             
          5. Is there a cardiologist in the entire country who has seen rates of myocarditis fall after the vaccines rolled out? How come you can’t find one?
             
          6. The FDA claims VAERS is high because people are overreporting. This is a handwaving argument. Where is the evidence of this? Every physician I know says the reporting rates are high because the vaccine is more deadly than all other vaccines.
             
          7. Why did the Pfizer trial report 24% more deaths in the vaccine arm than the placebo arm? Isn’t it supposed to be the other way around? Why weren’t there autopsies in any of those deaths? How can Pfizer be certain those deaths weren’t caused by the vaccines?
             
          8. My neurologist has 20,000 patients and 2,000 vaccine injured. She’s been in practice for 11 years w/o a vaccine injury. This vaccine is over 20,000X worse than other vaccines. If the vaccine is so safe, how do you explain a 10% injury rate?
             
          9. There are now over 1M adverse events reported in the VAERS system. Using CDC’s methodology, we know VAERS is ~40x underreported. That’s 40M adverse events and > 5,000 conditions that are significantly elevated. How can the CDC not spot a single safety signal (other than myocarditis)?
             
          10. There are over 5,000 significantly elevated adverse events in the VAERS system. How come we aren’t giving people a list of these? If they weren’t caused by the vaccines, then what were they caused by?
              
          11. How can the CDC not find any deaths caused by the vaccines, yet top pathologists like Ryan Cole and Sucharit Bhakdi claim that over 90% of the deaths within 60 days post-vaccination were likely caused by the vaccine. One of the world’s top pathologists, Peter Schirmacher, also found results consistent with their findings. Why should we trust the CDC? Did these pathologists make a mistake?
              
          12. Why is the CDC “still investigating” all the cases where the autopsy showed the person was killed by the vaccine?
              
          13. Why isn’t the CDC requiring that autopsies be done by pathologists trained in spotting COVID vaccine injury if the death was within 30 days of the vaccine?
              
          14. If the risk of myocarditis is only “slightly elevated” due to the vaccine, then how do you explain this chart from Jessica Rose’s paper?
              
              
          15. Ryan Cole has been a pathologist for 26 years. He’s seen nearly 500,000 patients and done 550 autopsies. He recently found a saphenous vein in a patient’s leg 4 feet long that was SOLID with clots. He’s never seen anything like that in his entire career. Others in the patient were 6 to 24 inches long. This was in a patient who died just 3 days after a booster shot. If it wasn’t the vaccine that caused this, then what did?
              
          16. If myocarditis after the vax is so rare, then how do we explain at least 4 myocarditis cases in a small private school (Monte Vista Christian School) among fewer than 400 boys?
              
          17. Why are there so few autopsies?
              
          18. Shouldn’t a 3 year old dying from cardiac arrest just one day after being vaccinated set off alarm bells? Does anyone care?
              
          19. If the vaccines are so safe and effective then why do surveys of firemen and airline pilots show that 80% would choose not to be vaccinated if they weren’t forced to?
              
       6. There are over 9 studies that show the vaccines make it MORE likely (not less likely) you’ll be infected from COVID. Did they make a mistake in all 9 studies?
          
       7. Early treatment
          
          1. Why is every single early treatment drug or supplement listed at c19early.com as being effective being ignored by the NIH?
             
          2. Fluvoxamine was shown to reduce death from COVID by 12X, but only if you took it. Why did the NIH give it a neutral rating?
             
          3. Ivermectin has been shown in multiple peer reviewed meta-analysis and systematic reviews to work against COVID. That’s the highest level of evidence based medicine. How can the NIH not recognize that? How can major pharmacy chains deny prescriptions? What actions by the Medical Boards have been taken to revoke the license of all of the rogue pharmacists who have denied these prescriptions and put patient’s lives in jeopardy?
             
          4. Why does it take a court order to give ivermectin in the hospital? Why aren’t doctors in hospitals allowed to use their own professional judgment?
             
          5. Why hasn’t the public been educated about the role of aspirin, Vitamin D, and NAC in treating COVID?
             
          6. Can we have an open debate with the FDA about the safety and efficacy of Paxlovid and Molnupiravir vs. proven early treatment protocols?
             
          7. Why has the NIH taken a blind eye to every early treatment protocol?
             
          8. Myfreedoctor has treated over 75,000 COVID patients with only 4 deaths. If early treatments don’t work, how do you explain these results?
             
       8. Biased news coverage
          
          1. People who die within 60 days of the vax are 90% likely to have died from the vaccine. How come we never talk about when they were vaccinated in their obituary? Why are there so few autopsies in these cases?
             
          2. Why does Jake Tapper use ad hominem attacks against Robert F. Kennedy, but will not debate him? Isn’t this unfair?
             
          3. How come Robert Malone and Peter McCullough never appears on CNN or in the NY Times or Washington Post?
             
          4. Why is the news coverage of vaccine safety and efficacy so one-sided? Isn’t the news media supposed to report both sides and let the viewers decide?
             
       9. Corruption
          
          1. Why do John Su and the CDC continue to stonewall all requests for the VAERS URF calculation paper for these vaccines using the methodology Su and other CDC authors wrote about a year earlier?
             
          2. Why did FEMA make a cash offer to Ernest Ramirez to declare his son’s death a COVID death? Did they have evidence the coroner got it wrong?
             
          3. Maddie de Garay, who was 12 at the time, was injured in the Pfizer phase 3 trial. She’s paralyzed. She’s now becoming a quadriplegic. Why didn’t the FDA, CDC, or NIH investigate? That’s clinical trial fraud. Why aren’t we telling people that based on the clinical trial, there is a 1 chance in 1,000 your child could be paralyzed too?
             
          4. Why aren’t any coroners trained on how to spot death from COVID vaccines?
             
          5. Why aren’t all deaths within 4 month of vax being autopsied to see if the vaccine caused the death? Even if we just did this for 1 day?
             
          6. Why is there no stopping condition? How many kids have to die from cardiac arrest before we stop the vaccines?
             
          7. Why refusing to fill valid ivermectin prescriptions protecting health? What studies show that the risks outweigh the benefits? Don’t you have to cherry pick studies to show that?
             
          8. Why was every single early treatment protocol using existing drugs/supplements suppressed by the NIH? 
             
          9. Why is ivermectin so expensive? One vaccine injured patient must pay $220 for 20 pills. Why is this not covered by insurance?
             
          10. Will Tony Fauci submit to a blood test so we can see if he really got the vaccine? If not, why not? How about all members of Congress?
              
       10. Intimidation tactics
           
           1. If doctors are free to practice medicine, then why is only one doctor in California willing to write medical exemptions from the vaccine?
              
       11. Mandates
           
           1. Is it ethical to mandate a vaccine that is more likely to kill people than to save them?
              
           2. Is it ethical to mandate a vaccine where most all of the vaccine injured cannot be cured?
              
           3. Is it ethical to ever mandate any vaccine ever?
              
           4. If the mandates are to protect society, why isn’t there a risk benefit analysis anywhere?
              
           5. Why it is ok to mandate vaccination for kids when the data shows we kill over 100 kids to save 1. Was there an error in Dr. Toby Rogers’ analysis?
              
           6. If you want to mandate something, why not mandate that everyone with COVID get early treatment ?
              
           7. Why won’t anyone with a mandate accept liability?
              
           8. Why must I be vaccinated to watch my daughter graduate from college? Why is testing not sufficient?
              
           9. If you die from the vaccine, many insurance companies won’t pay for it since you opted for an experimental treatment forced by your employer. Is it right for the burden to be on you?
              
           10. If the vaccines are as safe and effective as claimed, why do we need mandates?
               
       12. Masks
           
           1. Why are masks mandated when every randomized controlled trial shows that cloth and surgical masks are completely useless against COVID. The CDC knows this. Relying on studies that support the narrative while ignoring higher quality studies that don’t is evidence cherry picking. How is it that nobody in the mainstream medical community calls the CDC out on behavior like this?
              
           2. Can anyone show a study showing the risk reduction from an N95 mask varies over time within a room? It goes to zero after a short amount of time. What is it?
              
           3. Why are we not educating the public about P100 respirators? Don’t we want to protect people? P100 respirators such as the 3M 7503 with a 3M 2901 filter set are more than 150 times more effective than an N95 mask. The N95 mask is practically useless against COVID (see Incriminating Evidence mask section for details).
              
           4. Since the benefits of cloth and surgical are zero and the risks are non-zero, can we please see the risk-benefit analysis that the CDC prepared to justify the mask recommendations?
              
           5. If masking indoors is such a good idea then why were there 7 hours of public testimony, all of it against the mandate, in Oregon?
              
       13. Social distancing
           
           1. Where is the study showing that 6 feet results in a benefit? How does that benefit decay over time?
              
       14. Testing
           
           1. Since there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread, why are we testing people who are asymptomatic?
              
           2. Since there is no evidence the naturally recovered can infect others, why are we testing these people and requiring them to be vaccinated?
              
       15. Liability
           
           1. If the vaccines are safe and effective, then why do the manufacturers need liability protection?
              
           2. If the vaccines are so safe, why aren’t any of the organizations that mandate vaccines accepting liability?
              
       16. Source
           

Okay, take a break and rest your eyes,,,,,, refill your Drink!

[Kenzo]

   

It`s just to protect against covid


 

[Ninurta]

It`s just to protect against covid


 

I reckon no one told them that water and air both behave in the same fluid manner, and a virus will just follow the currents right around their silly little partitions...

.

[Ninurta]

This is a little creepy.

Stephen King wrote the story in 2006, and the movie was made 10 years later in 2016. Both long before the covid scamdemic to introduce odd vaccines.

When you add graphene oxide and xenobots together and inject them into people, and then add in some 5G and stir, what do you get?

"Cell".

The video will not embed. It claims to be "age restricted", but I saw nothing in it to cause that. Maybe they just don't want to scare the kids with a dose of potential reality...

Watch on YouTube


.

[727Sky]

Military and airline pilots https://rumble.com/vtct5w-nobody-talking...ignor.html

[Ninurta]

Military and airline pilots https://rumble.com/vtct5w-nobody-talking...ignor.html

I saw this morning, on CBS I think. which they had going on at the doctor's office, that United is running training classes right now to train pilots for an expected upcoming "shortage" of pilots.

We are also about 80,000 short on truck drivers at thee moment, and Canada has a convoy running coast to coast right now of truckers protesting covid mandates.

Covid vaccine mandates are putting a real hurt on transportation.

.

[BIAD]

It just shows you how terrified the mainstream media are about losing the Covid fear-porn narrative. The BBC fact-checked
a Doctor on YouTube who daily relates information issued from the UK Government's Office for National Statistics because
his down-to-earth presentation of agreed scientific facts don't align with their scare-tactics.

Bastards.




The MSM are dying and lashing out at those they believe might replace them.
...................................................

Covid: Posts claiming only 17,000 died of virus 'factually incorrect'


'A misleading claim that "only" 17,000 people in England and Wales have died of Covid has been circulating online.
The UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS) has stepped in to correct the record - but not before the false claim went viral.

"It has become a weapon of the cruel and heartless to dismiss the deaths of the people we love."
Matt Fowler lost his dad to Covid-19 in April 2020. Ian Fowler was 56 at the time of his death, and lived with type 2 diabetes
-which his son said had a "minor, barely perceptible impact on his life that he controlled with his diet".

But the suggestion that "only" 17,000 people in England and Wales have died of Covid - a figure arrived at by removing from
the data anyone with a pre-existing health condition - completely discounts the deaths of people like Ian. The true death toll is
more than 140,000, the ONS says. That number is limited to deaths directly caused by the virus, not those "involving" Covid
or people who happened to test positive but died of other causes.

There are other ways of calculating deaths by the virus, but all give figures in a similar ballpark.

Kernel of truth
Covid myths that spread on social media very often have a kernel of fact at their heart - a real statistic that gets misused -to tell
a story which ends up far from reality. In this case, that information was figures released by the ONS looking at people who died
of Covid and who had no other health conditions.

But the false implication made in social media posts - that if someone had any pre-existing health condition, they did not really
die of the virus - doesn't logically follow. "It is very common for the person dying to have a pre-existing health condition of some
sort, but this does not mean that the person was at imminent risk of dying from that condition, or even considered to have a
reduced life expectancy," the ONS explained.
It described the 17,000 figure as "factually incorrect and highly misleading".

Deaths which would not have been counted in the 17,000 include people with asthma, diabetes, an irregular heartbeat or high
blood pressure -all conditions with which many can expect to live a normal lifespan. In other words, these are not terminal
conditions that would have killed people had they not caught Covid.

"It wasn't type 2 diabetes that killed my dad, it was Covid-19," says Mr Fowler, who co-founded the group Covid-19 Bereaved
Families for Justice. "Were it not for the unchecked spread of the virus, my dad would still be alive today."
He describes such posts as "deeply offensive" and condemns people on social media for peddling "heartless conspiracy theories...
to attack us in our grief".

How death certificates really work
The idea, popular in some online groups, that a large proportion of virus deaths are people who died "with" but not necessarily
"of" Covid - coincidentally testing positive when dying of another cause - is based on a misinterpretation of how deaths are recorded.

When doctors fill in death certificates, they record the chain of events that led directly to a patient's death based on physical
examinations, tests, symptoms and medical records. For example, someone may catch Covid, which causes pneumonia, which leads
to acute respiratory distress syndrome (Ards), culminating in their death. A doctor would list all three as causes.

If someone was in hospital dying of another cause and happened to test positive for Covid, it would not be recorded in the same way.
There is another section of the death certificate form where doctors can add pre-existing conditions which may have contributed, like
asthma.

In some cases, the underlying condition may be very serious, like cancer or dementia. But the fact a doctor decided to note it in this
separate section, and not as an underlying cause, suggests the patient would not have died then just because of that condition alone.
As an extreme example, imagine someone is stabbed but had an irregular heartbeat which contributed to cardiac failure when they
were attacked. The irregular heartbeat might appear on their death certificate, but we wouldn't say the person who stabbed them was
not responsible for their death.

The idea that deaths can be mistakenly recorded as being due to Covid-19 can occasionally be true when considering a different
measure used in the UK - deaths within 28 days of a Covid positive test. However, even those cases which may be erroneously
picked up by that statistic aren't artificially inflating the death toll. In fact, the figure for deaths within 28 days of a positive Covid
test are actually lower than the number of death certificates listing Covid-19 as the cause.
That's because some people are ill for longer than 28 days before dying of Covid...'

But here's the rub, the BBC haven't contacted Doctor Campbell!

'...The BBC has contacted Mr Nawaz, Dr Campbell and Mr Davis.'

BBC:

[Ninurta]

It just shows you how terrified the mainstream media are about losing the Covid fear-porn narrative. The BBC fact-checked
a Doctor on YouTube who daily relates information issued from the UK Government's Office for National Statistics because
his down-to-earth presentation of agreed scientific facts don't align with their scare-tactics.

Bastards.




The MSM are dying and lashing out at those they believe might replace them.
...................................................

BBC:

The Beeb has a specialist "Health and Disinformation" reporter? What an odd combination of specialties to link together into a single job! Makes me wonder... I mean, if someone is telling me about health issues, I sure as hell don't want them having a degree in how to disinform me about them... I tend to leave disinformation chores to folks like the KGB, CIA, and MI6...

Also, I am shocked that South Africa is trying to "reverse engineer" the Moderna mRNA treatment because Moderna will not "release their technology". Yet Moderna expects to sell the product of that technology to governments to force into the bodies of their unwilling subjects. That's a Mengele level of horrific in my mind. 

Imagine if you will, a hagged-out wrinkled up old crone, with a pointy chin and a pointy nose with a wart with 3 hairs sprouting from the wart, with a bubbling cauldron behind her. She dips a goblet into that steaming mess and offers it to you, insisting you drink because "it's good for you, dearie", but who refuses to divulge the particular combination of newt-eyes, bat-wings, and tadpole-tails that she has brewed into the concoction to make it "good for you, dearie".

Nope. I ain't drinking from that steaming goblet, either.



.

[BIAD]

The Beeb has a specialist "Health and Disinformation" reporter? What an odd combination of specialties to link together
into a single job! Makes me wonder... I mean, if someone is telling me about health issues, I sure as hell don't want them
having a degree in how to disinform me about them... I tend to leave disinformation chores to folks like the KGB, CIA,
and MI6...

Oh they like their 'specialist' Correspondence, usually a London-based eager Journalist who talks non-stop for a few minutes
and hits every BBC propaganda branch during their fall. If the article is regional and over-narrated with a dialect not on the BBC's
Tick-box list (Good=Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, Manchester, London), then it's chopped up and presented as inserts during
a dubbed Left-loving monologue by another London-based Journalist calling him/herself a specialist.

And the biggest UK employer who's workers are stay-at-home employees...? The BBC.
Why else report the country is in favour of it!

[guohua]

What has R-N3 been saying all this time about Lockdowns.

Johns Hopkins researchers: Lockdowns had LITTLE OR NO impact

Being proved right by a University is Gratifying. 

Lockdowns had little or no impact on COVID-19 deaths, new study shows

Lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19, according to a new analysis by researchers at Johns Hopkins University.


The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by about 0.2%, said the broad review of multiple scientific studies.

“We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality,” the researchers wrote.
Source

This Spamdemic  is all about Controlling YOU!
Yes your Mind and your Body and Your Everyday Life now belongs to THEM if you allow it.

[guohua]

He does makes sense. At least I think so.

[guohua]

Along with my above post this needs to be posted as well.

You've allowed the Elites/Politicians and MSM to OWN You in your very own Church a place of Worship and Sanctuary.

Churchgoers have been left stunned after a police officer stopped a Catholic mass on Thursday to check parishioners were wearing masks.

Police halted the service at St Bernadette’s Glendalough church midway through the priest addressing the congregation following a tip off that people were not wearing masks.

In the video above, hear how an anti-mask protester interrupted Pope Francis at the Vatican

Masks are currently required to be worn at all public indoor setting across Perth and the Peel, South West, Wheatbelt and Great Southern regions.

Five people were found to not be wearing masks, one of which had an exemption while the four others were made to put them on.
The incident was shared to Facebook by a parishioner, who wrote “a policeman allowed himself in, strutting up the aisle demanding correct mask behaviour and checking exemptions.”

“Where have we seen this behaviour before in history?

Police said in a statement they responded to a report from a member of the public of people not wearing masks inside a church in Mount Hawthorn.


“Upon attendance, 5 people were spoken to by police and complied in wearing a mask,” they said.

“One person provided proof of an exemption.”

Catholic Archdiocese of Perth archbishop Tim Costelloe said it is “highly regrettable” that police felt obliged to intervene during the service to enforce the mask rules.

“It is my hope that other ways can be found to deal with this delicate issue in future and my office stands ready to cooperate with the police in this matter,” he said.

“It is the formal and very public policy of the Archdiocese of Perth to do everything it can to facilitate compliance with all the government’s requirements in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“It is a matter of regret to me that the police were placed in a position which led them to take the action they did.”

The church has since shared a message to its Facebook page reminding all parishioners that they cannot enter the place of worship without a mask.

Source

[Kenzo]

In the old days , being car crash was itself potentially lethal incident .  Now prople can be in real danger if EMT drags you to hospital, and if they want you to be COVID patient , put you in ventilator, give toxic drugs and try to kill you .


Man escapes hospital after almost being murdered


Notice that everyone can be covid patient , it`s just matter of some bogus medical test and the persons doing it , or they just declare it....you have covid .



The medical procedures they do for covid patients in hopspitals are murder .

[Kenzo]

The CCP knows that mRNA shots not good for health....that`s why they dont give it to anyone in China



no mRNA jabs in China, day 426


In Western countrys they acted very fast , the mRNA shots vere delivered on record time, then telled everyone to go take them.....now people are getting immuno deficiency. Oh but the Chinese were so much smarter

[guohua]

The CCP knows that mRNA shots not good for health....that`s why they dont give it to anyone in China



no mRNA jabs in China, day 426


In Western countrys they acted very fast , the mRNA shots vere delivered on record time, then telled everyone to go take them.....now people are getting immuno deficiency. Oh but the Chinese were so much smarter

That is because China actually cares about their future children and pregnant mother.
Believe it or Not.

3,573 Fetal Deaths in VAERS Following COVID-19 Vaccines – 1,867% Increase Over Non-COVID Vaccines

These results are just from America, not any other country.

The U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was updated this past Friday, February 11, 2022, and it is now reporting that there have been 1,103,893 cases of injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines since December of 2020, when the FDA issued emergency use authorizations for the COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)


By way of contrast, there were 918,856 cases of injuries and deaths following all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30+ years, from 1990 through November of 2020. (Source.)

So there have been more injuries and deaths recorded in VAERS during the past 14 months following COVID-19 vaccines, than there were for the previous 30+ years combined following all vaccines recorded in VAERS.

Fetal Deaths Increase by 1,867% Following COVID-19 Vaccines

The finding as of this year is: "3,573 fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines."

Source

[Ninurta]

In the old days , being car crash was itself potentially lethal incident .  Now prople can be in real danger if EMT drags you to hospital, and if they want you to be COVID patient , put you in ventilator, give toxic drugs and try to kill you .


Man escapes hospital after almost being murdered


Notice that everyone can be covid patient , it`s just matter of some bogus medical test and the persons doing it , or they just declare it....you have covid .



The medical procedures they do for covid patients in hopspitals are murder .

My sister is an RN at a hospital, She says that being put on a ventilator for COVID is a death sentence. She has only ever seen ONE person survive being put on a ventilator for COVID.

.