Hillary's Emails: We Have Them All

[Mystic Wanderer]

Oops! Bad news for Hillary Clinton.     She didn't realize her emails were being copied and sent to another person, Paul Combetta, "an IT aide Clinton hired who used BleachBit to destroy emails after they were subpoenaed and misled FBI agents."

• All but four of Hillary Clinton’s 30,000 emails were copied, likely secretly, to a Gmail address called CarterHeavyIndustries@gmail.com, according to a new Senate report.
  
  
• The FBI says that the account was linked to Paul Combetta, an IT aide Clinton hired who used BleachBit to destroy emails after they were subpoenaed and misled FBI agents.
  
  
• Combetta said he sent all of her emails to the Gmail account as part of trying to copy them to a new server. Combetta was copying Clinton’s emails off of an old laptop that he was supposed send back in the mail, but there’s no evidence he returned it, according to the Department of Justice Inspector General.
  
  
• When an intel agent discovered the copying to a third-party account, he said Peter Strzok seemed disinterested. The intel agency feared the email account could be a link to a foreign power, but the FBI refused to explain it to them.
  

Can you imagine Killary's face when she learned about this?  
I would have loved to see what happened. I imagine it was something similar to this:    


The article is long, so read it in full here. A timeline is provided at the end of the article: Source

[Mystic Wanderer]

If you would rather listen to a video on this topic, you are in luck.

[guohua]

I'm Thinking,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Two Shots to the Back Of The Head,,,,,,,,,again declared a,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, Suicide????

[BIAD]

Here's an example of how distant we -the public, are from what really happens in the world of the powerful and
how the media work to turn a narrative from a certain perception into another.

It's genuinely alarming really, in an age of anonymous postings on the internet, a point of view based on -what we're
led to assume is factual information, can steer a person from one assumption to an entirely different point of opinion.

If a consistent pressure is applied with a fair-minded cadence, many of the public will only ever see the Blue Pill and
the idea of an alternative explanation becomes a silly idea... a 'conspiracy theory', of you will.

With Hillary Clinton's email debacle, this trick of herding the public towards a particular narrative is being done again.
Here's where the same masses can be hijacked of their individual levels of social engineering.
If we agree that if a law is broken, then the culprit will be held accountable, this is how societies keeps cohesion and
ensures continuity.

The 'wrongdoer' is then evaluated via facts of the specific case and the penalty of transgression is weighed accordingly.
So in Hillary Clinton's case, one could see it in two ways.

One, she broke rules and regulations in regards of storing sensitive Governmental material and without being aware of
these ordinances, should still be held accountable for her breach of the agreed protocol.

Two, Mrs. Clinton never stored anything 'bureaucratically-delicate' on home-kept servers that were relevant to the US
Government and the country's security. At least this is the accusation in this Staff memo.



........................

Here's pieces of an article from April 2016, before the Presidential election. With an assumption that Hillary Clinton had
done something wrong, it discusses what type of penalty should be administered to her predicament.

Probation for President Hillary Clinton? Here's How it Would Work.

Experts says urine samples, random home visits are unlikely.



'President Barack Obama's potential Republican replacements routinely say Hillary Clinton may need to pardon herself
if she becomes president, or joke that she flatters Obama because he could put her behind bars.

As the FBI investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server nears an eventual end, another hypothetical exists:
the former secretary of state agreeing to serve probation to avoid a messy court case for allegedly side-stepping a
records retention law and/or mishandling classified information.

It’s currently unclear if Clinton will face any criminal charges as a result of the investigation, and it’s equally uncertain if she
could win the presidency after accepting a plea deal assigning her probation...'

'...Probation for President Hillary Clinton would not feature interns rushing down Pennsylvania Avenue with urine samples.
And it would not feature random home visits at the White House.
Instead, Clinton almost certainly would be assigned by the U.S. probation office in the nation’s capital to an administrative
caseload, which comprises low-risk, low-need offenders...'

'...More than 2,000 emails from Clinton's private server contain classified information, according to the State Department's
final review completed earlier this year. Some of the information is considered more sensitive than top secret, the intelligence
community's inspector general told Congress in January.

Clinton personally wrote 104 emails containing classified information, according to a Washington Post analysis of thus-far
-released correspondence from Clinton's time as secretary of state...'

'...Obama told Fox News in an interview aired Sunday he would not interfere in the decision-making process on whether to
prosecute Clinton, currently the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination.

He said there was “carelessness in terms of managing emails” but also that he "continue[s] to believe that she has not
jeopardized America's national security."...'

USA News:

Apart from the incorrect amount of emails on the servers, see how back then the idea that it's accepted that she'd done
something wrong and how dealing with a highly-political individual could be performed without such suggestions as
imprisonment.

That was three years ago and where are we now?

Senate investigators find no evidence China hacked Clinton server.

'A long-running Republican-led investigation into the handling of classified information on Hillary Clinton's private email
server did not find any evidence that China had successfully hacked the former secretary of state, confirming the findings
of the FBI, according to a memo released by two senior senators this week.

The findings, from Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, the former chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee and the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, respectively, should help put to
rest allegations that resurfaced after a report in a conservative news outlet last year that was later perpetuated online
by President Donald Trump.

"Neither the committees nor the FBI were able to confirm whether an intrusion into the server occurred," Grassley and
Johnson said in a news release Wednesday. Concerns of an intrusion by China into the server were first raised by two
officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office, which helped initiate the original review of Clinton's
email practices as secretary of state that was later referred to the FBI, according to the memo.

Both officials were interviewed by the Senate investigators as part of their probe.
One of the officials told Senate investigators that Peter Strzok, a senior FBI official on the Clinton investigation who was
fired last year after the release of text messages he'd sent that were critical of Trump, was "aloof and dismissive" when
presented with information about the potential Chinese hack.

The other Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office official told investigators that FBI employees were "poker faced"
when shown the information, which concerned the appearance of a Gmail address that had a similar name to a Chinese
trucking company in the metadata of a tranche of Clinton emails.

A letter in April to Grassley and Johnson from the inspectors general for the intelligence community and the Justice Department
that's included in the memo says a computer specialist who administered one of the private email systems told the FBI that he
had created the Gmail account to transfer archived emails between Clinton servers.

The FBI had been aware of the Gmail account in question before the two intelligence community inspector general officials
expressed their concerns over it in the meeting with Strzok, the memo shows.

After its own investigation, the FBI concluded in 2016 that there was no "direct evidence" that the server had been successfully
hacked, though former FBI Director James Comey conceded that "given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially
involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence."

Separately, the officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office also told Senate investigators that they had
witnessed efforts by senior State Department officials to try to avoid labeling certain emails as classified as part of the review.

The Senate investigation into the Clinton server is continuing and has shifted its focus toward a classified appendix of a report
from the Department of Justice Inspector General's Office scrutinizing the FBI's investigation that was released last year,
according to the memo. Investigators are interested in the decision by the FBI to not seek access to "certain highly classified
information potentially relevant to the investigation" and have written to the Justice Department with questions, they said in the
memo...'

CNN:

Without getting bogged-down in the 'whos' and the 'whats, the media and the Establishment have moved the situation away
from Mrs. Clinton having the servers at her home to whether anyone gained access to the electronic material.
The mishandling of the emails has been drowned-out by the more sexier suggestion that China illegally obtained them.

Of course it's suspicious for a Secretary of State to have an aide send confidential Governmental information to a dummy
Googlemail account, just as it's cagey for Hillary Clinton to have the servers kept at her home and later ask Platte River Networks
to take care of it.

Paul Combetta refused to discuss this three years ago and pleaded the fifth, now with an immunity in his back pocket, he's
portrayed as a lying accomplice who needed Reddit to help him shift the stuff. But the original accusation has been diluted
within those three years, that now in the age of 24-hour news, Hillary can feel safe in the woods again.

The captain of the Orca in the movie 'Jaws' suggested that his shark was either very dumb or very smart and I'd think that the
irascible Quint would make the same remark again if asked about the FBI's role in all of this. The media's part is a given.

Don't kid yourself, everyone is involved.

[Ninurta]

So this fella admits to transmitting 30K classified e-mails to a Gmail account, so that he could then transfer them to a new, "clean" e-mail server? Good thing he did, perhaps, but that in itself seems a break in protocol if he sent them in plaintext instead of highly encrypted. Why not just transfer them to a thumb drive or portable hard drive to preserve security? There's a whole lot that can go wrong with transfers across the internet...

Now, I've used Gmail to save things myself, but if they are of a sensitive nature, I zip them into a compressed, and encrypted, file, and then re-encrypt that. I wouldn't just send them individually in plaintext, which is what is indicated given the fact that each one had this company's e-mail address in the metadata.

Furthermore, when I have to encrypt stuff to send it across wire, it gets encrypted 4 times, with 4 different encryption algorithms. The one used for the zipped file, and then the next runs 3 different cascaded algorithms - one forward, the second backward, and the third forward again. When I'm done, that crap is so scrambled that eggs got nothin' on it. 4 different algorithms are used to guard against any one or two of them getting broken - there are still more layers to wade through, and to date none of them have been broken... and I'm just a dumbassed hillbilly. One would think an IT professional would run rings around my pathetic attempts.

It just seems... wrong... for an IT Security pro to send individual e-mails across the internet to a company that may be based in China in order to preserve US State Secrets when tools are available commonly to bypass such an awkward and time-consuming means of transferring classified e-mails from one computer to another.

.

[BIAD]

...When I'm done, that crap is so scrambled that eggs got nothin' on it. 4 different algorithms are used to guard
against any one or two of them getting broken - there are still more layers to wade through, and to date none of
them have been broken... and I'm just a dumbassed hillbilly.

One would think an IT professional would run rings around my pathetic attempts...

Ah, that's what we're all supposed to think and it is true in many cases, but as Gary Mckinnon found out, those
who are allegedly far-superior to us, don't have the 'street-savvy' we assume they hold.

The fault lies in the perception of worth, your transmitted information is yours and you didn't want anyone to
see them. The emails Paul Combetta was dealing with weren't his own and he was merely being paid to perform
his work.
I doubt that the importance of the material was even imparted to him.

[Ninurta]

The fault lies in the perception of worth, your transmitted information is yours and you didn't want anyone to
see them. The emails Paul Combetta was dealing with weren't his own and he was merely being paid to perform
his work.

I doubt that the importance of the material was even imparted to him.

Butbutbut - I'm reasonably well acquainted with an individual who at one time was an IT Security Specialist contracted to the Pentagon. Now, this individual didn't know the contents of much of the data they worked with, but was still expected to handle it in an extremely secure manner. So secure that they were never allowed to work on a computer without a guard present and, in partial answer to my other question, was never allowed to personally transport any removable media containing said data.

With that said, I think it is probably a given that a server hidden in Killary's bathroom probably didn't undergo the security stringency of, say for instance, a computer stored in the basement of the Pentagon... but the data security principles OUGHT to have been the same, or closely similar.

Just as a fun exercise, compare the time stamps on this post and my previous post, then geolocate the IP addresses for each. Just more evidence that my beard IS in fact evidence of wizardry! I travel dimensionally with impunity!

.

[Ninurta]

AHA!

Here's an important  bit:

Combetta is the same IT aide who used BleachBit to permanently erase copies of Clinton’s emails after they were subpoenaed by the House, misled the FBI about it, and was given immunity from prosecution, all while asking for basic computing advice on Reddit.

The last there - "all while asking for basic computing advice on reddit" speaks volumes about his expertise in matters IT. If only I had known how low the bar was regarding qualifications for a job in Killary's State Department - I coulda been rich by now!

.

[BIAD]

...The last there - "all while asking for basic computing advice on reddit" speaks volumes about his expertise in matters IT.
If only I had known how low the bar was regarding qualifications for a job in Killary's State Department - I coulda been rich
by now!

And that's it. I can conjure masterpieces -held in regard by millions on the internet, via Photoshop, 
but just ask me how any of the stuff you do is done, well...I'd swoon.