(04-03-2020, 06:35 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: RDoctorD points out the propaganda in this article by Newsweek. Listen so you will be able to do it for yourself next time.
We all knew this, but it's good to see the "reporters" admit it.
CNN ‘Journalist Of The Year’ Quits; Admits He Wrote Fake News
Even though this article is from 2018, it helps to remind people that there are hundreds more out there doing the same today.
The sad thing is, after all this time of beating lies into the minds of the public, most of them believe it. I've never seen more evidence of this than trying to have a conversation with someone on FB who leans to the left. It's like banging your head against a wall.
Quote:A reporter who was awarded CNN’s “Journalist of the Year” prize has resigned from his job and admitted to writing fake news for several years because he felt “pressure.”
“I am sick and I need to get help,” Claas Relotius said in his confession. He explained it was “fear of failing,” that made him falsify the news for liberal outlets, earning him praise and prestigious awards in the process.
“My pressure to not be able to fail got ever bigger the more successful I became.”
According to Der Spiegel, Relotius “made up stories and invented protagonists” in many of his articles in order to push liberal talking points, demonize conservatives, and reinforce the globalist world view.
Relotius, who was awarded CNN’s highest prize for journalism in 2014, was exposed as a long-term writer of fake news after another reporter raised suspicions about a popular anti-Trump story he wrote recently about the US-Mexican border.
The colleague, Juan Moreno, tracked down two “sources” quoted extensively by Relotius in the article, which was published in November. Both “sources” said they had never met Relotius. Relotius had also lied about seeing a hand-painted sign that read “Mexicans keep out”, a subsequent investigation found.
But the story about the US-Mexico border was just the tip of the iceberg. Relotius has a long history of writing fake news that pleased CNN and other liberal outlets. Other fraudulent stories included one about a prisoner in Guantanamo Bay, and another about former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
Further bolstering CNN’s reputation for producing and rewarding fake news if it suits their agenda, Relotius, 33, immediately admitted to the scam and resigned.
06-17-2020, 05:54 PM (This post was last modified: 06-17-2020, 05:55 PM by BIAD.)
I felt this category was the most appropriate for the BBC article.
The word-play to avoid reality when it involves any other ethnicity except caucasian is breathtaking.
'Gender-based violence' - a term that that doesn't explicitly point at the male, but is obviously a crime
predominantly performed by one. If it was a white male under the media's magnifying glass, it's called
misogyny or femicide.
But not to piss-off the Left, when Africans are in the article, the rules change and such words can only
be used waaaaay on down the piece!
Quote:Tshegofatso Pule killing: South African man on murder charge.
'A 31-year-old man has been charged with the murder of a South African woman whose stabbed body was found hanging
from a tree last week. Twenty-eight-year-old Tshegofatso Pule was eight months pregnant.
Mzikayise Malephane appeared in court and was charged with premeditated murder.
After her death, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said the culture of silence around gender-based violence had to
end. Ms Pule went missing on 4 June and four days later a member of the public found her body in the Johannesburg suburb
of Roodepoort.
She was hanging from a tree and had been stabbed through the chest.
There was a wave of outrage in South Africa after Ms Pule's death and the hashtag #JusticeForTshego trended on Twitter.
What happened in court?
Mr Malephane was arrested on Monday and appeared in court on Wednesday. In the short appearance he was not asked to
plead, reports the newspaper The Sowetan. The case has been postponed until 24 June to allow him to get legal representation.
The authorities have not revealed if he was known to the deceased...'
So now comes the massaging of the narrative, the slight forgiveness via a form of using the flat, non-biased
wording. It is what it is and we should embrace the fact that it's wrong to meddle in anyone's cultures.
Unless it's a certain part of the northern hemisphere.
Quote:'Men need to be part of the solution'
By Pumza Fihlani, BBC News, Johannesburg
The past few days have been difficult for the women of South Africa. At a time when the nation's focus has been on containing
the spread of coronavirus, the gruesome murders of women like Tshegofatso Pule have been a harsh reminder of the daily
violence women face here...'
See...? Hanging from a tree with an unborn baby is defined as a 'difficult' last few days. Then using plague-fear, the story adds
that the murders are a reminder of something that occurs every day. There's nothing to indicate any type of judgement from the
writer, merely a vague non-specific-blaming of a 'culture-like' behaviour.
Quote:'President Cyril Ramaphosa has described gender-based violence as the shame of the nation. His government has in the last
few months channelled more resources towards the fight. Some of the extra funding has gone towards training the police, some
towards special sexual offences courts.
But advocates say there should be more focus placed on prevention and, for that, attitudes towards women need to change.
That is something that will need more than hashtags and protests, it needs men to be part of the solution, they say.
South Africa - 'unsafe to be a woman'
On Saturday President Ramaphosa released a statement denouncing gender-based violence.
He said it had become more dangerous for women during South Africa's lockdown. "We note with disgust that at a time when the
country is facing the gravest of threats from the [coronavirus] pandemic, violent men are taking advantage of the eased restrictions
on movement to attack women and children," he said...'
Ah.. these are violent men, not just men. I get it now. Sort of Jeffery Epstein, but not blameable.
Quote:Mr Ramaphosa condemned the brutality of recent killings, mentioning Ms Pule and two other victims:
Naledi Phangindawo - the 25-year-old was stabbed to death in the harbour city of Mossel Bay last Saturday.
Those using the hashtag #JusticeforNaledi want the suspect, who is now in police custody, to be denied bail. He is believed to be
her partner.
Sanele Mfaba - the young woman had been dumped under a tree in Johannesburg's Soweto township on Friday.
As many as 51% of women in South Africa had experienced violence at the hands of someone they were in a relationship with, the
president's statement said.
He urged people to report crimes.
"Gender-based violence thrives in a climate of silence. With our silence, by looking the other way because we believe it is a personal
or family matter, we become complicit in this most insidious of crimes," President Ramaphosa said. Following an outcry over a spate
of femicides last year, President Ramaphosa said South Africa was one of "the most unsafe places in the world to be a woman"...'
Lord have mercy! It was a garage door pull down rope.
I'm assuming you all heard about the NASCAR black driver saying he found a rope in his garage? A big deal was made in the media and they even had a tribute to the guy at the race track.
I don't have that video to show you here, but it's out there if you want to see.
So we have another "Jessie Smollett" clown show using a black guy and a rope to pull a racist stunt on the public.
Quote:The FBI on Tuesday released a statement on its investigation at Talladega Superspeedway and determined that Bubba Wallace was not the target of a hate crime.
NASCAR on Sunday released a statement revealing that a noose was reportedly found in top driver Bubba Wallace’s Talladega garage stall.
As The Gateway Pundit suspected, there was no noose.
“The FBI learned that garage 4, where the noose was found, was assigned to Bubba Wallace last week. The investigation also revealed evidence, including authentic video confirmed by NASCAR, that the noose found in garage number 4 was in that garage as early as October 2019,” the FBI said in a statement.
In other words, the garage door pull rope wasn’t imagined as a noose until a racist narrative needed to be pushed out to the public.
Wonder how much the stupid democrats paid him to pull this stunt?
06-29-2020, 09:50 AM (This post was last modified: 06-29-2020, 09:51 AM by BIAD.)
Factual or cozen.
Quote:Mississippi votes to strip Confederate emblem from state flag.
'Politicians in the US state of Mississippi have passed a resolution to replace the state flag with one without the Confederate
emblem. Republican Governor Tate Reeves earlier said he would sign the legislation into law if approved by lawmakers.
Mississippi is the last state in the US to feature the emblem on its flag.
The Confederate emblem is viewed by many as a racist symbol, with recent protests over the death of George Floyd reigniting
debate over its use. The flag was originally used by the slave-owning states that lost the US Civil War (1861-65).
On Sunday, the measure passed in both chambers of the Mississippi legislature: in the House of Representatives by a margin
of 91-23, and then in the Senate by a majority of 37-14. Senators reportedly cheered when the results were announced.
Lawmakers voted in favour of proposing the bill on Saturday.
Mr Reeves, who had previously said that he would not veto a bill - but did not publicly back it, said on Saturday that "if they
send me a bill this weekend, I will sign it".
@tatereeves
The legislature has been deadlocked for days as it considers a new state flag.
The argument over the 1894 flag has become as divisive as the flag itself and
it’s time to end it. If they send me a bill this weekend, I will sign it.
"The argument over the 1894 flag has become as divisive as the flag itself and it's time to end it," he wrote on Twitter.
He added: "We should not be under any illusion that a vote in the Capitol is the end of what must be done - the job before
us is to bring the state together." "I would never have thought that I would see the flag come down in my lifetime," Democrat
Barbara Blackmon, who is African-American, said on Saturday.
A nine-member commission is expected to design a new flag, to be be voted on in November, that includes the phrase:
"In God, We Trust."
Hundreds of statues dedicated to the Confederacy - the southern states which revolted against the US government - exist all
throughout the US, and often serve as an reminder of the history of slavery and racial oppression in the US.
But the depth of feeling that followed the death of George Floyd has led to renewed demands for an end to institutional racism.
In the US and other countries statues of controversial historical figures have either been pulled down or taken down...'
07-06-2020, 11:14 AM (This post was last modified: 07-06-2020, 11:16 AM by BIAD.)
Here's one that makes me smile -or at least, smile for a moment. It's the contemporary reliance of software to
do the job junior Reporters were once tasked with. I'm assuming this is the case because the alternative is that
well-cultured eight year-old children are actually re-writing other Journalists' work!
..................................
There was a time when a Government policy would be issued to the Press and with its standard demand that
the information can only be displayed after a certain time and date, the mainstream media would prepare their
narratives and attach their own ratings-hooks.
Since most large and small news outlets are held by a handful of massive corporations with their fingers in many
pies of societal-shepherding, those narratives can sometimes take precedence over the actual facts.
These biased bulletins one hears declared every day can take many forms, a dislike of an authoritative decision
because it doesn't serve a particular agenda of the media or owner of that media group, a targeting of a particular
politician or that the administrative guidelines strangles a certain way of making money.
These days, it's usually the latter.
In England (5th July 2020), the Conservative Government issued a decree to invest £1.57bn in the arts sector due
to the plague lock-down. The main focus of the legacy media was the reopening of theatres because in their world,
everyone goes to the theatre, unless your a deplorable -of course.
The details -an ironic use of the word if your read further on, is in this Government link here.
So obviously, the next day (Monday) would be full of different opinions on this support package and the BBC were
no exception. (Well they wouldn't be would they?!) The story was their main headline and interviews with diverse
characters were abound, well-spoken people who've never shat outside, who regularly use taxi services and have
no idea what a food-bank looks like.
What some might call non-deplorables.
Here's part of a flowery piece from the BBC's Arts Editor, Will Gompertz. The link shows the whole article. (BBC Link)
6th July 2020.
"...The rescue package has been warmly welcomed by many arts leaders, some of whom said they thought it to be at the upper end of what had been hoped for.
The Culture Secretary, Oliver Dowden, who has been under pressure from the arts and heritage sector to deliver a meaningful funding solution to a crisis brought about by Covid-19, feels vindicated that his behind-closed-doors approach to negotiations with the Treasury has paid off.
As always, the devil will be in the detail. The government has not specified how the money will be divided between competing art forms or regions, nor how the application process will work. There will be winners and losers.
And then there's the elephant in the auditorium: when will the rules around social distancing in performing arts venues be relaxed to allow the show to go on?..."
Okay... now here's part of an article supposedly written by an 'Editorial Team' on the same date: (Link Here)
6th July 2020.
"...The rescue package deal has been warmly welcomed by many arts leaders, a few of whom stated they thought it to be on the higher finish of what had been hoped for.
The Tradition Secretary, Oliver Dowden, who has been underneath strain from the humanities and heritage sector to ship a significant funding resolution to a disaster caused by Covid-19, feels vindicated that his behind-closed-doors strategy to negotiations with the Treasury has paid off.
As all the time, the satan can be within the element. The government has not specified how the cash can be divided between competing artwork types or areas, nor how the appliance course of will work. There can be winners and losers.
After which there’s the elephant within the auditorium: when will the principles round social distancing in performing arts venues be relaxed to permit the present to go on?..."
Who wrote the first one and who -or what, re-wrote the second?!
The wording is similar, but certain colloquial phrasing is altered. 'Devil in the detail'... could this possibly offend some
section of the reading community or is it merely a poor sense of logical reasoning from something that struggles with
nuance and cultural terminology? 'Satan' is generally known as a name and yet it wasn't capitalised, but neither was 'Devil'. The title of Oliver Dowden
as the Culture Secretary morphed into 'Tradition Secretary', why?
A clue?
At this point, I would boast that this is the work of artificial intelligence, but there are other subtle changes from the Arts
Editor's supposed-article and the one from the Unique News Online web page.
"...And then there's the elephant in the auditorium" changes to "...After which there’s the elephant within the auditorium:". 'Then' becomes 'After which' and that could be simply an algorithm, but the 'there's' shows the same designed process
of explaining a catchphrase now taking a shortcut!
Shortcuts are due to the need to minimise space and time... what the f*ck is a computer-implementable set of instructions
doing worrying about column size?! It's a throw-away article, a literary-piece for the lad-de-da nonces who enjoy a trip to
the theatre and now we have computers telling you of an opinion.
Scary-stuff and another example of how far true-reality is from us.
Source: CNN Collins asks Trump: Why aren't medical experts at briefing? 01:49
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump made another series of false, dubious and misleading claims at a Wednesday coronavirus briefing in which he continued to paint an overly rosy picture of how the pandemic is affecting the United States.
Despite the sharp uptick in cases he acknowledged and a US death toll that now exceeds 142,000, Trump declared that "it's all going to work out. And it is working out."
He suggested children do not transmit the coronavirus, though early evidence suggests children can and do. He attributed the recent rise in cases in part to racial justice protests, though early evidence suggests the protests did not cause a spike, and in part to migration from Mexico, though there is no evidence for this either.
Trump also claimed that he has done more for Black Americans than anyone else with the "possible exception" of President Abraham Lincoln. That is transparently ridiculous.
CNN holds elected officials and candidates accountable by pointing out what's true and what's not. Here's a look at our recent fact checks.
Here is a look at some of Trump's claims and the facts behind them.
Trump suggests Mexico to blame
In assigning blame for the uptick in coronavirus cases, Trump also suggested that Mexico was responsible, even though public health officials haven't publicly made this same accusation.
"Likely also contributing were also sharing a 2,000-mile border with Mexico, as we know very well, and cases are surging in Mexico, unfortunately," Trump said on Wednesday.
Referring to his proposed US-Mexico border wall, Trump added, "It was really meant for a different purpose, but it worked out very well for what we're doing right now and the pandemic."
Facts First:Trump didn't provide any evidence to back up his claims, and the nation's top public health officials aren't blaming Mexico for the US pandemic. Also, cases are spiking in states that don't share a border with Mexico -- like Florida, Louisiana and Idaho -- undercutting Trump's implication that border-crossers are bringing the disease into the US en masse. It's worth noting that the virus first flared in places such as Washington State, New York and New Jersey, thousands of miles away from the Mexican border.
After the briefing, CNN's Chief Medical Correspondent Sanjay Gupta said there isn't medical evidence supporting Trump's assertions. "I don't think there's any data specifically on Mexico," Gupta said. "We actually looked up to see if there was any data on that, and I didn't find any."
To be sure, Mexico does not have widespread testing and faces credible accusations of under-reporting its death toll, perhaps by thousands. But even if the outbreak is worse than the Mexican government is letting on, it pales in comparison to the American outbreak. There are at least 3.9 million cases in the US -- a tenfold increase over the roughly 356,000 cases in Mexico.
In terms of deaths per capita, Mexico is worse off than the United States. And it's true that some of border regions have high infection rates per capita, but the hardest-hit part of Mexico is nowhere near the US. And one region that shares a long border with Texas is in decent shape. There is also a logic problem with Trump's comments. On one hand, he's blaming Mexico for the US spike. But he's also saying that the border barriers have successfully kept out the virus.
Trump's comments fit a larger pattern of his racially insensitive statements about Mexicans and Latinos, dating back to the first weeks of his presidential campaign, when he said many Mexican immigrants were "rapists" and that "tremendous infectious disease is pouring across the border."
Kids transmitting the virus
During Wednesday's briefing, Trump continued to advocate for schools opening in the fall. In support of this he claimed that "a lot of people" say children "don't transmit" coronavirus.
"They don't catch it easily, they don't bring it home easily," Trump added. "And if they do catch it, they get better fast."
Facts First:While children infected with coronavirus are less likely to develop severe symptoms than adults, not all "get better fast," like Trump claimed. Furthermore, several studies suggest that children can and do transmit the virus.
According to one recent study from the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, children between 10 and 19 years old may transmit coronavirus just as much as adults.
"Although the detection rate for contacts of preschool-aged children was lower, young children may show higher attack rates when the school closure ends, contributing to community transmission of Covid-19," the study said.
Both the National Institutes of Health and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also studying families and households to better understand the role children play in transmitting the virus. But as of June 30, CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield said, "We don't know the impact that children have yet on the transmission cycle."
As a result, even though children appear to be affected less commonly or severely than adults, returning to school still poses certain risks. "Relatively few children with COVID-19 are hospitalized, and fewer children than adults experience fever, cough, or shortness of breath," the CDC said in an article for pediatric health care providers published in late May. However, the article also noted that "severe outcomes have been reported in children including COVID-19 associated deaths."
Protests and the rise in cases
Trump said there were a "number" of causes for the recent spike in coronavirus cases. He cited some uncontroversial possible contributors, such as Americans returning to bars and increasing their travel.
The first cause he listed, though, was the racial justice protests that swept the country following the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis in late May.
"Cases started to rise among young Americans shortly after demonstrations...which presumably triggered a broader relaxation of mitigation nationwide," Trump said.
Facts First:There is no solid evidence that the protests against racial injustice were a significant contributor to the spike in cases -- though experts caution that there is still a lot we don't know about how the virus has spread. Several cities with large and repeated demonstrations, including New York City, Minneapolis and Chicago, did not see spikes in confirmed cases in the weeks following the protests.
Why not? Possibly in part because the protests took place outdoors, where the virus is transmitted less efficiently than in indoor spaces; possibly in part because a significant percentage of protesters wore masks; and possibly because some non-protesters may have reduced their in-person interaction as they tried to avoid the protests.
In one early study of the impact of protests in large cities around the country, a group of economists found "no evidence that net COVID-19 case growth differentially rose following the onset of Black Lives Matter protests, and even modest evidence of a small longer-run case growth decline."
And in a Fox News interview shortly after the briefing on Wednesday, Dr. Deborah Birx did not mention the protests as a cause of the spike, saying that "this was an event that we think can be traced to Memorial Day and opening up as people [began] traveling again and being on vacation."
It's also a stretch to assign sole blame to the protests for triggering the relaxation of mitigation efforts. While it's possible that some Americans saw the packed protests in May and June and decided it was therefore safe to return to normal activities themselves, Trump himself was calling in May for states to "open up ASAP" and saying things like "our country has to get back." Governors, including conservative Republicans not especially inclined to take cues from young activists, made decisions to relax official restrictions -- and some of them did so weeks before the protests even happened.
Obama and Chicago CNN's Kaitlan Collins noted that in 2016 Trump said that it was President Barack Obama's fault that homicides were up in Chicago. She questioned Trump, "Why was it the President's fault then and not your fault now?"
Trump claimed that Obama "was invited in and he did a poor job. President Obama could've gone into Chicago. He couldn't have solved the problem and he didn't."
Facts First: It is unclear what Trump is referring to exactly about Obama being "invited in" to mitigate violence in Chicago. Trump has advocated for sending the National Guard into Chicago before to help with its gun violence, something Obama did not do. Nor was federal law enforcement "invited in." under the Obama administration. In fact, the Obama Justice Department had to sue the city of Chicago and enter a federally enforceable court agreement to address the police department's pattern of excessive use of force against Chicagoans.
Since his early days in office, Trump has suggested sending the National Guard to curb gun violence in Chicago. Chicago's history with the National Guard is tumultuous, most notably during the 1968 Chicago riots and later at the 1968 Democratic National Convention.
Obama did not send the National Guard to Chicago, but he did send another federal entity: the Justice Department. In 2015, the Obama Justice Department launched an investigation into the Chicago Police Department's use of force practices and systems of accountability after the death of teenager Laquan McDonald, who was fatally shot 16 times by a police officer.
In January 2017, days before Trump took office, the DOJ released a scathing report that said, among other things, that officers have engaged in a pattern or practice of using force, including deadly force, and offered a litany of recommendations to curb police violence. The DOJ entered an "agreement in principle" with Chicago to enter a consent decree, but shortly after the report was released, Trump's Justice Department abandoned that effort.
Chicago wants a federal presence in the city After Trump announced plans to send a "surge of federal law enforcement" to Chicago this week after the city experienced more gun violence, he claimed that Chicago will "want us to go in, full blast."
"I think in their own way they want us to go in, full blast. There will be a time when they're going to want us to go in full blast, but right now we are sending extra people to help. We are arresting a lot of people that have been very bad," the President said.
Facts First:This is an overstatement and needs context. The mayor of Chicago, who has a testy relationship with Trump, has cautiously welcomed federal law enforcement into the city to help combat its gun violence, but noted that federal agents were not welcome to "terrorize our residents."
After Trump announced this week that his administration would send law enforcement to Chicago to curb its gun violence problem, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot's response to federal agents in Chicago evolved. Lightfoot sent a letter to Trump on Monday urging him not to send federal agents to the city, writing it would "spell disaster."
But by Tuesday, Lightfoot cautiously embraced Trump's federal law enforcement to help combat Chicago's gun violence so long as the agents remain focused on gun violence.
"If those agents are here to actually work in partnership and support of gun violence and violent cases, plugging into existing infrastructure of federal agents, not trying to play police in our streets, then that's something different," Lightfoot said at a news conference. "But the proof is going to be in the pudding. It's too soon to say if this is a value add or not."
Trump and Black Americans Trump was asked at the briefing to respond to a comment from his Democratic election opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, who said earlier Wednesday that Trump was the first racist to get elected president.
Biden's comment was inaccurate. Regardless of one's views on Trump, who has made a series of racist comments in office, we know that 12 presidents owned slaves, and that even some who didn't, such as Woodrow Wilson, held clearly racist views.
But Trump's response to Biden's assertion was also wrong. Citing policy measures like the Opportunity Zones tax-break program aimed at distressed communities and the criminal justice reform bill he signed, as well as the near-record-low Black unemployment rate prior to the pandemic, Trump said, "I've done things that nobody else -- and I've said this and I say it openly and not a lot of people dispute it: I've done more for Black Americans than anybody with the possible exception of Abraham Lincoln. Nobody has even been close."
Facts First:While we give Trump lots of latitude to express opinions, this one is simply ridiculous even if he is only comparing himself to previous presidents and excluding other Black heroes. It's absurd to say Lincoln is a "possible" exception; emancipating the slaves was obviously more important for Black Americans than anything Trump has done. President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, monumental bills whose impact dwarfed the impact of any legislation Trump has signed.
You can make an argument that numerous additional presidents did more for Black Americans than Trump, but we'll stop there. It's worth noting, though, that Black people themselves do not, on the whole, agree with Trump's self-assessment. Trump has had a consistently abysmal approval rating with Black citizens -- just 4% in one recent Quinnipiac University poll, for example, versus 93% disapproval.
CNN's Andrea Kane contributed to this fact check.
The methodolgy has improved here
much better written propaganda
But our own governor here in Kentucky blames people traveling to the beaches in Florida and South Carolina to our slight increase in cases, never addressing the fact of all these protesters traveling from out of state to here as a probable cause.
![[Image: EWONUPmWkAIqCyx?format=jpg&name=large]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EWONUPmWkAIqCyx?format=jpg&name=large)
![[Image: EWONUPrWsAYyjG2?format=jpg&name=medium]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EWONUPrWsAYyjG2?format=jpg&name=medium)
![[Image: video_pinned_white_bg.jpg]](https://www.i.cdn.cnn.com/.a/2.225.2/assets/video_pinned_white_bg.jpg)
![[Image: 200722200833-trump-collins-split-bvp-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200722200833-trump-collins-split-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 191029124416-liz-cheney-vindman-comments...-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/191029124416-liz-cheney-vindman-comments-10292019-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200722183048-trump-presser-0722-bvp-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200722183048-trump-presser-0722-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200722145559-tom-ridge-bvp-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200722145559-tom-ridge-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200722174355-seattle-mayor-jenny-durkan-...-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200722174355-seattle-mayor-jenny-durkan-lead-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200723021843-chicago-mayor-bvp-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200723021843-chicago-mayor-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200723015039-mom-died-covid-19-bvp-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200723015039-mom-died-covid-19-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200722230231-dons-take-07222020-vpx-bvp-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200722230231-dons-take-07222020-vpx-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200716094122-01-coronavirus-vaccine-rese...-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200716094122-01-coronavirus-vaccine-research-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200722212924-tom-ridge-donald-trump-spli...-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200722212924-tom-ridge-donald-trump-split-july-22-2020-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: 200626175124-liz-cheney-father-tweet-rea...-tease.jpg]](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200626175124-liz-cheney-father-tweet-real-men-wear-face-masks-gangel-tsr-vpx-00001329-bvp-tease.jpg)
![[Image: Ed7udwDUcAIpWvj?format=jpg&name=small]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ed7udwDUcAIpWvj?format=jpg&name=small)