(11-19-2021, 03:37 PM)Minstrel Wrote: Considering how much news they have to overlook and censor, its amazing they get anything published nowadays.
It's the general perception that the public has regarding the MSM that catches me. Ignoring the self-generated 'news'
that is really just decoration to allow a chosen performer to entertain via wordage that evokes emotional study, it's the
lack of accountability that agencies -supposedly in place to hold high ethical standards in Journalism, allow these costly
outlets to churn out their wares.
I often wonder if it isn't really poor journalism being pumped out to those who still listen, but actually a well-funded, politically
-agreed performance of selected artistes for the public purely for distraction purposes.
Hence, clear of accusations from genuine departments of factual-information management and rules governing false conduct
in the media industry -if they ever existed at all.
Who really owns the airwaves...? Who owns the satellites? Who owns the internet?
Movie stars get paid big money for the acting abilities, News Presenters get paid big money for reading an auto-cue. Odd!
The behaviour surrounding the current Rittenhouse trial isn't such a stretch from an episode of 'Judge Judy' or a story by
John Grisham.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.