Britain Today.

[Ninurta]

The establishment media has shown it's true colours and decided rather than take over these internet talk
-arenas, they demand these forums to be closed down. They cannot afford to unnaturally evolve as it would
imply uncertainty that anything that came before a change was unshakable.

They also know that they cannot infiltrate all these conversation groups because if they error, break cover
and it is seen, then whole game is exposed and any residue of ambiguity will be blown away forever.

Elsewhere on this site, I have made mention a couple of times of a tactic US Rangers are trained in called a "pull-apart ambush". The textbook example is of a column of troops progressing down a road, when a smaller element of guerrillas open fire on them. Tactical training is to assault into ambushes, so the troops assault in the direction of the fire element firing on them, confident that their superior numbers and ability to mass force on that point will win the day for them.

As soon as they are committed to the assault, another, previously hidden, element opens fire on them from another direction, typically the rear, but sometimes a flank. Now they have a choice to make - either split up to assault both positions, or take the casualties delivered by the new actors.

As soon as they reorganize and commit to one of those actions, a third group opens fire on them from yet another direction. Wash, rinse, repeat. This keeps going on until the troop column is pulled apart and decimated, hence the name of the type of ambush. I've seen them sprung with  as many as 8 small ambush elements which destroyed a much larger force by pulling it apart and dealing with each smaller subdivision individually. The tactic prevents your opponent from concentrating overwhelming force on a point target (meaning YOU).

I mention this here because something similar may be factoring in to the big tech giants preventing smaller sites with actual free speech from getting traction. They don't want to get "pulled apart" and decimated. They have a finite supply of what have come to be called "influencers", and having to spread them across a plurality of platforms necessarily would thin them out "on the ground". Similarly, their loss of membership to these smaller platforms is alarming to them. It gives them less personal data to sell, and fewer clicks to monetize. It hurts their bottom line.

So, instead of catering to the customer wishes, which would necessarily water down the slavery-based product they are pushing and allow for free exchange of ideas, they go all totalitarian on the customers by area denial operations, denying a refuge area to them in order to force them back onto the platform where the indoctrination can continue. Otherwise, their customers would have gotten "off the reservation", and out into the wider world with those troublesome notions of freedom. The Freedom Virus might get out of the lab and start infecting more people, with disastrous results to the Oligarchs.

They cannot have that, so they must keep us corralled, within their fences, so that they can concentrate the "influencers" in the proper density, and for that they must keep us contained, not "out there" where their troops can be pulled apart and dealt with.

One think I have learned over time is that it is very difficult to contain a guerrilla movement when the guerrillas simply refuse to be contained and corralled. You have to get out in the weeds and find them, and kill or capture them, and that can be a very dangerous business if they insist on not being captured.

In his "Book of Five Rings", Miyamoto Musashi said "from one thing, know 10,000 things", Note that he said "know" them, not "learn" them. You already learned them when you learned the first thing that led to the new applications. When you learn something, look around yourself to see where else it may be applied.

I suppose the real question to answer first is who are the true Elites of the UK and if they have such power
to control society, did they fail miserably? To intrigue ourselves with that, we'd need to start with the East
India Trading Company.

Odd you should mention that. There was a short-lived TV series called "Taboo" wherein the protagonist (if you've ever seen it, you'll know why he can't really be called "the hero") goes to war with the British East India Company after they stab him in the back and leave him for dead. Whether he "wins" that showdown is a matter of personal interpretation, but it's undeniable that he leaves a permanent mark on them such that they knew he'd been there!

.