10-02-2017, 08:47 PM
That’s what I don’t get. I still am having a hard time with “the guy just snapped”. Especially (as Ninurta said) if he scoped the place out first. I don’t know which of the hundreds of articles it was in but one of them said the FBI was looking into “giant gambling ‘transactions’ that he made in the last week”. They wouldn’t say if it was a win or a loss, but think about it:
You lose more money than you could bear and you snap. Go home, get the guns, walk into a soft target and shoot. Except he didn’t do that, he left the guns at home.
You lose more money than you could bear and you snap. You spend even MORE money to buy some more guns, leave the others at home, rent a hotel with a view of the strip for 5 days and then start shooting with said guns?
You lose more money than you could bear and you snap. You …. You get the point. None of this is adding up.
And here's the gambling link, I remembered:
NBC
You lose more money than you could bear and you snap. Go home, get the guns, walk into a soft target and shoot. Except he didn’t do that, he left the guns at home.
You lose more money than you could bear and you snap. You spend even MORE money to buy some more guns, leave the others at home, rent a hotel with a view of the strip for 5 days and then start shooting with said guns?
You lose more money than you could bear and you snap. You …. You get the point. None of this is adding up.
And here's the gambling link, I remembered:
NBC
Quote:The suspected gunman behind the Las Vegas massacre made several large gambling transactions in recent weeks, according to multiple senior law enforcement officials and a casino executive.
Quote:It was not immediately clear if those transactions were losses or wins.