This isn't a rant, honestly!!
It's the same with the issues like 'The Gender Pay Gap' 'Corruption in Politics' and 'Racism in our Schools'
where rational phrases are twisted and 'weasel-words' are put in place to form a certain narrative.
But the narratives have no substance, they leave a reader with more questions than answers and that's the
reason that Journalists write this way.
I used to think it was in regards of libel issues and to be fair, some of it is. But to intrigue a reader or
viewer is far-more beneficial than reporting impartial accurate information. It means they may come back
for more.
(Damn you Barnum!)
It may seem confusing to some that if mainstream media are on the same-side as 'Big Guv'ment' then why
would they bring such subjects to the public's attention?
They're not on a Government's side... they're with the Establishment's side!
But I can understand the doubt.
I've said a couple of times that life is simple and even though many of us may scoff at that notion due to the
rising cost of living, the constant struggle to find employment and the over-bearing rules and regulations that
seem to just want the average man and woman to feel bad all the time, I believe it's true.
The news is bad because they want you disgruntled. Many of us believe a 'man-bites-dog' tale at the end of the
news programme is to make you believe that maybe all the world isn't that bad, but initially it wasn't for that.
It was there to create a bridge from the viewer to the announcer using levity that both parties can appreciate.
The news-reader can become an acquaintance through humour and maybe even a friend.
And you trust friends, don't you?
But back in the world of simplicity, all you need is to eat, drink and have shelter, that's really about it.
A bath full of money may make you seem happy because it fills some-sort of covetness that you're hard-wired
into thinking it will make your existence easier, but you can't eat the stuff!
However, you can use it to purchase food, drink and shelter because the system you're born into condones
it. I know this may seem obvious, it is, but it's a clue into why Journalists do what they do -or in some cases,
told to do. It's the Money.
Globalism and globalisation is an ideology where a home-based decision is used to to financially 'colonise'
the world using a business plan to create a socially condoned level of behavior. You need money to live, ergo
the system says you work for it.
(Although Sweden is working hard towards a cash-free society and that's horror story for another time!)
The same system demands a strata of pay that can be deemed fair for the level of skill needed for a particular
job. Physical labour is seen a less skilled task than mental and therefore the pay level tends to lower for the
person who works with his hands.
This is merely a case of brow-beating society into accepting that decision-making requires deliberate thought,
where someone who shovels shit only needs a shovel.
Hell, the company will even spring for the shovel!
So here we are, a set of countries that trade with each other and attempt to get along. Except... that doesn't
endear productivity to some. For some, the bath of money isn't enough, ten baths full of cash won't do it.
They need the power to control all of it.
"Heh, hold on there BIAD...? you said this was about the media and their role in all this crappiness?
Now you're talking about New World Order or something?"
Well, they go hand-in-hand. You need the media to get your message out and you need to -not just
pay them to do it, they've got to see that their lifestyle benefits by what you're wanting the world to be.
A job... sorry hacks, a career in Journalism isn't just a 9-5, leave yer' shovel by the door-kind of task.
It needs you place your rational perception to one side.
Let's say you're writing about a soccer team you don't support, you don't refuse the task because you
don't like them and you know that writing about the team as a set of ass-holes will get you into hot water.
So you write a fair even piece that caters for all views of the reader, even though you're inwardly biased.
With that in mind, ask yourself why are the majority of mainstream media Journalists against President
Trump? What do they dislike about him...? what is it that causes the Reporters to write an article that
doesn't offer a fair view to all?
'He's spent $9 million on vacations and here's a picture of him in Florida' The fact that it was post-campaign
rally (whatever that is?!) is at odds with the idea that he's on vacation. Even though at that very rally, President
Trump roared that the mainstream media were not truthful!
Yet, the slur that he'd supposedly spent nine million bucks on vacations was written -even though they'd
been reporting on him in the White House since he entered office went unsaid.
Simple falsehoods, really!
They write lies, they concoct stories that subtly imply that they are part of an affluent environment.
How many writers from 'The New Yorker' write about shovelling shit...? How many Journalists from
The Washington Post explain to the readers about their drinking problem?
They don't... they are not only keeping the established narrative on track, they paint themselves as
part of it.
And if this person/acquaintance -who's sharing their information with you, relates the narrative in an
acceptable 'normal' manner then just by the interaction alone, you have also subtly become part of
that Establishment. So you'll tend to accept it
'Follow me' said the Pied Piper and emptied the town of those not wanted.
The MSM know that if the Establishment fails at turning this around and the people of the world who're
not just focused on finding jobs, quarrelling over petty news reports and trying to live in a happy society
become aware that their perceptions have been manipulated, then they will be answerable.
These Journalists know that they will not only NEVER be trusted again and their gravy-train will arrive at
the station to drop them off at the Welfare Office, they will have let a new form of information providers
into the public arena.
Namely, 'the people on the internet'!
It's the same with the issues like 'The Gender Pay Gap' 'Corruption in Politics' and 'Racism in our Schools'
where rational phrases are twisted and 'weasel-words' are put in place to form a certain narrative.
But the narratives have no substance, they leave a reader with more questions than answers and that's the
reason that Journalists write this way.
I used to think it was in regards of libel issues and to be fair, some of it is. But to intrigue a reader or
viewer is far-more beneficial than reporting impartial accurate information. It means they may come back
for more.
(Damn you Barnum!)
It may seem confusing to some that if mainstream media are on the same-side as 'Big Guv'ment' then why
would they bring such subjects to the public's attention?
They're not on a Government's side... they're with the Establishment's side!
But I can understand the doubt.
I've said a couple of times that life is simple and even though many of us may scoff at that notion due to the
rising cost of living, the constant struggle to find employment and the over-bearing rules and regulations that
seem to just want the average man and woman to feel bad all the time, I believe it's true.
The news is bad because they want you disgruntled. Many of us believe a 'man-bites-dog' tale at the end of the
news programme is to make you believe that maybe all the world isn't that bad, but initially it wasn't for that.
It was there to create a bridge from the viewer to the announcer using levity that both parties can appreciate.
The news-reader can become an acquaintance through humour and maybe even a friend.
And you trust friends, don't you?
But back in the world of simplicity, all you need is to eat, drink and have shelter, that's really about it.
A bath full of money may make you seem happy because it fills some-sort of covetness that you're hard-wired
into thinking it will make your existence easier, but you can't eat the stuff!
However, you can use it to purchase food, drink and shelter because the system you're born into condones
it. I know this may seem obvious, it is, but it's a clue into why Journalists do what they do -or in some cases,
told to do. It's the Money.
Globalism and globalisation is an ideology where a home-based decision is used to to financially 'colonise'
the world using a business plan to create a socially condoned level of behavior. You need money to live, ergo
the system says you work for it.
(Although Sweden is working hard towards a cash-free society and that's horror story for another time!)
The same system demands a strata of pay that can be deemed fair for the level of skill needed for a particular
job. Physical labour is seen a less skilled task than mental and therefore the pay level tends to lower for the
person who works with his hands.
This is merely a case of brow-beating society into accepting that decision-making requires deliberate thought,
where someone who shovels shit only needs a shovel.
Hell, the company will even spring for the shovel!
So here we are, a set of countries that trade with each other and attempt to get along. Except... that doesn't
endear productivity to some. For some, the bath of money isn't enough, ten baths full of cash won't do it.
They need the power to control all of it.
"Heh, hold on there BIAD...? you said this was about the media and their role in all this crappiness?
Now you're talking about New World Order or something?"
Well, they go hand-in-hand. You need the media to get your message out and you need to -not just
pay them to do it, they've got to see that their lifestyle benefits by what you're wanting the world to be.
A job... sorry hacks, a career in Journalism isn't just a 9-5, leave yer' shovel by the door-kind of task.
It needs you place your rational perception to one side.
Let's say you're writing about a soccer team you don't support, you don't refuse the task because you
don't like them and you know that writing about the team as a set of ass-holes will get you into hot water.
So you write a fair even piece that caters for all views of the reader, even though you're inwardly biased.
With that in mind, ask yourself why are the majority of mainstream media Journalists against President
Trump? What do they dislike about him...? what is it that causes the Reporters to write an article that
doesn't offer a fair view to all?
'He's spent $9 million on vacations and here's a picture of him in Florida' The fact that it was post-campaign
rally (whatever that is?!) is at odds with the idea that he's on vacation. Even though at that very rally, President
Trump roared that the mainstream media were not truthful!
Yet, the slur that he'd supposedly spent nine million bucks on vacations was written -even though they'd
been reporting on him in the White House since he entered office went unsaid.
Simple falsehoods, really!
They write lies, they concoct stories that subtly imply that they are part of an affluent environment.
How many writers from 'The New Yorker' write about shovelling shit...? How many Journalists from
The Washington Post explain to the readers about their drinking problem?
They don't... they are not only keeping the established narrative on track, they paint themselves as
part of it.
And if this person/acquaintance -who's sharing their information with you, relates the narrative in an
acceptable 'normal' manner then just by the interaction alone, you have also subtly become part of
that Establishment. So you'll tend to accept it
'Follow me' said the Pied Piper and emptied the town of those not wanted.
The MSM know that if the Establishment fails at turning this around and the people of the world who're
not just focused on finding jobs, quarrelling over petty news reports and trying to live in a happy society
become aware that their perceptions have been manipulated, then they will be answerable.
These Journalists know that they will not only NEVER be trusted again and their gravy-train will arrive at
the station to drop them off at the Welfare Office, they will have let a new form of information providers
into the public arena.
Namely, 'the people on the internet'!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.