Something is cooking...

[BIAD]

I wasn't going to approach this subject because it's been muddied by both sides of the 'Who-Dunnit' argument.

The images were provided by Reuters and it's the time-stamps that's causing the problem.
Gatwick Airport does have separate corridors and it could well be that the pair of accused poisoners left the
Customs area via separate exits.

But at exactly the same time? Possible I suppose, but the lengthy write-up by the BBC to dilute the suggestion
makes me wonder.

Sergei Skripal and the Russian disinformation game.

'When the UK authorities announced on Wednesday that they suspected two alleged Russian agents in the
poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury, they released CCTV images
of the suspects arriving at Gatwick airport.

Two of the images, framed side by side, began to spread on social media, driven by pro-Russia conspiracy
theorists and suspected troll accounts. They showed the alleged agents -Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov
-passing through a non-return gate at the airport.

The images had identical timestamps. How could two men be in exactly the same place at the same time,
a flood of tweets asked.



Speaking on state TV, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova claimed that either "the date
and the exact time were superimposed on the image" or that Russian intelligence officers had "mastered the
skill of walking simultaneously".

Her remarks were echoed by pro-Kremlin accounts on Twitter and on the messaging app Telegram, which
is popular in Russia. Users suggested the CCTV images had been manipulated. They mocked the British
authorities and alleged it was an MI6 operation.

Soon it would not necessarily matter that the background of the CCTV images were not identical; that the camera
was at a different angle; that Google Maps shows that the non-return gates at Gatwick are a series of near-identical
corridors that the two men could easily have passed down, adjacent to one another, at the same time.



What would matter would be that some people following the story would begin to question what was real and what
wasn't. Some might even begin to question the very idea that there was a real, reliable version of events at all.

Russia denies any involvement in the Skripal case, and its embassy in London did not respond to a request for
comment from the BBC, but analysts say the Russian state is now the chief exponent of a new kind of information
warfare.

A loosely-defined network of Russian state actors, state-controlled media, and armies of social media bots and
trolls is said to work in unison to spread and amplify multiple narratives and conspiracies around cases like the
Skripal poisoning. The goal is no longer to deny or disprove an official version of events, it is to flood the zone
with so many competing versions that nothing seems to make sense.

"What is really striking is that you no longer see the Russian machine pushing a single message, it pushes dozens
of messages," said Ben Nimmo, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who studies Russian disinformation.
"The idea is to confuse people."

Other theories circulating on Wednesday included a claim that the suspects were British actors, stars of a
(non-existent) KGB spy series broadcast on British television in the 2000s. Another suggested the attempted
assassination in Salisbury, and the deaths of other Russian nationals in Britain, were part of an MI6 plot.
"Why do all these horrible events only happen in Britain?" asked Andrei Klimov, a Russian member of
parliament, on state TV.

"The more different theories you put out, the more different Google results you're going to get," said Mr Nimmo.
"So instead of seeing two or three different versions of the story you're seeing 20 or 30. And for someone who
is not following the story regularly that becomes more and more confusing until they give up.
And at that point, the Russian disinformation has had its effect."

Early evidence of the tactic can be traced back to the 2000s but it first drew serious international attention in
2014 when Malaysian Airlines flight MH-17 was shot down over Ukraine, killing 298 people.
The evidence pointed to a Russian-supplied surface-to-air missile fired from rebel-held territory in east Ukraine.

In the days and months after the aircraft was shot down, Russian state media and pro-Kremlin social accounts
pushed out a raft of different and wildly contradictory theories: that a Ukrainian Su-25 combat aircraft had been
picked up by radar near MH-17; that video evidence showed a missile being fired from government, not
separatist, territory; that Ukrainian fighters had mistaken MH-17 for Vladimir Putin's plane in an assassination
attempt; that the CIA was behind it.

"MH-17 is really the classic example," said Samantha Bradshaw, a researcher on computational propaganda
at the University of Oxford. "You saw a whole series of different conspiracies and competing narratives emerge,
attached to various hashtags and social media campaigns.
The goal was to confuse people, to polarise them, to push them further and further away from reality."

The technique expanded and evolved in the years after the MH-17 attack, with Russia linked to disinformation
campaigns around its actions in Syria, the 2016 US election, the murder of Boris Nemtsov, and a UK inquiry
into the murder of former Russian intelligence officer Alexander Litvinenko in London.

Russia had already been accused of deploying crude disinformation techniques around its actions in east Ukraine
and its annexation of Crimea, but its response to being linked to the downing of MH-17 was on a different scale
-the "tipping point where Russian information warfare kicked into high gear", Mr Nimmo said.

In 2015, the European Union was sufficiently alarmed by Russian disinformation that it created a task force
-the East Stratcom team - directed solely at counteracting the perceived threat. The small team attempts to
debunk fake stories in real time, but it is reportedly vastly outmatched by the amount of material coming its way.

Peter Wilson, the UK ambassador to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, said earlier
this year the OPCW had counted more than 30 different Russian theories swirling around the poisoning of
Sergei and Yulia Skripal.

The effectiveness and reach of this type of disinformation operation in the West is debatable. A YouGov poll
conducted earlier found that 75% of Britons believed that the Russian state was behind the Skripal poisoning,
while just 5% said they thought Russia was innocent.

But the sheer volume of Russian disinformation being exported abroad remained a major cause for concern,
said one EU official who works on the issue but was not authorised to speak about it publicly.

"Some people like to think this tactic was used around Brexit and it went away, or it was used around Skripal
and went away, but it's happening 24/7," he said. "Others also use disinformation, of course ... But this
aggression, this exporting of information narratives abroad, this is really something where Russia is number
one in the world."...'

BBC:

So now you know, I'm a Bot or a Ruskie Troll.

By the way, when the BBC quote the tweet: '...The images had identical timestamps.
How could two men be in exactly the same place at the same time, a flood of tweets asked...'

Notice they omit a question-mark to the question, that's an old trick to make sure the reader
doesn't subconsciously dawdle on the sentence and give the query mental-credibility.
Crafty buggers!