04-07-2017, 12:18 PM
You know, this could be evidence that's fallout from the slow break-up of what we deem established news outlets.
Recently, Journalists from all areas of the mainstream media have focused on the conduit that is out-performing
the old way of delivering information to the public, namely the internet.
These wealthy corporations who believed that they once ruled the roost and the could direct the preferred narrative,
felt that the advertising companies who splurged vast sums of money on them would show a loyalty that would and
could never decay.
But they never thought about that other place... that cyber-world where the mainstream elite believed pizza-gorging
kids hung out and talked sh*t.
Then Brexit came along and on top of that, the US election where polls, Journalistic commentary and alleged expert
analysis failed miserably to predict that Donald Trump would be picked by those who they fully believed hung onto
their every word.
Ratings were decreasing and just like Rome in it's hey-day, the guys in the boardroom pondered what it could
be. To make matters worse, the same polls that are worshipped like gods among established mediums, told the
executives that their Journalists couldn't be trusted to deliver the truth.
Then where was the news coming fom that enchanted the masses...? Where were the sheep grazing these days?
It's agreed that the majority of television viewers in the United Kingdom range between 42 years-old up to fifty-five,
with variables dictating which end of the spectrum is attracted by particular programming.
In the States...
'...The long-prognosticated death of TV may be happening before our eyes—but at a glacial pace.
A new in-depth report from tracking firm Nielsen shows that TV is still by far America’s favorite entertainment
past-time, but individuals are spending more hours surfing web and viewing streaming services.
A growing number of households are choosing to dump TV altogether...'
SOURCE:
I would like to believe that what is being undertaken at this time isn't a coordinated effort, but due to Mystic's
thread that showed that a handful of corporations actually own all the television networks, I would seriously
doubt that there's a randomness in what certain Journalists are up to in regards of reporting to advertising
companies about Youtube
After informing renowned companies that their adverts are being placed alongside selected far-right, alleged
hate-speech, anti-semitic videos and footage to assist terrorisim, the Wall Street Journal then announced this
as a scoop.
The Times also did an investigation and even though these companies had no other connection with these
suspect videos except that their adverts were playing over them, the narrative was being set in place that
YouTube could be a minefield that could effect profits.
Companies like Disney and PepsiCo demanded their advertising to be dropped and with this, an automatic
demonetisation of the patrons of such supposedly offensive content ensued. Buzzfeed hammered away with
articles regarding Alex Jones and others, with a crafted scheme to make sure that any financial gains made
from producing anything supposedly 'controversial' would cease.
As Infowars suggests, there's a war on for your mind.
But in reality it's not only that the mainstream media are attempting to shore-up their failing credibility with the
public, they're also assuring that the same public will be forced to graze in the narrative fields they controlled
originally.
Let's hope Rogue Nation never becomes a meadow of the bland, heh?!
Here's a link that references Bill O'Riley and a connection to YouTube's knee-jerk reaction.
SOURCE:
Recently, Journalists from all areas of the mainstream media have focused on the conduit that is out-performing
the old way of delivering information to the public, namely the internet.
These wealthy corporations who believed that they once ruled the roost and the could direct the preferred narrative,
felt that the advertising companies who splurged vast sums of money on them would show a loyalty that would and
could never decay.
But they never thought about that other place... that cyber-world where the mainstream elite believed pizza-gorging
kids hung out and talked sh*t.
Then Brexit came along and on top of that, the US election where polls, Journalistic commentary and alleged expert
analysis failed miserably to predict that Donald Trump would be picked by those who they fully believed hung onto
their every word.
Ratings were decreasing and just like Rome in it's hey-day, the guys in the boardroom pondered what it could
be. To make matters worse, the same polls that are worshipped like gods among established mediums, told the
executives that their Journalists couldn't be trusted to deliver the truth.
Then where was the news coming fom that enchanted the masses...? Where were the sheep grazing these days?
It's agreed that the majority of television viewers in the United Kingdom range between 42 years-old up to fifty-five,
with variables dictating which end of the spectrum is attracted by particular programming.
In the States...
'...The long-prognosticated death of TV may be happening before our eyes—but at a glacial pace.
A new in-depth report from tracking firm Nielsen shows that TV is still by far America’s favorite entertainment
past-time, but individuals are spending more hours surfing web and viewing streaming services.
A growing number of households are choosing to dump TV altogether...'
SOURCE:
I would like to believe that what is being undertaken at this time isn't a coordinated effort, but due to Mystic's
thread that showed that a handful of corporations actually own all the television networks, I would seriously
doubt that there's a randomness in what certain Journalists are up to in regards of reporting to advertising
companies about Youtube
After informing renowned companies that their adverts are being placed alongside selected far-right, alleged
hate-speech, anti-semitic videos and footage to assist terrorisim, the Wall Street Journal then announced this
as a scoop.
The Times also did an investigation and even though these companies had no other connection with these
suspect videos except that their adverts were playing over them, the narrative was being set in place that
YouTube could be a minefield that could effect profits.
Companies like Disney and PepsiCo demanded their advertising to be dropped and with this, an automatic
demonetisation of the patrons of such supposedly offensive content ensued. Buzzfeed hammered away with
articles regarding Alex Jones and others, with a crafted scheme to make sure that any financial gains made
from producing anything supposedly 'controversial' would cease.
As Infowars suggests, there's a war on for your mind.
But in reality it's not only that the mainstream media are attempting to shore-up their failing credibility with the
public, they're also assuring that the same public will be forced to graze in the narrative fields they controlled
originally.
Let's hope Rogue Nation never becomes a meadow of the bland, heh?!
Here's a link that references Bill O'Riley and a connection to YouTube's knee-jerk reaction.
SOURCE:
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.