Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Coronavirus - Take two - Action!
Dr. Robert Malone helped with the invention of the mRNA vaccine technology. Listen to what he says about this "vaccine". 
He says his worst nightmare is coming true; people taking the vaccine are going to have to keep taking it because the jab is killing their immune system. 
I think this just applies to the Pfizer, but all of them have problems, judging from what I've seen. 

People! Spread this to your friends. This information is being suppressed heavily. You might save someone's life in the long run.

 https://rumble.com/vkfz1v-the-vaccine-ca...y3&mrefc=2
A personal observation from our trip out west. Thousands of people in Yellowstone park went without a mask, except for a handful. What pissed me off more than anything were that the kids under 12 wore a mask , but not their parents. I assume they had gotten the shot. Those poor kids looked like zombies.
The Truth is Out There, Somewhere
(07-29-2021, 02:28 AM)kdog Wrote: A personal observation from our trip out west. Thousands of people in Yellowstone park went without a mask, except for a handful. What pissed me off more than anything were that the kids under 12 wore a mask , but not their parents. I assume they had gotten the shot. Those poor kids looked like zombies.

Being that I live in an area where people come for their vacation, I saw this with lots of people too. First time I saw it was when I was going into a restaurant. The parents were walking in unmasked, and the children, both looked to be around 5 or 6, were wearing masks. 
Everyone here had stopped wearing masks even before the governor stopped the mandate, so seeing that shocked me. 
I couldn't stop staring at them. I'm sure I had a big frown on my face. 

These parents don't realize how deeply they are destroying their child's immune system, and also keeping necessary oxygen from reaching the child's brain. 

It's just pathetic how some people never question anything the government tells them.
Maybe right or maybe wrong just something to consider IMO  
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php...of-disease
Quote:World

Vaccine Expert Gives "Final Warning" STOP All Mass COVID Vaccinations Immediately or face unleashing incurable, deadly, unstoppable wave of disease
World NewsDesk 27 July 2021  Hits: 35042
  • [/url]


  • [url=https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/vaccine-expert-gives-final-warning-stop-all-mass-covid-vaccinations-immediately-or-face-unleashing-incurable-deadly-unstoppable-wave-of-disease]
[Image: Doctor-StopMassVaccinesImmediately_large.png]
Unless the mass vaccinations for COVID are HALTED immediately, the world will face an unstoppable wave of INCURABLE diseases mutating to escape the vaccines. That is the long and short of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche's (DVM, PhD) published article which he calls a "Final Warning."
A last word of caution to all those pretending the Covid-19 pandemic is toning down
Updated: 16 hours ago
Synopsis
The current expansion in prevalence of infectious Sars-CoV-2 variants is highly problematic because it erodes natural Ab-based, variant-nonspecific immunity in the non-vaccinated part of the population. The high infectivity rate that results from this expansion not only further enhances the expansion of these variants but may also drive natural selection of viral variants that are featured by an even higher level of infectiousness. Erosion, therefore, of natural Ab-based, variant-nonspecific immunity promotes breeding and transmission of more infectious viral variants in the non-vaccinated part of the population. On the other hand, mass vaccination promotes natural selection of increasingly vaccine immunity (VI)-escaping variants in the vaccinated part of the population. Taken together, mass vaccination conducted on a background of high infectivity rates enables more infectious, increasingly VI-escaping variants to expand in prevalence. This evolution inevitably results in inclining morbidity rates in both, the non-vaccinated and vaccinated population and precipitates the emergence of circulating viral variants that will eventually fully resist vaccine-mediated immunity (VMI). This is why mass vaccination campaigns should not be conducted during a pandemic of a highly mutable virus, let alone during a pandemic of more infectious variants (unless transmission-blocking vaccines are used!). It is critical to understand that a rapid decline in viral infectivity rates that is not achieved by natural infection but merely results from expedited mass vaccination campaigns will only delay abrupt propagation of emerging, fully vaccine-resistant viral variants and hence, only delay the occurrence of a high wave of morbidity and mortality. In contrast, mass vaccination campaigns that are progressing more slowly, especially when conducted on a background of relatively low infectious pressure, will result in a steadily growing propagation of increasingly VI-escaping variants and hence, cause a wave of morbidity and mortality that continues to grow bigger and larger as more and more people become vaccinated. It’s only when fully vaccine-resistant viral variants will become dominant that this wave will start to peak.

To prevent more detrimental consequences of the ongoing evolution of Sars-CoV-2, we have no choice but to mitigate erosion of natural, Coronavirus (CoV)-nonspecific immunity in non-vaccinated individuals and exertion of strong immune selection pressure on immunodominant vaccinal epitopes in vaccinated individuals. This is to say that we must stop mass vaccination and lower viral infectivity rates immediately. Continued mass vaccination will only lead to a further increase in morbidity and hospitalization rates, which will subsequently culminate in a huge case fatality wave when expansion of more infectious, vaccine-resistant variants will explode.

A rapid and substantial decrease in viral infectivity rates could be achieved by a short-term course of large-scale antiviral chemoprophylaxis (suitable candidates have already been identified) and adequate infection prevention measures while early treatment of symptomatically infected subjects and implementation of a healthy eating (including certain dietary supplements) and lifestyle (including exercise!) plan would further contribute to building herd immunity. Although this strategy is unlikely to eradicate the virus, it should allow forcing the pandemic into transitioning to a kind of ‘artificial’endemicity. Of course, as asymptomatic reservoirs (asymptomatically infected vaccinated or non-vaccinated humans or even animals) would remain, mass gatherings would still need to be avoided in the future and large-scale chemoprophylaxis campaigns using antiviral drugs would likely need to be repeated at specific time intervals and for as long as no sterilizing immune intervention is available. The action plan proposed above should immediately be implemented: Once the virus will become entirely resistant to the current vaccines, the above-mentioned measures will no longer be able to prevent a dramatic rise in casualties, unless campaigns of antiviral chemoprophylaxis are conducted worldwide and on a permanent basis.
 

Analysis of current evolution of the pandemic and impact thereon of mass vaccination campaigns
I herewith reiterate that I will continue to distance myself from those who pretend the pandemic is over or at least toning down as a result of growing herd immunity (HI). I take issue with the way the observations of genomic/ molecular epidemiologists are downplayed and with the fact that immunological data are oftentimes ignored, taken out of context, misinterpreted or not understood. I do not concur with experts who pretend that the pandemic has now started transitioning into an endemic phase and that the virus will eventually spontaneously degrade into yet another common cold CoV that is only of minor concern to public health. It seems, indeed, like some experts now tend to attribute diminished severity of disease and declining mortality rates to growing HI and/ or waning viral virulence. As will be explained below, the predictions they make are not taking into account the complex interplay between the growing infectious pressure exerted by more infectious circulating viral variants and the rising immune selection pressure exerted on the virus by the rapidly expanding immunized population. Their predictions are also not in line with recently published data from molecular/ genomic epidemiologists showing how rising population-level immune selection pressure is now driving the genomic evolution of Sars-CoV-2 variants (see my recent contribution: 'Why the ongoing mass vaccination experiment drives a rapid evolutionary response of SARS-CoV-2').

It is simply mind-blowing that some experts still continue to ignore the negative impact of mass vaccination on the evolution of this pandemic. On the contrary, some of them even pretend that the weak link between the number of infectious cases and morbidity/ hospitalization rates, as now observed in several countries in Europe and in the US, proves that variants do not escape the immune system. They attribute this to a kind of broadly protective HI that has been acquired through previous exposure to common cold CoV and/or previous asymptomatic infection with Sars-CoV-2 and/or (according to others) Covid-19 vaccination. Some experts even continue to emphasize the role of cross-reactive T cells elicited by one or more of the above-described immunization events as a key contributor to HI. That cross-reactive memory T cells would prevent spike(S)-directed immune escape and, therefore, prevent S-directed immune escape variants from propagating and adapting to the host population is not based on any scientific evidence. There is, indeed, no scientific proof whatsoever that cross-reactive memory T cells in previously exposed or vaccinated individuals effectively contribute to eliminating/ killing CoV-infected cells. There is not even proof that any kind of T cell could possibly eliminate CoV-infected host cells in the absence of S-specific memory B cells. There is, therefore, no scientific evidence that cross-reactive, variant-nonspecific T cells contribute to curtailing or diminishing viral transmission and thus, contribute to HI. If the opposite would apply, one would not understand why, at a later stage of the pandemic, some previously asymptomatically infected subjects all of a sudden contract Covid-19 disease!

But even anti-S Abs generated upon previous exposure to common cold CoV or upon previous asymptomatic infection with Sars-CoV-2 or after immunization with Covid-19 vaccines fail to control viral transmission. This is because
Anti-S Abs elicited by previous exposure to common cold CoV do not neutralize Sars-CoV-19
Anti-S Abs elicited by asymptomatic infection are short-lived and not fully functional (there is no evidence that asymptomatic infection with Sars-CoV-2 induces memory B cells). It has been reported that these short-lived Abs are not responsible for virus elimination (the latter occurs even before anti-S-Abs start to peak)
Anti-S Abs elicited by vaccination lose their neutralizing capacity towards more infectious and increasingly S Ab-resistant variants (hence, explaining the steadily increasing occurrence of ‘breakthrough’ cases).
But, even more importantly: How do these experts reconcile an allegedly growing HI with rising infectivity rates that are currently observed in many countries due to increased circulation of the delta variant? Wouldn’t this argue for a growing erosion rather than for a consolidation of HI? This observation is certainly far from indicating that the pandemic is currently transitioning into endemicity.

So, if HI cannot account for reduced severity of the disease, then maybe spontaneous attenuation of the virus could? But how on earth would a treacherous virus all of a sudden breed descendant variants that are no more harmful than a common cold CoV? Viruses can only replicate, mutate or hide. Selection and adaptation of the mutations they produce is driven by selection pressure placed on specific phenotypic features of the virus. But what kind of selection pressure would force the virus into attenuation? And how could that happen, given that the current selection pressure on Sars-CoV-2 is reportedly known to be exerted by the population’s overall immune status and is directed at the S protein, which is known to enable viral infectiousness? When and how does natural immune selection pressure on the infectiousness of a pathogen cause diminished virulence? If these mass vaccination campaigns were really driving the propagation of ‘attenuated’ viral variants that are no longer of public health concern, I would rather welcome them as a blessing rather than rejecting them as a scourge (1)! However, as far as I am aware, no genomic evidence has been provided so far to show that the delta variant or any other more infectious variant is currently evolving mutations that would mediate a more benign course of the disease or enable the virus to become intrinsically more infectious for younger age groups.

The scientifically more plausible explanation for the observed decline in disease severity in the non-vaccinated is that the delta variant, or any other more infectious variant, increasingly affects younger age groups (e.g., young adults). Younger age groups have higher levels of natural, polyreactive B1b Abs and can, therefore, better cope with antigenic variants than the elderly or individuals with underlying disease (see references from the literature on my website under topic 1). This already explains why the delta variant is seemingly ‘less virulent’. But why does the delta variant (or other more infectious variants) increasingly target young to middle-aged adults? This, most likely, has to do with its higher level of infectiousness rather than with its intrinsic virulence. Higher viral infectiousness implies enhanced affinity of the variant spike protein for the Ace-2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) entry receptor. Enhanced affinity results in diminished capture of the virus by natural, variant-nonspecific Abs. There is abundant and compelling scientific evidence on the protective effect of polyreactive, natural Abs, including their protective effect against a number of viral infections (see references from the literature on my website under topic 1). Elevated levels of these Abs are to be considered a hallmark of natural protection from symptomatic infection upon Sars-CoV-2 exposure. It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that individuals with low functional levels of natural Abs will be more prone to contracting severe Covid-19 disease.
 
But how or why do more infectious variants arise?

During the first ten months of the pandemic, high waves of infectious cases that occurred in overcrowded areas (e.g., slums, favelas, highly populated cities,..) affected by the pandemic may have caused immune pressure on viral infectiousness, especially upon re-exposure of previously asymptomatically infected individuals. It is possible that such events have been driving natural selection and enhanced circulation of more infectious, S-directed immune escape variants. The higher and more widespread the viral infectious pressure, the higher the likelihood that previously asymptomatically infected subjects become re-exposed to the virus at a point in time where their titers of low affinity, S-directed Abs are still high enough to compete with their natural, polyreactive Abs for binding to the circulating Sars-CoV-2 lineage (see Fig. 1; in previous contributions, I have explicitly explained why S-specific Abs have higher affinity for S protein than natural IgMs, which bind to virus surface-expressed motifs through multivalent interactions). Consequently, enhanced infectivity rates could lead to a transient increase of the susceptibility of younger age groups (< 60-65 years) to Covid-19 disease and may, therefore, raise morbidity and hospitalization rates in these age groups (as is currently observed in many European countries as well as in the US). So, the higher and more widespread the viral infectious pressure, the more productive the breeding ground for more infectious variants and the higher the likelihood for natural selection of certain S-directed immune escape variants (i.e., such that evolved mutations capable of resisting suboptimal immune pressure on viral infectiousness). Immune escape variants that are selected because of their capacity to overcome such immune pressure exhibit a higher level of infectiousness. This is how high infectivity rates facilitate breeding of increasingly infectious viral variants. During the first year of the pandemic, several of such ‘more infectious’ immune escape variants have emerged (e.g., alpha (2), beta, gamma, delta).

Depending on the remaining protective effect provided by natural Abs, younger and healthy age groups, and children in particular, may not even show any symptoms at all, even though dominant circulation of more infectious variants (e.g., delta variant) is now substantially increasing the risk of repeated exposure. This already explains why Covid-19 disease in the non-vaccinated is primarily observed in young, middle-aged adults. Since younger age groups are generally better protected by natural, poly-reactive Abs, cases of severe disease in these groups are rather rare. The severity of the disease in these subjects is thought to depend on the time point of re-exposure after their previous infection (i.e., the shorter thereafter, the higher the concentration of blocking S-specific Abs, the higher the likelihood for contracting more severe disease).

Because both, binding of natural CoV-nonspecific Abs to Sars-CoV-2 and binding of Sars-CoV-2 to the Ace-2 entry receptor is mediated by multivalent interactions, it is reasonable to assume that the blocking effect of natural, CoV-nonspecific Abs on the interaction between the Ace-2 receptor and a given Sars-CoV-2 lineage primarily depends on the functional concentration of these natural Abs. This would already explain why, under normal circumstances (i.e., if not suppressed by S-specific Abs), young and/ or healthy individuals can effectively deal with all Sars-CoV-2 viral variants. The higher the affinity of S for Ace-2 (i.e., the higher the level of intrinsic viral infectiousness) and the older the age group, the lower the residual (i.e., non-suppressed) functional capacity of natural Abs.

In contrast, vaccinal Abs are directed at a limited set of S-derived Sars-CoV-2 motifs (i.e., epitopes primarily comprised within the receptor-binding domain [RBD] of the S protein). Hence, very few mutations within this limited set of epitopes will already substantially diminish the affinity of vaccinal Abs for binding to Sars-CoV-2. This, however, does not apply to S-specific Abs acquired upon recovery from natural Covid-19 disease as those are directed at a much broader and diversified spectrum of B cell epitopes. This would already explain why more infectious Sars-CoV-2 variants more readily escape from vaccinal S-specific Abs than from naturally acquired S-specific Abs and also why we are now seeing more and more breakthrough disease cases with the more infectious delta variant in vaccinees whereas young and/ or healthy individuals or previously symptomatically infected people (provided seronegative for S protein (3)) remain largely protected from Covid-19 disease.

Molecular epidemiologists conclude that, because of the steadily increasing S-directed immune pressure exerted by the human population, circulating variants are now increasingly evolving mutations that drive resistance to S-specific Abs, especially to those recognizing immunodominant epitopes that are situated within the RBD and N-terminal domain (NTD) of the S protein. It is highly unlikely that naturally acquired S-specific Abs are responsible for this immune pressure as people who recover from Covid-19 disease only constitute a relatively small subset of the population and mount Abs against a much broader and more diversified panel of S-derived epitopes. Given the nature of the vaccinal Abs and the large vaccine coverage rates in most countries, there can be no doubt that the steadily increasing population-level immune pressure found to be exerted on RBD, for example, is caused by vaccination of large masses of people (in a previous contribution, I have expressed my astonishment about the fact that these brilliant scientists didn’t even mention ’mass vaccination’ at all as a potential cause of the massive increase in S-directed immune pressure; (see my recent contribution: 'Why the ongoing mass vaccination experiment drives a rapid evolutionary response of SARS-CoV-2'). This evolution is, of course, extremely worrisome. Whereas progressing convergent evolution towards increased resistance against functional, S-specific Abs elicited by the vaccine may not necessarily further increase the affinity of the virus for the Ace-2 receptor (and hence, not commonly cause more disease in young and healthy individuals), it is reasonable to assume that such evolution will rapidly raise the number and severity of disease cases in the vaccinated part of the population. This is because growing VI escape will cause vaccinees to lose their vaccine-mediated immune protection while having their natural, CoV-nonspecific natural Abs suppressed by high titers of long-lived, S-specific vaccinal Abs (4). It is reasonable to assume that, as a general rule, the level of suppression of natural, CoV-nonspecific Abs will increase with increasing strength (adjuvantation!), frequency and coverage rate of booster immunizations (including 2nd generation vaccines!).

Vaccinal S-specific Abs cannot outcompete S-specific Abs from previously symptomatically infected individuals for binding to viral variants due to multivalent B-cell epitope recognition by the naturally primed immune system. On the other hand, immunity acquired upon recovery from natural Covid-19 disease is very robust and has repeatedly been reported to be capable of dealing very effectively with a diversified range of antigenic variants upon re-exposure (including variants of concerns; VoCs). Non-antigen (Ag)-specific innate immune adjuvantation enables epitope spreading and is, therefore, likely to contribute to broad immune recognition. Naturally acquired immunity is, therefore, an almost ‘invariant’ component to herd immunity. It is, however, uncertain whether binding of S-specific Abs from previously symptomatically infected individuals to circulating VI-escaping viral variants could render these individuals more susceptible to Ab-dependent enhancement of disease (ADE).

Based on all of the above, it becomes already apparent that mass vaccination campaigns conducted in the midst of a pandemic of more infectious variants will rapidly and dramatically weaken instead of strengthen the population’s overall immune protection status and, therefore, not contribute to generating herd immunity. This is because mutual viral transmission between the non-vaccinated and vaccinated population enables a self-amplifying, synergistic effect between high viral infectivity rates (due to more infectious circulating variants) and high vaccine coverage rates (due to mass vaccination). This results in enhanced expansion of more infectious, increasingly VI-escaping variants as depicted in Fig. 2:
High infectivity rates turn the non-vaccinated population into a breeding ground for increasingly infectious variants and a factory for the production and transmission of such infectious variants. Due to their increasing infectiousness and expansion in prevalence, viral infection and transmission rates rapidly increase and further erode natural immunity in a number of previously asymptomatically infected individuals (i.e., starting with healthy, middle-aged adults and progressively involving younger and younger individuals). This, in turn, increases S-directed immune selection pressure and drives natural selection and possibly adaptation of even more infectious variants.
High vaccine coverage rates turn the exposed vaccinated population into a brewery for more VI-escaping viral variants.
Upon their transmission to vaccinees, more infectious variants that will evolve additional mutations conferring increasing resistance to functional S-directed vaccinal Abs will be selected as those gain a competitive advantage in vaccinees and will, therefore, reproduce more effectively. Subsequent transmission of the VI-escaping variants to non-vaccinated subjects will enable them to rapidly expand in prevalence and, therefore, replace or at least dominate previously circulating variants.
The interactions described above allow to understand how mass vaccination on a background of enhanced viral infectiousness (pandemic!) engages both, the vaccinated and unvaccinated population to expedite natural selection and adaptation of immune escape variants harboring additional, RBD-associated mutations which increasingly inhibit VMI. This is to say that mass vaccination campaigns conducted during a pandemic of more infectious variants will precipitate resistance of more infectious Sars-Cov-2 variants to S-based Covid-19 vaccines.

The more ‘more infectious’ variants expand and dominate and the more these variants are subject to vaccine-mediated immune selection pressure, the more rapidly the beneficial effect from mass vaccination (i.e., reduction of viral transmission and prevention of disease) will be replaced by a growing failure of the vaccines to protect the vaccinees and of the vaccinees to protect the unvaccinated. This evolution is currently expedited by relaxation of infection-prevention measures, including more frequent contacts among healthy individuals. More frequent contacts between asymptomatically infected vaccinated and non-vaccinated subjects (5) will only promote breeding of new variants that are both, more infectious and more readily escape from vaccine immunity (e.g., lambda variant).
 

Summary
In summary, it is reasonable to postulate that the expansion of a series of more infectious variants and the concomitant explosion of infection rates is due to self-amplifying natural selection and adaptation of more infectious circulating variants, some of which likely emerged and propagated as a result from overcrowding. As the more infectious alpha, beta, gamma or delta variants emerged prior to the deployment of mass vaccination campaigns, the latter can, indeed, not be at the origin of these variants. However, as the human population have recently been reported to exert more and more immune pressure on immunodominant epitopes comprised within the RBD, it is reasonable to assume that this additional immune pressure results from mass vaccination because vaccine coverage rates are steadily growing. More infectious variants that have evolved to harbor naturally selected, S-directed immune escape mutations will readily gain a competitive advantage as continued mass vaccination campaigns with current S-based Covid-19 vaccines cause vaccinees to augment and broaden immune selection pressure on critically important, immunodominant epitopes comprised within those vaccines. Due to widespread immune selection pressure combined with a high viral infection rate and more frequent contacts between healthy vaccinated and non-vaccinated people, more infectious immune escape variants will now rapidly further evolve to fully escape VMI while expanding in prevalence. This is to say that new immune escape variants that can no longer be eliminated by any kind of VMI will soon become the dominant circulating strains.

In other words, high viral infection rates drive natural selection and self-amplifying expansion of more and more infectious Sars-CoV-2 variants in the non-vaccinated part of the population while high vaccine coverage rates drives natural selection of increasingly VI-escaping Sars-CoV-2 variants. This evolution is now driving enhanced rates of disease in both populations. Consequently, mass vaccination during a pandemic of more infectious variants self-amplifies natural selection and expansion of more infectious, increasingly VI-escaping Sars-CoV-variants. Both, the vaccinated and non-vaccinated part of the population fully contribute to this evolution.

Because of all of the above, I can certainly not endorse the opinion of those who think that the decrease in disease severity and hospitalizations that is now observed in several countries where mass vaccination is well advanced would be due to some kind of ‘attenuation’ of viral variants or to some kind of growing HI. One rather concludes that this pandemic is far from over or from transitioning into endemicity. There can be no doubt that, at this stage, the pandemic is gearing up for breeding vaccine-resistant ‘supervariants’, a phenomenon that is at risk of fueling an even larger wave of morbidity, hospitalization and, unfortunately, also death, not at least in the vaccinated part of the population.

The ongoing mass vaccination campaigns must immediately be abrogated because the vaccines fail to block viral transmission and their large-scale use during a pandemic of more infectious variants will inevitably lead to vaccine resistance of circulating Sars-CoV-2 variants. Instead, mass chemoprophylaxis campaigns should be conducted at regular intervals to reduce viral infectious pressure and transmission and prevent more infectious viral variants from fueling the breeding and dominant propagation of more infectious, vaccine-resistant variants. Furthermore, people should boost their health status whereas early treatment of patients who come down with Covid-19 disease (for more information, please consult, for example, prof. Dr. P. McCullough’s presentations and publications) would not only prevent severe disease and hospitalization but also enable these patients to more rapidly acquire broadly protective Abs facilitating killing/ elimination of virus-infected host cells and, therefore, diminish viral transmission and contribute to herd immunity. The above-mentioned interventions have been summarized in Fig. 3.

As we are now dealing with a pandemic of highly infectious variants (e.g., delta variant), we cannot afford any longer to target herd immunity without relying on large scale antiviral chemoprophylaxis combined with early treatment of Covid-19 diseased patients. This, together with an immediate halt of all Covid-19 mass vaccination campaigns, should now constitute the main pillars of our battle against this otherwise totally uncontrollable pandemic.

As much as I follow reports on vaccine safety issues with a great deal of concern, worry and anxiousness, I tend to believe that the potential epidemiological impact of these vaccination campaigns on human lives could be orders of magnitude larger than that of their potential short- or long-term sequelae. I am, therefore, begging the WHO and all stakeholders of these campaigns to immediately intervene as proposed above. After the first experiment failed (instead of generating herd immunity, mass vaccination is now turning vaccinees into potential spreaders of VI-escaping variants!), our human race cannot afford a second large scale experiment that aims at continuing mass vaccination while promoting exposure of the population to an even higher infectious pressure exerted by even more infectious immune escape variants!
 

Overall Conclusion
Both, long-lived Sars-CoV-specific immunity acquired upon recovery from disease and innate, CoV-nonspecific Ab-mediated immunity normally contribute to establishing broadly protective herd immunity and thereby enable a natural CoV pandemic (or, for that matter, any pandemic of an acute, self-limiting viral disease) to eventually transition into an endemic phase. However, circulation of more infectious variants comes with a high price to pay for herd immunity to establish as high infectivity rates are more likely to erode natural, polyreactive (i.e., CoV-nonspecific) immunity in young and/ or healthy individuals. As a result, morbidity and hospitalization rates, and ultimately also the number of deaths, will increase. This self-amplifying cycle of enhanced viral infectiousness (resulting in enhanced viral infectivity rates) would only come to an end when the population density is diluted down to a level low enough for viral transmission (of a highly transmissible/ infectious variant!) to substantially diminish.

Whereas fast and dominant propagation of naturally selected, more infectious variants continues to erode the natural first line of variant-nonspecific immune defense in the non-vaccinated part of the population, vaccination of large parts of the population and contacts among vaccinated and non-vaccinated subjects are driving natural selection and adaptation of increasingly VI-escaping variants and are, therefore, increasingly compromising VMI. Neither previous CoV infection (including Sars-CoV-2 infection), nor higher vaccine coverage rates can compensate for the lost immunological capacity. Indeed, memory T cells elicited upon previous CoV infection or vaccination are not reportedly known to be endowed with cytotoxic activity towards CoV-infected cells, nor can S-specific Abs elicited upon previous CoV infection or vaccination prevent spreading of more infectious Sars-CoV-2 variants. Molecular epidemiologists have suggested that immune failure to block viral transmission (e.g., in immunosuppressed patients) causes variants to convergently evolve specifically selected mutations, thereby enabling escape from VMI. VI escape together with suppression of natural, CoV-nonspecific Abs by vaccinal Abs will make vaccinees highly susceptible to contracting Covid-19 disease.

Dominant propagation of more infectious viral variants could be mitigated by mass chemoprophylaxis using a potent antiviral. At the same time, immune pressure on vaccinal S-specific epitopes must be mitigated by calling an immediate halt to mass vaccination campaigns. Furthermore, early treatment of symptomatic subjects can prevent severe disease and provide them with durable protection against a diversified spectrum of more infectious variants and, thereby, also reduce viral transmission. However, this is the last opportunity to limit the disastrous consequences of mass vaccination
 
Indeed, it is yet uncertain and unexplored to what extent naturally selected immune escape variants can recombine upon co-infection and generate even more complex variants, the phenotypic characteristics of which are totally unpredictable. It is also unclear whether early treatment could prevent vaccinees who have become highly susceptible to Covid-19 disease (i.e., due to viral resistance to VMI) from succumbing to severe disease. In addition, it is completely unknown whether vaccines and even individuals who previously contracted symptomatic infection are more likely to fall victim to enhanced Covid-19 disease (i.e., ADE) as their vaccinal Abs may no longer be able to neutralize the virus but could still bind to it. Treatment of patients with ADE may be much more difficult and the outcome less predictable.

The more Sars-CoV-2 evolves to acquiring VI-escaping properties, the less likely vaccines will benefit from the above-proposed strategy. This is because even low infectivity rates of circulating variants could suffice to boost their vaccinal Abs and hence, suppress their innate immune defense. Such re-stimulation could only be prevented by eradicating all of the currently circulating Sars-CoV-2 variants. Eradication of those could be achieved by using universal vaccines (6) that induce sterilizing immunity. The development of such vaccines may require a fundamentally different approach to immune intervention in that induced immune effector cells ought to be capable of CoV-nonspecific killing of CoV-infected cells and provide durable protective immunity in all subjects of the population (regardless of their immunization history and immunogenetic background). It goes without saying that such characteristics would render a vaccine highly and durably effective, even when used in mass vaccination campaigns in the midst of a pandemic of a highly mutable virus, and even if more infectious viral variants would already be circulating. Vaccine safety remains of course paramount and cannot be subject to any compromise, especially not when a smart combination of antiviral chemoprophylaxis, infection prevention, early treatment and adherence to health-strengthening eating and life-style habits could still be safe and effective in preventing cases of severe disease and prevent VI-escaping variants from becoming dominant.

Unless continued mass vaccination with S-based vaccines in populations exposed to a CoV pandemic would be proven to not cause immune selection pressure on the functionality of the vaccinal Abs and unless S-specific Abs would be proven to not compete with natural, CoV-nonspecific Abs for binding to Sars-CoV-2, mass vaccination campaigns during a pandemic, especially during a pandemic of more infectious variants, will neither enable herd immunity nor mitigate future waves of disease (unless transmission-blocking vaccines are used!). In fact, they have exactly the opposite effect in that they promote the spread of increasingly VI-escaping variants and suppress natural immunity in vaccinees. This will only result in higher morbidity and mortality rates in the part of the population that is normally naturally protected from Covid-19 (i.e., the vast majority of the population). A decline of severe morbidity and mortality rates is only observed in the elderly and in people with some underlying diseases. The outcome, therefore, of the mass vaccination campaigns is very different from the original objective, which was to protect the vast majority of people, including those who are immunologically Sars-CoV-2 naïve (via herd immunity!). Scientifically speaking, it is hard to understand how the circulating, more infectious Sars-CoV-2 variants would not rapidly evolve to overcome the RBD-directed immune pressure that is currently exerted by large parts of the human population and merge into a supervariant that evades the immune response induced by all of the S-based Covid-19 vaccines. It is simply unthinkable that the ongoing mass vaccination campaigns could mitigate, let alone terminate, this pandemic of more infectious Sars-CoV-2 variants and force the virus into adopting milder instead of even more problematic features.

I, therefore, reiterate that the currently observed convergence of naturally selected mutations towards S-derived antigenic sites that facilitate or are directly responsible for binding to the Ace-2 entry receptor combined with the velocity at which this evolution currently takes place poses a huge and imminent threat to the human population and will heavily backfire if we continue mass vaccination on a background of high viral infection rates while largely relaxing infection prevention measures.

Last but not least, it must be emphasized that those calling themselves ‘experts’ while pretending that this pandemic is ‘a pandemic among the non-vaccinated’ are devoid of any scientific insight in the evolutionary dynamics of Sars-CoV-2 as currently shaped by a combination of high viral infectivity and vaccine coverage rates. Neither the vaccinated (who merely believed the vaccine would protect them from Covid-19 disease) nor the non-vaccinated (who simply believe there is no need for them to take the vaccine in order to stay protected) are to be blamed for the escalation of this pandemic. Mass vaccination is the one and only culprit.

Note: A copy of this letter has been sent to WHO, NIH, CDC, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, CEPI, FDA, EMEA and to R&D leaders from Pfizer, Moderna, Astra-Zeneca, J&J, Novavax and GSK

https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php...of-disease
   

This will work



[Image: attachment.php?aid=9714]
(07-29-2021, 06:36 AM)727Sky Wrote: Maybe right or maybe wrong just something to consider IMO  
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php...of-disease
Quote:World

Vaccine Expert Gives "Final Warning" STOP All Mass COVID Vaccinations Immediately or face unleashing incurable, deadly, unstoppable wave of disease
World NewsDesk 27 July 2021  Hits: 35042
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php...of-disease

I tend to believe that is right.

Considering the mass vaccinations, there are billions of people with this vaccine. Now add to that circumstance the fact that vaccinated people are STILL catching it, despite the vaccinations,  A certain percentage of the viruses therefore MUST be overcoming the vaccine, developing their own immunity to it. That creates billions of laboratories, billions of chances for the virus to develop defenses against the vaccine.


It only takes ONE virus doing that to wreak havoc. That one will multiply... and spread... and will necessarily be more potent than any previous forms, because it developed the way around the vaccine, and will be able to overwhelm the vaccines.

.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.

Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’


Quote:Why Are Globalists and Governments so Desperate for 100% Vaccination Rates?
[Image: Globalists-200x115.jpg]
Ask yourself, Why.
It is the Great Reset they Crave so badly.
Yes it is.
Quote:How is it possible that almost all the governments on the planet are in agreement on medical totalitarianism?
Well, it’s rather easy to understand when you realize the majority of them are linked together through globalists institutions like the World Economic Forum, which has repeatedly called the pandemic a “perfect opportunity” to push through their plans for a “Great Reset”.


The “Great Reset” is a long term ideological usurpation of what’s left of individual freedom and free market economies, and its goal is the imposition of a global socialist/communist dictatorship.
Globalists wrap these objectives in pretty sounding words and humanitarian sounding aspirations, but at bottom the “Reset” is about an end to liberty as we know it. This is not an exaggeration, this is reality; this is what these people desire above all else.

But how to achieve such a goal?


Well, interestingly enough the WEF and the Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation described exactly how they planned to do it during a “simulation” they held in October of 2019 called “Event 201”.

During the event, they imagined a massive coronavirus pandemic, spread supposedly from animals to humans, which would facilitate the need for pervasive restrictions on individual liberties, national economies as well as the internet and social media.


I’m sure it’s all a coincidence, but the exact same scenario the globalists at the WEF played out during Event 201 happened in the real world only two months later.
Source

Yes they had a Plan and now they are pushing their Agenda on us.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
There's nothing new under the sun. George Washington mandated smallpox vaccinations and Abigail Adams would allow no one on her property nor in her employ that weren't as well. Children were requires vaccines as well to attend public school during the last 60 or so years.This whole damned thing should be behind us at this juncture.
internet Agent Provocateur
(07-29-2021, 11:39 PM)Antisthenes Wrote: There's nothing new under the sun. George Washington mandated smallpox vaccinations and Abigail Adams would allow no one on her property nor in her employ that weren't as well. Children were requires vaccines as well to attend public school during the last 60 or so years.This whole damned thing should be behind us at this juncture.

My husband said Yes General Washington did have the Continental Army Vaccinated. 
I did not know this (being Chinese) so I looked it up.
Quote:On the 6th of January 1777, George Washington wrote to Dr. William Shippen Jr., ordering him to inoculate all of the forces that came through Philadelphia. He explained that: "Necessity not only authorizes but seems to require the measure, for should the disorder infect the Army . . . we should have more to dread from it, than from the Sword of the Enemy." The urgency was real. Troops were scarce and encampments had turned into nomadic hospitals of festering disease, deterring further recruitment. Both Benedict Arnold and Benjamin Franklin, after surveying the havoc wreaked by Variola in the Canadian campaign, expressed fears that the virus would be the army's ultimate downfall.
Source
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
https://greatgameindia.com/vaccinated-pe...a-variant/

Quote:Fully Vaccinated People Are Contagious And Spread Delta Variant To The Unvaccinated Says CDC

July 29, 2021
People who have been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 yet still get infected with the delta strain could transmit the infection to unvaccinated people, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky said Tuesday in justifying renewed recommendations for mask-wearing.
[Image: GreatGameIndia-Telegram-Channel.png?fit=500%2C88&ssl=1]
[Image: FullyVaccinatedPeopleAreContagiousAndSpr...C392&ssl=1]
“In rare occasions, some vaccinated people infected with the delta variant after vaccination may be contagious and spread the virus to others,” she told reporters on Tuesday.

“This new science is worrisome and unfortunately warrants an update to our recommendations.”
Previous recommendations from the agency were based on COVID-19 monitoring data that indicated vaccinated people rarely transmit the virus to others.
Walensky said CDC investigations have found that the amount of virus present in vaccinated people infected with Delta is similar to the levels found in unvaccinated people with Delta infections.


That’s an indication that vaccinated people can easily transmit the virus – even if they’re less likely to get sick on the whole.
In areas of high transmission, Walensky said, about 1 in 20 – or even 1 in 10 – of a person’s contacts could lead to a breakthrough infection (a case diagnosed after someone is fully vaccinated). That’s assuming vaccines are 90% to 95% effective.
However, about two-thirds of the general population have COVID-19 antibodies and 67.6% of India’s population were exposed to the disease, the fourth serosurvey conducted by ICMR during the June-July 2021 period found.


The US Food and Drug Administration has warned that Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose Covid-19 vaccine can cause Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare disorder where the immune system attacks the nervous system and can result in paralysis.
Meanwhile, Norway has announced that you are at a greater risk of dying from AstraZeneca vaccine branded as Covishield in India than from COVID-19. While waiting for the final decision on the controversial vaccine, Norway has meanwhile decided to offload its stock of AstraZeneca to fellow Nordic countries that actually want to use them despite the associated risks.

Even the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) safety committee has added another blood condition to the potential side effects of AstraZeneca’s vaccine branded as Covishield in India – the Capillary Leak Syndrome.
Capillary leak syndrome is a condition that causes fluid to leak out of blood vessels and could cause very low blood pressure, leading to pain, nausea and tiredness or, in the worst case, kidney failure and strokes.
On the other hand Portugal has accused the British government of lying about the cases of Nepal mutation and creating panic of what the authorities tried to portray as a ‘Super Indian Variant‘.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blo...ore-214698

Quote:Report, CDC Expected To Announce Tomorrow That COVID Vaccines Don’t Work on Delta Variant – Hence, White House Credits Trump With Vaccine Today

July 29, 2021 | Sundance | 457 Comments
The White House would never credit Donald Trump with the vaccine rollout unless there was something negative about the vaccine that is going to hit the newswires; that is a no-brainer.
That baseline is why CTH said two months ago to watch for the moment when the White House credits Trump with the vaccine, because that’s the moment when: (1) the vaccine was going to be identified as dangerous; and/or (2) reports would show the vaccine did not work.
Today the White House credited President Trump with the vaccine:
[Image: Kim-klacic-tweet.jpg]
….And right on cue, the late-evening reporting indicates that tomorrow the CDC will announce the vaccine doesn’t work (against the Delta variant).   Hence, the need for masks, social distancing and/or possibly lockdowns 2.0.   Reminder, when the Intelligence Branch needs to get the public relations engaged, they use the New York Times.
[New York Times] – […] New research showed that vaccinated people infected with the Delta variant carry tremendous amounts of the virus in the nose and throat, she said in an email responding to questions from The New York Times.
The finding contradicts what scientists had observed in vaccinated people infected with previous versions of the virus, who mostly seemed incapable of infecting others.
That conclusion dealt Americans a heavy blow: People with so-called breakthrough infections — cases that occur despite full vaccination — of the Delta variant may be just as contagious as unvaccinated people, even if they have no symptoms. (link)

Bottom line of this narrative shift… vaccinations don’t work. Everything goes back to square one. Blame Trump, not us.

There is also data showing that COVID hospitalizations offer no distinction between vaccinated and unvaccinated; and in the example of LA county, the percentage of  vaccinated people hospitalized with COVID is identical to the percentage of vaccinated people in the general population.  [70% of population vaccinated, 70% of COVID hospitalization patients are vaccinated.]  The vaccine offers no benefit from the standing of hospitalization… or so it appears.
In San Francisco, 77% of the population is vaccinated and 83% of the COVID hospitalizations at University of California SF Hospital are previously vaccinated [link].   Again, highlighting the vaccine offers no benefit from the standpoint of hospitalization.
Additionally, there’s data from a recent Pfizer study [Pre-Release pdf Here] where 44,000 patients were studied.  22,000 were given the vaccine, and 22,000 received the placebo.  The results amid both groups was almost identical.
[Image: pfizer-study-1.jpg]
Two COVID deaths in 22,000 for non-vaxxed (death rate of .0009%), and one COVID death out of 22,000 for the vaccinated group (death rate .00009%).   In essence, COVID is not that dangerous and has a very high survival rate depending on co-morbidities or pre-existing medical issues.
So, what does all this jumbled mess really add up to?
If we can predict pretty accurately, based entirely on political ideology and a review of the calendar, what will happen around the COVID mitigation narrative; which we have been doing for over a year; then that means the politics of COVID is what’s driving the actions of those who are using COVID.  Politics is driving the narrative.
Here’s a high level overview of what it appears to be…
COVID is essentially a bad flu virus that targets the respiratory system, hence SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome).  It is dangerous if you have pre-existing conditions, but not more dangerous than the regular flu virus for people with those same pre-existing conditions.
We have flu shots every year, but we don’t mandate them; and we don’t shut down businesses to avoid the flu; and we don’t close society and/or shut down commerce; and we don’t destroy schools and education and force people to wear masks to avoid the flu virus.  However, in order to weaponize COVID for political benefits, to include mail-in ballot fraud and rebuilding society, a ruse of fear must be maintained.
The fear of COVID is that ruse.

How to create an industry out of nothing. Big Pharma did it with the sniffles, now the dark side of the force is taking
a shot at it!


Quote:DODGY DOCS Fake Covid travel documents sold online for £100 -just as Britain opens up to double-jabbed tourists

'Fake Covid travel documents are being sold online for as little as a £100 just as Britain opens up its borders to
double-jabbed tourists. Criminals are flogging forged EU and US documents claiming they come from an international
network of corrupt doctors who enter false records of vaccinations on national databases.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=9719]
Vaccination passports and Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab. One of them is fake.

Ads on messaging app Telegram claim to be able to provide a “vaccination card for anyone who does not want to take
the vaccination but needs the vaccination card for work and travel.” As fully vaccinated travellers from the EU and USA
can enter the UK from Monday, Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said he “cannot guarantee” that there would not be
efforts to use fake documents.

One dodgy vendor boasts: “Our vaccination certificates are registered and authentic, clearly showing that you have been
vaccinated and are displayed in the country’s database system with a valid vaccination number.”

After explaining that the documentation could help with entry to several different nations they said: “We are working on
gaining access to other countries’ medical systems and will update the list.

One seller said he was able to arrange false documents for €200 (£170) each or €100 (£85) for two or more.
He followed up by sending a series of images showing documents laid out on a table.
He sent screenshots from an apparently satisfied customer wanting five more certificates to get his family into Belgium.
He demanded to be paid using Bitcoin but also said he would happily take payment through PayPal.

Sun investigators found six group channels on Telegram - used by criminals to to flog items - who were selling fake Covid
documents. Shockingly their combined following was over 230,000 people worldwide.

The forgers have turned to Telegram after being blacklisted on traditional networks such as Facebook, Twitter, and eBay.

Yesterday Mr Raab said the Government “cannot guarantee” that there would not be efforts to use fake documents, but it was
“highly unlikely.” He said: “The point here is that, with both the European countries and the US, we are talking about high-trust
countries with whom we have not just an intuitive level of high trust, we have active cooperation, so we know that we can
straighten out any discrepancies we might come across pretty quickly."

He added a “double lock” of written certification and proof of US residency for American travellers, will allow “further checks if
there is any suspicion of fraud.” It comes as Europeans jabbed with unregulated Russian and Chinese jabs will not be able to
skip quarantine when coming to the UK.

Mr Raab said Britain is not risking a new deadly covid outbreak by opening the borders to double-jabbed travellers from the
EU and USA. He said that there would be the “right level of security and assurance” adding: “So if it's one or other of the Chinese
or Russian vaccines, which have not been approved they wouldn't be allowed.”

Millions of Hungarians have been jabbed with the batches and won't be able enter the UK quarantine free...'
The Sun:


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
(07-30-2021, 07:54 AM)727Sky Wrote: https://greatgameindia.com/vaccinated-pe...a-variant/

Quote:Fully Vaccinated People Are Contagious And Spread Delta Variant To The Unvaccinated Says CDC

July 29, 2021
People who have been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 yet still get infected with the delta strain could transmit the infection to unvaccinated people, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky said Tuesday in justifying renewed recommendations for mask-wearing.
[Image: GreatGameIndia-Telegram-Channel.png?fit=500%2C88&ssl=1]
[Image: FullyVaccinatedPeopleAreContagiousAndSpr...C392&ssl=1]
“In rare occasions, some vaccinated people infected with the delta variant after vaccination may be contagious and spread the virus to others,” she told reporters on Tuesday.

“This new science is worrisome and unfortunately warrants an update to our recommendations.”
Previous recommendations from the agency were based on COVID-19 monitoring data that indicated vaccinated people rarely transmit the virus to others.
Walensky said CDC investigations have found that the amount of virus present in vaccinated people infected with Delta is similar to the levels found in unvaccinated people with Delta infections.


That’s an indication that vaccinated people can easily transmit the virus – even if they’re less likely to get sick on the whole.
In areas of high transmission, Walensky said, about 1 in 20 – or even 1 in 10 – of a person’s contacts could lead to a breakthrough infection (a case diagnosed after someone is fully vaccinated). That’s assuming vaccines are 90% to 95% effective.
However, about two-thirds of the general population have COVID-19 antibodies and 67.6% of India’s population were exposed to the disease, the fourth serosurvey conducted by ICMR during the June-July 2021 period found.


The US Food and Drug Administration has warned that Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose Covid-19 vaccine can cause Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare disorder where the immune system attacks the nervous system and can result in paralysis.
Meanwhile, Norway has announced that you are at a greater risk of dying from AstraZeneca vaccine branded as Covishield in India than from COVID-19. While waiting for the final decision on the controversial vaccine, Norway has meanwhile decided to offload its stock of AstraZeneca to fellow Nordic countries that actually want to use them despite the associated risks.

Even the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) safety committee has added another blood condition to the potential side effects of AstraZeneca’s vaccine branded as Covishield in India – the Capillary Leak Syndrome.
Capillary leak syndrome is a condition that causes fluid to leak out of blood vessels and could cause very low blood pressure, leading to pain, nausea and tiredness or, in the worst case, kidney failure and strokes.
On the other hand Portugal has accused the British government of lying about the cases of Nepal mutation and creating panic of what the authorities tried to portray as a ‘Super Indian Variant‘.



Who can trust the CDC ? How they even get the data that delta is no everywhere ?



I emailed the CDC to ask them how they are verifying what variant is dominant. This was their answer. Thoughts?


[url=https://twitter.com/DeniceMarin/status/1420967836613238784][/url]
This caught my ear and I believe the interesting part starts-in at the three-minute mark.




Taken from PLOTUS' thread titled " Moderna vaccination update for PLOTUS"
Link:

PLOTUS wrote on 12th March 2021
"...My friends I am nearly a month into my Vaccination and so far the side effects have been
the want of a Nap mid day. Of course that wasn't too uncommon prior to the shot, and that is
about it.

A few times an 'almost' headache..... well it never came on full, just the slightest of a hint that
one might be coming. That was as far as it manifest. 

I personally suggest you consider taking the chance. We all wonder if ...????????... and think
a conspiracy may be involved, or other concerned thoughts. 
But my experience has shown it to be a non-event....... So-Far.

Stay tuned, if there are changes, I will warn you.  Bear in mind, my second inoculation is coming
up next week, the Twenty Fourth of March 2021 Don't be cavalier, but don't be indifferent either...
(My suggestion only)"
..............................................................................

PLOTUS wrote on 13th March 2021
"...OK.... as I said, I would bring you any developments that I encountered related to the Vaccine. 
I can't be sure the cause..... but last night was absolutely miserable.

It started with a numbness in my shoulders and migrated to my hands, calves and feet with an intense
tingling akin to Neuropathy ? A general feeling of unease followed. All my arthritic pain which is standard
for me for the last 3-4 years, had increased substantially. I encountered Fever and Chills.

Well friends I will endeavor to keep you all apprised of my condition as it unfolds.
My next scheduled "Moderna" inoculation, 2 of 2 is scheduled for this coming Wed. on the 24th 2021.
Oh gosh-dog-it, I wish I could shake this pain and numbness.... Now that's funny ie. Pain and Numbness
in the same sentence, opposites ?

Well believe me, as I type here I have both and can scarcely feel my fingers from the palm down.
Well  friends, carry-on.. reports will be forthcoming if there is any change."
..............................................................................

Wallfire responded on the same day with:
"Very similar to what I got with AZ vaccine"
..............................................................................

GeauxHomeLittleD wrote on 15th March 2021:
"So here's the deal:
Mom and step-dad had first Moderna shots. Headaches, body aches, wooziness, etc... usual flu vaccine-like
symptoms- until a few days later!

First off step-dad wakes up acting like a total dick and tries to start fights with mom all morning.
Mom takes step-dad to regular urologist appointment. Nurse hands him cup for a urine sample.
He claims not to remember how and pisses himself right then and there, fully dresses and standing in the exam
room. Mom cleans him and dries him up best she can.

After appointment they leave doctor's office, stop to get some food and head home.
Step-dad doesn't remember anything about doctor appointment. They get home and as soon as they step through
the door he tells Mom he has to go to the bathroom and she says "Well go on then!" expecting him to head to the
bathroom- instead he stands there a minute or so and then proceeds to shit himself!
Then starts screaming at my Mom that it was her fault! He didn't remember any of it.

Dad and step-mom had their first Moderna shots as well. They also had flu symptoms, but Dad had swelling and
soreness in his lymph nodes pretty bad. Dad also had serious fuzzy headedness.
Will update if any more symptoms, especially when they all get their second doses. "
..............................................................................

PLOTUS wrote on 26th March 2021:
"...Aaaaaw, last night, miserable. Sweats, fever, painful joints and inability to urinate easily.
Also a constipation that was painful. Seem'd like time was going half speed.
Took forever to arrive at this morning. The 'sort'a' headache is still with me.
Neuropathy increased by double.

All in all, I feel like hammered shit. One good thing, last night put on a spectacular thunder and lightning show along
with brief downpours, so there's that ..lol

If this an indicator of the vaccine working by bringing so much chaos to my system....
then it must be VERY efficient....gosh dammm ugggggg A shower and coffee are in order, just maybe it will fade some."
..............................................................................

PLOTUS wrote on 27th March 2021:
"...Yes the second dose is far worse than the first. The first was pretty much a non-event, sleepiness and soreness for
a day at the injection site.  Today Saturday morning at 10:00 I have been in a lot of joint pain, difficulty in urinating and
movements, and neuropathy doubled.

My fingers are tingling 24/7 now. Appetite ....meh..  Mental acuity is still sharp, but feels tired, strained.
Which follows with the Tiredness I have been experiencing from the start.
That nagging wana-be headache that never quite comes on but remains in the background. 

And as I might of mentioned before, this time thing. Time seems to be going about quarter or half speed,
seriously. Time moving slow ? But never the less that is what it feels like. Take a nap, lay down and dream,
wonderful dreams, wake up what should be a couple hours having past, and in reality it's only been twenty minutes.
Well that is the morning review. Hoping to get back to normal..... if that still exists. Maybe I'm turning into a Borg lol."
..............................................................................

PLOTUS wrote on 29th March 2021:
"...Left handed and my left hand is tingling up to my wrist.
The rest of me ok, brief 10-15 minutes of fever about an hour ago. 
All's ok for now except the hand tingling like crazy."
..............................................................................

BIAD wrote on 30th March 2021:
"...I have both my little finger and the one next to it on both hands up to the wrists tingling due to my latest bout of flu
and I haven't been near a vaccine!"
..............................................................................

BIAD wrote on 30th March 2021:
"...I know exactly what he's saying and it's not just the exasperation of sleeplessness.
For myself, it was the concern that you're certain one's internal clock tells you approximately thirty minutes have passed
and it's been only two or three!

Time was moving slow and I know it was. Then rationality steps in and tells you to stop being silly.
I'll wager PLOTUS and I live nowhere near each other (me-UK) and I know we've never met.
He got the jab and I didn't. I got flu and he didn't. Yet we share time anomalies and tingles."
..............................................................................

There's another part to my weird encounter with the Coof that involved something I've decided was a dream.
But I'd swear that when I was in bed, I saw someone standing over me the night before I took ill and did something
to the side of my neck.

However, I ain't special. I don't know anyone important (except you guys!), if I glean any endorphin-tickles, it's from
the remarks on this site when BIAD makes a particular well-liked banner. I rarely leave my home and even-more rarer,
visit conspiracy sites similar from Rogue Nation.

I don't have a cell-phone, I've never been a member of Facebook, Twitter or even log-in for YouTube videos to comment.
I don't drink -although I did have a pint of beer when my wife and I went to the coast for a day and I've never had any
type of publically-frowned-upon drugs.
Hell, it's been over a decade since I visited a Doctor and before that single visit, it must be over twenty years since
I went to be examined. 

The above is the truth. (I did miss out my two-hour visit to an hospital when I broke my leg during an encounter with
a speeding vehicle! That was around 2001)
tinywondering
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
@"BIAD" wrote:

Quote:There's another part to my weird encounter with the Coof that involved something I've decided was a dream.

But I'd swear that when I was in bed, I saw someone standing over me the night before I took ill and did something
to the side of my neck.

You shouldn't have been hallucinating if you weren't sick yet. It's really strange that you and Plotus had the same experience of slow time, but you weren't jabbed. 


Someone sneaking into one's bedroom at night to inject an experimental cocktail of chemicals into your veins? I don't put anything past them. What better person to use than someone out of the public eye?
  
It makes me wonder what they're doing behind the curtain that they're still hiding from us?

tinysurprised
(07-30-2021, 04:38 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: @"BIAD" wrote:

Quote:There's another part to my weird encounter with the Coof that involved something I've decided was a dream.

But I'd swear that when I was in bed, I saw someone standing over me the night before I took ill and did something
to the side of my neck.

You shouldn't have been hallucinating if you weren't sick yet. It's really strange that you and Plotus had the same experience of slow time, but you weren't jabbed. 
Maybe something "they" are spraying in the skies above all of us?  
It makes me wonder what they're doing behind the curtain that they're still hiding from us?

tinysurprised

You may've picked up from my time at RN, that I'll tend to lean towards everyday rationality first before pondering
the worlds my late-mother mother fully believed in.

I've never seen a ghost and even though my wife says she has -and we later identified the female of her family that
she described standing at the top of our stairs, my hesitance remains because usually, the world tends to not exhibit
these occurrences.

If I read what I wrote, my first inclination would be to doubt it as a reality and agree that it was a dream.

I can remember the feelings I had when 'I convinced myself' someone was pinging on my personal-space radar.
I know I have a memory of someone leaning over me. I was facing towards the centre of the bed on my side.
The actual physical symptoms (shivery legs and a general feeling of weakness) of my four-week sickness came
the next evening, a Tuesday.

The similar symptoms that PLOTUS and I had, should not be able to be connected. He indicates the vaccine, I cannot
because I've never -and will never, had it.
It was the 'finger-numbness' that first caught my attention.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
(07-30-2021, 04:59 PM)BIAD Wrote:
(07-30-2021, 04:38 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: @"BIAD" wrote:

Quote:There's another part to my weird encounter with the Coof that involved something I've decided was a dream.

But I'd swear that when I was in bed, I saw someone standing over me the night before I took ill and did something
to the side of my neck.

You shouldn't have been hallucinating if you weren't sick yet. It's really strange that you and Plotus had the same experience of slow time, but you weren't jabbed. 
Maybe something "they" are spraying in the skies above all of us?  
It makes me wonder what they're doing behind the curtain that they're still hiding from us?

tinysurprised

You may've picked up from my time at RN, that I'll tend to lean towards everyday rationality first before pondering
the worlds my late-mother mother fully believed in.

I've never seen a ghost and even though my wife says she has -and we later identified the female of her family that
she described standing at the top of our stairs, my hesitance remains because usually, the world tends to not exhibit
these occurrences.

If I read what I wrote, my first inclination would be to doubt it as a reality and agree that it was a dream.

I can remember the feelings I had when 'I convinced myself' someone was pinging on my personal-space radar.
I know I have a memory of someone leaning over me. I was facing towards the centre of the bed on my side.
The actual physical symptoms (shivery legs and a general feeling of weakness) of my four-week sickness came
the next evening, a Tuesday.

The similar symptoms that PLOTUS and I had, should not be able to be connected. He indicates the vaccine, I cannot
because I've never -and will never, had it.
It was the 'finger-numbness' that first caught my attention.

@BIAD, I'm at a loss.  This one has me scratching my head. 

I know that we have the technology to cloak ourselves, so maybe it was Bill Gates who gave you a visit because he needed to see how the mind-body would react when believing they hadn't received the jab? Mind over matter, and all that jazz.  I'm sure, being the second richest man on the planet, he would have the cloaking technology. 

I'm just being funny.  tinylaughing  

But, what if it's true?   tinyhuh
   
(07-30-2021, 04:59 PM)BIAD Wrote:
(07-30-2021, 04:38 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: @"BIAD" wrote:

Quote:There's another part to my weird encounter with the Coof that involved something I've decided was a dream.

But I'd swear that when I was in bed, I saw someone standing over me the night before I took ill and did something
to the side of my neck.

You shouldn't have been hallucinating if you weren't sick yet. It's really strange that you and Plotus had the same experience of slow time, but you weren't jabbed. 
Maybe something "they" are spraying in the skies above all of us?  
It makes me wonder what they're doing behind the curtain that they're still hiding from us?

tinysurprised

You may've picked up from my time at RN, that I'll tend to lean towards everyday rationality first before pondering
the worlds my late-mother mother fully believed in.

I've never seen a ghost and even though my wife says she has -and we later identified the female of her family that
she described standing at the top of our stairs, my hesitance remains because usually, the world tends to not exhibit
these occurrences.

If I read what I wrote, my first inclination would be to doubt it as a reality and agree that it was a dream.

I can remember the feelings I had when 'I convinced myself' someone was pinging on my personal-space radar.
I know I have a memory of someone leaning over me. I was facing towards the centre of the bed on my side.
The actual physical symptoms (shivery legs and a general feeling of weakness) of my four-week sickness came
the next evening, a Tuesday.

The similar symptoms that PLOTUS and I had, should not be able to be connected. He indicates the vaccine, I cannot
because I've never -and will never, had it.
It was the 'finger-numbness' that first caught my attention.


Finger-numbness can be related to low B12, potassium, B1 . There`s actually some similarity`s with covid and thiamine B1 deficiency .


The Grim Reaper Uses a Stealth Vitamin B1 Deficiency (Beriberi), Hidden Behind the Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic


[Image: attachment.php?aid=9720]
(07-30-2021, 05:25 PM)Kenzo Wrote: The Grim Reaper Uses a Stealth Vitamin B1 Deficiency (Beriberi), Hidden Behind the Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic

That's the thing, Kenzo... the majority of the physical symptoms on that list that you kindly supplied, I never had.
Selected finger-numbness, imaginary back-ache and a slight blurring of my vision.
(I wish I could accept my sniffles caused my hair-loss, but sadly, no!)

But the amnesia is something that effected me, I'm sure of it.
My wife told my visiting son a tale regarding my behaviour during a meal and hand-on-heart, not only is it the type
of conduct I'd never perform, I have no memory of it happening.
tinywondering
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
(07-30-2021, 07:12 PM)BIAD Wrote:
(07-30-2021, 05:25 PM)Kenzo Wrote: The Grim Reaper Uses a Stealth Vitamin B1 Deficiency (Beriberi), Hidden Behind the Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic

That's the thing, Kenzo... the majority of the physical symptoms on that list that you kindly supplied, I never had.
Selected finger-numbness, imaginary back-ache and a slight blurring of my vision.
(I wish I could accept my sniffles caused my hair-loss, but sadly, no!)

But the amnesia is something that effected me, I'm sure of it.
My wife told my visiting son a tale regarding my behaviour during a meal and hand-on-heart, not only is it the type
of conduct I'd never perform, I have no memory of it happening.
tinywondering

Yeeh there can be so many reasons for amnesia , low oxygen to brain if not enough iron etc, or other deficiencys.



My head dont like mornings without coffee tinycrying,  or too much EMF which causes brain fog .


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 181 Guest(s)