Roe vs. Wade overturned

[Ninurta]

People who have worked hard and through no fault of their own are finding it hard to pay their rent and feed their children, yet I didn't see the government or big businesses coming to their rescue.

Disney has employees that have lost their homes and are living in motels. Disney has money to pay for travel and expenses for people to leave the State to get an abortion, but have no concern for their own employees. ?????

So this sounds really off, really suspicious. More is going in then meets the eye.

Yes, there is more going on than meets the eye. Corporations jumping on this bandwagon are doing it entirely for themselves, not for the employees in question. It is much cheaper to pay for an abortion than it is to pay maternity leave and suffer the economic loss of productivity that leave entails, not to mention the time off that mothers often have to take in order to take care of their children long after birth.

Notice how this was not really an issue, and certainly didn't have companies weighing in on it, until after the single paycheck family was a thing of the past, and women were forced into the workforce to make family ends meet. "Women's Liberation" was also a product of that financial maneuvering - getting women out of the house and into production to increase corporate profits, while at the same time convincing them that "liberation" was working for The Man and filling his pockets up. Notice how corporate profits skyrocketed after they got that societal change implemented.

Ask yourself why it is that "strong, confident, independent and empowered women" are always and every time making money for someone else, not much different from a common streetwalker and her pimp.

This is about loyalty to the company, and taking steps to avoid splitting that between the company and a family, retaining it instead all for the company (and of course the shareholders and dividends). It's all about maintaining and increasing corporate profits. It is all in favor of the company, and actually at the expense of that individual's ability to raise a family.

It's really, in the final analysis, all about the Benjamins, baby!

ETA: When you think about it deeply, it was really a pretty masterful stroke the way the corporate masters managed to convince a great many women, and then convince them it was somehow their own idea, that their "rights" only extend as far as it takes to cause them to make money for the corporations, and no further, certainly not to the extent of raising their own children! Your rights are what we say they are, peasant, and if it doesn't make us more profit, then it ain't your right!

The Democrat Party, and their corporate masters, learned long ago that it makes no difference who, how many, or how often people protest against them, just so long as they dutifully report to work unencumbered to make more money for those same corporations. It's just icing on the cake for them to have convinced those folks that the idea was theirs to begin with, and that they are protesting for their own "freedom" while at the same time willingly giving that freedom up, and putting their noses to the grindstone for the same corporate masters they profess to be protesting against...

.