Evidence that demands a verdict

[Ninurta]

Excellent debating.   
No one can prove the other one wrong here, there is No Evidence Of A God and No Clear Evidence On How Life,,,, Any Life Began.

Some have said that Life began as an Alien life form carried to earth on a rock that fell into the womb of mother earth and had all the right ingredients to culturize and grow. 
A warm moist Place,,,,, Mother Earth Womb 

Exactly - all religious "evidence" is subjective, rather than objective, and therefore cannot be scientifically tested. I'm not sure I'd want to hang around with a god who allowed it's creation to experiment on it, anyhow. Religions are based entirely on "faith", and "belief", and are not subject to scientific scrutiny.

Likewise, because deity cannot be proven, neither can it be DISproven (can't prove a negative) - so Atheists have to take it on faith and belief that there ISN'T a God, and their belief is not materially different from a Theist's belief - it's ALL just belief.

I'm not going to try to convince an Atheist that there IS a God, because I don't care what they believe. It's THEIR belief to live with, not mine. None of my business. In the same vein, I don't usually just sit there if they try to convince me to their side of belief, or the idiocy of mine. My belief is not theirs to live with, either.

I'm aware of the theory you speak of - it's called "Panspermia". It's a possibility for how life began on Earth, but not an explanation for the origin of life itself - the life "seeded" here in that theory would also have had to come from somewhere. Connected to that thought, the Cassini probe was purposely plunged into the atmosphere of Saturn to die a fiery death to sterilize any potential Earth microbes that may have stowed away on it to avoid seeding Saturn's moons with alien (in the case "alien" means "Earth standard") life.

I don't believe that DNA randomly assembled itself, and then randomly came together to make the first micro-organism, but I've no way to disprove it, either. In the same way, I can't disprove that if a thousand monkeys were locked into a dungeon with a thousand typewriters and given a thousand years to bang away on those typewriters, they wouldn't type up a copy of "War and Peace". I've no way to prove or disprove it, because I don't have a thousand monkeys, a thousand typewriters, or a thousand years to run the experiment - so it remains a possibility, likely unproveable.

It's an intriguing thought that a potentially randomly assembled strand of DNA, a gozillion random mutations later, got up one morning and thought hard enough to start writing "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy". If that's the case, then the answer to the Meaning of Life is not "42", it's "there ain't no meaning to life, and we might as well all die now".


.