10-05-2017, 10:12 PM
From @"BIAD"'s post,
TRUE, but it sounds like Rouse is trying to take the public's attention off the idea that there was more than one shooter, as the sheriff suggested.
Wonder why?
Could it be the FBI "sting gone wrong" could be true? I doubt ANY agent is going to step up and speak the truth if that's the case, therefore, NO FACTS will be available to work with and this shooting will remain a mystery to those who are asleep.
Quote:He said investigators were, however, pressing to find others who may have been involved.
It was possible that Paddock was “a super guy” who was “working out all of this on his own”,
Lombardo said. But he added: “It would be hard for me to believe that.”
The comment appeared to earn a veiled rebuke from the agent overseeing the FBI’s investigation.
“Theories are great and everyone can have a theory,” said Aaron Rouse, who runs the bureau’s
Las Vegas division, and took to the lectern immediately after the sheriff’s comments.
“But I need to deal with facts. The sheriff needs to deal with facts.”
TRUE, but it sounds like Rouse is trying to take the public's attention off the idea that there was more than one shooter, as the sheriff suggested.
Wonder why?
Could it be the FBI "sting gone wrong" could be true? I doubt ANY agent is going to step up and speak the truth if that's the case, therefore, NO FACTS will be available to work with and this shooting will remain a mystery to those who are asleep.