The referendum regarding the United Kingdom is still being played-out as some form of class-warfare,
where those who deem themselves above others allow the mainstream media to portray them as selfish
and arrogant.
Regardless of the outcome -unlike the 1975 referendum on whether Great Britain should remain in the
Common Market, the binary result is not being taken lightly and those in the public eye are taking a stand
against the plebeians who took an opposing position.
From the general reports about 'Brexit' in the established Press, it seems that leaving the EU is an insane
idea and yet, the same news outlets fail to ask those voted to leave, why. By doing so and staying with the
pro-remain celebrities, the divisions in society continue and the true nature of that gulf becomes more obvious.
Once again, it's not religion and it's not skin-colour, it seems to be those who view themselves as 'non-deplorables'
.................................
The full real and neutral facts of the benefits for staying in the European Union or becoming a country using the World
Trade Organisation regulations -(which we already do), were not fully shown during the referendum and even now, are
cherry-picked for a preferred narrative in the same manner I have done within the brackets above.
But ask yourself these questions.
If leaving the EU is such a bad idea -as often demonstrated in the MSM, then why did the referendum result show that
the majority of those who chose to vote, voted to do so?
Could they all have been confused and instead of taking the natural 'safety route' -derived from knowing what they already
have, selected an unknown and possibly poorer situation?
If -as the same Press occasionally imply by interviewing a member of the public who was in favour of remaining, a large
quantity of 'Leavers' are elderly, then would they intentionally or even accidentally condemn their children and grandchildren
to a future of negative existence?
.................................
Still, it makes good headlines with the minimum of input and the maximum of outrage.
LOST: A small and important animal last seen not long after Donald Trump decided to run for office.
Willing to encompass all views and acknowledge them as balanced.
Answers to the name 'Sanity'.
where those who deem themselves above others allow the mainstream media to portray them as selfish
and arrogant.
Regardless of the outcome -unlike the 1975 referendum on whether Great Britain should remain in the
Common Market, the binary result is not being taken lightly and those in the public eye are taking a stand
against the plebeians who took an opposing position.
From the general reports about 'Brexit' in the established Press, it seems that leaving the EU is an insane
idea and yet, the same news outlets fail to ask those voted to leave, why. By doing so and staying with the
pro-remain celebrities, the divisions in society continue and the true nature of that gulf becomes more obvious.
Once again, it's not religion and it's not skin-colour, it seems to be those who view themselves as 'non-deplorables'
.................................
The full real and neutral facts of the benefits for staying in the European Union or becoming a country using the World
Trade Organisation regulations -(which we already do), were not fully shown during the referendum and even now, are
cherry-picked for a preferred narrative in the same manner I have done within the brackets above.
But ask yourself these questions.
If leaving the EU is such a bad idea -as often demonstrated in the MSM, then why did the referendum result show that
the majority of those who chose to vote, voted to do so?
Could they all have been confused and instead of taking the natural 'safety route' -derived from knowing what they already
have, selected an unknown and possibly poorer situation?
If -as the same Press occasionally imply by interviewing a member of the public who was in favour of remaining, a large
quantity of 'Leavers' are elderly, then would they intentionally or even accidentally condemn their children and grandchildren
to a future of negative existence?
.................................
Still, it makes good headlines with the minimum of input and the maximum of outrage.
Quote:'I'd shoot her point blank': Former college lecturer behind cancel Brexit petition threatened toMailOnline:
shoot Theresa May as series of her shocking posts are unearthed.
*Woman behind petition to revoke Article 50 'made death threat' on Facebook
*Margaret Anne Georgiadou created a viral petition signed by millions of people
*But she reportedly made a Facebook comment saying she'd 'shoot' Theresa May
'The woman behind a three-million strong petition to revoke Article 50 reportedly made a Facebook comment in
which she threatened to shoot the Prime Minister.
Former college lecturer Margaret Anne Georgiadou made a viral petition backed by a host of celebrities, MPs and
members of the public who want a second referendum. In Facebook posts unearthed by blogger Guido Fawkes, she
reportedly wrote online: 'If i got hold of her 'gun' I'd shoot her [Theresa May] point blank in the name of patriotism'.
The petition has also been backed by physicist Brian Cox, actress Jennifer Saunders, singer Annie Lennox, actors
Eddie Marsan and Andy Serkis and author AC Grayling.
She told an LBC radio show this afternoon: 'The government ignored us, they didn't have any discussion with Remainers.
'With a referendum, this is what happens because it's not very democratic, it's majoritarian, the majority wins, it's ruled by
he majority for the majority -sod the minority.
'Whereas true democracy includes everybody's opinion in society.'
With the highest sign-up rate on record, more than two million people had pledged their support by the time Mrs May fielded
questions in Brussels last night. Ms Georgiadou spoke on LBC radio this afternoon, saying how she fed the petition by
approaching 'notable' celebrities on Twitter for endorsements.
The petition on the Parliament website quickly gained support in the wake of the PM's speech on Wednesday night and
Revoke Article 50 started to trend on Twitter. After signing the petition, Hugh Grant shared a link online and wrote: 'I've signed.
And it looks like every sane person in the country is signing too. National emergency. Revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU.'
Professor Cox said: 'I've signed this petition to revoke A50 and deal with the consequences afterwards -referendum, election,
whatever. 'I have no idea whether these things do any good but after May's astonishingly irresponsible speech this evening I'll
give anything a go.'
The petition's support was concentrated in London and constituencies around Cambridge, Brighton, Bristol, Oxford and Edinburgh.
In the 2016 referendum, these six cities were also in favour of Remain.
The petition reads: 'The Government repeatedly claims exiting the EU is 'the will of the people'.
'We need to put a stop to this claim by proving the strength of public support now, for remaining in the EU.'
Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom dismissed the petition, pointing out it was not on the same scale as the referendum.
'Should it reach 17.4million, I am sure there will be a very clear case for taking action,' she said.
During her Downing Street statement, Mrs May controversially blamed MPs for failing to stick to the result of the 2016 vote and
told the public: 'I am on your side.' The Petitions Committee said nearly 2,000 signatures were being completed every minute
over yesterday lunchtime, crashing the website because of the unprecedented hit-rate.
It quickly passed the 100,000-signature threshold needed for it to be debated in Parliament.
Anyone can fill it in, prompting fears that bots or foreign agents seeking to interfere could have contributed to the total number of backers.
But people signing petitions on the Parliament website were asked to tick a box saying they are a British citizen or UK resident and to
confirm their name, email address, and postcode to sign.
Data from the petitions website yesterday afternoon suggested more than 960,000 signatures were from people who said they were
from the UK, nearly 9,000 from France, nearly 5,000 from Spain and nearly 4,000 from Germany, among others.
Yesterday, EU leaders said Brexit could be delayed from March 29 to May 22 - but only on the condition that MPs vote for Mrs May's
deal next week.
If it is rejected in the third 'meaningful vote' then the UK would have until April 12 to tell the European Council a way forward.
An extension could continue for several more months if Britain agreed to vote in May's European Parliament elections.
In January MPs debated whether the UK should leave the EU without a deal after a petition calling for it got 371,673 signatures.
MPs have been sharing the petition to revoke Article 50 on social media, including Lib Dem Brexit spokesman Tom Brake.
Pro-Brexit Tory MP Nadine Dorries suggested it was 'likely' that foreign governments or bots had intervened in the petition to
revoke Article 50. 'I don't think you can trust the authenticity of any petition or social media response any longer as the issues
regarding bots and rouge internet sabotage is now an everyday occurrence,' she said.
But the Commons spokesman added that signature patterns are investigated to check for fraudulent activity and suspect
signatures are removed, including those that are 'clearly bots'.
He said: 'Anyone who is a UK resident or a British citizen can sign a petition. This includes British citizens living overseas.'
In December last year the European Court of Justice ruled that the UK can unilaterally revoke Article 50 of the Treaty of the European
Union and cancel the Brexit process...'
LOST: A small and important animal last seen not long after Donald Trump decided to run for office.
Willing to encompass all views and acknowledge them as balanced.
Answers to the name 'Sanity'.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.