In the last couple of years, there's been the trendy expression from certain areas of 'being woke' and
hints that we can all learn that the world is not as it seems. This perception has arisen from the use of
technology and the cynical evolution away from traditional family values.
Young and old can now broadcast their opinions from their own home and the internet has inadvertedly
allowed undeveloped and insecure thoughts to become a standard lens to evaluate a complex situation
where pragmatism and harsh reality struggle against comfortable wishing and the notion that the person
espousing their views are the innocent Percival combating a world of brooding evil.
Some people see that world as a domain that didn't exist until those -who seem to believe it, were born
and enjoy the idea that the environment we all live in is either a reconfiguration of 'The Trueman Show'
or a milder version of 'The Matrix'.
This is actually worrying. Perceiving reality through the lens of being a movie character smacks of a
juvenile comprehension of their surroundings and with the decrease of attention-span prevelant in today's
society, demands a simpler reason for something that occurs.
Added that the person feels badly regarding the ignorance of facts and through the current entitlement that
many of the recent generations have become accustomed to, the feeling of not knowing because they weren't
told, can bring a sinister quality to the creation of a particular uninformed judgement.
We even give real people's names to the villains in our imagined show. We occasionally have accomplices
who gallop in our charge to bring down the evil caitiff's castle. But it's a world that can be easily exploited by
those on the outside of the internet, the businesses that hold profit above titillating chivalry.
I'm suggesting that the mainstream media have 'cottoned-on' to this inexperience of how the world works
and used it to promote the idea that dark forces roam the fiscal land with horrible hobbies and the trend of
this Marvel-esque, bedroom-stationed Watchman, crime-fighting persona is the last hope for mankind.
Armed with the latest media reports of Oxbridge-educated old white men in Savile Row suits twisting the system
to benefit themselves and their child-abusing cohorts, YouTube is abound with young men and women flicking
their dyed-hair back and pondering how to relate their observations to their hungry subscribers.
And all the while, the original source of the story -usually put in as a link below the video, offers a multitude of
advertisements and revenue for the news outlet. 'Ten Children Abducted By Satan' and 'Buy A Mattress You'll
Never Want To Change'... which is real?
Try this one about the English Football (soccer) Premier League.
All the answers are in the lower-half of the article, but for the impatient Blogger and Social Justice Warrior, it's
another sign of how the system is rigged by 'The Man'. It hints at all they want to feed the conspiratorial hunger of
the star-struck naive, in the bullet points and the first paragraph.
The convoluted organising of a 'list-based' competition aligned with audience convenience, the logistics of a travelling
public, prime-time exposure for the well-paid professional footballers (remember, they have careers, not jobs) and a
maximum position to garner much-needed revenue via space-jostling advertisers... it's not as straight-foward as many
think.
But which is sexier...? A story that entices a reader with commerce intrigue and shadowy dealings or a hard-headed
evaluation of a subject that's rarely contemplated? Which one would sell better in an environment that stories like the
above promotes and supports?!
Being unaware of something doesn't mean it's being kept from you. Entitlement is the real dragon to slay.
hints that we can all learn that the world is not as it seems. This perception has arisen from the use of
technology and the cynical evolution away from traditional family values.
Young and old can now broadcast their opinions from their own home and the internet has inadvertedly
allowed undeveloped and insecure thoughts to become a standard lens to evaluate a complex situation
where pragmatism and harsh reality struggle against comfortable wishing and the notion that the person
espousing their views are the innocent Percival combating a world of brooding evil.
Some people see that world as a domain that didn't exist until those -who seem to believe it, were born
and enjoy the idea that the environment we all live in is either a reconfiguration of 'The Trueman Show'
or a milder version of 'The Matrix'.
This is actually worrying. Perceiving reality through the lens of being a movie character smacks of a
juvenile comprehension of their surroundings and with the decrease of attention-span prevelant in today's
society, demands a simpler reason for something that occurs.
Added that the person feels badly regarding the ignorance of facts and through the current entitlement that
many of the recent generations have become accustomed to, the feeling of not knowing because they weren't
told, can bring a sinister quality to the creation of a particular uninformed judgement.
We even give real people's names to the villains in our imagined show. We occasionally have accomplices
who gallop in our charge to bring down the evil caitiff's castle. But it's a world that can be easily exploited by
those on the outside of the internet, the businesses that hold profit above titillating chivalry.
I'm suggesting that the mainstream media have 'cottoned-on' to this inexperience of how the world works
and used it to promote the idea that dark forces roam the fiscal land with horrible hobbies and the trend of
this Marvel-esque, bedroom-stationed Watchman, crime-fighting persona is the last hope for mankind.
Armed with the latest media reports of Oxbridge-educated old white men in Savile Row suits twisting the system
to benefit themselves and their child-abusing cohorts, YouTube is abound with young men and women flicking
their dyed-hair back and pondering how to relate their observations to their hungry subscribers.
And all the while, the original source of the story -usually put in as a link below the video, offers a multitude of
advertisements and revenue for the news outlet. 'Ten Children Abducted By Satan' and 'Buy A Mattress You'll
Never Want To Change'... which is real?
Try this one about the English Football (soccer) Premier League.
Quote:Premier League arrange fixtures so top six will not meet on first or last weekend of season as criticsTHE DAILY MAIL:
blast special treatment for big clubs
*It has been revealed that specific scheduling is in place for commercial reasons
*Premier League also guarantee that two of top-six sides play on 26 weekends
*Fixtures are arranged as such to appeal to broadcasters and boost attendance
*Critics argue this gives special treatment to big clubs already awash with cash
'The Premier League ensure top six clubs do not play each other on the first or last day of the season,
it has been revealed. This arrangement has been executed for a number of years and also ensures two
of the those elite sides lock horns on 26 weekends of the campaign.
Fans have been kept in the dark about the Premier League's strategic scheduling, as exposed by the Times.
Critics have argued that specific planning of top-six fixtures gives big clubs special treatment with those
sides already attempting to claim a greater slice of money from overseas television rights.
Sources close to the Premier League claim the system is in place to appeal to broadcasters and boost
attendances.
There are traditionally smaller viewing figures for the opening weekend as it's during the holiday period.
And given the fact that every match on the final weekend takes place at the same time, there is a fear that
one huge game would draw attention away from the others.
The information was disclosed in the tender document provided to broadcasters by the Premier League
for the 2019-22 time frame. Kevin Miles, chief executive of The Football Supporters' Federation was unaware
of the arrangement but said: 'This is certainly news to us and we look forward to holding discussions with the
Premier League about the pros and cons of it.'
The Arsenal Supporters' Trust were far more critical and a spokesman said: Every Premier League club should
be treated equally, and we do not agree with this push for them to receive a bigger share of television money.
'The AST would like the focus of the schedule to be on organising fixtures and kick-off times that are convenient
for fans who go to matches, rather than what best suits domestic or overseas TV viewers.'...'
All the answers are in the lower-half of the article, but for the impatient Blogger and Social Justice Warrior, it's
another sign of how the system is rigged by 'The Man'. It hints at all they want to feed the conspiratorial hunger of
the star-struck naive, in the bullet points and the first paragraph.
The convoluted organising of a 'list-based' competition aligned with audience convenience, the logistics of a travelling
public, prime-time exposure for the well-paid professional footballers (remember, they have careers, not jobs) and a
maximum position to garner much-needed revenue via space-jostling advertisers... it's not as straight-foward as many
think.
But which is sexier...? A story that entices a reader with commerce intrigue and shadowy dealings or a hard-headed
evaluation of a subject that's rarely contemplated? Which one would sell better in an environment that stories like the
above promotes and supports?!
Being unaware of something doesn't mean it's being kept from you. Entitlement is the real dragon to slay.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.