After the last posting above, where the UK Government were allegedly concerned with what their country's masses may
or may not be reading online, I was surprised that by the end of that week, this appeared in the major UK newspapers
and television news-outlets...
Left-wing and right-wing news outlets...? I thought news was news and information holds no bias?!
Seriously, it's another indication of an established setting that has become concerned about alternative opinions via
the internet that counter their own.
And do you think that the final comment in the article of my last posting was a mere suggestion of things to come
or was it already set to go and the Editorial Departments independently decided to leave it until the Friday of this
week? No... news is only news to the reader when they read it. The reality of information control is far-different.
The BBC states the UK Government are wanting to help small 'local' newspapers because of dwindling sales and
on the heels of this declaration, Trinity says it's buying out major news outlets... coinicidence?
Maybe and perhaps one of the alternative mediums would agree and use the words 'Cabal, Deep State' and throw
Soros' name in for good measure!
There may be something to it as a large section of reported news is garnered from local newspapers, reports that
give the impression to a reader that the major one they're reading does have it's finger on the pulse of the country's
concerns.
In reality, emails, forums, global news websites and Editorial decision-making go a long way to give that impression
and it works, a preferred semi-localised butter-patted narrative from a Journalist is offered to a reader that enjoys
a story that alligns with their own belief-system.
Yes, there's ridiculous mediums out there that demand that the Earth is flat and Donald Trump is Satan. And yes, the
mainstream media offer us (hopefully!) tongue-in-cheek pages like this:
But the question is, where is the agreement that a website cannot push it's agenda and a newspaper is seen as
approved to persuade readers of their preferred narrative? The time-travel account is seen as silly and that area
of discussion is stifled for two reasons for two reasons that the latter has a bearing in the world of debating 'Fake'
and 'Real' news.
The first one is that it reduces any account from an alleged 'Time-Traveller' down to a lunatic reporting his/her's
fantasy and this is deemed important enough to print the article. Secondly, it gives the impression that the particular
media is the Judge and decides that even though some may see it as a 'silly-season' article in the realms of the
Loch Ness Monster and Ufos, they can print it, but alternative news companies shouldn't.
Ergo, the non-Establishment mediums have no credibility if they do.
A UK major newspaper exclaimed for many weeks that World War III was already underway with North Korea as a
headline and yet, the Winter Olympics is seeing Korea -both North and South working towards acquiring medals.
Poor reporting or Fake News...? One presumes the reader can decide.
And once more, that's where the Establishment steps in. We're not talking about torrid websites that offer society
-offensive images and criminal text here, we're in the area of eroding nuance-based influence that may go against
the grain of a 'way'... an accepted position that suits those who have the power to promote their own orthodoxed
wares.
Alex Jones isn't the enemy of the Fourth-Estate, the bloated arcane methods of delivering unvarnished news is
the real problem for the Establishment. The only irony is that the growling Texan's opinions are the mirror-opposite
in the manner he delivers his stuff!
Jones does it for money and so does the mainstream media, let's not forget that.
If the sales of newspapers is falling -and it is, I believe they need to change with the times. That doesn't mean they
should whole-heartedly cater for the 'weirder'-side of interests and look for stories about ghosts and Trump-Goblins,
I mean they should learn the ways of those they're in competition with.
The mainstream media's forays into the world of the internet are now set, but in regards of their core-setting of
newspapers and television news, that 'stuffy' old-world perception remains. It's no good bitching about memes and
sarcastic, caustic delivery of information that's rife on the net, it's the way that the mainstream have to understand.
The scenario I often offer is a party, a shin-dig where a group of young people are stood around talking to each
other. In you come, with your 'normie' attire and conditioned view of the world. You know how all this craziness
really works and the way the political and business world turns is the way it's always been.
You're 'The Guy' who knows the back-end of what these youngsters are slowly shuffling towards and you want to
tell them. These people are developing their outlook on the world and bouncing ego-protected ideas off each other,
but you've arrived with their short-cut.
The reason of making money off the back of convincing them... well, that's for another day!
You -possibly being older and with the belief you're more confident, stride forth and ask 'what is goin' down'!
They'll listen to you for a while, whilst you attempt to enforce your own rules of discussion and your 'established'
opinions, but five minutes later, they'll move off.
In the media business -where advertising money is the only reason you remain afloat, you've just lost potential
across-the-board, general customers... and getting them back rarely happens.
In the case of mainstream media, some outlets decided to wander into the minority groups where you continue to
hide your need for income and offer platforms where they can shout their views on their particular brand of living.
The original group and fellow-Normies move further away and your product circulation falls even more, the shock
-tactic didn't work.
................................................
It's because the mainstream media don't get it, it's not a bubble they're in, it's a self-created class level.
The industry sees itself 'better' than the group it's trying to sell to and no change of outfit, no changing the angle of
approaching a subject and no amount of favouring a section of people will work.
If you wish to survive in a world where the reader/viewer decides what it chooses to purchase, you have to truly
be who you're not at this time and some of that means losing your class-attitude.
or may not be reading online, I was surprised that by the end of that week, this appeared in the major UK newspapers
and television news-outlets...
Quote:Mirror buys Express titles from Richard Desmond.The BBC:
'The owner of the Daily Mirror has agreed to buy the company behind titles including the Daily Express, the Daily Star
and magazines such as OK!
Trinity Mirror is to pay £126.7m for the publishing assets of Northern & Shell, which is chaired by Richard Desmond.
Sale talks were announced in September, but a deal between the two has been on the cards for some time.
The sale brings to an end Mr Desmond's 18 years as a UK newspaper owner.
Northern & Shell's publishing assets include the Daily Express, Sunday Express, Daily Star and Daily Star Sunday,
as well as three celebrity magazines, OK!, New! and Star. Simon Fox, chief executive of Trinity Mirror, said: "Northern
& Shell's titles have a large and loyal readership, a growing digital presence and a stable revenue mix and offer an
excellent fit with Trinity Mirror."
Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, he said: "It's a very wise investment. We've had plenty of time to think about
this carefully." He said the deal would lead to cost savings, as the titles could pool their resources.
"For example, [instead of] sending two reporters to a football game, we can send one." Trinity Mirror expects the deal to
lead to savings of £20m a year.
Mr Fox pledged that the publications would retain their identities: "The Daily Express is not going to become left-wing
and the Mirror is not going to become right-wing."...'
Left-wing and right-wing news outlets...? I thought news was news and information holds no bias?!
Seriously, it's another indication of an established setting that has become concerned about alternative opinions via
the internet that counter their own.
And do you think that the final comment in the article of my last posting was a mere suggestion of things to come
or was it already set to go and the Editorial Departments independently decided to leave it until the Friday of this
week? No... news is only news to the reader when they read it. The reality of information control is far-different.
The BBC states the UK Government are wanting to help small 'local' newspapers because of dwindling sales and
on the heels of this declaration, Trinity says it's buying out major news outlets... coinicidence?
Maybe and perhaps one of the alternative mediums would agree and use the words 'Cabal, Deep State' and throw
Soros' name in for good measure!
There may be something to it as a large section of reported news is garnered from local newspapers, reports that
give the impression to a reader that the major one they're reading does have it's finger on the pulse of the country's
concerns.
In reality, emails, forums, global news websites and Editorial decision-making go a long way to give that impression
and it works, a preferred semi-localised butter-patted narrative from a Journalist is offered to a reader that enjoys
a story that alligns with their own belief-system.
Yes, there's ridiculous mediums out there that demand that the Earth is flat and Donald Trump is Satan. And yes, the
mainstream media offer us (hopefully!) tongue-in-cheek pages like this:
Quote:Time travel ‘PROOF’: ‘British government worker from 8973’ reveals terrifying secret.The Daily Star:
A man claiming to be a government official has lifted the lid on a terrifying secret going
on in the world, he claims.
'Videos of people claiming to be time travellers on YouTube have gone viral, each with
different accounts of the future. And one man claims that they are all speaking the truth
about what they have seen.
William Taylor appeared on Apex TV to claim there are many secrets being hidden from
us. He said: “There are many advanced technologies being kept secret from you.
“There are plans to release these to the public eventually but as of now, they are highly
classified. “They are going to come after me for making this video, I am putting myself
at risk for telling you the truth.”
After claiming to have gone up the ranks in the British Intelligence Agency, Mr Taylor
claims he was given access to their time machine. As part of his first mission, he claims
he was transported to the year 3,000 in a lead sphere.
He added: “Time travel was first successfully accomplished in 1981.
“There is an infinite number of alternate universes, it is possible that everyone of these
universes exist and it is possible to move between these universes.
“We developed a machine to not only time travel, but move between these parallel
universes...'
But the question is, where is the agreement that a website cannot push it's agenda and a newspaper is seen as
approved to persuade readers of their preferred narrative? The time-travel account is seen as silly and that area
of discussion is stifled for two reasons for two reasons that the latter has a bearing in the world of debating 'Fake'
and 'Real' news.
The first one is that it reduces any account from an alleged 'Time-Traveller' down to a lunatic reporting his/her's
fantasy and this is deemed important enough to print the article. Secondly, it gives the impression that the particular
media is the Judge and decides that even though some may see it as a 'silly-season' article in the realms of the
Loch Ness Monster and Ufos, they can print it, but alternative news companies shouldn't.
Ergo, the non-Establishment mediums have no credibility if they do.
A UK major newspaper exclaimed for many weeks that World War III was already underway with North Korea as a
headline and yet, the Winter Olympics is seeing Korea -both North and South working towards acquiring medals.
Poor reporting or Fake News...? One presumes the reader can decide.
And once more, that's where the Establishment steps in. We're not talking about torrid websites that offer society
-offensive images and criminal text here, we're in the area of eroding nuance-based influence that may go against
the grain of a 'way'... an accepted position that suits those who have the power to promote their own orthodoxed
wares.
Alex Jones isn't the enemy of the Fourth-Estate, the bloated arcane methods of delivering unvarnished news is
the real problem for the Establishment. The only irony is that the growling Texan's opinions are the mirror-opposite
in the manner he delivers his stuff!
Jones does it for money and so does the mainstream media, let's not forget that.
If the sales of newspapers is falling -and it is, I believe they need to change with the times. That doesn't mean they
should whole-heartedly cater for the 'weirder'-side of interests and look for stories about ghosts and Trump-Goblins,
I mean they should learn the ways of those they're in competition with.
The mainstream media's forays into the world of the internet are now set, but in regards of their core-setting of
newspapers and television news, that 'stuffy' old-world perception remains. It's no good bitching about memes and
sarcastic, caustic delivery of information that's rife on the net, it's the way that the mainstream have to understand.
The scenario I often offer is a party, a shin-dig where a group of young people are stood around talking to each
other. In you come, with your 'normie' attire and conditioned view of the world. You know how all this craziness
really works and the way the political and business world turns is the way it's always been.
You're 'The Guy' who knows the back-end of what these youngsters are slowly shuffling towards and you want to
tell them. These people are developing their outlook on the world and bouncing ego-protected ideas off each other,
but you've arrived with their short-cut.
The reason of making money off the back of convincing them... well, that's for another day!
You -possibly being older and with the belief you're more confident, stride forth and ask 'what is goin' down'!
They'll listen to you for a while, whilst you attempt to enforce your own rules of discussion and your 'established'
opinions, but five minutes later, they'll move off.
In the media business -where advertising money is the only reason you remain afloat, you've just lost potential
across-the-board, general customers... and getting them back rarely happens.
In the case of mainstream media, some outlets decided to wander into the minority groups where you continue to
hide your need for income and offer platforms where they can shout their views on their particular brand of living.
The original group and fellow-Normies move further away and your product circulation falls even more, the shock
-tactic didn't work.
................................................
It's because the mainstream media don't get it, it's not a bubble they're in, it's a self-created class level.
The industry sees itself 'better' than the group it's trying to sell to and no change of outfit, no changing the angle of
approaching a subject and no amount of favouring a section of people will work.
If you wish to survive in a world where the reader/viewer decides what it chooses to purchase, you have to truly
be who you're not at this time and some of that means losing your class-attitude.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.