Grenfell fire: MP calls for inquiry chairman to quit.
'The judge heading the Grenfell Tower inquiry has been urged to stand down by the MP for Kensington,
who says those affected need "somebody we can trust".
It follows a call on Monday for Sir Martin Moore-Bick to quit by lawyers representing some of the victims.
Labour MP Emma Dent Coad said Sir Martin was "a technocrat" who lacked "credibility" with the families.
Retired Court of Appeal judge Sir Martin has said he understands the "desire of local people for justice".
The call comes as questions are raised over the efforts being made to rehouse those left homeless by
the fire on 14 June.
At least 80 people are thought to have died in the Grenfell Tower fire in North Kensington, west London.
The final toll may not be known until the end of the year, say police...'
SOURCE:
................................
Another tale of obfuscation to delay the inevitable truth.
In my opinion and I mean no disrespect to those injured and dead, I think that this whole rat's nest should
be dragged out into the light and shown for what it really is.
The authorities set with investigating this tragedy don't know who were living in the Grenfell Tower, they don't
know who were visiting during the blaze, they're not entirely sure who the landlords are who were letting the
apartments out and there's still the problem of how many of the effected were illegal immigrants.
Some may inquire how can this be...? How can a system that registers, controls and funds a large section
of society not know who the occupants and visitors were? Social housing is paid for through Government
-approved grants to local Councils and it's not just handed out like confetti, there has to be information of
who it was for.
Welfare payments, unused monies in bank accounts designed to accepted Benefit payments, there's a
well-entrenched system that can show an absence of activity. Employment information... if someone isn't
turning up to their job, why?
It's not like any missing employee won't be 'on-the-books'... will it?
Property Owners:
In the majority of cases, landlords pay a fee to the letting-agents for administration, appropriate tenants and
maintenance. The names of who live those accommodations will surely be registered there.
Maybe the property owner dealt directly with the tenant. Even if it may seem heartless, surely the loss of income
would prompt the landlord to come forward and offer information regarding who he was housing?
Without seeming callous, there's been reports of sub-letting and sub-sub-letting and in this regard, knowledge
of who, how many and why people were living there gets into very murky waters.
Great Britain is wired up with that much surveillance that it's often sarcastically commented on all around the
world and it doesn't just involve cameras. Free movement from mainland Europe is monitored by both sides
and because of the current terrorist threats, will be ramped-up even more than usual.
Where's the lists?
Friends and loved-ones not visiting Grenfell Towers must be aware that anyone they deem close may not
have contacted them and by contacting Police with this information, people can be ruled in or out.
I would suggest that considering the manner that the mainstream media are painting this perception, it
would be easy for any outlet to ask viewers and readers to check Twitter and Facebook for any change
or absence in their online relationships.
But they don't, just like many other times when control is questioned, they gang together to create a soft,
nicey-nicey, heart-warming narrative. Blue Pill-takers like that.
Instead of real, mature questions and investigative journalism, we get tales of Jeremy Corbyn banging-on
about requisitioning nearby private properties that are seen as land-banking for use to house the survivors
of the fire. Considering his leanings, this would be standard for Comrade Corbyn.
Reports play one politician off with another where the Prime Minister -Theresa May, is reported as not visiting
the streets around Grenfell in a manner that implies she's too 'posh' or it's beneath the Tories to do so.
We get plenty of these stupid newspaper debates about who in the political world is-or-isn't doing enough
fawning around the effected and the usual images of tributes with the backdrop of a blackened stucture only
add to the false, dispassionate narrative.
All in an attempt to deflect from the real questions that need asking.
Structures like Grenfell were built because it's a cheap way to house the 'unwashed' of society... that's the
sad truth. It has nothing to do with race, gender or religion, it's to do with social class.
Who occupied those apartments (called flats in the UK) when they were first built...? The unemployed and
those who left rural communites destroyed by the closing down of industries for overseas political reasons.
The forgotten old and some from post-Empire days can also be added to the list.
For many years now, a cheap source of labour as come from overseas and when one includes the terrible
media-endorsed political correctness-stigma, it means that even legally, certain occupations are taken up
by newcomers who see half-a-wage in Britain, better than what they left behind.
Those who decide to arrive on our shores by criminal means, already know they have no legal platform to
argue their case and use the race-card if possible, but will settle for what they can get.
Make no mistake, Government agencies know about this cultural paradigm and understand that it benefits
many aspects of the country. There's no need to worry about Union disputes among this class, they prefer
to not get into waters where the whole scene would be exposed.
Also for the employer, there's no longer the burden of paying taxes, national insurance, possible pension
contributions, liabilities insurance and an obvious one, holiday pay.
All against the law of course, but when you've signed up to an official Europe-wide agreement that demands
you allow thousands upon thousands of people into your country, sometimes the system can 'accidentally'
let things slide.
And don't think we're just talking about manual workers here, the City Of London can boast it's fair-share
of well-dressed executives that enjoy a free-ride due to the assisting policies put in place by the non-elected
bureaucrats in Brussels.
Except you won't find them living in Grenfell Towers.
It also alleviates the concerns of indigenous working-class residents of Great Britain because we've had
three generations already, that perceive employment in a different light than their great-grandparents.
With benefit-payments from the Governement, not working is no longer seen as taboo.
For those who are seen as minorities due to culture, ethnicity or religious beliefs, the same monies and
living accommodation are available too. Just Like Dick Whittington perceived it and for some, London is really
paved with gold.
Some might ask that if this low-income society is so bad, how do they endure it?
Don't kid yourself, drug-dealing is big in many of our cities and when it comes to London, why are there
so many stabbing crimes?! In my view, our Capitol is lost to this behavior, but of course... it only benefits
the wealthy.
It's been said that the people of Grenfell want the truth, to commit to such a rare, noble act will take both
sides of those involved.
Now... do you really want to go down that particular rat-hole?
'The judge heading the Grenfell Tower inquiry has been urged to stand down by the MP for Kensington,
who says those affected need "somebody we can trust".
It follows a call on Monday for Sir Martin Moore-Bick to quit by lawyers representing some of the victims.
Labour MP Emma Dent Coad said Sir Martin was "a technocrat" who lacked "credibility" with the families.
Retired Court of Appeal judge Sir Martin has said he understands the "desire of local people for justice".
The call comes as questions are raised over the efforts being made to rehouse those left homeless by
the fire on 14 June.
At least 80 people are thought to have died in the Grenfell Tower fire in North Kensington, west London.
The final toll may not be known until the end of the year, say police...'
SOURCE:
................................
Another tale of obfuscation to delay the inevitable truth.
In my opinion and I mean no disrespect to those injured and dead, I think that this whole rat's nest should
be dragged out into the light and shown for what it really is.
The authorities set with investigating this tragedy don't know who were living in the Grenfell Tower, they don't
know who were visiting during the blaze, they're not entirely sure who the landlords are who were letting the
apartments out and there's still the problem of how many of the effected were illegal immigrants.
Some may inquire how can this be...? How can a system that registers, controls and funds a large section
of society not know who the occupants and visitors were? Social housing is paid for through Government
-approved grants to local Councils and it's not just handed out like confetti, there has to be information of
who it was for.
Welfare payments, unused monies in bank accounts designed to accepted Benefit payments, there's a
well-entrenched system that can show an absence of activity. Employment information... if someone isn't
turning up to their job, why?
It's not like any missing employee won't be 'on-the-books'... will it?
Property Owners:
In the majority of cases, landlords pay a fee to the letting-agents for administration, appropriate tenants and
maintenance. The names of who live those accommodations will surely be registered there.
Maybe the property owner dealt directly with the tenant. Even if it may seem heartless, surely the loss of income
would prompt the landlord to come forward and offer information regarding who he was housing?
Without seeming callous, there's been reports of sub-letting and sub-sub-letting and in this regard, knowledge
of who, how many and why people were living there gets into very murky waters.
Great Britain is wired up with that much surveillance that it's often sarcastically commented on all around the
world and it doesn't just involve cameras. Free movement from mainland Europe is monitored by both sides
and because of the current terrorist threats, will be ramped-up even more than usual.
Where's the lists?
Friends and loved-ones not visiting Grenfell Towers must be aware that anyone they deem close may not
have contacted them and by contacting Police with this information, people can be ruled in or out.
I would suggest that considering the manner that the mainstream media are painting this perception, it
would be easy for any outlet to ask viewers and readers to check Twitter and Facebook for any change
or absence in their online relationships.
But they don't, just like many other times when control is questioned, they gang together to create a soft,
nicey-nicey, heart-warming narrative. Blue Pill-takers like that.
Instead of real, mature questions and investigative journalism, we get tales of Jeremy Corbyn banging-on
about requisitioning nearby private properties that are seen as land-banking for use to house the survivors
of the fire. Considering his leanings, this would be standard for Comrade Corbyn.
Reports play one politician off with another where the Prime Minister -Theresa May, is reported as not visiting
the streets around Grenfell in a manner that implies she's too 'posh' or it's beneath the Tories to do so.
We get plenty of these stupid newspaper debates about who in the political world is-or-isn't doing enough
fawning around the effected and the usual images of tributes with the backdrop of a blackened stucture only
add to the false, dispassionate narrative.
All in an attempt to deflect from the real questions that need asking.
Structures like Grenfell were built because it's a cheap way to house the 'unwashed' of society... that's the
sad truth. It has nothing to do with race, gender or religion, it's to do with social class.
Who occupied those apartments (called flats in the UK) when they were first built...? The unemployed and
those who left rural communites destroyed by the closing down of industries for overseas political reasons.
The forgotten old and some from post-Empire days can also be added to the list.
For many years now, a cheap source of labour as come from overseas and when one includes the terrible
media-endorsed political correctness-stigma, it means that even legally, certain occupations are taken up
by newcomers who see half-a-wage in Britain, better than what they left behind.
Those who decide to arrive on our shores by criminal means, already know they have no legal platform to
argue their case and use the race-card if possible, but will settle for what they can get.
Make no mistake, Government agencies know about this cultural paradigm and understand that it benefits
many aspects of the country. There's no need to worry about Union disputes among this class, they prefer
to not get into waters where the whole scene would be exposed.
Also for the employer, there's no longer the burden of paying taxes, national insurance, possible pension
contributions, liabilities insurance and an obvious one, holiday pay.
All against the law of course, but when you've signed up to an official Europe-wide agreement that demands
you allow thousands upon thousands of people into your country, sometimes the system can 'accidentally'
let things slide.
And don't think we're just talking about manual workers here, the City Of London can boast it's fair-share
of well-dressed executives that enjoy a free-ride due to the assisting policies put in place by the non-elected
bureaucrats in Brussels.
Except you won't find them living in Grenfell Towers.
It also alleviates the concerns of indigenous working-class residents of Great Britain because we've had
three generations already, that perceive employment in a different light than their great-grandparents.
With benefit-payments from the Governement, not working is no longer seen as taboo.
For those who are seen as minorities due to culture, ethnicity or religious beliefs, the same monies and
living accommodation are available too. Just Like Dick Whittington perceived it and for some, London is really
paved with gold.
Some might ask that if this low-income society is so bad, how do they endure it?
Don't kid yourself, drug-dealing is big in many of our cities and when it comes to London, why are there
so many stabbing crimes?! In my view, our Capitol is lost to this behavior, but of course... it only benefits
the wealthy.
It's been said that the people of Grenfell want the truth, to commit to such a rare, noble act will take both
sides of those involved.
Now... do you really want to go down that particular rat-hole?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.