The Blue Pill.

[BIAD]

In regards of the Blue Pill and it's advantages of keeping you in a false environment of equanimity, it may help
those who have forego the dosage to understand the different shades of blue that can be found along the
shelf of docious-societal panacea.

In the United Kingdom, one of the main medicines is patriotism to the Crown, the centuries-old loyalty to
the King or Queen of that country. Recently, the media of Britain... England mainly, have offered articles that
suggest polls are showing a rise in this need to feel safe under the watchful gaze of an imperialist.

So in another fluff-piece to cater for the Royals and to make the rare English summer seem a little rosier for
the once-working-class-now-middle-class folk in their small back-gardens, a person with the title 'News Reporter'
rehashes a little bit of celebrity-gossip from the Newsweek magazine and adds a lot of commentary.

But to show that this type of Blue Pill isn't just wasted on  the generations that that can say they knew someone
that was in 'the World War' (the second one!)... this latest saphire-hued lozenge is flavoured for the youth of
today.

Prince William, his wife and two children have served their purpose in the Royal public relation services and
shown to their lowly followers that commitment in all it social family-orientated forms is the right way to go.
A two-parent family is offered as a 'good' thing and as tradition and commonsense indicate, it makes for a
more solid, healthy foundation of a nation.

'But what about the rebel young...?' -I hear you ask, what about those young men that haven't found their feathered
-hat-wearing soul-mate whilst perusing the paddock of Royal Ascot horse-racing or watching a game of Polo from
the tartan-blanketed tail-gate of their Range Rover?
Ah... that's where Prince Harry comes in and please, forgive my earlier snobbery.

Remember, we're not just dealing with young men and women who're struggling to house their children or just
finding ways to outwit the person behind the Welfare Claims desk for more money. Harry's not only speaking to
the homeless glue-sniffers or migrating Europeans hiding in squalour or the shoeless worshipper in a Mosque.

We're reaching out to those in our society who poo-poo such silly notions of monarchy and show their displeasure
of being ruled by another by marching in the capital city on a workday. Harry is gently whispering to the millennials,
Generation X and Z, the young who perceive the world through their I-Phones and believe communism is similar to
how Fred Kite in the movie 'I'm Alright, Jack' identified it.
"Ahhh, Russia. All them corn fields and ballet in the evening."

The second of Prince Charles and the late-Lady Diana's offspring -or the spare future king, if you like, can be
found promoting the idea of British sovereignty in this article below.

However, to make the piece more enticing -and failing dramatically in my view, Andy Hayes, the 'News Reporter'
decides to have a headline that is irrelevent to what the ginger-haired Prince is actually saying.
..........................................
SOURCE:
Prince Harry: No one in the Royal Family wants to be King or Queen.

'The Prince has also spoken about walking behind his mother's coffin, saying: "I don't think
any child should be asked to do that."



Prince Harry has suggested that no one in the Royal Family wants to take over from the Queen.
Interviewed by Newsweek magazine, Harry said: "Is there any one of the Royal Family who wants
to be King or Queen? I don't think so, but we will carry out our duties at the right time."...'

Well, I would suggest this statement is open to interpretation. In the realms of a monarchy, one doesn't state that
they should be ruler if it involved usurping the line of succession. And before the reader thinks I'm over-reacting or
nit-picking, I would also suggest a lesson in sovereign governance could assist in this adult-form of social control.

But it's a fluff-piece, BIAD... you promised it would be light...! and you're correct.
So staying within the confines of showing the dumbing-whilst-informing qualities of the Blue Pill, we'll pop one in
our mouths and move on. Let's get back to the 'touchy-feely' candy.

'...He also hinted at a lingering resentment about what he was asked to do at his mother Princess Diana's
funeral in 1997, when he was just 12. "My mother had just died, and I had to walk a long way behind her coffin,
surrounded by thousands of people watching me while millions more did on television," he said.
"I don't think any child should be asked to do that, under any circumstances. I don't think it would happen today."

Harry revealed in April that he had sought help after he "shut down" his emotions following Princess Diana's death
in a road accident in 1997. Regarding Diana's legacy, he said: "I intuitively know what my mother would like me to
do and want to progress with work she couldn't complete."...'

I'm not being heartless towards Prince Harry and the loss of his mother, she was held in such esteem by the public
that Harry's Father -Charles, always seemed to be in Diana's  shadow. But my focus is how this article is used as a
vehicle by both the writer and the Prince to carry a message.

It's probably only a coincidence that this article is published a couple of days after a dying man revealed he was
a retired MI5 agent that allegedly assassinated Prince Harry's mum. That piece is deemed bogus by the mainstream
media and the gatekeepers of the internet, so I'll guess that the word 'coincidence' is an apt one and certainly suits
anyone who consumes the Blue Pill!

'...When she was photographed shaking hands with a HIV-positive man in 1987, the notion that HIV/Aids might be
passed on through touch was challenged.

In December, Harry was photographed having an HIV test in Barbados. He said his mother "had the most wonderful
sense of humour and always wanted to make things fun for us, as well as protect us".
Diana also "took a huge part in showing me an ordinary life"...'

This last sentence could be seen in two ways. When the Royals talk outside of their inner-circle, they tend to use titles
of station and by name rather than 'my brother/sister/mother' unless the narrative demands otherwise.
If you're talking about a relation in the context of his position to the throne, then it's best not to offer personality  and
keep it formal. The structure of succession must be maintained at all times.

The last sentence could also just be a drop-in by the writer of the article with a bit of 'free licence'!

'..."People would be amazed by the ordinary life William and I live," Harry said. "I do my own shopping.
Even if I was King, I would do my own shopping."...'

No he couldn't and certainly not in the manner his subjects generally purchase items in a high-street or even online.
He knows he wouldn't be allowed to behave in the way it's implied, but he's attempting to 'humanise' the monarchy
organisation for the kids with purple hair and gender-study degrees. Harry's suggesting that after Brexit, the loveable
plum-voiced Windsors will be there just like the regular Nigel or Daphne in the street... just like you and me.

What Prince Harry is either omitting or isn't aware of (which I doubt!)... is that there's a system in place that protects
this family from harm. This system doesn't see Union Jack-waving old women as harmless and they don't assume
gawking shoppers as merely in awe if any member of the Royal family even believed they could just trot down to Oxford
Street in London to buy a bottle of Chateau Petrus.
Which they can't.

Think Micheal Jackson is Harrods... and then triple the security logistics.

'...But could things become too ordinary, removing the Royal Family's mystery? "It's a tricky balancing act," he said.
"We don't want to dilute the magic. The British public and the whole world need institutions like it."
Harry had lots of praise for the Queen, saying: "She is so remarkable."...'

See...? She's his freakin' Grandmother, for heaven's sake!! Yet when protecting the narrative, Queen Elizabeth is
spoken about in her position of station and not as a family member. And this is news, huh!

'..."The monarchy is a force for good," he said, "and we (Harry, William and Kate) want to carry on the positive
atmosphere that the Queen has achieved for over 60 years, but we won't be trying to fill her boots...'

Sneaky-bit inserted there possibly -and possibly by the Sky Reporter. You notice the '...but we won't be trying to fill her boots'
comment isn't set in quotation marks in the article? This is possibly to vaguely tie the material back to it's original headline.
But unless it's an original error in Newsweek or from the cut-and-pasting by this Sky guy, Prince Harry didn't say it.

Anyway, Harry's getting the message through that having a King or Queen is 'a force for good' and that's what counts here!
Maybe the lad -Prince Henry of Wales officially and Captain in the Army Air Corps can tell us more about the real reason
for this article.

'..."We are involved in modernising the British monarchy. We are not doing this for ourselves but for the greater
good of the people." Concerning which roles he, William and Kate take on, Harry said the Queen "has been
fantastic in letting us choose". He added: "She tells us to take our time and really think things through."...'

And there you have it. When those of the British Isles that are still taking the recommended measure of the Blue
Pill and find themselves on the otherside of Brexit, they can feel safe that a structure that was in place long before
anyone ever dreamed of halting the many wars between the countries that really control the European Union,
will be there to steer Great Britain forward and keep the status-quo for those who've never stacked shelves in a
Supermarket or slept rough beside a canal.

And don't worry, the cat pictures on the internet and Bollinger-induced marches in London for the wealthy
guilt-ridden can continue.
God bless the Queen.