With the recent development of Gordi's fine advertisement of Rogue Nation on a YouTube video, I made a
comment in the Shout Box that our reasearch should be more diligent and disciplined when proposing a
topic to discuss and providing valid sources.
Many of us were concerned that even though this a is deemed a conspiracy website, subjects brought by
our members shouldn't be supported by dubious proponents of the theory based on obvious CGI or biased
commentary.
So if a member of RN posted an article that was untrue because the evidence that is false was written within
the article, I'm sure fellow-members would say that the poster of that piece should really try harder, to say the
least!!
Meanwhile, on the mainland...
UK passport could turn dark blue after Brexit under £490m contract.
'Passport routinely redesigned every five years and Eurosceptics say burgundy EU
passport is a ‘humiliation’...'
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=1530]](http://rogue-nation3.com/attachment.php?aid=1530)
Old-style British passport. The Home Office said no decision had been made about the colour
of the passport under the new contract. Photograph: C Squared Studios/Getty Images.
Great Scott...! and I don't mean Gordi this time!
After only one sentence of this Guardian article, the reality of what is filling this web page is
announced as false! The Home Office of the United Kingdom has stated there's no decision on
the colour of future passports, so let's wander towards the water-dispensor and gossip.
No..? There's more?!
'...The UK passport could turn dark blue again after Brexit under a £490m contract to redesign
and produce a new version of the document. The passport is routinely redesigned every five years
and Eurosceptics view the new contract as a way to ditch the EU burgundy cover in favour of a
return to the colour of the past.
The current contract expires in 2019, the year the UK is set to leave the European Union after
Theresa May began the formal two-year withdrawal process last week...'
Oh, so we're using the word 'could' in the context of 'maybe' the Home Office -who hasn't proposed
the change of colour. Maybe we could do an article on how extraterrestrials can obtain a passport
if they exist...? Or would that come-off as too click-baity?
'...Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell said the burgundy passport had been a source of national
“humiliation”. He told the Press Association: “The restoration of our own British passport is a clear
statement to the world that Britain is back.
Our British identity was slowly but surely being submerged into an artificial European one that most
Brits felt increasingly unhappy about.
“The humiliation of having a pink European Union passport will now soon be over and the United
Kingdom nationals can once again feel pride and self-confidence in their own nationality when travelling,
just as the Swiss and Americans can do...'
Is this assistance in promoting a patriotic feeling for the reason of displaying a national confidence
in the hopes it enhances business links outside of the EU...?! It certainly sounds it. Remember, we're
only talking about the possible colour of a document for travelling here... the contents of that small
book is far-more important than it's colour.
And to be frank, more important than this article.
'...National identity matters and there is no better way of demonstrating this today than by bringing back
this much-loved national symbol when travelling overseas.” Fellow Tory Michael Fabricant said: “You keep
your passport until it expires. If you renew after Brexit, I am hoping we’ll have new navy blue passports.”...'
Oh I'm sure Prime Minister May will pat you -Mr Rosindell and your colleague Micheal Fabricant on the
head for your strong comments that shows Britain is resolute in it's EU withdrawal. The oddity is that this
newspaper is all for diversity and free movement of people from all races.
This article seems to lean towards nationalism and the knee-jerk reaction to that word is to scream 'NAZI!'
At this moment and after perusing this story again, I'm wondering if The Guardian doesn't really hold these
views dearly and is actually in the business of opportunism.
One of the main reasons I suggest that this newspaper is moving slightly to the right with this article is the
comment '...The humiliation of having a pink European Union passport'.
It was okay to endorse pink hats at a womens protest and this 'humiliation' wasn't commented on when
describing Eddie Izzard's beret that was stolen.
Just sayin'
'...The Home Office said no decision had been made about the colour of the passport under the new contract.
A spokesman said: “The UK passport is routinely redesigned every five years to guard against counterfeiting.
We are launching the procurement process now to ensure there is sufficient time to produce and design UK
passports from 2019 when the current contract ends.
The timing of any potential changes to the passport after the UK has left the European Union has not been set.”'
SOURCE:
Crap! That was a waste of time!
But seriously, the benchmark we are aspiring to reach on this website is important and if we're to be seen as
a serious -yet non-despotic, open-minded forum where mature discussions can be generated, isn't it ironic
that we looked at getting our act together because of bettering our place and a established news outlet like
The Guardian is conceitedly shovelling this kind of fluff-sh*t under the banner of established true news?
comment in the Shout Box that our reasearch should be more diligent and disciplined when proposing a
topic to discuss and providing valid sources.
Many of us were concerned that even though this a is deemed a conspiracy website, subjects brought by
our members shouldn't be supported by dubious proponents of the theory based on obvious CGI or biased
commentary.
So if a member of RN posted an article that was untrue because the evidence that is false was written within
the article, I'm sure fellow-members would say that the poster of that piece should really try harder, to say the
least!!
Meanwhile, on the mainland...
UK passport could turn dark blue after Brexit under £490m contract.
'Passport routinely redesigned every five years and Eurosceptics say burgundy EU
passport is a ‘humiliation’...'
Old-style British passport. The Home Office said no decision had been made about the colour
of the passport under the new contract. Photograph: C Squared Studios/Getty Images.
Great Scott...! and I don't mean Gordi this time!
After only one sentence of this Guardian article, the reality of what is filling this web page is
announced as false! The Home Office of the United Kingdom has stated there's no decision on
the colour of future passports, so let's wander towards the water-dispensor and gossip.
No..? There's more?!
'...The UK passport could turn dark blue again after Brexit under a £490m contract to redesign
and produce a new version of the document. The passport is routinely redesigned every five years
and Eurosceptics view the new contract as a way to ditch the EU burgundy cover in favour of a
return to the colour of the past.
The current contract expires in 2019, the year the UK is set to leave the European Union after
Theresa May began the formal two-year withdrawal process last week...'
Oh, so we're using the word 'could' in the context of 'maybe' the Home Office -who hasn't proposed
the change of colour. Maybe we could do an article on how extraterrestrials can obtain a passport
if they exist...? Or would that come-off as too click-baity?
'...Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell said the burgundy passport had been a source of national
“humiliation”. He told the Press Association: “The restoration of our own British passport is a clear
statement to the world that Britain is back.
Our British identity was slowly but surely being submerged into an artificial European one that most
Brits felt increasingly unhappy about.
“The humiliation of having a pink European Union passport will now soon be over and the United
Kingdom nationals can once again feel pride and self-confidence in their own nationality when travelling,
just as the Swiss and Americans can do...'
Is this assistance in promoting a patriotic feeling for the reason of displaying a national confidence
in the hopes it enhances business links outside of the EU...?! It certainly sounds it. Remember, we're
only talking about the possible colour of a document for travelling here... the contents of that small
book is far-more important than it's colour.
And to be frank, more important than this article.
'...National identity matters and there is no better way of demonstrating this today than by bringing back
this much-loved national symbol when travelling overseas.” Fellow Tory Michael Fabricant said: “You keep
your passport until it expires. If you renew after Brexit, I am hoping we’ll have new navy blue passports.”...'
Oh I'm sure Prime Minister May will pat you -Mr Rosindell and your colleague Micheal Fabricant on the
head for your strong comments that shows Britain is resolute in it's EU withdrawal. The oddity is that this
newspaper is all for diversity and free movement of people from all races.
This article seems to lean towards nationalism and the knee-jerk reaction to that word is to scream 'NAZI!'
At this moment and after perusing this story again, I'm wondering if The Guardian doesn't really hold these
views dearly and is actually in the business of opportunism.
One of the main reasons I suggest that this newspaper is moving slightly to the right with this article is the
comment '...The humiliation of having a pink European Union passport'.
It was okay to endorse pink hats at a womens protest and this 'humiliation' wasn't commented on when
describing Eddie Izzard's beret that was stolen.
Just sayin'
'...The Home Office said no decision had been made about the colour of the passport under the new contract.
A spokesman said: “The UK passport is routinely redesigned every five years to guard against counterfeiting.
We are launching the procurement process now to ensure there is sufficient time to produce and design UK
passports from 2019 when the current contract ends.
The timing of any potential changes to the passport after the UK has left the European Union has not been set.”'
SOURCE:
Crap! That was a waste of time!
But seriously, the benchmark we are aspiring to reach on this website is important and if we're to be seen as
a serious -yet non-despotic, open-minded forum where mature discussions can be generated, isn't it ironic
that we looked at getting our act together because of bettering our place and a established news outlet like
The Guardian is conceitedly shovelling this kind of fluff-sh*t under the banner of established true news?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.