02-23-2017, 07:08 PM
(02-23-2017, 06:31 PM)Ninurta Wrote: Lately, I've noticed a veritable mountain of this new definition of "immigrant"
being used on MSM, as if it is a foregone and accepted conclusion that they
have gotten to redefine the word.
They don't get to. Not on my watch.
Agreed, in European news outlets, labels of migrants and refugees are interchangeable
in a biased manner to nudge a narrative forward. People from any land within -or that
are working to enter the European Union can travel to work in any other EU country
without need of a passport.
A refugee is someone who is fleeing war and because of 'feelings' it's accepted that legal
documents wouldn't be at the forefront of their minds.
To back this up, the media will always show a trembling child with the 'let me in' doe-like
eyes.
It's cheap labour and because the millennials of the first-world believe it's okay to deceive
for one's own benefit, it's portrayed as some type of benevolent act to help a country
with an economic problem.
In my view, it's the same as those working in the USA from Mexico. It's nice to be nice
to those that are beneath you and if you don't, then must be some type of racist!
Establishment logic.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.