I'm resisting the leap to accept everything outlets like Alex Jones claims to be really going on
and even though the dodgy reporting from mainstream media leaves more questions than
answers, I'm focused on believeing this is to do with more about poor journalism and the
limited amount of column inches available, than any underhanded agreement to keep the truth
from the public
When people use the expression 'The Establishment' I think that it's full connotation is never
fully explained. True, we tend to perceive the establishment as those in expensive attire, sitting
in Governmental or private offices and feeling confident that their bank balances will never be
looked on in a similar manner as the average person.
We also tend to think of this collection of people as those who accept corruption and bribery
as mere vehicles within commerce and politics. The more cynical of us may even believe that
the idea 'to serve' is something this set of exclusive class identify as a callow feeling from those
they also deem as 'cannon fodder'
I suppose that in simple terms, if you weren't happy with your lifestyle, you may realise that to
to change it would probably improve it. If you were already in a acceptable lifestyle, can we agree
that you would not only wish to maintain it, you could look at improving it even more, yes?
In today's turbulent seas of industry, banking and politics, kindness and friendliness are always
great attributes to have, but in an environment where to succeed is to able to not only climb on
the shoulders of those also reaching for the brass ring, but to also slow others ascensions, being
'nice' is always-always seen as a sign of weakness.
If the improvement you aspire to involves working with those who are willing to do anything to
reach their goals of power and wealth (let's be honest, get the first one and the other comes
very soon behind it, anyway!)... would you assist this controlling and persuasive person for
your own ends?
Put yourself in shoes of the person seeking their position in society, can you do it alone or
will you need help? And if that assistance is compromised and becomes an obstacle, would
you be willing to eject them from your scheme...? Allow them to classified as the cannon fodder
mentioned earlier?
So in a theatrical form, we see these people clambering over the bodies of each other to reach
a point where they believe their wants will be fufilled. Nobody will be hoisted ahead unless it suits
a reason that benefits those doing the lifing. The cooperation can become familiar, but it's generally
agreed to keep the pile of bodies limited.
This is the Establishment... this is what's at stake if new people come along, possibly with new
ideas too. The many levels that support that hill of climbers must be maintained and ideally, it must
also remain secretive. I don't say this lightly and I know many of you already know it, they will kill
without remorse to keep it that way.
A rational narrative is formed to make sure that the populations come to accept that in life, there
are leaders and there are followers. Trust the leaders and the followers will benefit. We -the Elite
work hard to bring you a better lifestyle. When you sleep, we're there manning the wall and looking
at ways of furthering our tribe.
When in actuality, the person doing the 'manning of the walls' and working hard are really the
people who work for these people. What you could once again label cannon fodder.
A reasonable person could look at the whole game and come to the conclusion that it makes
sense and it does. It does because it's meant to not arouse your curiosity and keep your focus
on your own concerns. There's no movie-style 'baddies' and any major incidents against the laws
of the land are done using compartmentalisation.
The Jigsaw.
The Establishment works because the playing field belongs to them, the positions where you
stand on that field are decided by them in a way that makes you think that you decided.
They know of only one thing that they cannot fight and that is a mass infection of self-awareness.
If the Establishment is set on a bedrock of a societal dynamics promoting survival, it must come up
with ways of succeeding in their goals whilst adhering to those accepted dynamics.
To do this, they need to adjust the masses perception of those basic rules of society and it must be
done in incremental stages.
If the altering progress is too much, then either a deflection is needed to draw focus away or bodies
may have to be sacrificed for their greater-good. The population calms down and the dilution of the
accepted norm can continue.
Think back... what would have you found objectionable in the past that you see as normal now?
Now what do you think someone younger who never knew of that difference would say to you?
That's where we're at -at this moment. The old remember the difference and the young cannot
perceive it.
Why change something that works...? What on earth would you change it to?
Better the Devil you know and all that!
The big 'E' see it coming long before we do.
and even though the dodgy reporting from mainstream media leaves more questions than
answers, I'm focused on believeing this is to do with more about poor journalism and the
limited amount of column inches available, than any underhanded agreement to keep the truth
from the public
When people use the expression 'The Establishment' I think that it's full connotation is never
fully explained. True, we tend to perceive the establishment as those in expensive attire, sitting
in Governmental or private offices and feeling confident that their bank balances will never be
looked on in a similar manner as the average person.
We also tend to think of this collection of people as those who accept corruption and bribery
as mere vehicles within commerce and politics. The more cynical of us may even believe that
the idea 'to serve' is something this set of exclusive class identify as a callow feeling from those
they also deem as 'cannon fodder'
I suppose that in simple terms, if you weren't happy with your lifestyle, you may realise that to
to change it would probably improve it. If you were already in a acceptable lifestyle, can we agree
that you would not only wish to maintain it, you could look at improving it even more, yes?
In today's turbulent seas of industry, banking and politics, kindness and friendliness are always
great attributes to have, but in an environment where to succeed is to able to not only climb on
the shoulders of those also reaching for the brass ring, but to also slow others ascensions, being
'nice' is always-always seen as a sign of weakness.
If the improvement you aspire to involves working with those who are willing to do anything to
reach their goals of power and wealth (let's be honest, get the first one and the other comes
very soon behind it, anyway!)... would you assist this controlling and persuasive person for
your own ends?
Put yourself in shoes of the person seeking their position in society, can you do it alone or
will you need help? And if that assistance is compromised and becomes an obstacle, would
you be willing to eject them from your scheme...? Allow them to classified as the cannon fodder
mentioned earlier?
So in a theatrical form, we see these people clambering over the bodies of each other to reach
a point where they believe their wants will be fufilled. Nobody will be hoisted ahead unless it suits
a reason that benefits those doing the lifing. The cooperation can become familiar, but it's generally
agreed to keep the pile of bodies limited.
This is the Establishment... this is what's at stake if new people come along, possibly with new
ideas too. The many levels that support that hill of climbers must be maintained and ideally, it must
also remain secretive. I don't say this lightly and I know many of you already know it, they will kill
without remorse to keep it that way.
A rational narrative is formed to make sure that the populations come to accept that in life, there
are leaders and there are followers. Trust the leaders and the followers will benefit. We -the Elite
work hard to bring you a better lifestyle. When you sleep, we're there manning the wall and looking
at ways of furthering our tribe.
When in actuality, the person doing the 'manning of the walls' and working hard are really the
people who work for these people. What you could once again label cannon fodder.
A reasonable person could look at the whole game and come to the conclusion that it makes
sense and it does. It does because it's meant to not arouse your curiosity and keep your focus
on your own concerns. There's no movie-style 'baddies' and any major incidents against the laws
of the land are done using compartmentalisation.
The Jigsaw.
The Establishment works because the playing field belongs to them, the positions where you
stand on that field are decided by them in a way that makes you think that you decided.
They know of only one thing that they cannot fight and that is a mass infection of self-awareness.
If the Establishment is set on a bedrock of a societal dynamics promoting survival, it must come up
with ways of succeeding in their goals whilst adhering to those accepted dynamics.
To do this, they need to adjust the masses perception of those basic rules of society and it must be
done in incremental stages.
If the altering progress is too much, then either a deflection is needed to draw focus away or bodies
may have to be sacrificed for their greater-good. The population calms down and the dilution of the
accepted norm can continue.
Think back... what would have you found objectionable in the past that you see as normal now?
Now what do you think someone younger who never knew of that difference would say to you?
That's where we're at -at this moment. The old remember the difference and the young cannot
perceive it.
Why change something that works...? What on earth would you change it to?
Better the Devil you know and all that!
The big 'E' see it coming long before we do.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.