11-22-2016, 01:05 PM
Those who are against the election of Donald Trump and they are legion, are using a
tactic that's been around for years and in the political environment, I'm surprised it's
surfaced again.
You accuse your opposition of doing something and then if you've already done it, you
can feel confident and believe anyone investigating won't look at the accuser for any proof
of being the actual culprit because of social logic.
Or you do it after the accusation is made based on the same reason that it's generally
agreed that it would be too brazen. It also implies a confidence of being above the law,
social acceptance and ergo, indicates a threatening posture.
Why would you say that a person has done something they haven't and you have...?
Because we go where someone points.
tactic that's been around for years and in the political environment, I'm surprised it's
surfaced again.
You accuse your opposition of doing something and then if you've already done it, you
can feel confident and believe anyone investigating won't look at the accuser for any proof
of being the actual culprit because of social logic.
Or you do it after the accusation is made based on the same reason that it's generally
agreed that it would be too brazen. It also implies a confidence of being above the law,
social acceptance and ergo, indicates a threatening posture.
Why would you say that a person has done something they haven't and you have...?
Because we go where someone points.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.