11-27-2017, 01:20 PM
I have to agree with you both, we -the public, don't appreciate the situation when it comes to a Presidency.
Apart from it being a preferred chunk of ''nasty' gossip that fills are a column or two for the biased media,
it's actually insulting the reader by implying Presidents, ex-Presidents and the people all the way down the
ranks, are just there to serve only.
Mr. Obama still has security, he is and always will be a valuable asset for friend and foe alike.
The same goes for Hillary Clinton to some extent. It's just that a gauntlet of solemn-faced men in sun-glasses
aren't as visible as the Secret Service. I'd guess that sections of the FBI and possibly other tax-funded agencies
are involved in making sure a level of current and past governing people are monitored in the name of security.
It's not like the television tells us!!
Now does a Presidency require a person to be shackled to the resolute desk all day...? No, of course not.
It's just that this dumb-assed media has brought down the level of public intellect and offers what it calls
news in a fashion that resembles a report about a supposedly-important incident in a soap-opera.
Put it another way.
What happens when you're four or eight years are up...? Can you just drop by a cafe one day or take a sailing
holiday in the Caribbean with your family and expect nobody (the media included) not to give you hassle or even
attempt to capture an important dignitary for Machiavellian purposes.
The media don't tattle-tale that stuff.
Obama and Trump like golf. The Bush family liked fishing and tending their ranch. I'll wager there was-and-is a
telephonic device close by, the President job tends to warrant that!
They can afford to do the things they do and that's just how it is. The security comes out of the tax-payers pockets
and that's just how it is too!
Thee only blip in all of this is when Cheney went hunting, now that may have caused some security problems!
Apart from it being a preferred chunk of ''nasty' gossip that fills are a column or two for the biased media,
it's actually insulting the reader by implying Presidents, ex-Presidents and the people all the way down the
ranks, are just there to serve only.
Mr. Obama still has security, he is and always will be a valuable asset for friend and foe alike.
The same goes for Hillary Clinton to some extent. It's just that a gauntlet of solemn-faced men in sun-glasses
aren't as visible as the Secret Service. I'd guess that sections of the FBI and possibly other tax-funded agencies
are involved in making sure a level of current and past governing people are monitored in the name of security.
It's not like the television tells us!!
Now does a Presidency require a person to be shackled to the resolute desk all day...? No, of course not.
It's just that this dumb-assed media has brought down the level of public intellect and offers what it calls
news in a fashion that resembles a report about a supposedly-important incident in a soap-opera.
Put it another way.
What happens when you're four or eight years are up...? Can you just drop by a cafe one day or take a sailing
holiday in the Caribbean with your family and expect nobody (the media included) not to give you hassle or even
attempt to capture an important dignitary for Machiavellian purposes.
The media don't tattle-tale that stuff.
Obama and Trump like golf. The Bush family liked fishing and tending their ranch. I'll wager there was-and-is a
telephonic device close by, the President job tends to warrant that!
They can afford to do the things they do and that's just how it is. The security comes out of the tax-payers pockets
and that's just how it is too!
Thee only blip in all of this is when Cheney went hunting, now that may have caused some security problems!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.