The Blue Pill.

[BIAD]

Never giving up hope that the Remainers against the referendum will get their way, the BBC proudly announce that
the Elite that we're supposed to serve have said that democracy is for the birds.

Personally, I tend to think this is another last-ditch attempt before the House of Commons debate Theresa May's
exit-plans -to enrage those who want to wave bye-bye to the EU without a deal and to make the Remainers feel a
little better.
But I'm a deplorable, so what do I know?

"UK can cancel Brexit, says EU court
The European Court of Justice rules that the UK can cancel Brexit without the consent of the other EU states."...'

States...? other EU states? I thought they were individual countries that agreed to a pact that benefited each other.
Now the Beeb is calling them states. Therefore within the London media bubble, California is now a country.

Still, it's very kind that the Kings and Queens of the European Union has decided that the UK public can go and
f*ck themselves if they believe that an outcome of a vote has any relevance when it comes to what Juncker wants.

'The European Court of Justice has ruled the UK can cancel Brexit without the permission of the other 27 EU members.
The ECJ judges ruled this could be done without altering the terms of Britain's membership...'

Don't leave us Britain... France needs repairing and the the French/Spanish/Italians are undermining confidence in
 'The Project'. F*ck off.

'...A group of anti-Brexit politicians argued the UK should be able to unilaterally halt Brexit, but they were opposed by the
government and EU. The decision comes a day before MPs are due to vote on Theresa May's deal for leaving the EU...'

And right there is the real story, if you can call it that. Some unnamed politicians wanted the UK to stay in the EU and
because of the referendum result, it's been turned down. But the biased BBC wanted to not only fill the page with their
usual scare/pandering tactics, they also wanted to make sure their decreasing viewers still believed that the EU was
in charge. Basically, sovereignty is for Europeans... not for their perception of Nationalists.

'...MPs are already widely expected to reject the proposals during a vote in the House of Commons on Tuesday night.
BBC Brussels correspondent Adam Fleming said the ruling made staying in the EU "a real, viable option" and that may
"sway a few MPs" in the way they vote...'

Oh yeah? A Journalist said something that tows the media-line and that gives it credibility?!!
Now don;t forget BBC, back-tracking will be needed soon.

'...But he said "a lot would have to change in British politics" to see the UK remain in the EU, with Mrs May and the
government having to change its mind to make it a "political reality"...'

A political reality... not the reality, then.

'...A senior ECJ official - the advocate general -said last week he agreed the UK should be able to change its mind
about leaving. His opinion was not legally binding, but the court tends to follow his advice in the majority of cases...'

Hmmm.... a neutral comment that deflates the whole article.

'...On Monday a statement from the ECJ said the ability for a member state to change its mind after telling the EU
it wanted to leave would last as long as a withdrawal agreement had not been entered into, or for the two-year period
after it had notified the bloc it was leaving.

If that two-year period gets extended, then a member state could change its mind during that extra time too.
But the court said the decision must "follow a democratic process", so in the UK's case, it would have to be approved
by Parliament.
The member state would then have to write to the EU to notify them of the "unequivocal and unconditional" decision...'

That's very slippery of the BBC, at no point is the UK public mentioned. The same public that reached a majority vote
against remaining in the EU. The 'democratic process' is the key that isn't emphasised, Parliament -the officials elected
by the public would be obligated to the decisions their individual constituencies (areas of the country they represent).

'...The ECJ said it made the ruling to "clarify the options open to MPs" ahead of voting on Mrs May's deal.
The campaigners hope the victory in their legal case will increase the chances of Brexit being called off completely,
potentially through another referendum.

This is because they believe it sends the message that MPs are not facing a choice between accepting Mrs May's deal or
leaving the EU with no deal, and that "there are other options, and we can stop the clock."...'

Thanks for the translation BBC, it really shows that the 51% that voted to leave -some your viewers, by the way, can be
dismissed and Westminster can maintain their lucrative pro-Euro business lobbying income.
Unbiased commentary at its best!

'...The case was brought by a cross-party group of politicians, including Scottish Green MSPs Andy Wightman and Ross Greer,
SNP MEP Alyn Smith and MP Joanna Cherry and Labour MEPs David Martin and Catherine Stihler, who have been supported
by Jolyon Maugham QC of the Good Law Project.

They received a major boost last week when one of the ECJ's advocate generals, Manuel Campos Sanchez-Bordona, issued
a statement which backed their position. Mr Campos Sanchez-Bordona said it was his opinion that if a country decided to leave
the EU, it should also have the power to change its mind during the two-year exit process specified in Article 50 of the EU treaty.
Crucially, he also said it should be able to do so without the consent of the other EU states...'

A person's opinion means a lot when it falls in line with a preferred narrative, but wouldn't you think the BBC would be more
concerned with why the other 'EU states' cannot give consent or not? Unelected officials deciding what's good for a number
of countries regardless of their opinions?!

I aplogise, this is a non-story for scare-tactics... I forgot.

'...But he said the possibility of revoking the decision would be subject to "certain conditions and limits".
This includes the withdrawal being a parliamentary decision, and observing "the principles of good faith and sincere co-operation...
to prevent abuse of the procedure"...'

Again, a media that claims to have ethical standards not being diligent to it's viewers/readers. It ignores the outcome of a
public referendum and focuses on how Parliament would decide whether to stay or leave. What ever happened to real
journalism?

'Dangerous precedent
This was despite the EU warning during a previous court hearing that it would set a dangerous precedent by encouraging other
countries to announce they are leaving in an attempt to secure better membership terms, before cancelling their withdrawal...'

So now we have the EU saying make your mind up once and don't cause temptation from other countries to leave the EU.
Good sense if you want to keep your machine running, but no mention of what the British public think.
If there's still anyone out there doesn't believe how mainstream media is being used to manipulate the masses for the rich
and powerful, here's a perfect example.

'...The UK government's lawyers argued that the case was purely hypothetical as "the UK does not intend to revoke its
notification", and ECJ judges should therefore have refused to rule on it. They also claimed that the politicians behind it
wanted to use the case as "political ammunition to be used in, and to pressure, the UK Parliament"...'

More word-smithery from Auntie Beeb. It's an hypothetical situation given credence by offering only side that favours
an alternative result. 'Claimed' is an old trick when reporting, it implies it's only a point of view... like all of this article.

'...The case was initially taken to the Court of Session in Edinburgh, which ultimately agreed to pass it to the ECJ.
Two attempts by the UK government to appeal against the referral to the European court were rejected, and the case
was heard by all 27 ECJ judges last month...'

BBC:

There's nothing positive in the last paragraph for Remainers and that is why it's the last paragraph.
That f*ckin' Westminster political-media bubble... no wonder Guy Fawkes to a walk one November night!

Edit: They've added to the linked page since this posting.