Here's an article that I found interesting and it's not the first to comment on certain media companies
that are purported to give out dubious reports, but in my view, it shows once more that the group deemed
'the mainstream media' are still reluctant to look at themselves and how they're reluctant to change their
ways.
Nato says viral news outlet is part of "Kremlin misinformation machine"
'In the world of viral news, it's a relative baby - but it's already become so controversial that
a Nato spokesperson told BBC Trending that Sputnik is an agent of Russian misinformation.
Sputnik was set up in 2014 and puts out podcasts, radio shows and text stories which are
shared thousands of times a day on Twitter and Facebook. It's recently been adding
international bureaux, including a UK headquarters in Scotland.
But at the same time Sputnik has also been on the receiving end of criticism - by US intelligence
agencies, the British defence secretary, and now by Nato, who says it is part of a "Kremlin
misinformation machine."
"Outlets like Sputnik are part of a Kremlin propaganda machine which are trying to use information
for political and military needs," Nato spokesperson Oana Lungescu told BBC Trending.
"It is a way, not to convince people, but to confuse them, not to provide an alternative viewpoint,
but to divide public opinions and to ultimately undermine our ability to understand what is going
on and therefore take decisions if decisions need to be made."..'
The BBC:
What amazes me is the flagrant ingorance of the accepted news outlets doing the same and at times,
releasing poorly researched articles and obvious propaganda. When the election took place, many
people saw the one-sidedness of the media in it's full light and now, either the MSM still sits in it's
aloof position and refuses to believe it's failings or it's implementing a steady, methodical plan to
force their customers back to them.
If you maintain a narrative long enough, the opposer may perceive it as 'just the way it really is' and
contemplate that their alternative view may have blossomed from a selfish need to believe they were
right.
Basically, it's an individuals-against-a-group-mentality, where a single person sees the wall of contradictory
information and when it seems it doesn't alter, they give in and accept that the carefully-crafted information
must be true because the many mainstream outlets have articles that are not only similar, the pieces are
prioritised the same way.
It's Machiavellian in the fact that it uses high standing of media delivery that was created long ago.
News readers don't lie and reports aren't moulded to suit a narrative because... well, because it's on the
television and in the newspapers.
That's it...?!! That's the only reason someone viewing or reading a news article must accept it's true?!
I suppose 'they' wouldn't dare assassinate a President and I suppose they wouldn't dare write a falsehood
because of what would happen if it was found out.
Well...? Nothing really. The faultfinder would be told an investigaion would be held and then, when enough
time has passed to let emotions ease, a verdict that would suit all would be announced and in serious cases,
this is usually done after the culprit is either dead or quietly ensconced in another position.
To 'wake up' in terms of information screening is portrayed as some-sort of shadowy conspiracy-monger
that denies their own failings in life and spends their time looking for evidence to blame others for their
own faults.
But ask yourself, who promotes that view?
..........................................
Here's what I mean. It is in regards of soccer game where two areas of standing football supporters
were crushed due to overcrowding. Many deaths and injuries were involved.
The reactions of the Police were questioned and a cover-up ensued.
Hillsborough Disaster
'Liverpool FC have banned The Sun from their stadium and training ground
over the newspaper's coverage of the Hillsborough disaster.
Four days after the 1989 tragedy, the tabloid ran a front page story headlined
"THE TRUTH", which claimed supporters attacked police officers tending to
injured fans and stole from dead bodies.
In 2012, The Sun issued an apology after a report found the allegations were
false and had been part of a police cover-up...'
SOURCE:
that are purported to give out dubious reports, but in my view, it shows once more that the group deemed
'the mainstream media' are still reluctant to look at themselves and how they're reluctant to change their
ways.
Nato says viral news outlet is part of "Kremlin misinformation machine"
'In the world of viral news, it's a relative baby - but it's already become so controversial that
a Nato spokesperson told BBC Trending that Sputnik is an agent of Russian misinformation.
Sputnik was set up in 2014 and puts out podcasts, radio shows and text stories which are
shared thousands of times a day on Twitter and Facebook. It's recently been adding
international bureaux, including a UK headquarters in Scotland.
But at the same time Sputnik has also been on the receiving end of criticism - by US intelligence
agencies, the British defence secretary, and now by Nato, who says it is part of a "Kremlin
misinformation machine."
"Outlets like Sputnik are part of a Kremlin propaganda machine which are trying to use information
for political and military needs," Nato spokesperson Oana Lungescu told BBC Trending.
"It is a way, not to convince people, but to confuse them, not to provide an alternative viewpoint,
but to divide public opinions and to ultimately undermine our ability to understand what is going
on and therefore take decisions if decisions need to be made."..'
The BBC:
What amazes me is the flagrant ingorance of the accepted news outlets doing the same and at times,
releasing poorly researched articles and obvious propaganda. When the election took place, many
people saw the one-sidedness of the media in it's full light and now, either the MSM still sits in it's
aloof position and refuses to believe it's failings or it's implementing a steady, methodical plan to
force their customers back to them.
If you maintain a narrative long enough, the opposer may perceive it as 'just the way it really is' and
contemplate that their alternative view may have blossomed from a selfish need to believe they were
right.
Basically, it's an individuals-against-a-group-mentality, where a single person sees the wall of contradictory
information and when it seems it doesn't alter, they give in and accept that the carefully-crafted information
must be true because the many mainstream outlets have articles that are not only similar, the pieces are
prioritised the same way.
It's Machiavellian in the fact that it uses high standing of media delivery that was created long ago.
News readers don't lie and reports aren't moulded to suit a narrative because... well, because it's on the
television and in the newspapers.
That's it...?!! That's the only reason someone viewing or reading a news article must accept it's true?!
I suppose 'they' wouldn't dare assassinate a President and I suppose they wouldn't dare write a falsehood
because of what would happen if it was found out.
Well...? Nothing really. The faultfinder would be told an investigaion would be held and then, when enough
time has passed to let emotions ease, a verdict that would suit all would be announced and in serious cases,
this is usually done after the culprit is either dead or quietly ensconced in another position.
To 'wake up' in terms of information screening is portrayed as some-sort of shadowy conspiracy-monger
that denies their own failings in life and spends their time looking for evidence to blame others for their
own faults.
But ask yourself, who promotes that view?
..........................................
Here's what I mean. It is in regards of soccer game where two areas of standing football supporters
were crushed due to overcrowding. Many deaths and injuries were involved.
The reactions of the Police were questioned and a cover-up ensued.
Hillsborough Disaster
'Liverpool FC have banned The Sun from their stadium and training ground
over the newspaper's coverage of the Hillsborough disaster.
Four days after the 1989 tragedy, the tabloid ran a front page story headlined
"THE TRUTH", which claimed supporters attacked police officers tending to
injured fans and stole from dead bodies.
In 2012, The Sun issued an apology after a report found the allegations were
false and had been part of a police cover-up...'
SOURCE:
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.