(02-08-2018, 06:46 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Dilley's insider left us with some homework right before he ended his periscope live stream this morning. He had other intel also, but these crumbs will most likely be covered in the Q posts.
Here is the drop/homework:
Obama answers to Valerie Jarrett, she answers to the rogue CIA.
Who runs the rogue CIA? George Bush Sr.
Who runs point for George Bush Sr.?
There was a comment suggesting it was David Rockefeller, but when he died it fell into GWB's lap.
Another said it is Kissinger.
Anyone know?
And here's more...
Ah-ha! Dilly just gave us the answer to the question above.
John McCain runs point for George HERBERT WALKER BUSH and is the conduit between bush and soros.
02-08-2018, 10:53 PM (This post was last modified: 02-08-2018, 10:55 PM by BIAD.)
(02-08-2018, 10:36 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: ...We are part of history that will be discussed for the next 500 years. What a great time to be alive.
I agree, however it may not be a great time to be alive if you're a Clinton!
Quote:Uranium One informant says Moscow paid millions in bid to influence Clinton.
'An FBI informant involved in the controversial Uranium One deal has told congressional committees that Moscow paid millions to a U.S. lobbying firm in a bid to influence then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by helping former President Bill Clinton’s charities during the Obama administration.
The Hill first reported late Wednesday that informant Douglas Campbell gave a 10-page statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, House Intelligence Committee and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and was interviewed for several hours behind closed doors by committee staff.
In the statement, obtained by Fox News, Campbell said Russian executives told him that Moscow was hiring APCO Worldwide in an effort to influence the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton...'
As B posted a few days ago about seeing Comey in handcuffs, coming to a news channel near us, now this meme is being posted. The last time I saw it Comey's domino piece was standing up... now it's falling.
I know they have nabbed some people behind the scenes. This post seems to suggest he is one of them.
Here is an updated list of all the people who have "resigned", left office, or died since Trump started draining the swamp.
Q told us to keep up with it.
02-11-2018, 11:54 AM (This post was last modified: 02-11-2018, 12:13 PM by BIAD.)
I'm looking through the list that Mystic kindly provided and it makes interesting reading.
Of course, this list doesn't imply anything sinister or under-handed in the resignations and retirements, this goes
on every day and the variables involved are many.
But it can be seen as alarming when companies such as 'Newsweek' fire a large number of their management
and Editorial staff all on the same day!
Meanwhile, after Roland van Hauwermeiren resigned from his position as 'Country Director' for the Oxfam Charity
in February of this year -that is also on the list, here's something connected to the scandals around Haiti that also
had a bearing on comments about The Clinton Foundation's role on the island.
Quote:Charities warned after Oxfam Haiti prostitute claims.
'Charities doing overseas aid work will lose funding if they fail to cooperate over safeguarding issues, warned the international development secretary. Penny Mordaunt said it was "despicable" that sexual exploitation and abuse still existed in the aid sector.
Penny Mordaunt.
Her comments come after Oxfam workers were accused of using prostitutes in Haiti following the 2010 earthquake. Oxfam said it was "dismayed by what happened" and would fully cooperate with authorities.
The UK-based charity said it had already set up a whistleblowing hotline to prevent sexual abuse and misconduct. Oxfam received nearly £32m from the government in the last financial year.
Ms Mordaunt said she was writing to all British charities that receive UK aid to insist they detail the steps they are taking to ensure safeguarding policies are fully in place.
"With regard to Oxfam and any other organisation that has safeguarding issues, we expect them to cooperate fully with such authorities, and we will cease to fund any organisation that does not," she said. "I am very clear: we will not work with any organisation that does not live up to the high standards on safeguarding and protection that we require."
'Horrific behaviour' She said her "absolute priority" was to keep the world's poorest and most vulnerable people safe from harm. "In the 21st century, it is utterly despicable that sexual exploitation and abuse continues to exist in the aid sector," she said.
"The horrific behaviour by some members of Oxfam staff in Haiti in 2011 is an example of a wider issue on which DfID (Department for International Development) is already taking action, both at home and with the international community via the UN."
Fresh claims Meanwhile, Oxfam is facing further allegations, reported in the Observer, that its staff used prostitutes in Chad in 2006. The same senior staff member, Roland van Hauwermeiren, led this mission and the charity's work in Haiti. He resigned from Oxfam in 2011.
Oxfam said it could not corroborate the latest allegations, but it said it was "shocked and dismayed" at what it called the unacceptable behaviour by a small number of people.
"Since the Haiti case in 2011 we have introduced a range of measures to prevent sexual abuse and misconduct happening in the first place and improve how we handle any allegations," the charity said.
Oxfam has faced growing criticism over the way it handled the sexual misconduct claims against some staff in Haiti in 2011. The aid workers were in Haiti as part of the relief effort following the devastating magnitude 7.0 earthquake that killed more than 200,000 people in 2010.
Its own investigation into the allegations led to four people being sacked and three others resigning. On Saturday the Charity Commission said that while Oxfam told the regulator it was investigating inappropriate sexual behaviour, bullying, harassment and staff intimidation, the charity had not given the full details.
The Charity Commission took no further action but says it would have acted differently had it known all the facts. Oxfam has denied any cover-up and has said the behaviour of some of its staff in Haiti had been "totally unacceptable"...'
Ignoring the stupid bullsh*t of the incidents being reported as accusations and yet, Ms Mordaunt in the article states: "The horrific behaviour by some members of Oxfam staff in Haiti in 2011 is an example of a wider issue..."
shows that this behavior has gone on and it's merely P.R-control.
To the extent that 'accused' Oxfam employees have been involved in other such terrible activities, may never surface.
Just one charity...? Or is it another peeled-back layer of the horrible onion that the MSM seem reluctant to investigate.
If there's a web of human abuse, this could be one of the strands.
...................................
Edit: The cuckolding Guardian reports that:
Quote:'...Roland van Hauwermeiren, who has since been embroiled in a sexual misconduct scandal in Haiti, was head of Oxfam in Chad at the time. Van Hauwermeiren resigned from Oxfam in 2011, after admitting that prostitutes had visited his villa in Haiti.
One former Chad aid worker said on Saturday: “They would invite the women for parties. We knew they weren’t just friends but something else...'
They omit to say that the villa was paid for by the Oxfam charity and I would guess that many of us wouldn't
assume to put parties alongside earthquake-causing aid-work!
The Sun newspaper called them orgies, but let's stay within the boundaries the Establishment are attempting
to maintain!
A little bit of intel was given to Dilley last night, but the message packs a powerful punch.
"Marine Group ready to snatch 44". Not sure if 44 means Obummer, or if they are speaking about 44 people. Most of the time they refer to the presidents by their number. We can only hope.
02-12-2018, 01:40 PM (This post was last modified: 02-12-2018, 01:44 PM by BIAD.)
Connected to my last post:
Well, it seems there may be more to Oxfam's Haiti relief as Sky News implies that the 'prostitutes-in-the-villa' episodes
weren't the only sordidness going on.
Here on Rogue Nation, some of us are looking at the idea that a global child-abuse network is operating under the
radar of the public and through various means, sometimes breaks the surface.
But one of the sad facets of living in a world where we perceive those around us as we perceive ourselves, is that the
lens we look through is distorted via the internet and mainstream medias. Criminals are bad people...low-life felons,
who probably look and dress a certain way.
Many think cruelty is obvious to an observer and intent is judged on privilage. It's not. An organised structure that caters
for a certain market is a business and businesses use people from all walks of life.
If you manufacture tin cans, does this make you partly guilty for what's put in those containers? Whether it is processed
-peas or Zyklon B, the motive is the key -not the aspired goal.
If Oxfam is a charity that seeks to help the stricken around the world who deal with disaster and poverty, then all-well-and
-good. They may employ 'good' people and they may inadvertently employ bad.
Humans make mistakes at times and can be tempted from a virtuous path for a multitude of reasons.
But if a business is merely a cover for something more deceptively abominable, then discovering if it's an isolated
act or part of a bigger situation becomes paramount when appreciating what the 'product' or service is that they may
be providing.
Quote:Oxfam sex scandal 'tip of iceberg' as bosses hauled in to see ministers.
'...Mark Goldring, the charity's chief executive, will be among Oxfam officials to meet with International Development Secretary Penny Mordaunt. The Charity Commission will also speak to Oxfam on Monday, with the watchdog having accused the charity of having not divulged "full details" of allegations in a 2011 report.
Last week, The Times reported senior aid workers used prostitutes in Haiti amid an international relief effort following the Caribbean nation's devastating 2010 earthquake.
An internal investigation by the charity into sexual exploitation, the downloading of pornography, bullying and intimidation is claimed to have found children may have been exploited by employees...'
These claims in the light of the current political situation regarding immigration and recent discoveries of human-trafficking,
could be just an isolated case where members of the charity have abused their positions. But when the logistics are even just
lightly perused... like why a villa is provided for the alleged prostitution parties and what were the circumstances regarding any
payments made to those women... one must think that any management to monitor such behavior would be fleeting
-to say the least.
It could be naivety on the part of the charity and as commented on below, considering the amount of funding from the
British Government, I'd have thought some sort of diligence would have been the norm when using tax-payers money.
Unless... this is the tip of the iceberg and a larger view should be taken. If Oxfam -aware of it or not, are part of a global
web that takes advantage of the vulnerable in our societies and uses them for heinous reasons for others, then who would
be those 'others'?
A market demands product and customers, and such a socially-unthinkable commodity would demand a high price from
those who wish to engage in the darker practices. Why is it that Governments around the world haven't worked harder to
burn this type of crime out...? especially when it effects aid-companies that rely on public funding?
Quote:'...The scandal has sparked wider concerns about the aid sector, with former international development secretary Priti Patel having claimed there is a "culture of denial" in the aid sector about exploitation and sexual abuse over decades.
The Tory MP, who resigned from Government last year, claimed that when she raised the issue of sexual abuse within her department it was "dismissed".
Warning the Oxfam scandal is "only the tip of the iceberg", Ms Patel wrote in the Daily Telegraph on Monday: "When Secretary of State for International Development, it was my mission to ensure that every taxpayer pound was spent to serve those in need, and met UK development objectives.
"That meant accountability not just on aid effectiveness, but also the sexual abuse, not just of adults, but also the rape of children.
"I would like to say that I was supported and presented with facts from the department laying out the long history that UK governments, Labour and Conservative, had in tackling this global problem. Sadly, I can't."..'
Considering the emotive blow-back of this issue and the 'ticks in the good column' it would receive from the voters/public, one would
suggest any annual investigation into possible misconduct within tax-payer funded aid-businesses would be a good thing.
But that's if you only want to look and only if you're willing to deal with what you may find.