Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Government Quietly Admits to Weather Modification Program
#1
I found this juicy little tidbit on my news feeds. It looks like California is openly admitting to getting under the Chembow!



[Image: eASQcGX.png]

[Image: UDpyQPT.png]



Quote:Weather modification, geoengineering, chemtrails; these are all topics that if brought up in most circles today, would garner the speaker the telltale look that most Truthers have become all too familiar with. It is a look that has been ingrained into all who have opted to cast aside their critical thinking for their comforting daily lie. There is a herd mentality that has been established that causes even those on the fence or those interested in “outside the box” ideas, to fall in line while surrounded by the docile mass. So when the government recently released a “Notice of Intent” on page 11 of the Pasadena Star Classifieds, announcing their plan to carry out weather modification in Los Angeles County, it became clear that those blank stares should be turned inward, for some much needed self-reflection and re-evaluation.

So it looks as though the Weather Makers of the 20th Century knew a thing or two that modern science picked up on. What could possibly go wrong? It will be interesting to see the effects of the program out in the open, to be honest though. Who in the world, okay's something like that? They very quietly announced this to citizens in as a notice of intent in the classified section of the newspaper! 

Source Link
#2
 

Quote:Melina Hawk wrote:


... Who in the world, okay's something like that? 


As you say - Who gives the okay?

This will open the way to Weather Ownership Legislation...eventually --- Which then, could spread worldwide, as one nation accuses its neighbor/s of 'stealing' its weather
#3
I believe this fits here. It's an audio file, but the topic is about weather manipulation.

Quote:It appears weather manipulation and electronic warfare may have caused the highly unusual weather, with a mini hurricane developing over the region where the military is experimenting with electromagnetic weapons. On tonight’s show, Clyde Lewis talks with activists and researchers, Elana Freeland and Ann Fillmore in ‘CALL OF THE STORM CROW: QUICKLY DESCENDING DISASTER UNENDING!’


Hear the audio file  HERE
#4
Well we know they can manipulate the weather, hence why in 1976 the UN Treaty was signed by Nations to prevent using weather as a weapon


State.Gov


Quote:In August 1975, the chief representatives of the U.S. and the Soviet delegations to the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament (CCD) tabled, in parallel, identical draft texts of a "Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques."

The Convention defines environmental modification techniques as changing -- through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes -- the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydro-sphere, and atmosphere, or of outer space. Changes in weather or climate patterns, in ocean currents, or in the state of the ozone layer or ionosphere, or an upset in the ecological balance of a region are some of the effects which might result from the use of environmental modification techniques.

Intensive negotiations held in the CCD during the spring and summer of 1976 resulted in a modified text and, in addition, to understandings regarding four of the Treaty articles. These were transmitted to the U.N. General Assembly for consideration during the fall session.

Article I sets forth the basic commitment: "Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party." An understanding defines the terms "widespread, long-lasting or severe." "Widespread" is defined as "encompassing an area on the scale of several hundred square kilometers"; "long-lasting" is defined as "lasting for a period of months, or approximately a season"; and "severe" is defined as "involving serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural and economic resources or other assets."


But......but it left the door wide open for "scientific exploration" (cough-cough)


Quote:With regard to peaceful uses of environmental modification techniques, the convention provides that the parties shall have the right to participate in the fullest possible exchange of scientific and technological information.



So yes, countries still to this day, can modify the weather as long as it is not used as a weapon

However, think of what it does to Earth's climate overall
Which I firmly believe they (TPTB) came up with this Global Warming hoax to cover up for their little "experiments" which over time, is truly affecting Mother Nature for real.
 

In other words, the only humans to blame are the governments/military
NOT the general public or corp, as they would like people to believe


Weather Manipulation
Geo-engineering
Chemtrails


Oh yeah, that does exist and has been for quite some time
What the long term affects will be, is anyone's guess
Especially when there is more than 1 Nation playing God with our weather

a.k.a. 'snarky412'
 
        

#5
It reminds me of Charles Hatfield. He was a "rain maker" at the turn of the 20th century. In 1904 he was commissioned in California to fill the Morena Dam. The area was suffering greatly from droughts, and the city felt they had nothing to lose by employing Hatfield to make rain. Besides his contract stated that if he did not produce rain, then he would not get paid. So the city felt it was a sure bet, that Hatfield not only couldn't produce the rain, but would never fill the dam. 


Quote:In 1915 the San Diego city council, pressured by the San Diego Wide Awake Improvement Club, approached Hatfield to produce rain to fill the Morena Dam reservoir. Hatfield offered to produce rain for free, then charge $1,000 per inch ($393.7 per centimetre) for between forty to fifty inches (1.02 to 1.27 m) and free again over fifty inches (1.27 m). The council voted four to one for a $10,000 fee, payable when the reservoir was filled. A formal agreement was never drawn up, though Hatfield continued based on verbal understanding. Hatfield, with his brother, built a tower beside Lake Morena and was ready early in the New Year.[2]:91

On January 5, 1916 heavy rain began - and grew gradually heavier day by day. Dry riverbeds filled to the point of flooding. Worsening floods destroyed bridges, marooned trains and cut phone cables - not to mention flooding homes and farms. Two dams, Sweetwater Dam and one at Lower Otay Lake, overflowed.[4] Rain stopped January 20 but resumed two days later. On January 27 Lower Otay Dam broke, increasing the devastation and reportedly causing about 20 deaths (accounts vary on the exact number).[citation needed]

Hatfield talked to the press on February 4 and said that the damage was not his fault and that the city should have taken adequate precautions. Hatfield had fulfilled the requirements of his contract - filling the reservoir - but the city council refused to pay the money unless Hatfield would accept liability for damages; there were already claims worth $3.5 million. Besides, there was no written contract. Hatfield tried to settle for $4000 and then sued the council.[citation needed] In two trials, the rain was ruled an act of God but Hatfield continued the suit until 1938 when two courts decided that the rain was an act of God, which absolved him of any wrongdoing, but also meant he did not get his fee


Source Link


Now I can imagine this happening, when trying to play God with the weather. I think it might bite back, yeah know?


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)