Scientists create world’s first synthetic embryos

[EndtheMadnessNow]

We knew this was coming from the mad scientists. A new type of clone for spare parts and a new slave race?

Scientists create world’s first ‘synthetic embryos’ (Aug 3, 2022)

Researchers use stem cells from mice to form embryo-like structures with intestinal tract, beginnings of a brain, and a beating heart


A natural embryo (left) compared with a synthetic embryo. Synthetic embryos are expected to drive deeper understanding of how organs and tissues form during the development of natural embryos. Photograph: Weizmann Institute

Researchers have created the world’s first “synthetic embryos” in a groundbreaking feat that bypassed the need for sperm, eggs and fertilisation.
Scientists at the Weizmann Institute in Israel found that stem cells from mice could be made to self-assemble into early embryo-like structures with an intestinal tract, the beginnings of a brain, and a beating heart.

Known as synthetic embryos because they are created without fertilised eggs, the living structures are expected, in the near term, to drive deeper understanding of how organs and tissues form during the development of natural embryos.
But researchers believe the work could also reduce animal experimentation and ultimately pave the way for new sources of cells and tissues for human transplantation. For example, skin cells from a leukaemia patient could potentially be transformed into bone marrow stem cells to treat their condition.

“Remarkably, we show that embryonic stem cells generate whole synthetic embryos, meaning this includes the placenta and yolk sac surrounding the embryo,” said Prof Jacob Hanna, who led the effort. “We are truly excited about this work and its implications.” The work is published in Cell.
Last year, the same team described how they had built a mechanical womb that enabled natural mouse embryos to grow outside the uterus for several days. In the latest work, the same device was used to nurture mouse stem cells for more than a week, nearly half the gestation time for a mouse.

Some of the cells were pre-treated with chemicals, which switched on genetic programmes to develop into placenta or yolk sac, while others developed without intervention into organs and other tissues.

While most of the stem cells failed to form embryo-like structures, about 0.5% combined into little balls that grew distinct tissues and organs. When compared with natural mouse embryos, the synthetic embryos were 95% the same in terms of their internal structure and the genetic profiles of the cells. As far as the scientists could tell, the organs that formed were functional.

Hanna said synthetic embryos were not “real” embryos and did not have the potential to develop into live animals, or at least they hadn’t when they had been transplanted into the wombs of female mice. He has founded a company called Renewal Bio that aims to grow human synthetic embryos to provide tissues and cells for medical conditions.

“In Israel and many other countries, such as the US and the UK, it is legal and we have ethical approval to do this with human-induced pluripotent stem cells. This is providing an ethical and technical alternative to the use of embryos,” Hanna said.

Dr James Briscoe, a principal group leader at the Francis Crick Institute in London, who was not involved in the research, said it was important to discuss how best to regulate the work before human synthetic embryos were developed.

“Synthetic human embryos are not an immediate prospect. We know less about human embryos than mouse embryos and the inefficiency of the mouse synthetic embryos suggests that translating the findings to human requires further development,” Briscoe said.

But, he added: “Now is a good time to consider the best legal and ethical framework to regulate research and use of human synthetic embryos and to update the current regulations.”

Speaking to StatNews, Prof Paul Tesar, a geneticist at Case Western Reserve University, said the more scientists pushed stem cell-derived embryos further and further along the path of development, the more the synthetic and natural embryos begin to merge.
“There will always be a grey area,” he said. “But as scientists and as a society we need to come together to decide where the line is and define what is ethically acceptable.”

The creation of “synthetic” human embryos is outside of the legal framework of the UK’s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, but it would be unlawful to use them to establish a pregnancy in a woman, because they are not classed as “permitted embryos”.

There you have it: (1) the "embryos" aren't real embryos because (2) they didn't come about the "natural" way, and (3) only a few of them,  about a half of a percent actually looked like they were becoming embryos, but wow! Thank goodness! - they only looked like they were but couldn't actually have become embryos, and oh! by the way, we're also going to be doing the same thing and "grow human synthetic embryos to provide tissues and cells for medical conditions." Notice the "disguised viability argument": those 0.5 % that look like they're developing into proper embryos aren't proper embryos because they cannot survive outside the womb because we're not providing them with an artificial womb except that we are, in order to study 'tissues and cells for medical conditions' but we're not allowing them to develop into real embryos which it only looks like they're doing, but we can still use the developed tissue for other stuff..."

I'm not buying for a second that these scientismists won't want to do this with human embryos, and they won't grow them to full term, and murder them, because they'll be arguing all sorts of sophistical points that they are not really human.

So the question is, why? What is or are those "medical conditions" that they are so intent on treating?

I have one guess, and it's speculation: the condition is aging and death. They already know that stem cells, and even "young blood", if injected into older populations, reinvigorates them. For many years there has been a "meme" among alternative researchers that "adrenochrome" also restores youthful vitality. It's not but, I'm sure they have and been working on a miracle elixir. Some geneticists have seriously proposed that there is no reason humans cannot be, and should not be, virtually immortal. Billions are being dumped into this fantasy immortality research under the transhumanism agenda to create "new man" 2.0.

Some people, myself included suggest that there is something "off" about the longevity of some of today's most notorious and quite evil characters; they fund and promote all manner of chaos and evil, call themselves "gods" in propping themselves to apotheosis status, and their skin is literally sagging and hanging in folds on their faces... you all know who I'm talking about. Other billionaires have openly admitted taking blood transfusions from very young people.

[BIAD]

Blade Runner 2049:
'K': I've never retired something that was born before.

Lieutenant Joshi: What's the difference?
'K': To be born is to have a soul, I guess.

Lieutenant Joshi: Are you telling me no?
'K': I wasn't aware there was an option, madame.

Lieutenant Joshi: Attaboy.
[K walks to the door]

Lieutenant Joshi: Hey! You've been getting on fine without one.
'K': What's that, madame?

Lieutenant Joshi: A soul.