Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trump announces release
#1
Quote:Trump announces release of long-awaited JFK files. This is the new info you can expect.
Yes he has, I don't expect to read the Truth in this report (L B Johnson ordered this Hit) but hopefully more details.
Now that ALL the people are Dead who knew the Truth or was a Participant in the Murder.

This will give us something to talk about I think.
Quote:President Donald Trump confirmed Saturday that he will release the trove of documents related to President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

What did he say?
Trump made the announcement from his personal Twitter account Saturday morning.

[/url]
Quote:

 Follow
[Image: kUuht00m_normal.jpg]Donald J. Trump 

✔@realDonaldTrump

Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President, the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.
5:35 AM - Oct 21, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy



The tweet countered a story in Politico magazine on Friday, which said that Trump planned to block the release of some of the documents. The story said it was a “slim possibility that the always-unpredictable Trump could decide at the last minute to release all the remaining JFK files.”
How many will be released?
The release will include more than 3,000 that have never before been released, and another 30,000 that have been released but with redactions.
What new information can I expect?
From CBS News:
Quote:JFK scholars believe the trove of files may provide insight into assassin Lee Harvey Oswald’s trip to Mexico City weeks before the killing, during which he visited the Soviet and Cuban embassies. Oswald’s stated reason for going was to get visas that would allow him to enter Cuba and the Soviet Union, according to the Warren Commission, the investigative body established by President Lyndon B. Johnson, but much about the trip remains unknown.

Among the protected information up for release is details about the arrangements the U.S. entered into with the Mexican government that allowed it to have close surveillance of those and other embassies, said Tunheim, a federal judge in Minnesota.

Kennedy experts also hope to see the full report on Oswald’s trip to Mexico City from staffers of the House committee that investigated the assassination, said Rex Bradford, president of the Mary Ferrell Foundation, which publishes assassination records.
Why are they being released now?

The thousands of never-before-seen documents are slated to be released by Oct. 26. The date was established 25 years ago in the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, which sought to release the documents and minimize conspiracy theories surrounding JFK’s murder.


The National Archives is releasing the documents.
Source

Anybody who actually believe’s that Oswald planned this all by himself is stupid. The Warren report had many flaws. Especially how the bullets entered JFK and exited.  
No matter what info is released. 
My theory after studying this 20 years ago. It all points to LBJ.

Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#2
Quote:'...In 1992, Congress ruled that all assassination documents can be released within 25 years,
unless the president asserts that doing so would harm intelligence, law enforcement, military
operations or foreign relations...'
SOURCE:

I'm just putting this in because of the narrative-forming that the mainstream media are attempting.
Of course, if a name or a function that was relevant back in 63' may have a serious importance
today, then that 'unless'-caveat is needed when a President makes that decision.

It's just in case the current President -advised by those concerned, states some files are to be
kept back and it turns into the usual sh*t-show of the 'Trump goes back on his word again' routine.

But, it'll be interesting to see how the MSM play with whatever is revealed.


Quote:'...The CIA and FBI, whose records make up the bulk of the batch, have declined to say
whether they've appealed to the Republican president to keep them under wraps...'

Which means these agencies didn't comment and I don't see the purpose of stating
a Republican President in the comment. Are NBC news saying that a Democrat would
have agreed to keep them from the Public?

What is NBC implying...? Are they saying that the Democrat Party are well aware that
something in those classified files could harm their public perception and would readily
hide them for their own benefit?

See..? Anyone can write crap! I just don't get paid for my biasedness!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#3
I thought I heard a speaker once say that Daddy Bush had some involvement in this, or at least knew what was going on?

He's still alive, so maybe that's why the FBI or CIA still wanted the papers kept secret.  Wait until they are all dead so we can't have our revenge on them! 

Once again, the rules that apply to the 'little people' don't apply to those in high office.  This is something I hope Pres. Trump is about to change during the investigation to the Obama administration and the Uranium deal with Russia.
#4
@"BIAD"  That is Very True.

Since the Warren Commision was L B J's Baby, there is NO Truthful Evidence To Release.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#5
(10-22-2017, 04:10 PM)guohua Wrote: @"BIAD"  That is Very True.

Since the Warren Commision was L B J's Baby, there is NO Truthful Evidence To Release.

If one gets into the JFK stuff and resist the urge to race forward towards November 63',
even if you believe Oswald was the lone gunman, the amount of 'old-boy' clique of wealthy
Texans connected to the subject is astounding.

Lee Oswald's mother (which one, I can't say!)... rubbed shoulders with people far above her
station. Sid Richardson resided at the famous Fort Worth Club where Marguerite's second
husband used to take her occasionally.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#6
(10-22-2017, 06:22 PM)BIAD Wrote:
(10-22-2017, 04:10 PM)guohua Wrote: @"BIAD"  That is Very True.

Since the Warren Commision was L B J's Baby, there is NO Truthful Evidence To Release.

If one gets into the JFK stuff and resist the urge to race forward towards November 63',
even if you believe Oswald was the lone gunman, the amount of 'old-boy' clique of wealthy
Texans connected to the subject is astounding.

Lee Oswald's mother (which one, I can't say!)... rubbed shoulders with people far above her
station. Sid Richardson resided at the famous Fort Worth Club where Marguerite's second
husband used to take her occasionally.
Here,,,, Feast Your Eyes On This,,,,,,

Quote:The mastermind and primary driving force behind the JFK assassination -- LBJ's personal attorney -- Edward Clark, though he never directly admitted a payoff for the assassination, told confidantes at his law firm that the total was $2 million cash for him alone from the Texas right-wing oilmen. 

"NOT A THREAT BUT A PROMISE"

Madeleine Duncan Brown was on record stating that Johnson was behind the killing of Kennedy and of SEVERAL OTHER MEN. Brown has a bound manuscript and a book on the subject, but has been largely disregarded. She passed away on June 22, 2002. Her story was extended beyond its original basics, a problem for many in the wake of the assassination. 

In her memoir, "Texas In The Morning,"(1997), LBJ's mistress, the late Madeleine Brown, wrote of being at a "social" in honor of J Edgar Hoover at the home of Texas oil millionaire, and longtime backer of LBJ, Clint Murchison, on Nov 21, 1963, the evening BEFORE the JFK assassination. 

"A short time later Lyndon, anxious and red-faced, reappeared. squeezing my hand so hard, he spoke into my ear, not a love message, but one I'll always remember: 'After tomorrow, those goddamn Kennedys will never embarrass me again -- that's NOT a threat -- that's a promise.'" 


JFK/LBJ FLASH POINT: 

Kennedy's secretary, Evelyn Lincoln wrote that the day President Kennedy left for Dallas, they discussed the Bobby Baker scandal, LBJ's deep involvement in it, and the effects of the scandal on the campaign. Kennedy told her: "I will need a running mate in '64, a man who believes as I do." 

Lincoln wrote: "President Kennedy had talked and I had just listened, but I did venture one question. Now I asked, "Who is your choice as a running mate?"

He looked straight ahead, and without hesitating, he replied: 'At this time, I am thinking about Governor Terry Sanford of N Carolina. BUT IT WILL NOT BE LYNDON.' 

This news was not shocking to me. It had been my feeling for quite a while that Lyndon Johnson would NOT be the Vice-Presidential candidate in the next campaign. In fact, I had discussed this possibility with my husband and friends many times." 


JOHNSON's DIRTY POLITICAL LAUNDRY

So much scandal swirled about Johnson that it all but destroyed Kennedy's presidency. Johnson was known to have stolen elections, and history has it that the Kennedy/Johnson ticket had the election stolen for them in Chicago, W Virginia and Texas. The Billie Sol Estes scandal involving Johnson was followed by the Bobby Baker scandal. 

Had Kennedy NOT died and Johnson become president, Johnson would probably have been forced from office and indicted in the Bobby Baker case. Baker was a former Senate page boy who rose to be Lyndon Johnson's right hand when he was the majority leader, perhaps the second most powerful position in America. 

If John Kennedy had not been murdered, the Baker investigation would not have ended. If John Kennedy had not been murdered, the Baker scandal would have either destroyed or tarnished Johnson's image so completely that he would NOT have been on the 1964 ticket. Johnson would have been forced out by Kennedy and/or the media over the Baker scandal, and Johnson's power would have been forever destroyed. 

And all of those Texas business defense contractor interests that stood to gain from the Vietnam War would have lost because Kennedy was determined NOT to get involved in combat anywhere in Southeast Asia. 

If President Kennedy had not been slain, the truth about LBJ may have put him in PRISON -- as his grandma predicted -- rather than into the White House. 

This, then is the solution to the case: LBJ had Kennedy killed to save his political career and stay out of prison. It was just business as usual for LBJ and his little group; Texas was a rough old place in 1963 and LBJ was, in effect, running his own crime syndicate. And, of course, he became president.
Source 
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#7
Wait... JFK is dead??? OMG

tinydrroling
[Image: CoolForCatzSig.png]


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)