Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Offended again, are we?
#1
Just yesterday I was mentioning in a post somewhere that soon we wouldn't be able to talk anymore because we'd offend someone by doing so.


For those of you who are on Facebook, you know the drill...you post it, no one cares if it's personal, it can ruin your career, your life.


There is a School Principal here in Canada who now is under investigation because she posted anti Radical Islamist posts on her Facebook.


[Image: ghadaprofile.jpg.size.custom.crop.1086x611.jpg]


Quote:The York Region District School Board is investigating allegations that an elementary school principal put anti-Muslim posts on her Facebook page.

A spokesman for the board said it was aware of concerns raised by a community member about public postings on a Facebook page under the name Ghada Sadaka. Sadaka is identified as a principal in the York board on the page.


Alright. Let's see what posts she's put up that have now put her into target mode:


[Image: image11.jpg]



So she's asking Muslims that are not extremists where they stand. Seems like a legitimate question to me...


[Image: image10.jpg]


OK. I guess some Muslims would not like that one. EVEN if it's saying the TRUTH. But we're getting used to a two tiered system where common sense is out so...


But what really got her in trouble is this one:


[Image: truth.jpg]


She is asking for vigilance and refers to an article, with the appropriate link that I followed.


Now, here in Canada, the plan was to get 25,000 new refugees by Christmas. I think your numbers in the U.S. and abroad are probably tenfold those.


But has anyone seriously looked at the stats?


That is what that article is all about. The article speaks of the Trudeau government, the screening process, principally. Examples:


Quote:How is he going to do security checks on 25,000 people, coming from a terrorist no-man’s-land, in seven weeks?


Quote:Trudeau has no clue how to screen for terrorists. But what about Syrian migrants who haven’t committed violence — but who support terrorism, and sharia law, and extremism? What about them?

It’s a serious problem: an opinion poll of 900 Syrian migrants shows that nearly a third of Syrian “refugees” support terrorist groups.

The poll, taken last year by the Arab Centre for Research and Public Policy Studies, shows that 31% of Syrian migrants in refugee camps in the region do not want the Islamic State to be defeated.

They’re cheering for the terrorists.

So, out of 25,000 Syrian refugees Trudeau wants to bring in, 7,500 could be ISIS supporters.



Damn. But that's not all:


Quote:Only 1 in 5 "Syrian" refugees is really Syrian
The EU's official statistics office, EuroStat, has just revealed that only 21 percent of the so-called "Syrian refugees" flooding into Europe are actually Syrian.

This means the other 79 percent are -- as The Rebel has reported since the beginning -- economic migrants, not true refugees



It gets better:


Quote:When we think of "refugees," we often think of desperate families of all ages. But the "refugee crisis" is being driven by fit young Muslim men who can afford to pay smugglers.

Men make up 72% of these current migrants, according to the UN. Only 15% are children.

In Canada as well as Europe, the political and media elites are cheering. They're outbidding each other to look the most caring.



The Media is playing us again.


But if ONE little dude or dudette complains, then it's fire and brimstone....


And THIS here is exactly what happened to Principal Sadaka. ONE Muslim mother concerned for her little darling, who expressed fear over Sadaka's Facebook posts complained to higher authorities as it OFFENDED them.


FFS.


Quote:CBC News has spoken to a Muslim mother and her pre-teen daughter, who didn't want to be named, because the girl is still a senior student at Sir Wilfrid Laurier Public School in Markham where Ghada Sadaka is the principal.

"I was mortified. I was scared," the girl said. "I was surprised that someone would say these things and still be a principal of a multicultural school."



So Sadaka's posts were taken down but noooooo.....that ain't enough:


Quote:The posts may have been pulled down, but the mother and daughter say they feel their concerns have been ignored.

"No one is taking accountability on this. I just feel like the board is sweeping it under the rug and hoping it goes away," the mother said.

"I feel like I've been stonewalled."



Stonewalled. Nothing less.


Stories like this one makes me want to move to another planet.


FREEDOM OF FUCKING SPEECH, ANYONE ???


Out the window like the rest of our values that we hold dear, to ACCOMMODATE those we open our doors to.


Links to this utter mess:



Principal under investigation for anti-Muslim posts



The Truth About Refugees



Muslim parents demand answers from York board about principal's Facebook posts



smallkillingpc
~ Today is the youngest you'll ever be again ~
#2
Oh God!  Come get me; I can't take any more of this bull shit!!!!!!   minusculeredtantrum
#3
I can't believe it......well, actually I can.


People are taking offense of others with differing views, nothing more.
They are trying to limit their freedom of speech due to the fact they don't care for what was posted.


Now had that been a threat towards someone or a particular group of people, that would have been different.
But it is not.


This is where our Admin and others have created a touchy-feely atmosphere where Muslims are concerned.



Having said all that...
You would not believe the hate towards Christians that I have seen on Facebook and yet, no one says a word or reports it being as there are dozens and dozens of spiteful crude remarks on the post.


So why in the hell are Muslims treated with kid gloves?




I saw yesterday where the Facebook employees even wanted to remove Trumps comments about placing a temporary ban on Muslims until they (the government) could sort the vetting process out.

Do you know they, the FB employees, considered that hate speech?

How the hell is protecting National Security by upgrading our vetting process considered hate?
Screw those narrow-minded selfish assholes.


Anyhow, Zuckerface decided to leave Trumps comments alone, being as it wouldn't look right to delete a candidates comment.
And the employees got upset. pffft.

Oh go find you a safe place.

National Security is a lot more important to me, than worrying about who it offends talking about it.

a.k.a. 'snarky412'
 
        

#4
(10-23-2016, 01:36 AM)senona Wrote: I can't believe it......well, actually I can.


People are taking offense of others with differing views, nothing more.
They are trying to limit their freedom of speech due to the fact they don't care for what was posted.


Now had that been a threat towards someone or a particular group of people, that would have been different.
But it is not.


This is where our Admin and others have created a touchy-feely atmosphere where Muslims are concerned.



Having said all that...
You would not believe the hate towards Christians that I have seen on Facebook and yet, no one says a word or reports it being as there are dozens and dozens of spiteful crude remarks on the post.


So why in the hell are Muslims treated with kid gloves?




I saw yesterday where the Facebook employees even wanted to remove Trumps comments about placing a temporary ban on Muslims until they (the government) could sort the vetting process out.

Do you know they, the FB employees,  considered that hate speech?

How the hell is protecting National Security by upgrading our vetting process considered hate?
Screw those narrow-minded selfish assholes.


Anyhow, Zuckerface decided to leave Trumps comments alone, being as it wouldn't look right to delete a candidates comment.
And the employees got upset. pffft.

Oh go find you a safe place.

National Security is a lot more important to me, than worrying about who it offends talking about it.


But here is the thing.. it's everyone on the right who is being attacked, not just Christians, but everyone who is ideologically on the right. 

Do you remember when I first joined ATS? I was Muslim back then and many of my posts were very pro Islam, but at the same time, politically I was always very much right of center.. I was against financing the Brotherhood in the Arab spring and more.. 

When I first came and all the lefties learned I was Muslim they were so excited to have me as their new poster child, until I started giving my decidedly anti left opinions.. then I was hated, passionately. There was no difference between me and Nenothtu then, or me and any Christian on that forum.. I became an islamophobic, xenophobic scum who didn't know Islam, never mind that I was practicing the faith. 

I wasn't the only right wing Muslim attacked over political views and ideals, this is not a religious ideological war as much as it's a political ideological war.  The left and mainstream Muslims want the same thing politically in the most essential aspects, and have decided to use one another to achieve those goals.

So, it's an ideological war, one that religion is much less a factor, but whether or not we are politically right or left - at least for now.The left will do anything and say anything to silence the right though, and I mean anything

There is no other position that is acceptable to them.. it's either a left wing opinion or outright attack.
#5
(10-23-2016, 02:20 AM)Grace Wrote: But here is the thing.. it's everyone on the right who is being attacked, not just Christians, but everyone who is ideologically on the right. 

Do you remember when I first joined ATS? I was Muslim back then and many of my posts were very pro Islam, but at the same time, politically I was always very much right of center.. I was against financing the Brotherhood in the Arab spring and more.. 

When I first came and all the lefties learned I was Muslim they were so excited to have me as their new poster child, until I started giving my decidedly anti left opinions.. then I was hated, passionately. There was no difference between me and Nenothtu then, or me and any Christian on that forum.. I became an islamophobic, xenophobic scum who didn't know Islam, never mind that I was practicing the faith. 

I wasn't the only right wing Muslim attacked over political views and ideals, this is not a religious ideological war as much as it's a political ideological war.  The left and mainstream Muslims want the same thing politically in the most essential aspects, and have decided to use one another to achieve those goals.

So, it's an ideological war, one that religion is much less a factor, but whether or not we are politically right or left - at least for now.The left will do anything and say anything to silence the right though, and I mean anything

There is no other position that is acceptable to them.. it's either a left wing opinion or outright attack.




True that.

You're correct in that it is political ideological war.

I have found the leftist to be internet bullies, that only parrot what the DNC says about Trump supporters.

No argument really, just slinging the usual insults of racists, bigots, xenophobic, Islamophobic etc etc.
Pathetic and sad really, that they cannot fathom allowing people to "think" differently then they do.


And as an Independent, I find myself distancing from the Democratic selfish, controlling, bullying ways. 
I want no part of that kind of hate.


They are trampling over the freedom of speech to those with differing views, yet all the while claim they are for freedom of speech.
Yeah, right....only when the words being spoken are in line with your way of thinking.

a.k.a. 'snarky412'
 
        

#6
Quote:True that.

You're correct in that it is political ideological war.

I have found the leftist to be internet bullies, that only parrot what the DNC says about Trump supporters.

No argument really, just slinging the usual insults of racists, bigots, xenophobic, Islamophobic etc etc.
Pathetic and sad really, that they cannot fathom allowing people to "think" differently then they do.


And as an Independent, I find myself distancing from the Democratic selfish, controlling, bullying ways. 
I want no part of that kind of hate.


They are trampling over the freedom of speech to those with differing views, yet all the while claim they are for freedom of speech.
Yeah, right....only when the words being spoken are in line with your way of thinking.


Freedom to the left is a one sided freedom, it is not based in individuality, but rather, is a collective effort for majority rule.

Basically, you and I see freedom itself constitutionally which places the highest value on individual freedom. The left sees freedom democratically rather than individually, which is a "mob" or majority rule where freedom is what the majority dictates it to be. 

Therein lies the difference, and why their freedom never seems free to us, yet they keep espousing it as freedom. It's that Marxist type of ideology, communism or socialism or whatever you want to call it. 

Most communist regimes have "democratic" in their names, because they are just that way, they went down the same road we are heading down at some point in their history, and decided upon democratic majority rule, rather than a constitutional republic that represents all the individuals in it, rather than just the majority. 

So, when we see leftist "terrorism" which seeks to destroy careers and more for having a different political ideology, they are simply trying to be the loudest in the fight for majority rule. If they do reach critical mass in this country, our constitutional republic is gone.  And essentially, in this race in the fight between globalism and nationalism, this is the essence of the fight... Will the constitutional republic stand against the onslaught of those fighting for their democracy (aka majority rule)
#7
The Lady in the article needs to post this on her FB page. ha.


[Image: E-vIdZ0VivNHNitUzEbzeREYf-BfyFBnvzcTkqRX...80-h800-no]

a.k.a. 'snarky412'
 
        

#8
(10-23-2016, 06:57 AM)senona Wrote: The Lady in the article needs to post this on her FB page. ha.


[Image: E-vIdZ0VivNHNitUzEbzeREYf-BfyFBnvzcTkqRX...80-h800-no]
smallroflmao  Very Appropriate.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#9
(10-23-2016, 06:57 AM)senona Wrote: The Lady in the article needs to post this on her FB page. ha.


[Image: E-vIdZ0VivNHNitUzEbzeREYf-BfyFBnvzcTkqRX...80-h800-no]

LMAO !!


Good one !!!
~ Today is the youngest you'll ever be again ~


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)