The Slaves Of Leicester, But The Wrong Colour For BLM.

[ABNARTY]

Isn't this the same country able to detect if your TV isn't properly licensed? The same country with umpteen thousand closed circuit cameras? The same place who has been in and out of court with their mass surveillance programs of their population? Yet, over decades they can't find scores of giant buildings in one city churning out truck loads of textiles on a daily basis. That doesn't pass the smell test. 

We have the same issue in the US with undocumented workers. Nothing against the folks doing the work. If their ill-protection "under the law" wasn't facilitated by a cabal of schmucks in important positions, they wouldn't be there.

Oh, you mean the 'loicence' meme and the worries of Big Brother watching the Limeys!

Well the BBC lied when they frightened the public with their 'TV Detector Van' commercial. (It was a PR stunt)



What they omitted to say that the BBC had a list of names of those who'd purchased licences (which funded
the BBC) and hadn't renewed them. Of course, if your name wasn't on the list and you were watching one
of the only three channels available at the time, the BBC reckoned their detector vans could somehow detect
a signal from a 'live' television.

Considering an analogue television was a receiver and not a transmitter, their evidence was based on readings
-that they concealed from their customers, of an oscillation within a TV set that is involved in converting the incoming
signal to a manageable frequency.
It was all bullshit of course, but the British Broadcasting Company was the bastion of truth, so the public just gulped
the propaganda right down!
........................................

With the camera surveillance, that one's easy!
Like most things in England, the main concern isn't how much it initially costs, it's how much it costs to maintain it.
So after receiving financial assistance from the Government to install the cameras, one would think a crack-squad
of watchers would be sought to monitor the screens.

But video storage of quiet streets and wages cost monies that can be used elsewhere and after a few months, the
vigilance is sacrificed for a low-paid employee who's training was minimal. It's 2021 and most footage is taken by
the Police from private business's security cameras and the invention of cell-phones/high-tech doorbells

It's always the same, why maintain law-enforcement-funded surveillance equipment when it's easier just to ask for
a member to come forward with any phone-footage through the use of a local or major newspaper.
........................................

The media lie!

That darn BBC again!