Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax?

[Ninurta]

As said, this week it was someone familiar to British television audiences and had his own long-running series of interviewing
programmes. However, Richard Madeley asked a question to a Professor that is normally kept away from the public's perception
of academic autocrats.


...


What I'm wondering is why this woman is a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) that supposedly
recommends to the British Government appropriate ways of dealing with national medical problem? The Coof is a physical
disease, isn't it...? What needs does Susan Mitchie serve as a Behavioural analyst in a time when fully-untested drugs are
being pumped into the arms of the frightened? And a keen Communist -to boot!

Just food for thought.

Michie is Professor of Health Psychology and Director of the Centre for Behaviour Change at UCL, so prima facie she has the
credentials to be a scientific advisor. What is never mentioned at any point to give context to her many media appearances,
in which she usually launches a tirade at the government, is that she has for 40 years been a member of of the Communist Party
of Britain.

...

Guido Fawkes:
......................................................

On another note, the Bots are busy helping the narrative!

So.

You know, that sounds suspiciously like a propaganda campaign. It appears to me to be an effort to "normalize" communism and make it more palatable to the general public. Humans are herd beasts, and if they believe everyone else is going to run off the cliff...

In other news, since when is a "Professor of Health Psychology" qualified to speak on MEDICAL matters? Since when are they even a scientist? There is little to nothing in psychology that is related to science. Psychology is mostly voodoo trying to masquerade as science. My first wife was a PhD in Psychology (got her PhD after we split, was only at Masters level before), and did at times attempt science in doing animal experiments, but her experiments were much more closely related to Neurology than to Psychology. She was trying to figure out how brains work. Brains, NOT minds, which are much more insubstantial than brains. You can poke a brain with your finger, but you can't poke a mind with it.

Asking a Psychologist a medical opinion is like getting an estimate to have a new roof put on your house from an auto mechanic. The mechanic may be great at what he does, but roofing is NOT what he does, so his opinion carries quite a lot less weight in roofing and carpentry matters than it would in automotive matters.

"Science" used to start with a question, and then through experimentation come to a conclusion that answered it. Since the Left took over science, now it starts with the answer, and tries to find enough supporting evidence - even if they have to make it up - to confirm that preconceived conclusion. It's exactly bass ackwards now...

... but Psychology has ALWAYS been like that.

I will also note that there is an old saying regarding Professors - "Them that can, do. Them that can't, teach."

Under Socialist and Communist regimes, EVERYTHING is colored by the edicts of the Party. "Scientists" must find "conclusions" that support the edicts of the Party. Therefore, the politics of a communist "scientist" are ALWAYS relevant to their conclusions. Especially the fakest scientists, Psychologists. It was entirely proper to question just how much the Party had colored Ms. Michie's conclusions. Personally, I would have also gone even further, and questioned her credentials and expertise to assess concrete questions when her "science" is not a concrete science.

Instead, the person questioning her politics and qualifications got dog piled by commie-bots, all in an effort to make the general public think that it thinks other than how it does. Classic.

So who would go to that kind of effort to normalize communism and make it more palatable? What government is composed of communists with deep pockets? What does the middle "C" in "CCP" stand for?

It's a patently transparent attempt to promote communism using presumed "science" as a smoke screen, science that is not science at all, but since we call it science, the unfaithful dare not question it's conclusions...

,,, because The Party has spoken!

.