06-05-2021, 09:24 AM
Here's a good link from the Off-Guardian website that can help in evaluating the worrisome perils of
navigating all the shite that is out there regarding the Coof. Tips On Understanding Covid Studies.
There are other minefields that we tend to not realise are traps for those who still believe the mainstream
news. A simple one is that when two television Journalists or news Presenters are talking to each other,
they're not reporting accurate information to the public, they are 'influencing' the viewer with the slippery
ruse that you're sort-of listening-in to someone you believe are better informed than oneself due to their
occupation.
This has a duel effect. One: A viewer or listener can think they're getting a 'behind-the-scenes' look at a
problem. Two: Reinforces the idea that the the audience needs the employees of these news conduits
because... it seems Journalists and those in the media business know better.
A false idol -if you will.
Obfuscation is another good ploy in the art of making something more than it really is. Information that is
relevant can be left out if it counters a desired goal of the one relating the information. It's not lying and can
be argued that lack of TV-time or column space could be reasons why particular details were omitted, but it
is still a deceptive act.
Through word-trickery and unneeded emphasis on certain phrases, a person could be led to believe anything
due to those in the media abusing a trust that has been cultivated with the public for years. The damage for
such agenda-driven activities in the MSM gives more credence to dubious outlets -such as the ones the
establishment press deem 'on the internet' and 'social media'.
Ironically, when it serves a purpose, the same mainstream media will quote from such click-bait websites,
but it's a narrow selection that tends to have the same aim at heart.
What's surprised me the most is the easy manner the same MSM moved from 'Vaccine: The Cure' -indicating
a single injection would solve the Covid problem, to: 'You'll Need Three Jabs -At Least!'
I've not seen one orthodox media company offer a report on how so-called 'science' changed horse in mid-stream.
It's sad to see these traditional networks resort to expressions like 'Experts suggest, Scientist believe and most
people understand...' in their reporting, but it does display this customary style of communication that society has
accepted for generations has evolved from factual accounting into a form of entertainment.
I think I'll stick with the sentence on the end of Rosemary Frei's linked essay from above.
"Trust yourself. You can do it."
navigating all the shite that is out there regarding the Coof. Tips On Understanding Covid Studies.
There are other minefields that we tend to not realise are traps for those who still believe the mainstream
news. A simple one is that when two television Journalists or news Presenters are talking to each other,
they're not reporting accurate information to the public, they are 'influencing' the viewer with the slippery
ruse that you're sort-of listening-in to someone you believe are better informed than oneself due to their
occupation.
This has a duel effect. One: A viewer or listener can think they're getting a 'behind-the-scenes' look at a
problem. Two: Reinforces the idea that the the audience needs the employees of these news conduits
because... it seems Journalists and those in the media business know better.
A false idol -if you will.
Obfuscation is another good ploy in the art of making something more than it really is. Information that is
relevant can be left out if it counters a desired goal of the one relating the information. It's not lying and can
be argued that lack of TV-time or column space could be reasons why particular details were omitted, but it
is still a deceptive act.
Through word-trickery and unneeded emphasis on certain phrases, a person could be led to believe anything
due to those in the media abusing a trust that has been cultivated with the public for years. The damage for
such agenda-driven activities in the MSM gives more credence to dubious outlets -such as the ones the
establishment press deem 'on the internet' and 'social media'.
Ironically, when it serves a purpose, the same mainstream media will quote from such click-bait websites,
but it's a narrow selection that tends to have the same aim at heart.
What's surprised me the most is the easy manner the same MSM moved from 'Vaccine: The Cure' -indicating
a single injection would solve the Covid problem, to: 'You'll Need Three Jabs -At Least!'
I've not seen one orthodox media company offer a report on how so-called 'science' changed horse in mid-stream.
It's sad to see these traditional networks resort to expressions like 'Experts suggest, Scientist believe and most
people understand...' in their reporting, but it does display this customary style of communication that society has
accepted for generations has evolved from factual accounting into a form of entertainment.
I think I'll stick with the sentence on the end of Rosemary Frei's linked essay from above.
"Trust yourself. You can do it."
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.