(09-27-2021, 11:37 AM)Ninurta Wrote: I'm looking through it, second by second in real time, searching for that elusive 2 second shot.
In the meantime, here is a link to an apparent professional Nessie Hunter who is not buying the video.
I think his reasons are invalid, but the reader may make up his own mind in the matter. Red flags are not smoking guns...
The image of the drawing from 1975 is the most compelling part of the argument to me, but it still doesn't quire make the cut, in my mind.
I know, a couple of days ago I too created a comparison-image of Rines' mid-water shot and Maver's strange shape near
the shore and felt a small alarm bell go off.
However, if it is true that fakery was at play here, it means a great risk to why the video was originally made.
The charity would be incidentally dragged through the mud and Maver's YouTube channel would be mocked and useless.
Now... if someone has somehow 'hijacked' the video whilst it sat in YouTube's control, then we're in a place far-deeper than
Loch Ness!
It's a pickle-alright and seriously damaging to the idea of charity-donating.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.