11-25-2021, 01:18 PM
(11-25-2021, 06:16 AM)Ninurta Wrote: I know that's how they frequently do business, but it's not really an "informed" consent, and I believe could be fought against in court - no one is going to read a small book just to have someone else scrape their brain through their nose with a cotton swab.
.
Since a lot of those tested in mass, and injected in mass, never signed anything, they may stand a chance, if it ever goes to court, but the system is set up to cover any pesky dissenters.
The fact that they bombarded the air waves, and social media with information about the virus and the vaccines, they can claimed the folk were informed, and the fact that they willingly, showed up in mass, waited for hours, and allowed themselves to be swabbed, and or injected, would speak strongly of consent.
Consent can be tricky if the person is not of sound mind, or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. I am not sure it would work in a court of law, if you are under the influence of a lying corrupt establishment.
It would be wonderful if we had a chance at winning on those grounds, but with our present system, I don't think we stand a chance.
For every one person that read this post. About 7.99 billion have not.
Yet I still post.
