For YOU Crypto Types

[BIAD]

Of course, to counter the Morehead-Sierra sounds, the establishment have to step in and place their stamp
of my-way-or-highway jurisdiction on any suggestions that favours the idea of an unknown language-using
entity.

(From Scientific American.com)

'...The Sierra Sound recordings, also known as the Berry/Morehead tapes, are touted as the gold-standard
of evidence for a Bigfoot language.

During a number of expeditions to the Sierra Nevada Mountains between the years 1972-1975, Alan Berry,
Ronald Morehead and their crew captured audio recordings of alleged Bigfoot encounters. They recorded
a total of 90 minutes of Bigfoot language and vocalizations using a microphone dangled from a tree branch
attached to a reel-to-reel recorder.

Over the years they also found 18-inch footprints of Bigfoot, and experienced many sightings...just not during
the recordings! Morehead and Berry (until his death in 2012) staunchly deny that the recordings are a prank.

However, for a number of reasons, it is highly probable that the recordings are a hoax, or that the crew were
hoaxed. The expeditions were undertaken specifically to hunt for Bigfoot. "Bigfoot" was heard but never seen
when the recordings were made...'

Staying with the rationale, any human that passes you in the street cannot be defined fully as a modern human
unless they speak?!! I understand the exposition that the sounds may have come from humans, but again, this
is using the stone-set establishment precedent that Bigfoot doesn't exist, ergo the sounds were from animals
with human-like vocal abilities.

'...It is obvious that other animals made some of the sounds, such as bears.
The wood knocks are easy to re-create, while the "language" itself is unconvincing. The vocalizations are an
amateur impression of how a proto-language might sound if it evolved from non-human primates...'

Or the alternative balanced suggestion that the 'proto-language' is from a group of proto-humans!!
We don't know what Cro-Magnons sounded like and it's only a supposition of a date when Homo sapiens
first began to vocally communicate.

Maybe the 'chatter' in the recordings sound like early-man because the ones producing the sound IS early-man or
an off-shoot not discovered yet.
Ffs, why does everything have to be negative when it comes to this subject, it's not like it'll be the anthropologists
will have to rewrite the f*ckin' history books themselves!

'...This "Bigfoot" is likely human, and the Sierra Sounds a combination of hoax and misidentification, like all of
the other evidence for Bigfoot. Self -proclaimed "Bigfoot language expert" R. Scott Nelson has taken the Bigfoot
language claims one-step further.

As though it is the Linear B of Bigfoot language to be deciphered, Nelson has created a transcription of the Sierra
Sound Recordings. He is a retired U.S. Navy Cryptologic Technician Interpreter who speaks Russian, Spanish and
Persian...'

Here we go, ridicule a person interested in the phenomena and simultaneously mocking the phenomena with
certain word-use. The vice-like grip of establishment on what is the reality we're in must be kept within the
framework provided, anything outside that structure is corrupt and arrived at via underhanded action.

'...He also believes he can speak "Bigfoot". Nelson claims he has identified not only vocalizations such as whistles,
grunts, and snarls, but also individual phonemes, i.e., the sounds that combine to create words. Nelson has created
a pronunciation key for these phonemes, and he uses the Latin alphabet, diacritics and various other symbols to
represent these sounds.

He calls this the Sasquatch Phonetic Alphabet (SPA), or the Unclassified Hominid Phonetic Alphabet (UHPA).
It is unclear why he doesn't use the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), the standardized representation of the sounds
of spoken language. Bilingualism (speaking two or more languages) and working as a translator doesn't qualify someone
to identify or describe undocumented languages.

This is an area of anthropological linguistics, although it appears as if many cryptozoological fans confuse "crypto-linguistics"
as a field that researches the language of cryptids. The Sierra Sounds are used not only to support the claim of a Bigfoot
language, but also to legitimize claims of Bigfoot's existence...'

Wow...! How f*ckin' stupid is R. Scott Nelson! Fancy thinking we can talk to another species on this planet!!
Next, we'll be thinking parrots can copy our language.

'...As Nelson argues, "The existence of the Sasquatch Being is hereby assumed, since any creature must exist before
his language." However, there are still prior questions. Does Bigfoot exist, and if so, could Bigfoot speak?...'

Here's where the canny word-use comes into play. It gives a little, slyly invites you out into the weeds and then mentally
sodomises any proposition that Bigfoot-only, can exist.

'...For arguments sake, if Bigfoot did exist, the species would likely have developed its own system of communication,
like chimpanzees and Vervet monkeys. Similar to the claims of the (so far mythical) Orang-Pendek, Bigfoot would
probably communicate using vocalizations.

However, non-human primates don't have the physiology to produce a wide variety of speech sounds, so it is unlikely that
Bigfoot would have developed language, or would be able to speak existing human languages.

At any rate, this is all starting off on the wrong (Big)foot. There is no solid physical evidence to support the existence of Bigfoot.
Before we establish the existence of Bigfoot language, we would need to establish the existence of Bigfoot...'

SOURCE:

And there you have it. The article places Bigfoot firmly in the animal realm, where evidence abides that apes use basic
rudimentary diction and physical signals within their own specific species and since Bigfoot would behave the same,
the Sierra Nevada recordings are fake.
Then finally, the shovel of dirt on the coffin that academia has been using for years was thrown.
No solid evidence, so no Bigfoot.

Every poor bugger that's seen one of these things is a liar, the language on the tapes are just kids goofing around in the dark
and it's all-one big tourist-trap. The scientists who keep pushing back in time our 'human'-origins, told us so.