Child Sex Trafficking/Pizzagate/Pedogate/Organ-Harvesting

[BIAD]

Here's the PDF link to the Grand Jury Report... it's terrible and hints that the initial shouting of
organised child-abuse and trafficking has some merit.
LINK:

'....Special agents testified before us that they had identified a series of practices that regularly appeared,
in various configurations, in the diocesan files they had analyzed. It's like a playbook for concealing the truth:

First, make sure to use euphemisms rather than real words to describe the sexual assaults
in diocese documents. Never say "rape"; say "inappropriate contact" or "boundary issues."

Second, don't conduct genuine investigations with properly trained personnel. Instead,
assign fellow clergy members to ask inadequate questions and then make credibility
determinations about the colleagues with whom they live and work.

Third, for an appearance of integrity, send priests for "evaluation" at church -run psychiatric
treatment centers. Allow these experts to "diagnose" whether the priest was a pedophile, based
largely on the priest's "self -reports," and regardless of whether the priest had actually engaged in
sexual contact with a child.

Fourth, when a priest does have to be removed, don't say why. Tell his parishioners that
he is on "sick leave," or suffering from "nervous exhaustion." Or say nothing at all. 

Fifth, even if a priest is raping children, keep providing him housing and living expenses,
although he may be using these resources to facilitate more sexual assaults.

Sixth, if a predator's conduct becomes known to the community, don't remove him from
the priesthood to ensure that no more children will be victimized. Instead, transfer him to a new
location where no one will know he is a child abuser.

Finally and above all, don't tell the police. Child sexual abuse, even short of actual penetration,
is and has for all relevant times been a crime. But don't treat it that way; handle it like a personnel
matter, "in house." ...'

'...In the Diocese of Greensburg, a priest impregnated a 17 -year -old, forged the head pastor's signature
on a marriage certificate, then divorced the girl months later.

Despite having sex with a minor, despite fathering a child, despite being married and being divorced, the
priest was permitted to stay in ministry thanks to the diocese's efforts to find a "benevolent bishop" in another
state willing to take him on.

Another priest, grooming his middle school students for oral sex, taught them how Mary had to "bite off the
cord" and "lick" Jesus clean after he was born. It took another 15 years, and numerous additional reports of
abuse, before the diocese finally removed the priest from ministry...'

'...A priest in the Diocese of Harrisburg abused five sisters in a single family, despite prior reports that were
never acted on.
In addition to sex acts, the priest collected samples of the girls' urine, pubic hair, and menstrual blood.

Eventually, his house was searched and his collection was found. Without that kind of incontrovertible evidence,
apparently, the diocese remained unwilling to err on the side of children even in the face of multiple reports of
abuse.

As a high-ranking official said about one suspect priest: "At this point we are at impasse - allegations and no
admission." Years later, the abuser did admit what he had done, but by then it was too late. ...'

'...The Diocese of Scranton also chose to defend its clergy abusers over its children. A diocese priest was arrested
and convicted after decades of abuse reports that had been ignored by the church.

The bishop finally took action only as the sentencing date approached. He wrote a letter to the judge, with a copy to
a state senator, urging the court to release the defendant to a Catholic treatment center.
He emphasized the high cost of incarceration. 

In another case, a priest raped a girl, got her pregnant, and arranged an abortion. The bishop expressed his
feelings in a letter:
"This is a very difficult time in your life, and I realize how upset you are. I too share your grief."

But the letter was not for the girl. It was addressed to the rapist. ...'

(From the Link)

There are many more and offers credibility  to the proposed allegations regarding the Establishment's lust for
control.