This is a translated page, so please excuse any errors in grammar.
SOURCE:
Quote:THIS IS THE FAKE "ALIEN" HAND THAT THE MAUSSAN SCIENTISTS DETERMINED
ANATOMICALLY CORRECT AND FUNCTIONAL.
Rodolfo Salas-Gismondi, Ph.D.
Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum, UNMSM, Lima - Peru
Research Associate, Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, NY - USA
Member of SSH.
Quote:'Abstract . Journalist Jaime Maussan has defended the "non-human" authenticity of various remains
of mummies from Nasca based on his team of international scientists, after direct inspection of
specimens and X-ray analysis.
Regarding the hand that I analyze in this article, Mr. Maussan referred ("Contact" program, July 2)
that his scientists have agreed that each finger has six phalanges and that the hands are anatomically
correct and functional.
FIGURE 1.
Based on the X-ray of this hand and using basic comparative anatomy, I identify the bones that make
it up and show that
(1) the hand is formed by at least two human individuals and
(2) that each finger has two (human) An absolute anatomical and evolutionary aberration.
This is not an opinion, it is the result of anatomical-comparative analysis.
This cheeky assembly is the scientific evidence that Maussan's team defends as authentic.
Anatomical analysis shows that Dr. Maussan's scientists, including Mexican forensic scientist Jose de
Jesus Salce and Peruvian surgeon Edson Salazar, are unable to distinguish between a metacarpal
and a phalanx, or do not want to
When one hears the comments of Mr. Maussan, the outstanding Mexican forensic Jose de Jesus Salce
and the Peruvian surgeon Edson Salazar, about the authenticity of Nasca's remains, these are quite
convincing.
This capacity for persuasion lies not only in the passion they transmit, but also in the fact that each and
every one of their arguments is supposedly backed up by the knowledge and skill that their professions
confer on them and, in the words of Mr. Maussan, all A team of reputed international scientists.
In this article I analyze the hand that the team of eminent scientists gathered by Maussan determined as
authentic and anatomically functional. The result does not speak well of the anatomical knowledge of this
equipment.
Identification of the bones that make up the hand provided by the French Thiery Jamin.
As a reference, Figure 1 shows a radiographic image of a human arm with the nominated bones.
FIGURE 2.
According to Mr. Maussan, the "alien" hand was provided by the French Thierry Jamin (Figure 2).
For the identification and analysis of the hand I used the radiographic image shown by Mr. Maussan in
the program "Contact" of July 2 of the present ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzpZYcVI6Rk ).
The image shows a hand with three fingers. According to Mr. Maussan's scholars, each finger consists
of six phalanges and the metacarpals (which would conform the palm of the hand) are long, thin and form
a rectangular palm.
This analysis is absolutely superficial, incorrect, and is based on the relative position of the bones and
not on the morphology of each bone.
In a human hand, as in other vertebrates (eg, mammals, reptiles and birds), each finger has only one
metacarpus and usually several phalanges (Figure 1).
The number of phalanges is variable between species, but there is never more than one metacarpal per
finger.
The metacarpals are bones with complex joint facets and very different from the simple morphology of the
phalanges, that is, it is not possible to confuse metacarpals with phalanges when they have relatively clear
images.
On the x-ray of Jamin's "alien" hand, the morphological analysis of the bones indicates that each finger is
made up of two metacarpals and four phalanges, not six phalanges, as indicated by the Mexican forensic
scientist and the other Maussan scientists .
All these bones are of human adults. In the figures, the true metacarpals are indicated with "MC" and
phalanges with "F".
On the other hand, the "long, thin metacarps forming a rectangular palm" (as identified by Maussan's
scientists) are actually different bones: two human metacarpals arranged symmetrically (but in reverse),
two possible phalanges and several Long bones.
The curious thing is that these long bones do not have definite articular facets and they have the desolate
epiphysis (for example, tibia of Figure 2), so they probably are bones of immature individuals, for example,
very young children (neonate).
The small size of these bones and their morphology would also indicate that they are the bones of the arm
and / or the leg of neonates.
FIGURE 3.
When comparing the hand of Thierry Jamin with that of Paul Ronceros (Figure 3) a similar pattern is observed.
That is, each finger is formed by at least two human metacarpals.
The "palm" of the hand includes several long bones. In this case it is more evident that one of the bones of the
palm is a radius or a child's ulna.
Moreover, in this hand some metacarpals are mixed between the phalanges, without any anatomical sense.
Even one of the fingers has an upside down phalanx, that is to say oriented in the anatomically incorrect sense.
In summary, the hand considered authentic by the Maussan team of scientists has two rows of human metacarpals.
The bones of the so-called rectangular "palm" are probably the bones of arms and legs of newborn human individuals.
The hand presented by Paul Ronceros also has more than one row of human metacarpals and also metacarpals
mixed between the phalanges and even a phalange inside out. None of the hands has anatomical, functional or
evolutionary sense and have clearly been armed from more than one human individual.
It appears that both hands include bones of the arm and leg of newborn individuals in the area of the "palm" of the
hand, so I assume that the same author constructed both hands by mixing long bones (ulna, radius, tibia)
According to Jaime Maussan the hand presented by Thierry Jamin has been dated (with Carbon 14) in 1200
years of antiquity in the Autonomous University of Mexico. These results are indicative of the archaeological
character of the remains used for the construction of this hand.
The modifications of the "María" mummy hands described in the previous post were also made on archaeological
material, which demonstrates a systematic destruction of heritage remains in the area of Nasca.
This noxious activity can be increased if irresponsible false evidence is still presented as analyzed in this article.
This subject can become even more delicate if some of the human bones belong to non-archaeological skeletons.
The outstanding scientists of Mr. Maussan, among them the Peruvian surgeon Edson Salazar and the Mexican
forensic Jose de Jesus Salce, have not been able to distinguish phalanges from metacarpals.
His compelling statements about the authenticity of these remains are not based on scientific knowledge and
leave a bitter taste about the true reasons behind this shameless farce.
In relation to the mummy of Maussan, denominated "Maria" ( see previous post), I would like to add that the
"non-human" evidence is so poor that no computerized axial tomographies or DNA tests are needed to determine
that it is a human archaeological mummy.
Comparative anatomy (not Photoshop) shows that hands have the shape and proportions of human hands after
the described alterations. The bones of the foot correspond to human bones. The deformed, elongated skull has
been documented in human mummies of prehispanic cultures of the area.
The rest of the skeleton corresponds to that of a human. What would be the result of a DNA analysis if the anatomy
corresponds to that of a human? If the phenotype (the anatomy) is the result of the genotype (the genetic information),
the DNA would be closer to that of a human than to that of a chimpanzee.
What extraterrestrial evidence are we talking about?
To this anatomical evidence of fraud, we must add that no one knows the exact origin of all these remains,
nor is it known to the discoverer, that all remains remain hidden, and that alterations on archaeological remains
have occurred previously in the area of Ica and Nasca.
In addition, Mr. Maussan has previously defended "alien" evidence that has been proven false and lives on this activity...'
SOURCE:
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.