Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
About Those “Nuclear Secrets”
#4
(09-09-2022, 03:31 PM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: The spin is great on that article IMO.

The "tells" that stand out for me most were the following.

The "more than 100" classified documents, that can range from 101 documents to as many as 199, were then referred to as "hundreds" of documents that could go from 200 to as high as 999.

Also, the most sensitive document involved a "foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities". Although this was classified, it may have been information available to the public already. Otherwise it has some other information that was highly classified. Perhaps it's because of our defensive counter measures that may have been in the document. Being so highly classified, I see no reason to mention anything about what that information may be except for some political agenda.

Those two things alone make me suspicious of the veracity of this report and makes me lean toward it being a propaganda piece.

Not paying much attention to this in the media.

I agree with you that the information was probably public knowledge or at least well-known by anyone who has interest in the subject. The classification was likely derived from the general nature of protecting the source of the information. IOW, a conversation likely occurred overseas, the collector of the information was justifying paying a dinner bill, generated a field report documenting the discussion, and slapped a classification on it based on the nature of the subject. Pretty common stuff.

How classified documents wound up at Mar-a-Lago? Does anyone think Trump actually did any packing as he left The White House? People are so damned stoopid these days they'll believe anything they hear on the news. So, again, agree there's nothing more than a political agenda we're being made to look at.

Our defensive countermeasures for a nuclear attack are laffable ... and those of some foreign military cannot be described ... as the reality is: Defense against a nuclear attack is realistically impossible. Too much propaganda circulating to even begin an effort of sifting through and determining what's true and what's a lie.  That had to be one of their goals all along.

Clown World!!


Messages In This Thread
RE: About Those “Nuclear Secrets” - by BIAD - 09-09-2022, 08:26 AM
RE: About Those “Nuclear Secrets” - by Snarl - 09-09-2022, 04:02 PM
RE: About Those “Nuclear Secrets” - by Snarl - 09-11-2022, 02:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)