The Latest Tragedy: Sudden Adult Death Syndrome

[guohua]

I don't want to be considered a troll nor do I wish to ruin anyone's day. But I have to say that the article mentioned in the OP is misleading at best and deliberately spreading totally false information at the worst. Not an attack on the OP, please understand this. I'm attacking the article itself. I went to one of my favorite websites for ascertaining if something is true or misleading and found this:

Posts Baselessly Link Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome to COVID-19 Vaccines - FactCheck.org

"Referring to two specific heart conditions that can cause SADS, Dr. Michael Ackerman, professor at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and head of the SADS Foundation board of directors, said in a statement provided by the foundation to FactCheck.org, “There’s not a single signal of increased LQTS events or CPVT events among diagnosed and treated patients who’ve been vaccinated [against COVID-19].”

The article referenced above sums up very clearly facts about SADS, along with misleading articles about it. Here's another snippet from the article:

Although both the story and the headline claimed that Australia had a “new national register” for tracking SADS, it doesn’t. That project started in 2019 in the Australian state of Victoria.

There is a lot of misinformation out there regarding SADS. Since I was curious about it, that's where I looked it up. The misleading article they are referring to came from the British tabloid, The Daily Mail, which is indeed a tabloid. I realize many on here are anti vaccination, and that's okay. We're not all gonna agree on things. I'm just putting my opinion out there with a link to the article. 

I'm not trolling you either but I don't trust all fact checker's.
I might add from the National Center for Biotechnology Information advances science and health has this to say.
coVID-19: the Risk to Athletes

Purpose of review: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on athletics, and the question of safely resuming competitive sports at all levels has been a source of significant debate.
Concerns regarding myocarditis and the risk of arrhythmias and sudden death in athletes have prompted heightened attention to the role of cardiovascular screening.

In this review, we aim to comprehensively outline the cardiovascular manifestations associated with COVID-19 infection, to discuss screening, diagnosis, and treatment strategies, and to evaluate the current literature on the risk to athletes and recommendations regarding return-to-play.

Recent findings: COVID-19 is known to cause myocarditis, with presentations ranging from subclinical current or prior infection detected on cardiac MRI imaging, to fulminant heart failure and shock. While initial data early in the pandemic suggested that the risk of myocarditis could be significant even in patients with nonsevere COVID-19 infection, recent studies suggest a very low prevalence of clinically significant disease in young athletes.

Summary: While COVID-19 can have significant cardiovascular manifestations, recent data demonstrate that a screening approach guided by severity of COVID-19 infection and cardiovascular symptoms allows the majority of athletes to safely return to play in a timely manner.

We must continue to tailor our approach to screening athletes as knowledge grows, and further research on the longitudinal cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 is needed.

Keywords: Athlete’s heart; COVID-19; Myocarditis; Sports cardiology.



This is important.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Jack Goergen declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Aakash Bavishi declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Micah Eimer declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Allison Zielinski declares that she has no conflict of interest

Source

Now I am VERY Suspicious of those Pharmaceutical Companies owned by Billionaires and Millionaires.    
Why?

Why a Judge Ordered FDA to Release Covid-19 Vaccine Data Pronto
A group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. Plaintiff’s attorney Aaron Siri, who is representing the group, explains the fight that led a federal court to order expedited release of documents the agency claimed it would take decades to process.

Why did they need a judge to order the FDA and Pfizer to release their report on the vaccines?

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Food and Drug Administration asked a federal judge for permission to make the public wait until the year 2096 to disclose all of the data it relied upon to license Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.


That is not a typo. The FDA wanted court approval to have up to 75 years to publicly disclose this information.


In its attempts to build public support for Covid-19 vaccinations, the FDA repeatedly promised “full transparency,” and reaffirmed its “commitment to transparency” when licensing Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.

With that promise in mind, after the vaccine’s licensure in August 2020, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, a group of highly credentialed scientists submitted a FOIA request to the FDA for the data submitted by Pfizer. The scientists explained that, until all the data is produced, a proper review cannot be conducted because missing even a single data set could throw off any analysis.

In response, the FDA produced nothing. Therefore, in September 2021, the scientists, represented by their attorneys at Siri & Glimstad, sued the FDA demanding it produce this data by March 2022.
Source

Another link

Another Link

So who do we trust? Who are the Fact Checkers Obligated too, who writes the checks to pay for their research?