03-26-2022, 10:50 AM
What I find intriguing is how 'unsteady' the objects in both videos and many others I've seen of unknown craft, are.
I know that 'unsteady' is the incorrect term, but when observing usual aircraft -be it hovering helicopters or even the Boeing
Harrier, there's a stability that implies a type of control.
Of course, this constancy is borne from our accepted way we handle ourselves on the ground too. Staggering and darting
about indicates a lack of focus, can be detrimental to the body and and those around a rapidly-shifting object.
To some, such fluctuating and seemingly erratic motion can easily be explained as chaotic behaviour found in nature, where
our assumptions on the 'why' are forsaken in the allowance of instinctiveness. Birds like Swallows and Swifts randomly alter
direction for reasons of feeding and communication. Hunting animals searching for scent change course as they collate the
various pieces of information dicovered in their tracking. Natural behaviour we equate to survival functions of organic lifeforms.
Maybe that's why many sightings of flying objects are put down to birds and insects! But there's a subtle difference that is
never approached when observing these capricious craft dancing around in the night sky. We perceive our 'home-grown'
flying-machines as tools to:
1. Travel in direct lines, adept and utilising the quickest way for humans to get from A-to-B in order to continue an agenda
not connected with the mode of travell used.
2. Travel the shortest route in order to encounter like-minded humans in matters of urgency, safety, exploration and war.
So are the actions of the filmed-craft lack of control as we accept it or movement due to propulsion-systems we -the public,
are unaware of or is this type of motion the result of an agenda that humans don't usually adhere to in regards of travelling
in the air?
I know that 'unsteady' is the incorrect term, but when observing usual aircraft -be it hovering helicopters or even the Boeing
Harrier, there's a stability that implies a type of control.
Of course, this constancy is borne from our accepted way we handle ourselves on the ground too. Staggering and darting
about indicates a lack of focus, can be detrimental to the body and and those around a rapidly-shifting object.
To some, such fluctuating and seemingly erratic motion can easily be explained as chaotic behaviour found in nature, where
our assumptions on the 'why' are forsaken in the allowance of instinctiveness. Birds like Swallows and Swifts randomly alter
direction for reasons of feeding and communication. Hunting animals searching for scent change course as they collate the
various pieces of information dicovered in their tracking. Natural behaviour we equate to survival functions of organic lifeforms.
Maybe that's why many sightings of flying objects are put down to birds and insects! But there's a subtle difference that is
never approached when observing these capricious craft dancing around in the night sky. We perceive our 'home-grown'
flying-machines as tools to:
1. Travel in direct lines, adept and utilising the quickest way for humans to get from A-to-B in order to continue an agenda
not connected with the mode of travell used.
2. Travel the shortest route in order to encounter like-minded humans in matters of urgency, safety, exploration and war.
So are the actions of the filmed-craft lack of control as we accept it or movement due to propulsion-systems we -the public,
are unaware of or is this type of motion the result of an agenda that humans don't usually adhere to in regards of travelling
in the air?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.