05-06-2021, 10:31 AM
Doesn't look like a bigfoot to me. There isn't a head, the "eyes" are where the "shoulders" would be coming together - no neck, no head.
I don't think it's a tree - there is no continuation of the "trunk" above the eyes.
It looks like a lens flare caused by fogging on the camera lens, but there are two sets of eyes reflecting the IR light from the camera, so there is probably some sort of critters there, probably an adult and young one.
I'd have to see a daylight picture from that same viewpoint, and know what the weather was like when it was taken to get any further than that.
.
I don't think it's a tree - there is no continuation of the "trunk" above the eyes.
It looks like a lens flare caused by fogging on the camera lens, but there are two sets of eyes reflecting the IR light from the camera, so there is probably some sort of critters there, probably an adult and young one.
I'd have to see a daylight picture from that same viewpoint, and know what the weather was like when it was taken to get any further than that.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’