Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane?
#9
(08-04-2019, 05:12 AM)Ninurta Wrote: Not just on structural supports, but at specific places on the structural supports. To verify this for yourself, re-watch the video and notice ALL of the other building demolitions shown to try illustrating the point that it was demolition charges that brought the WTC down. On the WTC, the explosion was at the level of the alleged airplane entry, at about the 78th floor. Demolition charges are set lower, much closer to ground level, as can be seen in the various demolition videos included in the documentary. That is because a higher charge may not sufficiently damage the support structures, and could potentially leave a very dangerous, unstable, and large portion of the building standing. That would in turn necessitate sending in further demo crews to do the job right the second time. The hazardous duty pay for that would be astronomical... not to mention highly visible by a world watching closely - not the best methodology for an alleged black-bag, clandestine job.

Furthermore, the fireball blossoms directly from the 78th floor office windows. It would be difficult to say the least to surreptitiously plant hundreds of pounds of explosive in those offices while having to work around curious office workers.

Also notice that the fireball bloomed from one side of the building. In the actual demolition videos shown, it comes from ALL sides of the building, and it's done simultaneously. Destabilizing one side of a building is a BAD idea just as destabilizing one side of a tree when felling it is a GOOD idea - it allows you to control which way the tree falls. If a demolished building falls sideways, bad idea, as it destroys several more surrounding buildings. You want to drop it straight down. True enough that is exactly what WTC did, but that was just the luck of the draw, not from poorly planned demolitions.
Hi Nin,
Just a quick reply to one point right now (I'm having to go out into the RL in a few mins!!! LOL)

The references to "controlled demolition" aren't talking about the plane-impact fireball explosion.
They are referring to the multiple smaller explosions which occurred as the towers actually came down.
Witnesses reported hearing a "boom-boom-boom-boom..." sound, and vertical lines of smaller explosions throwing dust/debris out from descending floors of the building in sequence are clearly visible in many of the videos. (Exactly as seen in the comparison demolition videos).
cheers,
G
[Image: CoolForCatzSig.png]


Messages In This Thread
STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane? - by gordi - 08-02-2019, 09:56 AM
RE: STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane? - by BIAD - 08-02-2019, 12:25 PM
RE: STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane? - by Wallfire - 08-03-2019, 09:52 AM
RE: STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane? - by gordi - 08-03-2019, 05:00 PM
RE: STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane? - by gordi - 08-04-2019, 12:41 PM
RE: STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane? - by gordi - 08-05-2019, 11:19 AM
RE: STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane? - by BIAD - 09-01-2019, 02:32 PM
RE: STUNNING 911 Video - No 2nd plane? - by Kenzo - 09-19-2021, 12:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)