Chicken-Little Cortez Caught Out By Science.

[BIAD]

Oh, I see. This is not really a "science" paper, it's a cleverly disguised political hit piece attempting to silence opposing voices.
How clever of them!

Note too the use of the pejorative term "climate deniers", and the persistent (and erroneous) continual use of the term "scientific
consensus".

This was a political hit piece, nothing more. It's likely the original paper was as well, or at the very least a puff paper intended only
to support a political narrative. There are too many errors for me to think otherwise.

But... but it's in The Guardian...? Surely a predominantly Left-leaning, in-Downing Street's-pocket, start at 9.am-finish-at-noon,
diverse-because-it's cheaper-to-employ-the-coloured-folk-ergo-I'm-guiltless, homogenize-the-world, mochaccino-sipping Editorial
Staff would realise it's a political vehicle used to further a bias?

Oh for the days when Journalists had a pencil behind their ear!